近幾年來，企業系統資訊化程度與日俱增且廣泛，在企業中的資訊系統管理員面對管理的系統數量日劇龐大，資訊系統管理員需針對各種資訊系統的特徵與用途，需編寫相對應的管理文件，這些管理文件包含了一般的日常維運需求，更不可避免的是異常管理文件，其中包含發生異常時所需的解決方案與其他系統之間的關聯影響，以及企業中作為傳承所需要撰寫的報告；這些異常管理的文件可有效減少企業生產風險，但企業終將會面對人員的異動或者其他因素，導致這些知識文件的流失。
本研究將異常管理透過知識管理系統的優勢，整合開發了異常知識管理系統，將顯性與隱性的異常處理知識轉化，並透過整合式的搜尋方法，優化異常處理流程，達到異常事件的再發防止，進而有效改善資訊系統，企業工作交接期望能有效循環，節省產生報告時間，並利於內部溝通使用。
本研究係以科技接受模式理論與資訊系統成功模式理論之整合作為參考理論模型，探討資訊系統管理人員對於異常知識管理系統的行為使用意向之因素分析，研究中針對企業中30名資訊系統管理員進行問卷調查；研究結果發現，提高資訊品質與服務品質可以提升該異常知識管理系統對於資訊系統管理人員之認知有用性，而提升認知有用性、資訊品質以及服務品質，則可以提升資訊系統管理人員對於使用異常知識管理系統之行為使用意願；根據本研究結果提出相關建議，提供企業資訊系統設計與管理做為參考。

In recent years, the increasing of informatization in enterprise system has brought a huge loading to system administrator. System administrators need to compile documents according to the characteristic and purposes of various information systems. These documents are including documents of routine maintenance procedures, documents of abnormality handling, as well as documents of correlation systems. Besides that, these documentation are very valuable to an enterprise as it could serve as a knowledge sharing documents, especially when there is abnormal event happened, employees resignation or other factors that cause lost of documentation.
This paper discusses how abnormal events are handled by making use of these knowledge management documents, a Exception Knowledge Management System is developed, which transform explicit and implicit exception handling into a knowledgebase system. This system uses integrated search method and optimized exception handling process, which prevent the recurrence of the abnormal events as well as effectively improve the information system. With this system, the working experience can be pass on, time uses for report generating is shorten and internal communication become more effective.
This research is based on the theory of Technology Acceptance Model and the theory of Information System Success Model as a reference, to analyze the intentions and the factors that lead the system administrator to use this Exception Knowledge Management System. In the study, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 30 information system administrators in the enterprise. The results of the study found that improving the Information Quality and Service Quality can enhance the perceived usefulness of the Exception Knowledge Management System for information system administrators, and improving the perceived usefulness, Information Quality and Service Quality can improve the information System administrators’ behavioral usage intention to use the Exception Knowledge Management System; Based on the results of this research, it is suggested that the design and management of enterprise information systems are provided as references.

