跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳洛涵
Lo-Han Chen
論文名稱: 悖論領導行為對創新行為的影響: 以心理安全感與工作敬業作為序列中介變項
The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership Behavior on Innovation Behavior: Psychological Safety and Work Engagement as Sequential Mediators
指導教授: 林文政
Wen-Jeng Lin
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Human Resource Management
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 79
中文關鍵詞: 悖論領導行為心理安全感工作敬業創新行為
外文關鍵詞: Paradoxical Leadership Behavior, Psychological Safety, Work Engagement, Innovative Behavior
相關次數: 點閱:146下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在快速變動且充滿不確定性的環境中,領導者往往需要在看似矛盾的管理需求之間尋求平衡,以促進組織創新。然而,僅依賴領導行為本身並不足以充分解釋員工創新行為的產生。員工在展現創意與突破性思維的過程中,除了受到外部管理風格的引導,更需具備安全無虞的心理狀態與投入工作的內在動力,如果能理解這些內在心理歷程,將有助於揭示促成創新行為的深層機制。因此,本研究進一步探討心理安全感與工作敬業在悖論領導行為與創新行為之間的作用機制,建構全面的序列中介模型。本研究採用問卷調查法,以台灣企業的員工作為研究對象,共回收有效樣本179 筆,結果顯示,悖論
    領導行為對部屬的創新行為具有正向效果,這種影響可以直接發生,也可以透過心理安全感與工作敬業的來強化這個影響。這意味著,主管的悖論領導行為本身能激發員工創新行為的同時,也可以透過提升心理安全感,從而願意投入更多精力於工作中,最終促使創新行為的展現。由此可知,悖論領導行為是推動創新行為的重要因素,而心理安全感與工作敬業能進一步強化這個過程。


    In a rapidly changing and uncertain environment, leaders often need to strike a balance between seemingly contradictory management demands to foster organizational innovation. However, relying solely on leadership behaviors is insufficient to fully explain the emergence of employee innovative behavior. In the process of exhibiting creativity and breakthrough thinking, employees not only require external guidance from management styles but also need
    a sense of psychological safety and intrinsic motivation to engage in their work. Understanding these internal psychological processes can help unveil the deeper mechanisms that drive innovative behavior. Therefore, this study further explores the roles of psychological safety and work engagement in the relationship between paradoxical leadership behavior (PLB) and innovative behavior, constructing a comprehensive serial mediation model. This study targeted employees of Taiwanese enterprises for the questionnaire survey, collecting a total of 179 samples. The results show that PLB has a positive effect on subordinates' innovative behavior, which can occur both directly and indirectly through psychological safety and work engagement, enhancing this effect. This implies that PLB not only directly stimulates employees' innovative behavior but also fosters a sense of psychological safety, encouraging them to invest more energy into their work, ultimately leading to the manifestation of innovative behavior. Consequently, PLB is a crucial factor in driving innovative behavior, while psychological safety and work engagement further strengthen this process.

    中文摘要 ………………………………………..………………...………………...…..…… ⅰ 英文摘要 ...………………………………….……………………….…..…………………. ⅱ 目錄 ……………………………………………………..…………...…...………….…...… ⅲ 圖目錄 ......………………………………………..…………...…………………….……… ⅴ 表目錄 ......………………………………………..…………....……………………...…… ⅵ 第一章、 緒論 …………………………………………………...………………………… 1 1-1 研究背景與動機 ........................................................................................................... 1 1-2 預期貢獻及重要性 ....................................................................................................... 5 1-3 研究目的 ...................................................................................................................... 6 第二章、 文獻探討 …………………………………………….………………………….. 8 2-1 悖論領導行為(Paradoxical Leadership Behavior) ....................................................... 8 2-2 創新行為(Innovation Behavior) .................................................................................. 12 2-3 悖論領導行為對創新行為的影響 ............................................................................ 15 2-4 心理安全感的中介效果 ............................................................................................ 17 2-5 工作敬業的中介效果 .............................................................................................,.. 10 2-6 心理安全感與工作敬業的序列中介效果 ................................................................ 21 第三章、 研究方法 ............................................................................................................. 24 3-1 研究架構與假設 ........................................................................................................ 24 3-2 研究樣本與資料蒐集程序 ........................................................................................ 24 3-3 研究工具 .................................................................................................................... 25 3-4 資料分析與統計方法 ................................................................................................ 27 第四章、 資料分析與結果.................................................................................................. 29 4-1 研究樣本來源與特性.................................................................................................. 29 4-2 題項包裹法 ................................................................................................................ 30 4-3 信度分析 .................................................................................................................... 31 4-4 效度分析 .................................................................................................................... 32 4-5 模型適配度分析 ........................................................................................................ 34 4-6 相關分析 .................................................................................................................... 35 4-7 迴歸分析與驗證假說 ................................................................................................ 36 第五章、 結論與建議 ......................................................................................................... 40 5-1 研究結論與討論 ........................................................................................................ 40 5-2 研究貢獻 .................................................................................................................... 42 5-3 管理意涵與實務建議 ................................................................................................ 43 5-3 研究限制與未來研究建議 ........................................................................................ 47 參考文獻 ............................................................................................................................... 52

