| 研究生: |
李健銘 Chien-ming Lee |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
磁力噴砂加工表面之研究 Study of Magnetic assisted sandblasting with surface processing |
| 指導教授: |
顏炳華
Biing-Hwa Yan |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 機械工程學系在職專班 Executive Master of Mechanical Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 88 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 回歸方程式 、田口法 、表面粗糙度 、磁力噴砂 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Regression equation, Taguchi method, Surface roughness, magnetic sandblasting |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:15 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
噴砂主要是針對金屬表面進行破壞性的加工,利用噴射磨料對金屬表面衝擊,讓表面產生像顆粒化般的凹陷,目的是讓金屬表面能產生霧化或咬花及去除毛邊的效果。
本研究主要是針對噴砂加工搭配磁力的手法,選用鋁材6061
作為加工材料,藉由其材質柔軟及加工後皺褶的現象,縮短噴砂的加工時間,觀察到磁力噴砂對應表面粗糙度的加工趨勢,進一步研究磁力噴砂的加工特性及對表面加工的影響。
首先安排前期實驗及L18實驗,將磁力噴砂的加工參數做規劃,如磁鐵擺放方式(直立or橫擺)及噴嘴角度及噴嘴距離及磁鐵距離及磁力強度及噴射強度等對加工結果(粗糙度及移除量及加工範圍)的影響。由前期實驗結果將加工時間及噴嘴角度固定,因噴嘴角度影響加工範圍及區域,對於粗糙度影響較小,加工時間則是因鋁材6061加工後會有皺褶的現象,而縮短加工時間觀察加工趨勢。而後經L18實驗結果發現噴嘴距離及磁鐵距離同為變數時,磁鐵相關的加工參數貢獻度不明顯,因此後續單因子實驗中將噴嘴角度及噴嘴距離定義為固定參數。
由單因子實驗結果可以得到各磁鐵配置對應的粗糙度趨勢,在噴射壓力5kgf的配置下,磁力強度550mT及磁鐵距離80mm磁鐵橫擺時會有最佳的粗糙度表現,並可得到加工區域靠近磁鐵端會有較佳的粗糙度表現的結論,再輔以搭配回歸方程式所求得的方程式,則後續即可使用公式先行預估不同磁力配置下的粗糙度,有效的省去實驗次數,並加速找到較佳化結果。
Abstract
Sandblasting is mainly directed to destructive process on the metal surface. Use abrasive to impact the metal surface, let surface occur a depression like granulate,goal is to produce atomized metal surface etching and removal of flash effect。
This study focuses on the sand blasting technique with a magnetic,and select aluminum 6061 for processing materials,with soft texture and folds of the phenomenon of post-processing,can shorten processing time of sandblasting,observed in the corresponding magnetic surface roughness of sandblasting processing trends, further study of magnetic properties and processing of sandblasting on the surface。
first, arrange the preliminary experiment and L18 experiment, to do planning for the processing parameters of the magnetic sandblasting, if magnet placed way (vertical or yaw)and nozzle angle and nozzle distance and the distance of magnetic and magnetic intensity and spray on the processing results (roughness and removal rate and processing range) effects。
Preliminary experimental results point to a fixed processing time and nozzles angle. Because the angle of the nozzle effect processing area and region, less affected of roughness, processing time is due to be processed 6061 aluminum folds of the phenomenon, and shorten the processing time to observe the processing trends.
Then by the L18 results the nozzle distance and distance of magnetic as the variable at the same time, magnet processing parameters associated with no significant contribution, therefore fixed the angle of the nozzle and nozzle distance at follow-up single factor experiments。
The single factor experiments results can be obtained from the magnetic configuration corresponding to the roughness of the trend, the configuration of the jet pressure 5kgf, magnetic intensity 550mT and magnet distance 80mm and when the magnet yaw will be the best performance of the roughness,and get near the magnet end of processing areas will have better performance of the conclusions of the roughness, then used with equation obtained by the regression equation, follow-up can be estimated using the formula in advance of the roughness of the different magnetic configurations, effectively eliminating the number of experiments, and accelerate to find the optimal results。
參考文獻
1. 孟繼洛,機械製造,初版,全華出版社,台北市,民國94年
2. 曾建隆,「模具表面狀態不同對表面潤濕性的影響」,國立中央大學,機械工程學系,碩士論文,民國94年
3. 楊子誼,「新型複合磨料於廢棄晶圓表面異質層之加工性探討,」,國立中央大學,機械工程學系,碩士論文,民國98年
4. WonJo Park,Sunchul Huh,SungHo Park”A study on the Fatigue characteristics of Al6061-T651 by Shot Peening Velocity”key Engineering Materials,326-328,1093,(2006).
5. R.Clausen,J.Stangenberg”Roughness of shot-peened surfaces-definition and measurement”,Tech. University Hamburg-Harburg,Germany,pp.70-76
6. H. Wensink, H. V. Jansen, J. W. Berenschot, M. C. Elwenspoek, “Mask materials for poeder blasting”, J Micromech. Microeng10,pp.175-180,(2000).