中文文獻
方世杰, & 方世榮. (2000). 知識管理-觀念架構的建立. 商管科技季刊, 1(3), 353-374.
王祖晨. (2012). 品質異常與對策之知識管理: 以 TFT-LCD 製程為例. 交通大學管理學院工業工程與管理學程學位論文, 1-29.
施育正. (2019). System Log 異常偵測與告警系統. TANET2019 臺灣網際網路研討會,
1163-1167.
石崇良, 侯勝茂, 薛亞聖, 鍾國彪, 蘇喜, & 廖熏香. (2005). 異常事件通報系統與通報
障礙. 台灣醫學, 9(1), 63-70.
鄭琨耀. (2008). 應用 PDCA 管理循環在半導體製造工程上之重大異常處置管理系
統 (Doctoral dissertation).
蔡鎬宇. (2013). 建構金融信用卡特店服務系統備援方案之研究. KC 2013第九屆知識社
群研討會論文集, 20–13.
榮泰生. (2006). 管理資訊系統. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
陳光華, & 潘榕森. (2003). 知識管理及其於學術圖書館之應用. 大學圖書館, 7(2), 37-59.
陳建文, 李有仁, 嚴秀茹, & 鄭江宇. (2008). 消費者使用購物網站之行為模式. 資訊管
理學報, 15(3), 1-27.
許賢陽. (2018). PDA路邊停車資訊系統對巡場開單人員影響因素探討-以高雄市政府
交通局為例. 國立中山大學資訊管理學系學位論文.
陳勁宇. (2013). 以科技接受模式探討智慧家庭之父母管控功能使用意圖. 國立中央大
學資訊工程學系學位論文.
羅嘉琳. (2004). 探討對行動學習輔具科技接受模式的研究. 國立中央大學網路學習科
技研究所學位論文.
陳彥勳. (2009). 以科技接受模型探討影響企業員工使用數位學習系統之研究. 企業管
理學系學位論文.
周君倚, & 陸洛. (2014). 以科技接受模式探討數位學習系統使用態度-以成長需求為調
節變項. Information Management, 21(1), 83-106.
黃仕豐, & 黃興進. (2013). 知識管理, 組織文化對學習型組織實踐與工作滿意之關聯性
研究-以高科技產業為例 (Doctoral dissertation).
皮世明, 許通安, & 范錚強. (1999). 影響資訊系統服務品質的因素研究. 國立中央大學資
訊管理研究所博士論文.
鄭經文. (2009). 以資訊系統成功模式探討國立屏東教育大學圖書館資訊系統. 屏東教育
大學學報,(29), 57-78.
謝恬, & 阮明淑. (2006). 台灣知識管理系統比較分析初探. 教育資料與圖書館
學, 43(4), 487-508.

英文文獻
Sousa, K. J., & Oz, E. (2014). Management information systems. Cengage Learning.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37.
Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2006). Knowledge creation and management: New challenges for managers. Oxford university press.
Harris, D. B. (1996). Creating a knowledge centric information technology environment.
Quintas, P., Lefrere, P., & Jones, G. (1997). Knowledge management: a strategic agenda. Long range planning, 30(3), 385-391.
Trees.L., & A.P.Q.C. (2018). IMPROVING THE FLOW OF ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE. APQC. https://www.apqc.org/resource-library/resource-listing/improving-flow-organizational-knowledge
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press.
Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2014). Knowledge management: Systems and processes. Routledge.
Strong, D. M., & Miller, S. M. (1995). Exceptions and exception handling in computerized information processes. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 13(2), 206-233.
Mišić, D., Domazet, D., Trajanović, M., Manić, M., & Zdravković, M. (2010). Concept of the exception handling system for manufacturing business processes. Computer Science and Information Systems, 7(3), 489-509.
Garcia, A. F., Rubira, C. M., Romanovsky, A., & Xu, J. (2001). A comparative study of exception handling mechanisms for building dependable object-oriented software. Journal of systems and software, 59(2), 197-222.
Wang, Y., & Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive systems research, 11(1), 81-92.
Sahno, J., & Shevtshenko, E. (2014, April). Quality improvement methodologies for continuous improvement of production processes and product quality and their evolution. In 9th International DAAAM Baltic Conference “Industrial Engineering (pp. 181-186).
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 38(3), 475-487.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.
Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of information and system quality: an empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of management information systems, 21(4), 199-235.
Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS quarterly, 173-187.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53.
Sedgwick, P. (2012). Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Bmj, 345.
Rencher, A. C., & Schaalje, G. B. (2008). Linear models in statistics. John Wiley & Sons.
William C.Black, Rolph E.Anderson, Barry J.Babin, Joseph F.Hair (Jr), Joe F.Hair, & W.Phillips Shively. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Edition.
Wagner, C. (2004). Wiki: A technology for conversational knowledge management and group collaboration. Communications of the association for information systems, 13(1), 19.
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207-228.