為瞭解近地表的入滲現象,可使用間接的地球物理測量或利用直接水文量測如含水量或張力進行分析。單獨使用地球物理測量測量雖可提供高密度地下圖像，但圖像和含水量間的關係卻不明確；反之，若是單獨使用水文量測數據分析，雖然可以清楚表達水文數據和流體運移之關係，但通常空間上的涵蓋範圍較小。結合兩種方法，可彌補彼此之間的缺點，可提高量測結果的密度與可靠度。本研究主要目的是利用現地試驗方法，嘗試結合自然電位與直接水分含量量測，描述淺層地表的入滲行為。本研究選定一實驗場址，現地試驗前先進行自然電位與水分含量計對現地土樣之水分含量率定實驗，並取得該率定曲線。實驗場址則設置共48支電極，量測入滲環定水頭入滲期間電位資料分佈，場址內另置一水分含量計記錄水分含量。入滲過程電場資料與單點之水分含量資料再依據電場與水分含量率定曲線反推，可得入滲過程全區域之水分含量分布。此入滲過程的水分含量分佈再與FEMWATER數值模式結果比對，評估觀測結果之合理性。研究結果顯示，實驗室土樣量測電位差與水分含量呈線性負相關，現地電位量測可反映入滲過程中，水由入滲環向外擴散現象，但因場地外部電場干擾大，使得結果不明顯。

Typical approaches to assess the infiltration can use either the geophysical surveys or hydraulic tests such as the measurements of water content or pressure. The geophysical survey such the self-potential method can map electrical properties of soils with high resolution. However, the variations of soil hydraulic properties are not available by using solely the geophysical observations. Measurements of water content can directly reflect the infiltration behavior but the number of measurements is usually limited. This study aims to integrate self-potential and water content measurements to assess the infiltration behavior of a single ring constant head test. A small test site was considered for the infiltration test. The soil samples of the site were used to create a rating curve for self-potential and water content measurements. To measure the voltage variation during the infiltration test, the study installed 48 probes with constant interval of 0.5m in the test site. A water content probe was used to directly measure time series of water content during the test. Based on the rating curve obtained from soil samples in the laboratory test, the voltage variations at the location of the water content probe were then use to map water content distributions for the entire test site. This study then used the FEMWATER numerical model to evaluate the water content distributions for the infiltration test. Results of the laboratory test showed that the voltage differences linearly correlate with the variations of the water content. Field-scale self-potential measurements can reasonably reflect behavior of single ring infiltration test. However, the variations of the voltage variations are not clear due to the complex disturbance sources near the test site.

[1] 台灣大百科全書-透地雷達，http://taiwanpedia.culture.tw/web/content?ID=1099
[2] M. B. Kowalsky, S. Finsterle, J. Peterson, S. Hubbard, Y. Rubin, E. Majer,A. Ward, and G. Gee : Estimation of field-scale soil hydraulic and dielectric parameters through joint inversion of GPR and hydrological data WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 41, 2005
[3] Michael L. Brewster and A. Peter Annan: Ground‐penetrating radar monitoring of a controlled DNAPL release: 200 MHz radar Ground‐penetrating radar monitoring of a controlled DNAPL release: 200 MHz radar,59(8), 1211-1221.1994
[4] R.A van Overmeeren, S.V Sariowan, J.C Gehrels:Ground penetrating radar for determining volumetric soil water content; results of comparative measurements at two test sites Journal ofHydrologyVolume 197, Issues 1–4, 1 October 1997, Pages316–338
[5] J Vandenberghe, R.A van Overmeeren: Ground penetrating radar images of selected fluvial deposits in the Netherlands Sedimentary Geology Volume 128, Issues 3–4,15 October 1999, Pages 245–270
[6] Harry M. Jol and Charlie S. Bristow: GPR in sediments: advice on data collection, basic processing and interpretation, a good practice guide Geological Society, London, Special Publications v. 211, p. 9-27,2003
[7] Annan, P., GPR methods for hydrogeological studies, in Hydrogeophysics,edited by Y. Rubin and S. S. Hubbard, chap. 7, 532 pp.,Springer, New York.,2005
[8] I.A. Lunt, S.S. Hubbard, Y. Rubin: Soil moisture content estimation using ground-penetrating radar reflection data Journal of HydrologyVolume 307, Issues 1–4, Pages 254–269, 9 June 2005
[9] MICHAEL B. KOWALSKY, JINSONG CHEN, and SUSAN S. HUBBARD: Joint inversion of geophysical and hydrological data for improved subsurface characterization ,THE LEADING EDGE,vol730-734 JUNE 2006
