企業為了提升研發優勢維持其競爭力，而台灣企業面臨全球化市場及大陸低人力成本的挑戰，為了提升競爭力也紛紛轉型致力於研發、設計。統計數字發現各國對於研發資源投入逐年成長，然而研發成果不確定性極高，結果卻常常不如預期。研發組織是一個知識密集的組織，其組織成員、構想、資金來源、組織文化使得其有別於其他部門，管理工作主要是整合許多研發人員的專業、個別單位/部門的協調工作，研究組織管理如何與組織研發績效相關聯，是一個日益重要的主題，也是本研究所探討的主軸。因此本研究希望探討研發單位對組織管理重視程度與組織研發績效之關聯，並分析研發組織規模與研發經費之投入是否干擾研發組織管理與組織研發績效之關係，
本研究透過問卷調查方式，以台灣上市上櫃企業為調查對象，共有136家企業研發單位主管填答，另依據公司公開財報資訊進行分析研究，以組織研發績效—2006年專利數、營業收入作為依變項，研發組織管理為自變項，並將產業別、資產、員工人數作為控制變項，研發組織人數及研發經費投入為研究發展投入變數，探討各變項間的相關性，以及研發組織管理與研發資源投入交戶作用進行階層迴歸分析，以瞭解其對於組織研發績效之關聯，研究結果指出：
（一）填答之研發主管有74%的人認為組織管理為其重要工作任務
（二）研發組織規模及研發經費投入與組織研發績效有顯著相關
（三）研發組織管理對組織研發績效影響之主效果不顯著，但會與研發組織資源產生交
互作用而影響組織研發績效

Enterprises improve the advantage of research and development to maintain their competitiveness. Those of Taiwan face the challenges of the globalization market and China low labor cost. They make the transition and devoted to research, development and designing in order to advance the competitiveness in such a highly changeable circumstance.
The statistic finds various countries increase the investment on R&D resources year by year. But, the uncertainty of research and develop is extremely high, and the result is often not so good as anticipated. R&D organization is a knowledge-intensive organization. Its members, ideas, capital sources, organization culture make it different from other departments in the company. The topic of how organizational management is related with R&D performance is increasingly important, and is the primary objective of this study.
1. to study the relation between the attention degree of R&D organization management and R&D performance
2. to analysis the relation between R&D performance and the interaction of R&D organization scale, expenditure and organization management
Through the research results from the survey of 841 R&D managers of TSEC/GTSM Listed Companies and the return of 136 effective copies were analyzed by means of using hierarchical regression analysis. In this study three significant results are found:
1. 74% of the R&D managers agree that organization management is one of their important
tasks
2. The scale of R&D organization and the R&D expenditure have significantly positive
influence on R&D performance.
3. The organization management has no significant influence on R&D performance, but the
interaction with R&D organization scale and expenditure will influence the R&D performance

一、中文部份
1.行政院國家科技委員會2006年全國科技動態調查。http://www.nsc.gov.tw/tech/pub_data_main.asp
2.曹克、劉立，”論R&D（研究與發展）的企業內部化過程”，（自然辨證法研究）, 29-32頁, 1997。
3.薛求知、王輝，”西方企業R&D的演進及其啟示”，（研究發展管理），16(3)，28-33頁，2004
4.柳卸林，”不連續創新的第四代研究發展—兼論跨越發展”，（中國工業經濟），150，53-58頁，2001
5.陳松柏，”評估研發績效的新方法—研發槓桿程度衡量法”，國立空中大學管理與資訊學系管理與資訊學》，8，43-58頁，2003
6.吳思華，策略九說，臉譜出版社，民國89年，pp.127-134
7.曾碧芬，「研發主管管理才能與部門績效之研究」，國立中山大學，碩士論文，民國92年
8.張恩浩，「研究發展之影響因素及其與績效關係之研究」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，民國80年
二、英文部分
1.Alok K. Chakrabarti, “The Competition in High Technology: Analysis of Patents of U.S., Japan, U.K., France, West Germany and Canada”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol 38(1), pp. 78-84, Feb 1991
2.Bean, Alden S., “Why some R&D organizations are more productive than others”, Research Technology Management, Vol 38(1), pp.25-29, Jan-Feb 1995
3.Chandler, G.N. & Hanks, S.H., “Founder Competence, the Environment and Venture Performance”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol18(3), pp.77-89, 1994
4.Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt E. J., ”Winning Business in Product Develop: The Critical Success Factors” , Research Technology Management, Vol 39(4), pp. 19-29, 1996
5.Debra M. Amidon, “The Challenge of Fifth Generation R&D”, Research-Technology Management, Vol 39(4), pp. 33-41, Jul/Aug 1996
6.Golder, P.N. and Tellis, G.J., “Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend”, Jounal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30, pp. 158-170, 1993
7.Grant, Rober M., “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, Vol 33(3), pp. 114, 1991
8.Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J., “Structure Inertia and Organizational Change”, American Sociological Review, Vol 49, pp. 149-164, 1984
9.Hounshell, D.A., “The Evolution of Industrial Research in the United States” , Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1996
10.Jain, R.K. and Triandis, H.C., Management of Research and Development Organizations- Managing the Unmanageable, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., U.S.A, 1997, p18
11.Larson, F. Charles, ”50 Years of Change in Industrial Research and Technology Management”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 50(1), pp.26-31, Jan/Feb, 2007
12.Lev B., Sougiannis T., “The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-relevance of R&D”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 21(1), pp. 107-138, Feb 1996
13.Liebermann, M. and Montgomery, D., “First-mover advantages”, Strategic Management Journal, pp. 41-58, 1998
14.Miller, William and Morris, Longdon, Fourth Generation R&D—Managing Knowledge, Technology and Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Canada, 1999
15.Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss and Roger Calantone.(1994), “Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol 11(5), pp. 406, 1994.
16.Morbey, G., “R&D Expenditures and Profit Growth,” Research Technology Management, Vol.32, No.3, pp.20-23, 1989
17.Pearson, Alan W., “Management development for Scientists and Engineers”,
Research Technology Management, Vol 36, pp. 45-48, Jan/Feb 1993。
18.Robert Szakonyi, “Measuring R&D Effectiveness”, Research Technology Management, Vol 37, Mar/April 1994
19.Roussel, Philip, Saad Kamak and Erickson, Tamara, Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy, Arthur D. Little, Inc., U.S.A., 1991
20.Thomas, Patrick and McMillan, G. S., “Using Science and Technology Indicators to Manage R&D as a Business”, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 13(3), Sept. 2001