    王朝暉(2018)。悖論式領導如何讓員工兩全其美? ——心理安全感與工作繁榮感的
    多重中介作用。外國經濟與管理,40(3),107-120。
    李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體 Amos 之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用─Graphics
    & Basic。心理出版社。
    黃芳銘(2007)。《結構方程模式理論與應用》。五南出版社。
    劉雲、石金濤(2009)。組織創新氣氛與激勵偏好對員工創新行為的交互效應研究。
    管理世界,(10)88-101。
    Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Creativity and innovation under
    constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. Journal of management, 45(1), 96-
    121.
    Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake‐Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative
    work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work
    engagement. Career development international, 17(3), 208-230.
    AlEssa, H. S., & Durugbo, C. M. (2022). Systematic review of innovative work behavior
    concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly, 72(4), 1171-1208.
    Al-Omari, M. A., Choo, L. S., & Ali, M. A. M. (2019). Innovative work behavior: A review
    of literature. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(2), 39-47.
    Amabile TM. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. (1
    st ed.). Westview Press.
    Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in
    Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
    Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and
    innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in
    53
    Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.
    Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1987). Management issues facing new product teams in high
    technology companies. Advances in industrial and labor relations, 4(191), 221.
    Babakus, E., Yavas, U., & Karatepe, O. M. (2017). Work engagement and turnover
    intentions: Correlates and customer orientation as a moderator. International Journal of
    Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(6), 1580-1598.
    Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and
    psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of
    Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68.
    Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: current trends. Career Development
    International, 23(1), 4-11.
    Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the
    art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
    Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career
    Development International, 13(3), 209-223.
    Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and
    looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
    Bakker, A. B., & Van Wingerden, J. (2021). Do personal resources and strengths use increase
    work engagement? The effects of a training intervention. Journal of Occupational
    Health Psychology, 26(1), 20.
    Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An
    emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200.
    Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance:
    The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human relations, 65(10), 1359-1378.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs,
    54
    NJ, 1986(23-28), 2.
    Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the
    vision. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 19-31.
    Bass, B. M., & Bass Bernard, M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.
    Benson, S. G., & Dundis, S. P. (2003). Understanding and motivating health care employees:
    integrating Maslow's hierarchy of needs, training and technology. Journal of Nursing
    Management, 11(5), 315-320.
    Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis
    of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588.
    Bergmann, B., & Schaeppi, J. (2016). A data-driven approach to group creativity. Harvard
    Business Review, 12, 43-62.
    Bienefeld, N., & Grote, G. (2014). Speaking up in ad hoc multiteam systems: Individuallevel
    effects of psychological safety, status, and leadership within and across
    teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(6), 930-945.
    Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2).
    Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R.
    (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural
    boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 141.
    Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2001). Confronting failure: Antecedents and
    consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of
    Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 161–177.
    Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and
    learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6),
    709-729.
    Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2009). Learning behaviours in the workplace: The
    55
    role of high‐quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems
    Research and Behavioral Science, 26(1), 81–98.
    Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.
    Chen, C. Y., Yen, C. H., & Tsai, F. C. (2014). Job crafting and job engagement: The
    mediating role of person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37,
    21-28.
    Chen, M. J. (2002). Transcending paradox: The Chinese “middle way” perspective. Asia
    Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 179-199.