[10] Francesco Chidichimo, Enzo Rizzo, Monica Riva, Warren Barrash, Andre Revil,Michael Cardiff, Alberto Guadagnini: Joint inversion of steady-state hydrologic and self-potential data for 3D hydraulic conductivity distribution at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site Journal of Hydrology 407 115–128 2011
[11] A. Revil, V. Naudet and J. D. Meunier: The hydroelectric problem of porous rocks: inversion of the position of the water table from self-potential data Geophys. J. Int. 159 (2):435-444. 2004
[12] D. Schiavone, R. Quarto:Self-potential prospecting in the study of water movements Geoexploration Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 47–58, February 1984
[13] Kord Ernstsonand H. Ulrich Scherer:Self‐potential variations with time and their relation to hydrogeologic and meteorological parameters GEOPHYSICS,Volume 51(10), 1967-1977,October 1986
[14] Frédéric Perrier, Michaël Trique, Benoit Lorne, Jean-Philippe Avouac, Sophie Hautot ,Pascal Tarits:Electric potential variations associated with yearly lake level variations,Geophysical Research Letters Volume 25, Issue 11, pages 1955–1958, 1 June 1998
[15] M. Aubert andQ. Yéné Atangana:Self-Potential Method in Hydrogeological Exploration of Volcanic Areas,GroundwaterVolume 34, Issue 6, pages 1010–1016, November 1996
[16] Jean-Louis Thony, Pierre Morat, Georges Vachaud,Jean-Louis Le Mouël:Field characterization of the relationship between electrical potential gradients and soil water flux,Earth and Planetary Science,Volume 325, Issue 5, Pages 317–321, September 1997
[17] Aubert, M., Atangana, Q.Ye´ne´:Self-potential method in hydrogeological exploration of volcanic areas. Ground Water 34, 1010–1016, 1996
[18] Birch, F.S.:Imaging the water table by filtering self-potential profiles. Ground Water 36, 779–782, 1998
[19] Linde, N., Revil, A., Bolève, A., Dagès, C., Castermant, J., Suski, B., Voltz, M.:Estimation of the water table throughout a catchment using self-potential andpiezometric data in a Bayesian framework. J. Hydrol. 334, 88–98, 2007
[20] Jardani, A., Revil, A., Barrash, W., Crespy, A., Rizzo, E., Straface, S., Cardiff, M., Malama, B., Miller, C., Johnson, T.:Reconstruction of the water table from self-potential data: a bayesian approach. Ground Water 47 (2),213–227, 2009
[21] Al Hagrey,Müller:GPR study of pore water content and salinity in sand,Geophysical ProspectingVolume 48, Issue 1, pages 63–85, January 2000
[22] B. Schmalza, B. Lennartzb:Analyses of soil water content variations and GPR attribute distributions,Journal of HydrologyVolume 267, Issues 3–4, Pages 217–226, 15 October 2002
[23] A. Revil1, D. Hermitte, M. Voltz, R. Moussa, J.-G. Lacas, G. Bourrié, F. Trolard:Self-potential signals associated with variations of the hydraulic head during an infiltration experiment,Geophysical Research Letters,Volume 29, Issue 7, pages 10-1–10-4, April 2002
[24] Claude Doussana,, Laurence Jouniauxb, Jean-Louis Thonyc:Variations of self-potential and unsaturated water flow with time in sandy loam and clay loam soils,Journal of Hydrology, Volume 267, Issues 3–4, Pages 173–185, 15 October 2002
[25] 北京天諾基業科技有限公司: http://www.technosolutions.cn/show/217.html
[26] Blaine R. Hanson, Douglas Peters:Soil type affects accuracy of dielectric moisture sensors,California Agriculture 54(3):43-47. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v054n03p43. May-June 2000.
[27] Blaine R. Hanson, Steve Orloff, Douglas Peters:Monitoring soil moisture helps refine irrigation management,California Agriculture 54(3):38-42. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v054n03p38. May-June 2000.
[28] 李昆性:桃園台地紅土入滲行為之探討，中原大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，2004
[29] 桃園縣政府網站: http://www.tycg.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=64&parentpath=0,6,58
[30] 地下水觀測網: http://pc183.hy.ntu.edu.tw/d6.php
[31] 李光敦，水文學，五南圖書出版公司，2003