7. Manabu Wakuda,Yukihiko Yamauchi,Shuzo Kanzaki“Material response to particle impact during abrasive jet machining of aluminaceramics“,Journal of Materials Processing Tech. Vol.132 Issue 1-3,Page 177-183,(2003)
8. E Belloy, A Sayah, MAM Gijs, “Oblique powder blasting for three-dimensional micromachining of brittle materials”, Sensors and Actuators vol. 92,pp.358-363, (2001).
9. Stefan Schlautmann,Hugo A.H.Billiet”New approaches for fabrication of microfluidic capillary electrophoresis devices with on-chip conductivity detection”Electrophoresis.Vol22,Issue 2,page 235-241.(2001).
10. 陳昱先,「噴砂工法應用在古蹟修復(木料去漆)的研究」,國立成功大學,建築研究所,碩士論文,民國96年
11. Dong-Sam Park,Myeong-Woo Cho“Micro-grooving of glass using micro-abrasive jet machining“ Journal of Materials Processing Tech. Vol.146 Issue 2,Page 234-240,(2004)
12. A.Sayah,Eric Belloy“Powder blasting patterning technology for microfabrication of complex suspended structures in glass“ Microelectronic Engineering Vol.67-68,Page 557-565,(2003)
13. M.Junkar,B.Jurisevic“Finite element analysis of single-particle impact in abrasive water jet machining“ International Journal of Impact Engineering Vol.32,Issue 7,Page 1095-1112,(2006)
14. Deng.J,Feng.Y,Ding.Z“Wear behaviour of ceramic nozzles in sand blasting treatments“J.Eur.Ceram.Soc.Vol.23,no.2,pp.323-329,(2003)
15. J.A.Plaza,C.Cane,Y.Min“A novel single chip thin film metal oxide array“ Sensors and Actuators B:Chemical.Vol.93,Issue 1-3,Page 350-355,(2003)
16. Hryniewicz P. , Szeri A.Z. , Jahanmir S. , “Coolant flow in surface grinding with non-porous wheels”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 42 2347-2367,(2000).
17. P.S.Pa“Turning-form electrode in ultrasonicaided electrochemical finishing“Journal.Vol.21,Issue 2.(2007)
18. W.H. Yang,Y.S Tarng“Design Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Turning Operations Based on the Taguchi Metho”,Journal of Materials Processing Technology vol.84, pp122-129, (1998)
19. C. Y. Nian, W. H. Yang , and Y. S. Tarng ,“Optimization of Turning Operations with Multiple Performance Characteristics”, Elsevier Science , vol.95,pp.90-96, (1999)
20. Taguchi, G., “Taguchi Methods in LSI Fabrication Process”, IEEE International Workshop on 2001 6th, 1-6. (2001)
21. J.A. Ghani,I.A.Choudhury and H.H.Hassan“Application of Taguchi method in the optimization of end milling parameter”,Journal of Materials Processing Technology vol.145,pp.84-92,(2004)
22.J.M. Liang, P.J. Wang,” Self-learning control for injection molding
based on neural networks optimization”, Journal of Injection Molding
Technology 6 58–72.(2002)
23. Hideo Nakae, Ryuichi Inui, Yosuke Hirata and Hiroyuki Saito
”Effect of surface roughness on wettability”,inacta mater. Vol.46,
No7,pp.2313-2318,(1998).
24. J.Kijlstra, K.Reihs,A.Klamt,”Roughness and topology of ultra-hydrophobic surfaces”,Colloids and surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 206 pp.521-529,(2002).
25. 楊昌鎮,「加工部品圓度品質控制之最佳參數模組搜尋」,國立雲林科技大學,工業工程與管理系研究所,碩士論文,民國90年
26. 王陳鴻,「加工液中添加Al-Cr混合粉末對工具鋼放電加工特性之影響」,國立中央大學,機械工程學系,碩士論文,民國89年
27. 楊惠閔,「光學薄膜表面粗糙度量測方法之研究」,逢甲大學,電機工程學系,碩士論文,民國97年
28. I. Ohlidal,M. Ohlidal,D. Franta and M. Tykal,”Comparison of optical and non-optical methods for measuring surface roughness.”,Proc. SPIE, Vol.3820,pp.456-467(1999)
29. Pradip K.Saha,「A case study on the abrasive surface finishing of aluminum flat sheet」,Wear 258 pp.13-17(2005)
30. A.Ghobeity,T.Krajac,T.Burzynski,M.Papini,J.K. Spelt,「Surface evolution models in abrasive jet micromachining」,ScienceDirect wear 264 pp.185-198(2008)
31. H. Wensink, H. V. Jansen, J. W. Berenschot, M. C. Elwenspoek, “Mask materials for poeder blasting”, J Micromech. Microeng10,pp.175-180,(2000).
32. M. Wakuda, Y. Yamauchi, S. Kanzaki, “Material response to particle impact during abrasive jet machining of alumina ceramics”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology vol.132,pp. 177–183, (2003)