    Chen, M. J. (2008). Reconceptualizing the competition—cooperation relationship: A trans
    paradox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 288-304.
    Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., & Park, B. I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement:
    Mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior
    and Personality: An International Journal, 43(6), 931-943.
    Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative
    review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel
    Psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
    Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to
    employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic
    test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834.
    Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary
    review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
    De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative
    behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
    De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and
    validation. EIM Business and Policy Research, 8(1), 1-27.
    56
    De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., Niesen, W., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014).
    On the relation of job insecurity, job autonomy, innovative work behaviour and the
    mediating effect of work engagement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(3),
    318-330.
    Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door
    really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
    Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user
    computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 453-461.
    Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team
    processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111.
    Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.
    Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
    Edmondson, A., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future
    of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and
    Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23-43.
    Edmondson, Amy C., and Anita Williams Woolley. "Understanding Outcomes of
    Organizational Learning Interventions." Chap. 10 in Blackwell Handbook of
    Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, edited by M. Easterby-Smith
    and M. Lyles, 185–211. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.
    Edmondson, Amy. (2011). Psychological Safety, Trust, and Learning in Organizations: A
    Group-level Lens. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches.
    Eisenbeiss, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership
    and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 93(6), 1438–1446.
    Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002).
    57
    Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and
    employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.
    Elbaz, A. M., Haddoud, M. Y., & Jabeen, F. (2022). Empowering leadership and innovative
    work behavior: The mediating roles of psychological empowerment and trust in leader.
    European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 1087–1109.
    Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant
    leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly,
    30(1), 111–132.
    Fang, T. (2010). Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on
    Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1), 155–170.
    Fischer, C., Malycha, C. P., & Schafmann, E. (2021). The influence of intrinsic motivation
    and synergistic extrinsic motivators on creativity and innovation. Frontiers in
    Psychology, 12, 626543.
    Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture (2nd ed.).
    SAGE.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with
    unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1),
    39-50.
    Franken, E., Plimmer, G., & Malinen, S. (2020). Paradoxical leadership in public sector
    organisations: Its role in fostering employee resilience. Australian Journal of Public
    Administration, 79(1), 93-110.
    Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6),
    693-727.
    Fry, L., & Kriger, M. (2009). Towards a theory of being-centered leadership: Multiple levels
    of being as context for effective leadership. Human Relations, 62(11), 1667-1696.
    58
    Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Kearney, E. (2021). How and when paradoxical leadership
    benefits work engagement: The role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of
    Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 672-705.
    Garg, S., & Dhar, R. (2017). Employee service innovative behavior: The roles of leadermember
    exchange (LMX), work engagement, and job autonomy. International Journal
    of Manpower, 38(2), 242-258.
    Ge, Y., & Sun, X. (2020). The relationship of employees' strengths use and innovation: Work
    engagement as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International
    Journal, 48(5), 1-6.
    Ge, Yuanqin. (2020). Psychological safety, employee voice, and work engagement. Social
    Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 48(3).
    https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8907
    Getz, Isaac & Robinson, Alan. (2003). Innovate or Die: Is that a Fact?. Creativity and
    Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00276
    Ghani, U., Teo, T., Li, Y., Usman, M., & Islam, T. (2020). High-performance work practices
    and innovative work behavior: A PLS-SEM analysis. European Business Review, 32(5),
    919–943.
    Gong, Y., Cheung, S. Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J. C. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process
    for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and
    psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1611-1633.
    Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational
    leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative selfefficacy.
    Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778.
    Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership:
    Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years:
    59
    Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-
    247.
    Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance:
    Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management
    Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
    Groves, K. S. (2007). Integrating leadership development and succession planning best
    practices. Journal of Management Development, 26(3), 239–260.
    Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of
    partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the
    Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
    Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Burnout and work engagement
    among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495-513.
    Hayes, A. F. (2012, February). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed
    variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling.
    Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.
    American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
    Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of
    cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management &
    Organization, 13(1/2), 46–74.
    Hollander, E. P. (2009). Inclusive leadership: The essential leader-follower relationship.
    Routledge.
    Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6),
    597-606.
    Hoon Song, J., Kolb, J. A., Hee Lee, U., & Kyoung Kim, H. (2012). Role of transformational
    leadership in effective organizational knowledge creation practices: Mediating effects of
    60
    employees' work engagement. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23(1), 65-101.
