| 研究生: |
李明憲 Ming-hsien Li |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
高中第一類組學生數學科學習需求分析研究 A Study on the Demand of Mathematics for the First Group Highschool Students in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
單維彰
Wei-chang Shann |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 數學系 Department of Mathematics |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 102 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 86 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 第一類組 、社會組 、選修數學 、數學乙 、商管學系 、微積分 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | the First Group, the Social Group, Elective Mathematics, Department of Business Administration |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:18 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討高中第一類組學生,根據未來大學課程需求不同,是否可以將高三數學加以區分為兩大類別加以學習。
本研究共設計兩份問卷,針對高中端495位一年級學生及大學端270位商管學系學生加以施測,並將問卷結果加以統計、歸納,以探討第一類組學生於數學學科上之學習需求。研究者並根據民國73年及民國101年大學入學考試相關統計資料,觀察第一類組人數需求之變化,並加以討論。
根據本研究結果顯示,高一學生認為,影響他們選擇類組最鉅的學科是「自然科」,其次是「數學科」,再者為「社會科」。民國73年大學入學考試中,商管學系學生占第一類組學生可選填之大學校系比例,高於民國101年大學入學考試之比例,而根據數學科學習需求之不同,第一類組學生可以分成兩大類別加以學習。最後,商管學系學生因為高中選修數學課程之不同,未學習過選修數學(II)的學生普遍認為對於大一微積分有銜接上之困難。
本研究最後,研究者根據研究結果討論,對於高三第一類組學生數學課程上提出建議,希望對於未來第一類組學生的學習有幫助。
This study aims to investigate whether it is possible to classify Elective Mathematics, which are offered in the third grade of Taiwanese senior high school education courses into two categories for students of the First Group. The main criteria used for dividing the course into two will have to depend on the professional goals or skills requested by different colleges or departments in university education accordingly.
The subjects for the present study are 495 first-graded students from five Taiwanese senior high schools, and 270 freshmen from the Department of Business Administration in Taiwan. They were asked to fill out questionnaires, based on which were explained and summarized in this research to investigate the needs of the First Group students for Mathematics. In addition, the researcher also examined the diversification of demand for the First Group students regarding to the statistics reports made on the college entrance examination of year 1984 and 2012.
It is observed in this study that the first-grade students in senior high consider “Natural Sciences” as the most decisive subject in their decision of which class group they would enroll in, which is secondly followed by “Mathematics”, and lastly, “Social Sciences”.
As for the result of the research, this study demonstrates that the ratio for the First Group students who major in Business Administration in 1984 is higher than that in 2012. Besides, students of the First Group can be further divided into two subclasses for Mathematics, according to different learning needs for the subject. Finally, this study shows that most of the students from the Department of Business Administration find difficulties in learning Caculus in their freshman year, since they have never learned Elective Mathematics (II) in senior high.
Finally, the researcher offers some suggestions to the high school Mathematics curriculum, designed for students of the First Group, based on the important findings of the research, and hopes these suggestions will be useful for senior high students of the First Group in the future.
一、中文部分
[1] 大學甄選入學實施成果之研究(第二期),國立教育資料館。
[2] 黃福來(1980),「高中學生選組狀況及其影響因素」,國立臺灣師範
大學,碩士論文。
[3] 陳敏文(2005),「探討高中生選擇類組與個人性向、興趣、學科成績
之研究-以高雄市立三民高中為例」,義守大學,碩士論文。
[4] 聯合資料庫,聯合報。
http://udndata.com/promo/board/main1980.html
[5] 大學招生委員會聯合會,大學甄選入學委員會,101學年度大學甄選
入學繁星推薦招生:第一類學群校系查詢。
https://www.caac.ccu.edu.tw/star101/101s_ColQryx/SGroup1.htm[6] 大學招生委員會聯合會,大學甄選入學委員會,101學年度大學甄選
入學繁星推薦招生:第四類學群校系查詢 https://www.caac.ccu.edu.tw/star101/101s_ColQryx/SGroup4.htm
[7] 大學招生委員會聯合會,大學甄選入學委員會,101學年度大學甄選
入學繁星推薦招生:第五類學群校系查詢。 https://www.caac.ccu.edu.tw/star101/101s_ColQryx/SGroup5.htm
[8] 大學招生委員會聯合會,大學甄選入學委員會,101學年度大學甄選
入學個人申請:校系分則查詢。
https://www.caac.ccu.edu.tw/caac101/101a_ColgQryd/TotalGsdShow.htm
[9] 大學招生委員會聯合會,大學考試入學分發委員會,101學年度大學
考試入學分發校系條件與錄取人數一覽表。
http://www2.uac.edu.tw/101data/101_04.pdf
[10] 教育部高中數學學科中心 (2010),普通高級中學課程:數學科課程
綱要專刊。
[11] 教育大事年表,中華民國教育部部史全球資訊網。
[12] 內政部統計月報。
[13] 101日間學制學士班招生名額分配表,教育部高教司。
二、英文部分
[1] Richard U. Utubaku Aniah-Betiang,Elizabeth I.Mathematics for Daily Living: Imolication for the Society. Journal of Educational and Social Research,1(2),86-87.