跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 安迪多
Andito Haryo Saputro
論文名稱： 通過學習計算思維使思維可見的多層棋盤遊戲
A Multi-Layer Board Game using Make Thinking Visible on Learning Computational Thinking
指導教授： 陳國棟
Gwo-Dong Chen
口試委員:
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 資訊電機學院 - 資訊工程學系
Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering
論文出版年： 2021
畢業學年度： 109
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 61
中文關鍵詞： 運算思維 、桌遊 、思考視覺化
外文關鍵詞： Computational thinking, board game, make thinking visible
相關次數： 點閱：13  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本研究認為現今運算思維(Computational thinking)是現在每一個人都須具備的能力，而且每一種學習媒介都很容易接觸到需要它的人。因此，本研究提出一種可作為運算思維學習媒體的多層次桌遊，且此桌遊包含容易理解、實用、便宜且可以隨時隨地供任何對象使用等特性。為了滿足研究需求，此桌遊採用多層次設計。因此，本研究將會針對此設計方式探討學生學習成效及其影響。實驗對象為大學生，並將他們分為實驗組及對照組以區別他們的學習成效，其中實驗組使用本研究提出的多層次桌遊，而對照組則使用現有的桌遊去學習運算思維，並且於前測與後測中採用卡內基美隆大學的運算思維與甲骨文(Oracle)公司資料庫對程式設計的定義去設計題目，並藉此量化學習成效。
    研究結果顯示多層次桌遊比起其他桌遊更能提升學習成效。並且使用此多層次桌遊，使用者能更容易的將他們的思考視覺化，並使得他們更容易發現及修改自己的錯誤

    In this research, we agree that computational thinking is a skill that must be possessed by everyone today. From there, it means that learning media that can reach everyone is needed. Therefore, this thesis presents multi-layer board game as computational thinking learning media that are easy to understand, practical, inexpensive, and can be used anywhere by everyone. We make board games with multi-layer design intending to create aspects that we concern about in this research. In this research, we will examine whether there is a learning performance improvement by the effect of a given multi-layer board game approach. Quantitative data were collected to identify differences in learning performance in university students which were divided into two groups. The experimental group plays a multi-layer board game design, and the control group plays the existing board game of computational thinking. Carnegie Mellon University's definition of computational thinking and Oracle reference for programming is used as a reference in the preparation of pre-test and post-test used to obtain computational thinking learning performance data.
    The main findings showed that the multi-layer board game could provide better computational thinking learning performance in some aspects. By using the multi-layer board game, the user can visualize their thinking. It makes it easier for them to find and revise if they find any mistake in their thinking.

    摘要 i ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT iii LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURES vi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1-1 Background of The Research 1 1-2 Research Objectives and Questions 2 1-3 Limitation of The Research 2 1-4 Significant of The Research 3 1-5 Definition of The Key Terms 3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 4 2-1 Computational Thinking for Everyone 4 2-2 Game Based Learning 5 2-3 Computational Thinking Characteristics 5 2-4 Learn with Tangible Item 6 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 7 3-1 Computational Thinking Overview 7 3-2 Experiment Group Approach 10 3-3 Control Group Approach 20 CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH METHODS AND ANALYSIS 31 4-1 Research Design 31 4-2 Research Subjects 31 4-3 Research Flow 31 4-4 Research Tools 33 4-5 Data Analysis 33 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 40 5-1 Conclusion 40 5-2 Suggestion 40 REFERENCES 42 APPENDIX 1: Pre-test and Post-test 44

    Apostolellis, P., Stewart, M., Frisina, C., & Kafura, D. (2014). RaBit Escape: A Board Game for Computational Thinking. ACM, 349.
    Aspray, W. (1990). The stored program concept. IEEE Spectrum, 27(9), 51.
    Curzon, P., McOwan, P. W., & Plant, N. (2014). Introdcing Teachers to Computational Thinking Using Unplugged Storytelling. WiPSCE (pp. 89-92). Berlin: ACM.
    Faber, H. H., Wierdsma, M. D., Doornbos, R. P., Ven, J. S., & Vette, K. d. (2017). Teaching Computational Thinking to Primary School Students via Unplugged Programming Lessons. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, Vol. 12, 13-24.
    Hinebaugh, J. P. (2009). A board game education. R&L Education.
    Kazimoglu, C., Bacon, L., Kiernan, M., & MacKinnon, L. (2011). Understanding Computational Thinking before Programming: developing Guidelines for the Design of Games to Learn Introductory Programming through Game-Play. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 316-338.
    Kinzie, M. B., & Joseph, D. R. (2008). Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: implications for educational game design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 643-663.
    Kuo, W. C., & Hsu, T. C. (2020). Learning computational thinking without a computer: How computational participation happens in a computational thinking board game. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 67-83.
    Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2017). Computational Thinking in Education: Where does it fit? A sistematic literary review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07659.
    Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science Education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & education, 1-12.
    Plass, J. L., Perlin, K., & Nordlinger, J. (2010). The games for learning institute: Research on design patterns for effective educational games. In Game Developers Conference. San Francisco: CA.
    Portfolio, T. (1999). PL/SQL User's Guide and Reference, Release 8.1.6. Oracle Corporation.
    Prensky, M. (2003). Digital Game Based Learning. Computers in Entertainment, 21-21.
    Resnick, M., Martin, F., Berg, R., Borovoy, R., Colella, V., Kramer, K., & Silverman, B. (1998). Digital Manipulatives: New Toys to Think With. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, (pp. 281-287).
    Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. (2008). Making Thinking Visible (Article) | Project Zero. Retrieved from Harvard Project Zero Website: https://pz.harvard.edu/resources/making-thinking-visible-article
    Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. R., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video Games and The Future of Learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 105-111.
    Singh, J., Dorairaj, S. K., & Woods, P. (2007). Learning Computer Programming Using A Board Game - Case Study on C-Jump. Proc. of the Int. Symposium on Information and Communications Technologies. Kuala Lumpur.
    Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., & Ninaus, M. (2018). Training computational thinking through board games: The case of Crabs & Turtles. International Journal of Serious Games, 5(2), 25-44.
    Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communication of the ACM, 33-35.
    Wing, J. M. (2014). Computational Thinking Benefits Society. 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing, p. 26.
    Zhou, X., Ren, Z., Ma, Y., Fan, K., & Ji, X. (2020). Data Structures and Algorithms Analysis - New Prespectives. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
    Zwiers, J. (2019). Next Steps with Academic Conversations: New Ideas for Improving Learning Through Classroom Talk. Portsmouth: Stenhouse Publishers.

    QR CODE
    :::