本研究係採用2000年台灣積體電路廠商公開說書與股東大會說明書，共取得66家廠商之經理人員共166人、董監事人員共170人之背景資料來進行分析，而在理論與分析方法的採用上，本文是主要利用Granovtter(1973) 所提出弱連帶優勢理論與巨分子模型工具，結果發現在高階經理人與董監事部份均呈現高度密集的團體內強連帶關係，且存在具有密切之團體間弱連帶關係，根據弱連帶優勢理論，我們可以指出台灣積體電路產業的人際關係社會網絡是處於較佳的訊息流通環境。

一、中文部份
薩克瑟尼安（AnnaLee Saxenian）著，彭蕙仙、常雲鳳譯（1999），「區域優勢」, 天下遠見出版社，台北。
高希均、李誠主編（1991），「台灣經驗四十年： 一九四九-一九八九」，天下遠見出版社，台北。
吳思華（1999），「台灣積體電路產業的動態網絡」，網絡台灣：企業的人情關係與經濟理性，遠流出版社，台北。
陳東升（1996），「積體電路產業組織網絡的形式及其形成的制度基礎」，國科會研究計畫。
李文雄（1999），「新竹科學工業園區高科技產業發展之探討」，淡江大學管理科學學系博士論文。
高士欽（1999），「生產網絡與學習型區域 ─台中工具機產業轉型分析」，東海大學社會學系博士論文。
張苙雲主編（1999），「網絡台灣：企業的人情關係與經濟理性」，遠流出版社，台北。
段旭銘（2000），「台灣高科技產業發展之政治經濟分析：以半導體產業為例」，國立台北大學財政學系碩士論文。
莊懷山（2000），「探討德國科技城之發展-以烏爾姆Ulm科學城為例」，淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。
吳思華、沈榮欽（1999），「台灣積體電路產業的形成與發展」，管理資本在台灣，遠流出版社，台北。
陳介玄（1994），「協力網絡與生活結構－台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析」，聯經出版社， 1994。
羅家德（1997），「為什麼矽谷能擊敗128公路區」，中山管理評論，5卷2期：287-314。
葉匡時、蔡敦浩、王俊森（1994），「台灣紡織業的網絡結構」，中山管理研討會，2卷1期：102-121。
林鍚銘（1987），「開發中國家新興產業發展過程之研究－，我國IC工業實例探討」，台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
蘇立瑩（1994），「也有風雨也有晴－電子所二十年的軌跡」，新竹工研院電子所。
鍾基年、Granovetter, M.（1997）,「社會網絡、組織政治與聯統治－產業公司與美國電力產業的發展：1885-1910」，中山管理評論， 5卷第2期：243-286.
英文部份
Acemoglu, D.(1996), A Microfoundation for Social Increasing Returns in Human Capital, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111: 779-804.
Adams, J. D., E. P. Chiang and K. Starkey(2000), Industry-University Cooperative Research Centers, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7843, Cambridge, Mass.
Al-Sultan, Y. Y.(1998), The Concept of Science Park in the Context of Kuwait, International Journal of Technology Management, 16: 800-807.
Banatao, D. P. and K. A. Fong(2000), The Valley of Deals: How Venture Capital Helped Shape the Region, in The Silicon Valley Edge — A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 295-313.
Bania, N., L. N. Calkins and D. R. Dalenberg(1992), The Effects of Regional Science and Technology Policy on The Geographic Distribution of Industrial R&D Laboratories, Journal of Regional Science, 32: 209-228.
Bell, E. R. J.(1993), Some Current Issues in Technology Transfer and Academic-Industrial Relations: A Review, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 5:
Bidault, F. and W. A. Fischer(1994), Technology Transactions: Networks over Markets, R&D Management, 24: 373-386.
Black, D. and V. Henderson(1999a), A Theory of Urban Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 107: 252-284.
Burt, R(1992), Structural holes:The Social structure of competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Cabral, R.(1998), The Cabral-Dahab Science Park Management Paradigm: an Introduction, International Journal of Technology Management, 16: 721-725.
Cabral, R.(1998), Refining the Cabral-Dahab Science Park Management Paradigm, International Journal of Technology Management, 16: 813-818.
Cabral, R. and S. O. Dahab(1998), Science Parks in Developing Countries: the case of BIORIO in Brazil, International Journal of Technology Management, 16: 761-777, 1998.
Castilla, E. J., H. Hwang, E. Granovetter and M. Granovetter(2000), Social Networks in Silicon Valley, in The Silicon Valley Edge — A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 218-247.
