| 研究生: |
詹順安 Shun-an Jhan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
出口競爭與廠商的直接投資決策 -匯率的考量 |
| 指導教授: |
邱俊榮
Jiunn-rong Chiou |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 64 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 出口競爭 、外人直接投資 、匯率 、資金管制 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Export Competition, Foreign Direct Investment, Exchange Rate, Capital Control |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:12 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文建立一個三國兩廠商的出口競爭模型,在模型中,本國廠商和外國廠商分別為不同國
家且生產成本不對稱之廠商,其中兩家廠商可能選擇各自在國內生產,或是本國廠商可能選擇
進行外人直接投資、和外國廠商同在外國生產,生產同質產品並同時全數出口到第三國市場從
事數量競爭,藉以討論「匯率」對廠商採取直接出口或直接投資決策的影響。
本文的主要發現如下。首先,在本國與外國間資金非完全管制的情況下,本國貨幣若貶值,
將導致本國廠商到外國直接投資的生產成本增加,使得本國廠商較無誘因至外國直接投資。相
對地,在本國與外國間資金管制傾向完全流動的情況下,本國貨幣若貶值,加上兩國間生產成
本差距夠大,則將導致本國廠商出口競爭力上升的效果大於因貶值所致生產成本增加的效果,
使得本國廠商仍有誘因到外國直接投資。其次,在本國與外國間資金管制較為嚴格的情況下,
外國貨幣若貶值,將導致本國廠商較無誘因至外國直接投資;在本國與外國間資金管制較為寬
鬆的情況下,外國貨幣貶值對本國廠商至外國直接投資決策的影響,須視兩國間生產成本之差
距及僱用兩國生產要素比例之多寡而定。最後,在資金管制較為寬鬆的情況下,若本國與外國
間生產成本差距夠大且僱用外國生產要素比例偏高,則無論本國貨幣或外國貨幣貶值,皆會增
加本國廠商到外國直接投資生產的意願。
This paper establishes a three-country, two-firm model of export competition to discuss
“exchange rate”how to affect the firms whether to engage in foreign direct investment (FDI) or not.
In the model, we assume a domestic firm and a foreign firm which are located in different countries
and whose marginal costs are asymmetrical. In respect of production, there are two decisions which
may be adopted by the domestic firm. The first one is direct export which means each firm will
produce products in their own countries and the second one is foreign direct investment which means
the domestic firm will produce in the foreign country to lower its production cost. After producing
homogeneous products, the two firms simultaneously export their own products to the third-country
market and compete in a Cournot fashion.
The major findings of the paper are as follows: First, if devaluation occurs in domestic country
with incomplete capital control, it will enhance the production cost in the foreign country. This may
cause that domestic firm isn’t interested in engaging in foreign direct investment. On the other hand,
if devaluation occurs in the domestic country with lightly capital control and the difference of
production costs between domestic and foreign firms are much larger, it may cause that domestic
firm is still interested in foreign direct investment. This is due to the increment of export competition
is larger than the increment of production cost. Second, if devaluation occurs in the foreign country
with strict capital control, it may cause that domestic firm isn’t interested in foreign direct investment;
on the contrary, if devaluation occurs in the foreign country with lightly capital control, the effect of
devaluation in the foreign country will depend on the difference of production costs and the ratio of
factors of production between the two firms. Finally, with lightly capital control, if there are a larger
difference of production costs and a higher ratio of foreign-owned factors of production between the
domestic and foreign firms, it will increase the interest of the domestic firm to engage in foreign
direct investment no matter the devaluation occurs in the domestic or foreign country.
Bernhofen D. M. (1997), “Strategic Trade Policy in A Vertically Related Industry,”
Review of International Economics, 5, 429-433.
Blonigen, B. A. (1997), “Firm-Specific Assets and the Link between Exchange Rates
and Foreign Direct Investment,”American Economic Review, 87, 447-465.
Brander J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1985), “Export Subsidies and International Market
Share Rivalry,”Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.
Buch, M. C. and J. Kleinert (2008), “Exchange Rates and FDI: Goods versus Capital
Markets Frictions,”The World Economy, 31, 1185-1207.
Cushman, D. O. (1983), “The Effects of Real Exchange Rate Risk on International
Trade,”Journal of International Economics, 15, 45-63.
Dunning, J. H. (1981), International Production and the Multinational Enterprises,
Allen & Unwin, London.
Eaton, J. and G. M. Grossman (1986), “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under
Oligopoly,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 383-406.
Goldberg, S. L. and M. Klein (1998), “Foreign Direct Investment, Trade, and Real
Exchange Rate Linkages in Developing Countries,”in Reuven Glick (ed.),
Managing Capital Flows and Exchange Rates: Perspectives from the Pacific
Basin Cambridge University Press, 73-100.
Sung, H. and H. E. Lapan (2002), “Strategic Foreign Direct Investment and
Exchange-Rate Uncertainty,”International Economic Review, 41, 411-423.
Xing, Y. and L. Zhao (2008), “Reverse Imports, Foreign Direct Investment and
Exchange Rates,”Japan and World Economy, 20, 275-289