    House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture,
    Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage Publications.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure
    analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a
    multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
    Huang, S., Chen, J., & Liang, L. (2018). How open innovation performance responds to
    partner heterogeneity in China. Management Decision, 56(1), 26-46.
    Huang, T. C. (2017). The paradox of innovation in manufacturing: Balancing stability and
    change. Journal of Industrial Management, 34(2), 95–112.
    Huhtala, H., & Parzefall, M. R. (2007). A review of employee well‐being and innovativeness:
    An opportunity for a mutual benefit. Creativity and innovation management, 16(3), 299-
    306.
    Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of
    innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.
    Isaksen, S. G. (1987). Frontiers of creativity research. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
    Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work
    behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
    Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less
    satisfactory relations with co‐workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
    Psychology, 76(3), 347–364.
    Jong, J. P. J. (2007). Individual Innovation: The connection between leadership and
    employees' innovative work behavior. Amsterdam, The Netherlands:: EIM.
    De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour. Creativity and
    Innovation Management, 19, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
    61
    Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at
    work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
    Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication research, 15(5),
    509-523.
    Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and
    aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work
    involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785-804.
    Kaya, B., & Karatepe, O. M. (2020). Does servant leadership better explain work
    engagement, career satisfaction and adaptive performance than authentic
    leadership?. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(6),
    2075-2095.
    Kearney, E., Shemla, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Scholz, F. A. (2019). A paradox
    perspective on the interactive effects of visionary and empowering
    leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 20-30.
    Kenrick D.T., Griskevicius V., Neuberg S.L., Schaller M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of
    needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on
    Psychological Science, 5, 292–314.
    Kesler, G., & Kates, A. (2015). Bridging the talent gap: Strategic succession planning that
    works. Talent Strategy Partners.
    Kim, M. S., & Koo, D. W. (2017). Linking LMX, engagement, innovative behavior, and job
    performance in hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
    Management, 29(12), 3044-3062.
    Kim, M., & Park, S. (2020). Transformational leadership, knowledge sharing, organizational
    climate and innovative behavior: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Asian Business
    and Economic Studies, 27(1), 94–110.
    62
    King, N., & Anderson, N. (2002). Managing innovation and change: A critical guide for
    organizations. London: Thompson.
    Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual
    innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
    Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The
    Guilford Press.
    Koch, A. R., Binnewies, C., & Dormann, C. (2015). Motivating innovation in schools:
    School principals’ work engagement as a motivator for schools’ innovation. European
    Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(4), 505-517.
    Konermann, J. (2012). Teachers' work engagement: A deeper understanding of the role of
    job and personal resources in relationship to work engagement, its antecedents, and its
    outcomes. [PhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT, University of Twente].
    University of Twente. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036533027
    Kontoghiorghes, C., Awbrey, S. M., & Feurig, P. L. (2005). Examining the relationship
    between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and
    organizational performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(2).
    Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of
    individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–
    group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.
    Kundi, Y. M., Aboramadan, M., Elhamalawi, E. M., & Shahid, S. (2021). Employee
    psychological well-being and job performance: exploring mediating and moderating
    mechanisms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(3), 736-754.
    L. Statsenko and G. Corral de Zubielqui, (2020) . Customer collaboration, service firms’
    diversification and innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 85:
    180–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.09.013.
    63
    Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2019). Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of
    transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational
    support. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(3), 527-547.
    Lee, J., Yun, S., & Park, J. (2021). How leadership enhances employees’ innovative
    behavior: A moderated mediation model. Current Psychology, 40(12), 5962–5972.
    Leong, C. T., & Rasli, A. (2014). The Relationship between innovative work behavior on
    work role performance: An empirical study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
    Sciences, 129, 592-600.
    Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of
    Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.
    Li, C., She, Z., & Yang, J. (2020). Promoting innovative behavior through high-quality
    leadership: The mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification.
    Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1204.
    Li, Y., Zhang, G., & Liu, L. (2021). Platform corporate social responsibility and employee
    innovation performance: a cross-layer study mediated by employee
    intrapreneurship. Sage Open, 11(2), 21582440211021406.
    Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and
    prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1),
    71-92.
