跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 詹順安
Shun-an Jhan
論文名稱: 出口競爭與廠商的直接投資決策 -匯率的考量
指導教授: 邱俊榮
Jiunn-rong Chiou
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 64
中文關鍵詞: 出口競爭外人直接投資匯率資金管制
外文關鍵詞: Export Competition, Foreign Direct Investment, Exchange Rate, Capital Control
相關次數: 點閱:12下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文建立一個三國兩廠商的出口競爭模型,在模型中,本國廠商和外國廠商分別為不同國
    家且生產成本不對稱之廠商,其中兩家廠商可能選擇各自在國內生產,或是本國廠商可能選擇
    進行外人直接投資、和外國廠商同在外國生產,生產同質產品並同時全數出口到第三國市場從
    事數量競爭,藉以討論「匯率」對廠商採取直接出口或直接投資決策的影響。
    本文的主要發現如下。首先,在本國與外國間資金非完全管制的情況下,本國貨幣若貶值,
    將導致本國廠商到外國直接投資的生產成本增加,使得本國廠商較無誘因至外國直接投資。相
    對地,在本國與外國間資金管制傾向完全流動的情況下,本國貨幣若貶值,加上兩國間生產成
    本差距夠大,則將導致本國廠商出口競爭力上升的效果大於因貶值所致生產成本增加的效果,
    使得本國廠商仍有誘因到外國直接投資。其次,在本國與外國間資金管制較為嚴格的情況下,
    外國貨幣若貶值,將導致本國廠商較無誘因至外國直接投資;在本國與外國間資金管制較為寬
    鬆的情況下,外國貨幣貶值對本國廠商至外國直接投資決策的影響,須視兩國間生產成本之差
    距及僱用兩國生產要素比例之多寡而定。最後,在資金管制較為寬鬆的情況下,若本國與外國
    間生產成本差距夠大且僱用外國生產要素比例偏高,則無論本國貨幣或外國貨幣貶值,皆會增
    加本國廠商到外國直接投資生產的意願。


    This paper establishes a three-country, two-firm model of export competition to discuss
    “exchange rate”how to affect the firms whether to engage in foreign direct investment (FDI) or not.
    In the model, we assume a domestic firm and a foreign firm which are located in different countries
    and whose marginal costs are asymmetrical. In respect of production, there are two decisions which
    may be adopted by the domestic firm. The first one is direct export which means each firm will
    produce products in their own countries and the second one is foreign direct investment which means
    the domestic firm will produce in the foreign country to lower its production cost. After producing
    homogeneous products, the two firms simultaneously export their own products to the third-country
    market and compete in a Cournot fashion.
    The major findings of the paper are as follows: First, if devaluation occurs in domestic country
    with incomplete capital control, it will enhance the production cost in the foreign country. This may
    cause that domestic firm isn’t interested in engaging in foreign direct investment. On the other hand,
    if devaluation occurs in the domestic country with lightly capital control and the difference of
    production costs between domestic and foreign firms are much larger, it may cause that domestic
    firm is still interested in foreign direct investment. This is due to the increment of export competition
    is larger than the increment of production cost. Second, if devaluation occurs in the foreign country
    with strict capital control, it may cause that domestic firm isn’t interested in foreign direct investment;
    on the contrary, if devaluation occurs in the foreign country with lightly capital control, the effect of
    devaluation in the foreign country will depend on the difference of production costs and the ratio of
    factors of production between the two firms. Finally, with lightly capital control, if there are a larger
    difference of production costs and a higher ratio of foreign-owned factors of production between the
    domestic and foreign firms, it will increase the interest of the domestic firm to engage in foreign
    direct investment no matter the devaluation occurs in the domestic or foreign country.

    摘要.....................................................i Abstract................................................ii 誌謝辭.................................................iii 目錄....................................................iv 第一章 研究動機與目的....................................1 第二章 基本模型..........................................8 2.1 本國廠商採取直接出口的比較靜態分析..............10 2.2 本國廠商採取直接投資生產的比較靜態分析..........13 第三章 本國與投資地主國匯率固定下的直接投資決策.........22 第四章 本國與投資地主國匯率浮動下的直接投資決策.........34 第五章 本國與投資地主國匯率不完全浮動下的直接投資決策...42 第六章 結論.............................................54 參考文獻................................................56 附錄....................................................57

    Bernhofen D. M. (1997), “Strategic Trade Policy in A Vertically Related Industry,”
    Review of International Economics, 5, 429-433.
    Blonigen, B. A. (1997), “Firm-Specific Assets and the Link between Exchange Rates
    and Foreign Direct Investment,”American Economic Review, 87, 447-465.
    Brander J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1985), “Export Subsidies and International Market
    Share Rivalry,”Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.
    Buch, M. C. and J. Kleinert (2008), “Exchange Rates and FDI: Goods versus Capital
    Markets Frictions,”The World Economy, 31, 1185-1207.
    Cushman, D. O. (1983), “The Effects of Real Exchange Rate Risk on International
    Trade,”Journal of International Economics, 15, 45-63.
    Dunning, J. H. (1981), International Production and the Multinational Enterprises,
    Allen & Unwin, London.
    Eaton, J. and G. M. Grossman (1986), “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under
    Oligopoly,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 383-406.
    Goldberg, S. L. and M. Klein (1998), “Foreign Direct Investment, Trade, and Real
    Exchange Rate Linkages in Developing Countries,”in Reuven Glick (ed.),
    Managing Capital Flows and Exchange Rates: Perspectives from the Pacific
    Basin Cambridge University Press, 73-100.
    Sung, H. and H. E. Lapan (2002), “Strategic Foreign Direct Investment and
    Exchange-Rate Uncertainty,”International Economic Review, 41, 411-423.
    Xing, Y. and L. Zhao (2008), “Reverse Imports, Foreign Direct Investment and
    Exchange Rates,”Japan and World Economy, 20, 275-289

    QR CODE
    :::