Castells, M. and P. Hall(1994), Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes, Routledge, London.
Chang, P. L.(1994), The Formation Process of Taiwan’s IC Industry-Method of Technology Transfer, Technovation, 14:161-171.
Echols A. E. and J. W. Meredith(1998), A Case Study of the Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center in the Context of the Cabral-Dahab Paradigm with Comparison to Other US Research Parks, International Journal Technology Management, 16: 761-777.
Freeman, L. C., C. M. Webster, and D. M. Kirke(1998), Exploring Social Structure Using Dynamic Three-Dimensional Color Images, Social Network, 20: 108-118.
Galaskiewicz, J.(1985), Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embedded-ness, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.
Gibbons, J. F.(2000), The Role of Stanford University: A Dean’s Reflections, in The Silicon Valley Edge — A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 200-219.
Granovetter, M.(1973), The strength of weak tie. American Journal of Sociology, 78:1360-1380.
Granovetter, M.(1985), Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91,3: 481-510.
Hamiltan, G.(1997), Organization and Market Processes in Taiwan’s Capitalist Economy, in The Economic Organization of East Asian Capitalism, Edited by Mareo Orru et al., Thousand oaks: Sage, 237-293.
Hamilton, G. and N. W. Biggart(1998), Market, Culture and Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East, American Journal of Sociology, 94: 52-94.
Hanson, G. H.(1996), Localization Economies, Vertical Organization, and Trade, American Economic Review, 86: 1226-1278.
Hanson, G. H.(2000), Scale Economies and The Geographic Concentration of Industry, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8013, Cambridge, Mass.
Hellmann, T. F.(2000), Venture Capitalists: The Coaches of Silicon Valley, in The Silicon Valley Edge — A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 276-294.
Henderson, J. V.(1974), The Sizes and Types of Cities, American Economic Review, 64: 640-656.
Hong, S. G.(1992), The Politics of Industrial Leapfrogging: The Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and South Korea, P.H.D. Dissertation, North Western University.
Krugman, P.(1991), Increasing Returns and Economic Geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99: 483-499.
Liu, C. Y.(1993), Government’s Role in Developing High-Tech Industry: The Case of Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry, Technovation, 13: 299-309.
Lucas, R. E.(1988), The Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3-42.
Luo, J.(1997), The siginificance of network in the initiation of small businesses in Taiwan, Sociological Forum12(2).
Ma, B. Q.(1998), A Project for the 21st Century in China: Kwanghua Science Park, International Journal of Technology Management, 16: 808-812.
Mathews, J.(1995), High-Technology Industrialization in East Asia: The Case of the Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and Korea, Taipei Chung-Hwa Institution for Economic Research.
Meaney, C. S.(1991), Created a Competitive Niche: State Policy and Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry, Paper Presented to Center for Chinese Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
Polanyi, Karl.(1957), The economy as instituted process.(eds.), in karl Polanyi, C. M. Arensbwrg, and H. W. Pearson, Trade Market in the early empires, NY: The Free Press.
Rowen, H. S.(2000), How Technology and Markets Came to Favor Silicon Valley, in The Silicon Valley Edge — A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 184-199.
Saxenian, A.(1994), Regional advantage: Culture and Competition in silicon valley and route 128. Canbrudge:Harvard University Press.
Shaver, J. M. and F. Flyer(2000), Agglomeration Economies, Firm Heterogeneity, and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1175-1193.
Vedovello, C.(1997), Science Parks and University-Industry Interaction: Geographical Proximity Between the Agents as a Driving Force, Technovation, 17: 491-502.
Venables, A. J.(1996), Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries, International Economic Review, 37: 341-360.
Westhead, P.(1997), R&D Inputs and Outputs of Technology-Based Firms Located on and off Science Parks, R&D Management, 27: 45-62.
Westhead P. and D. J. Storey(1997), Financial Constraints on the Growth of High Technology Small Firms in the United Kingdom, Applied Financial Economics, 7: 197-201.
Williams, J. C.(1998), Frederick E. Terman and the Rise of Silicon Valley, International Journal of Technology Management, 16: 751-759.
White, H.(1970), Chains of opotunity: System models of Mobillity in organization. Camridge: Havard university press.
Xue, L.(1997), Promoting Industrial Research-and-Development and High-Tech Development Through Science Parks - The Taiwan Experience and Its Implications for Developing-Countries, International Journal of Technology Management, 13: 444-761.