    Lyu, X. (2016). Effect of organizational justice on work engagement with psychological
    safety as a mediator: Evidence from China. Social Behavior and Personality: An
    International Journal, 44(8), 1359-1370.
    Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370.
    Maslow, A. H. (1962). Notes on being-psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2(2),
    47-71
    64
    May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of
    meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at
    work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37
    McCarty, G. J. (1967). Personal and Organizational Change through Group Methods: The
    Laboratory Approach by Edgar H. Schein and Warren G. Bennis. International Journal
    of Group Psychotherapy, 17(1), 105–106.
    McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural
    equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64.
    Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2014). Exploring the role of target specificity in the
    facilitation of vocational teachers’ innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational
    and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 80-101.
    Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that
    promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal
    of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 175–199.
    Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks:
    Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational
    Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229–240.
    Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989).
    Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological
    Bulletin, 105(3), 430.
    Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application,
    and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27.
    Nasser, F., & Takahashi, T. (2003). The effect of using item parcels on ad hoc goodness-offit
    indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: An example using Sarason's Reactions to
    Tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 75-97.
    65
    Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader
    inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in
    health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941-966.
    Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese
    Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Nunnally J. C., Bernstein I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY:
    McGraw-Hill.
    Nunnally, J.C. (1978). An Overview of Psychological Measurement. In: Wolman, B.B.
    (eds) Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders. Springer, Boston, MA.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4
    OECD. (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities: Guidelines for
    collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). OECD Publishing.
    Oh, S.-H., Dong, L., Nahm, A. Y., & Yu, G.-C. (2023). Fostering innovation and
    involvement among Korean workers in problem solving through trust and psychological
    safety: the role of paradoxical leader behaviours. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(3),
    701–718.
    Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual
    factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
    Orth, M., & Volmer, J. (2017). Daily within-person effects of job autonomy and work
    engagement on innovative behaviour: The cross-level moderating role of creative selfefficacy.
    European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 601-612.
    Owens, B. P., Wallace, A. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2015). Leader narcissism and follower
    outcomes: the counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 100(4), 1203.
    Parker Sharon K, Williams Helen M, Turner Nick. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of
    66
    proactive behavior at work.[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3).
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
    Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of
    proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827-856.
    Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.
    American Psychologist, 54(9), 741-754.
    Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and
    organization theories. Academy of management review, 14(4), 562-578.
    Pundt, A. (2015). The relationship between humorous leadership and innovative
    behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 878-893.
    Rasheed, K., Khan, T., Irfan, M., Khan, K., & Kiran, Z. (2024). Relationship Between
    Ethical Leadership Practices, Positive School Climate And Trust In Leaders In Public.
    Schools Of Lahore. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.13901665
    Reb, J., Chaturvedi, S., Narayanan, J., & Kudesia, R. S. (2019). Leader mindfulness and
    employee performance: A sequential mediation model of leader empathy and employee
    gratitude. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 745-763.
    Robinson, A. G., & Schroeder, D. M. (2004). Ideas are free: How the idea revolution is
    liberating people and transforming organizations. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining innovation leadership: The role of
    paradoxical leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956-974.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic
    motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
    Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of
    Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.
    Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship
    67
    with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational
    Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
    Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The
    measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic
    approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
    Schaufeli, WB, Bakker, AB, & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement
    with a short questionnaire a cross-national study. Educational & Psychological
    Measurement, 666(4), 701-716.
    Schroeder, Roger & Ven, andrew & Scudder, Gary & Polley, Douglas. (2000). The
    Development of innovation Ideas. 10.1093/oso/9780195139761.003.0004.
    Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of
    individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580.
    Scozzi, B., Garavelli, C. and Crowston, K. (2005), Methods for modeling and supporting
    innovation processes in SMEs, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 8
    No. 1, pp. 120-137.
    Shao, Y., Nijstad, B. A., & Täuber, S. (2019). Creativity under workload pressure and
    integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical
    leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 7-19.
    Simonton, D. K. (1984). Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a
    two-step cognitive process. Developmental Review, 4(1), 77-111.
    Smith, G. P. (2002). The New Leader: Bringing Creativity & Innovation to the Workforce.
    CYC International Publication.
    Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium
    model of organizing. Academy of management Review, 36(2), 381-403.
