| 研究生: |
莊佛如 Fo-Ju Chuang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
盧梭《愛彌兒》的教育理念在小學現場實踐的可能 The possibility of Rousseau's Émile ideal education concepts that practiced in modern elementary school |
| 指導教授: |
孫雲平
Yun-Ping Sun |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
文學院 - 哲學研究所 Executive Master of Philosophy |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 108 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 盧梭 、愛彌兒 、自然教育 、小學 、十二年國民教育 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emile, Natural Education, Elementary School, 12-year Basic Education |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:20 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
讓・雅各・盧梭(Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1712-1778)是18世紀法國著名哲學家,他的著作《愛彌兒》是教育界的不朽鉅著,影響源遠流長。在日新又新的世代更迭中,教育也逐漸發展出不同的樣貌。隨著科技的進步,我們可以用各種不同的資源來輔助教學,但問題是:「我們的教育成果有隨之進步嗎?」教育的目的在於擴展人的視野,得到質的提升。國力相對茁壯進步與之成長,世界便能趨於演進,逐步邁向完美。
不過從歷史的脈絡來看,科技的進展確實改善人類的生活,讓我們的生活便利舒適,但社會問題依然層出不窮;教育改良革新,學問日趨專業精美,卻根治不了惡行的發生。是不是我們社會在教育的制度上存在著根本的缺陷?本研究藉由《愛彌兒》的觀點出發,在比較書中的教育制度與現代教育的異同,或許可以從中察覺教育盲點,思索改進之處;試圖在現代小學教學現場融入盧梭理想教育的精髓,冀求邁向健全的教育方向。
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) is one of the famous French philosophers in the 18th century. His work Émile is an immortal masterpiece of education and has a long tern influence. By generations, education has developed different ways gradually. With the advancement of technology, we can use a variety of different resources to assist teaching, but we still want to ask: “Will our educational achievements improve by the time?” The purpose of education is to expand people's horizons and achieve qualitative improvement of human beings; National grows stronger, progressive, then the world will tend to improve and move toward perfection.
However, from the perspective of history, the progress of science and technology has indeed improved the lives of human beings, making our lives more convenient and more comfortable, but social problems are still emerging. Education reform and innovation, learning is becoming more professional and exquisite, but still can’t prevent the evil conducts. Is there a fundamental flaw in our education system of society? Based on the viewpoint of " Émile ", this study may be able to detect blind spots in education by consider about the different of the educational system in this book and the modern education; trying to integrate Rousseau's ideal education essence in the modern elementary school. Then, we may reach to a consummate education.
一、中文部分
1. Rousseau, J.J. (2012a)。懺悔錄(上)(李平漚譯)。北京:商務印書館。(原著出版於1782)
2. Rousseau, J.J. (2012b)。懺悔錄(下)(李平漚譯)。北京:商務印書館。(原著出版於1782)
3. Rousseau, J.J. (2012c)。愛彌兒(上)(李平漚譯)。臺北:五南。(原著出版於1762)
4. Rousseau, J.J. (2012d)。愛彌兒(下)(李平漚譯)。臺北:五南。(原著出版於1762)
5. Rousseau, J.J. (2012e)。一個孤獨者散步的夢(李平漚譯)。北京:商務印書館。(原著出版於1782)
6. Rousseau, J.J. (2003)。社會契約論(何兆武譯)。北京:商務印書館。(原著出版於1762)
7. Rousseau, J.J. (2014)。盧梭審判讓-雅克:對話錄。北京:商務印書館。(原著出版於1782)
8. Rousseau, J.J. (2015)。德性墮落與不平等起源(苑舉正譯)。臺北,聯經。(原著出版於1750,1755)
9. Cassirer, E. (1992) 。盧梭・康德・歌德(劉東譯)。北京:雙橋。(原著出版於1944)
10. Cassirer, E. (2009) 。盧梭問題(王春華譯)。南京:譯林。(原著出版於1989)
11. Locke, J. (1986) 。政府論次講(葉啓芳、瞿菊農譯)。臺北:唐山。(原著出版於1689)
12. Hobbes, T. (2002) 。利維坦(朱敏章譯)。臺北:臺北商務。(原著出版於1651)
13. 江金太(1982)。再論盧梭:自然人與社會人,國立政治大學學報,46,97-131。
14. 張芬芬、張嘉育(2015)。十二年國教「議題融入課程」規劃芻議。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(3),頁26-33。
15. 教育部(2014)。十二年國民教育課程綱要 總綱。教育部。臺北:教育部。
16. 趙雅博(1972)。研究盧梭的先決事項,國立政治大學學報,25,頁51-78。
二、英文部分
1. Rousseau, J.J. (1979): Emile or On Education. Translation by Allan Bloom. United State of America: Basic Books.
2. Rousseau, J.J. (2002): The Social Contract and The First and Second Discourses. Edited by Susan Dunn. United State of America: Yale University.
3. Locke, J. (1824): Some Thought concerning Education. London: C. Baldwin Printer New Bridge street London.
4. Berlin, I. (2002): Freedom and its betrayal. Edited by Henry Hardy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Richard Bailey, Robin Barrow, David Carr and Christine McCarthy. (2010): The SAGE Handbook of Philosophy of Education. London: SAGE.