    Smith, W. K., & Tracey, P. (2016). Institutional complexity and paradox theory:
    68
    Complementarities of competing demands. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 455-466.
    Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions,
    measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
    Sun, L. Y., Chen, J., & Luo, X. R. (2022). The double-edged sword effect of psychological
    safety on employees' innovative behavior: The mediating role of employee engagement.
    Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 834265.
    Sun, Y., & Huang, J. (2019). Psychological capital and innovative behavior: Mediating effect
    of psychological safety. Social Behavior and Personality: An International
    Journal, 47(9), 1-7.
    Tang, Y., Shao, Y. F., & Chen, Y. J. (2019). Assessing the mediation mechanism of job
    satisfaction and organizational commitment on innovative behavior: the perspective of
    psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2699.
    Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. (2013). Maslow and the motivation hierarchy: Measuring
    satisfaction of the needs. The American Journal of Psychology, 126(2), 155-177.
    Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining
    teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational
    Research, 85(3), 430-471.
    Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and
    relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–
    1148.
    Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.
    Tu, Y., & Lu, X. (2013). How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work
    behavior: A perspective of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 441–
    455.
    Tu, Y., & Lu, X. (2016). Do ethical leaders give followers the confidence to go the extra
    69
    mile? The moderating role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 129-
    144.
    Tynan, R. (2005). The effects of threat sensitivity and face giving on dyadic psychological
    safety and upward communication 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(2), 223-
    247.
    Urabe, K., Child, J., & Kagono, T. (Eds.). (1988). Innovation and management: International
    comparisons. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management
    Science, 32(5), 590-607.
    VandeWalle, D. (2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human
    Resource Management Review, 13(4), 581–604.
    Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to be a paradox-savvy leader. Academy of
    Management Perspectives, 30(3), 316–327.
    Walton, R. E. (1985). From Control to Commitment in the Workplace: In factory after
    factory, there is a revolution under way in the management of work. US Department of
    Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations and Cooperative Programs.
    Wang, X. H. F., & Howell, J. M. (2010). Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational
    leadership on followers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1134.
    Wang, Zhining & Wang, Nianxin. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm
    performance. Expert Systems with Applications. 39. 8899–8908.
    10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017.
    West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. In
    Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies.
    West, M.A., & Farr, J.L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M.A. West and J.L.
    Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational
    70
    strategies (pp. 3–13). Chichester: John Wiley.
    Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Work
    engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal
    resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 183–200.
    Xerri, M. J., & Brunetto, Y. (2013). Fostering innovative behaviour: The importance of
    employee commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour. The International
    Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3163–3177.
    Xue, H., Lu, K., & Hao, N. (2018). Cooperation makes two less-creative individuals
    turn into a highly-creative pair. NeuroImage, 172, 527–537.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.007
    Yang, J., Zhang, Y., & Chen, T. (2021). Paradoxical leadership and employee creativity: The
    role of thriving at work and psychological safety. Journal of Leadership &
    Organizational Studies, 28(1), 62-75.
    Yang, M., & Han, C. (2021). Stimulating innovation: Managing peer interaction for idea
    generation on digital innovation platforms. Journal of Business Research, 125, 456-465.
    Younis, S., Bashir, S., Irshad, M., & Javed, B. (2023). Impact of the Paradoxical Leadership
    on Employee Creativity: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model. SAGE Open, 13(2),
    21582440231182615.
    Yu, C., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Liu, X. (2021). Paradoxical leadership and employee voice
    behavior: A social cognitive perspective. Leadership & Organization Development
    Journal, 42(2), 265–280.
    Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting
    Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 81–93.
    Zhang, Y., & Yang, F. (2021). How and when spiritual leadership enhances employee
    innovative behavior. Personnel Review, 50(2), 596-609.
    71
    Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in
    people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management
    Journal, 58(2), 538-566.
    Zhao, H., Liu, W., & Chen, Y. (2022). Paradoxical leadership and innovative behavior: A
    multilevel moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Research, 144, 65–75.
    Zhao, X., Sun, X., Zhao, L., & Xing, Y. (2022). Can the digital transformation of
    manufacturing enterprises promote enterprise innovation?. Business Process
    Management Journal, 28(4), 960-982.
    Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of
    supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal
    of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413.
    Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging
    the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.

    QR CODE
    :::