本文旨於探究自主學習應用於國小四年級數學科之歷程探究，基於Zimmerman提及自主學習理論以教師行動研究開啟本文。本研究對象為北部某國小四年級藝才班22位學童，課程時間為期九週。過去研究多著重於自主學習的成效，本研究探討學生的自主學習歷程，論述自主學習應用於教育現場的實況。教師運用前測、後測、訂立目標、課程整合、自我省思來幫助學生自主學習，透過量化分析學生的學習成就。教師參與觀察協助學生自主學習、理解學生如何建立個人學習歷程，以及透過訪談理解學生學習態度的轉變。筆者蒐集學生上課筆記、習作與考卷勘誤、數學日記之學習省思、七位學生的訪談故事以呈現學習歷程。研究結果發現教師適時的引導能幫助學生自主學習，有效的教學修正更能使自主學習得以發展；學生自主學習的歷程是由多元的因素交織成學習行動網絡；數學科融入自主學習後，學生的學業表現有明顯進步。此研究結果可以提供教師作為自主學習應用於課堂之參考。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning process of 4th grade students through Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) in math class. The thesis was based on Self-Regulated Learning theory of Zimmerman and action research. The object of this study was an elementary school 4th grade art talent class 22 students in north Taiwan. The course times spent nine weeks. Most past research were focused on the effectiveness of self- regulated learning. But this study was deeply to understand the process of self-regulated learning, to provide and explain real education scene about self-regulated learning.Used the ways of pre-test and post-test, set goals, curriculum integration, and self-reflection to help students in self-regulated learning. Besides, through quantitative analysis to analyze students’ learning achievement. Teacher participated in and observed how to assist students in self-regulated learning, how students published personal learning network, and understood students’ change of learning attitude through interviews. A descriptive survey design was adopted to collect students’ class notes, correct errors in printing of homework and quizzes, learning reflection of math diaries, as well as interview stories about seven students to present learning process. The results revealed that teacher gave assistance in appropriating times can effectively revise teaching and develop self-regulated learning, learning combined with multiple factors, also, students’ academic performance was clearly improved after self-regulated learning integrate into math class. The study results may serve as a guide for teachers of self-regulated learning apply into courses.

王明傑（2002）。國小學生自我調整學習模式之驗證暨應用性向與事件評量融入社會領域之自我調整閱讀理解教學效果之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文，已出版，台北市。
吳清山（2017）。自主學習。教育研究月刊。133-134。
吳璧純（2018）。學生自主學習，老師「做什麼」？教育脈動，（15），1-7。
林吟霞（2010）。自主學習取向之適性課程與教學研究：臺灣小學與德國小學「方案教學」個案比較。課程與教學，13（3），47-76。
林昭宇（2014）。 「數位原民」與「建構學習」的省思:自主學習性導向之數位藝術創作教學。藝術學報，（94）， 1-28。
林碧珍、鄭章華、陳姿靜（2016）。數學素養導向的任務設計與教學實踐—以發展學童的數學論證為例。教科書研究，9（1），109-134。
林福來、單維彰、李源順、鄭章華（2013）。十二年國民基本教育領域綱要內容前導研究整合型研究之子計畫三：十二年國民基本教育數學領域綱要內容 之前導研究研究報告（NAER-102-06-A-1-02-03-1-12）。新北市：國家教育研究院。
邱志賢（2004）。教室情境中自我調整學習模式的驗證暨影響國小五年級學生數學科自我調整學習的教室情境因素之探討。國立台灣師範大學教育心理輔導研究所博士論文。已出版，台北市。
洪詠善、林佳慧、楊惠娥（2018）。十二年國教課綱自主學習之實踐探究。教育脈動，（15），1-9。
康軒文教，《國民小學數學教師手冊第七冊》，台北：康軒文教，2019。
張嘉倩（2013）。開放式反思學習札記作業設計對強化自主學習的效益：以高階英語學習者的自主學習為例。英語教學期刊，37（4），195-232。
張輝誠（2016）。翻轉教學：學思達的自學能力培養與圖書館新教養。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，（25），1-7。
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：教育部。
梁雲霞（2005）。自主學習方案的設計與實踐。人文及社會學科教學通訊，15（5），157-176。
梁雲霞（2006）。從自主學習理論到學校實務。當代教育研究。171-206。
梁雲霞（2012）。以自主為弓，學習為箭，做個自主學習的人。 T&D飛訊，（149），1-14。
梁雲霞、辛政信（2002）。課程架構理念與實施。載於深美國小教學團隊、梁雲霞（主編），看見想像的學校：教學創新在深美國小的實作紀錄（頁28-38）。台北市：遠流。
梁雲霞、周良基、王佩蘭（2003）。以自主學習帶動創造力：自主學習方案的開創與省思。載於國立政治大學創新與創造力研究中心（主編），創造力實踐力成研討會論文專輯（下冊）（頁764-785）。台北市：國立政治大學。
許大偉（2018）。教室中，自主學習的實務分享。教育脈動。（15），1-11。
郭梅珍、李書芬（2008）。影響護專學生身體評估技術課程學習態度與學習成效之 相關因素探討。長庚護理，19（2），172-186。
陳美芳（1996）。資優生身心特質與評量。教育資料集刊，21，13-26。
劉旨峰、林俊閎、徐水柯、王培菁、張雅惠（2017）。均一教育平台資源導入學校課程之教學模式分析：以數學科教學為例。T&D飛訊，（226），1-25。
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(3), 586.
Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: Aperspective on assessment intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231.
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537-550.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in education, 2012(3).
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Khan, S. (2011). TED: Let’s use video to reinvent education [video]. Retrieved September 20, 2019.
Lee, J. K., Han, E. T., Huh, S., Park, W. Y., & Yu, J. R. (2009). A hospital-based serological survey of cryptosporidiosis in the Republic of Korea. The Korean journal of parasitology, 47(3), 219.
Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 132, 16-30.
Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational psychologist, 37(2), 107-114.
Morin, E. (2011). La Voie. Pour I’avenir d’humanite’. Paris, France: Fayard.
Murphy, R., Gallagher, L., Krumm, A., Hafter, A. (2014). Research on the Use of Khan Academy in Schools. SRI Education.
Paris, S. G., Byrnes, J. P., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Constructing theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives,2, 253-287.
Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, l. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychlolgist.37(1). 5-15.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International journal of educational research, 31(6), 459-470.
Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 71-86.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. NY: The Guildford Press.
Schwienhorst, K. (2008). CALL and autonomy: Settings and contexts variables in technology-enhanced language environments. Independence, 43, 13-15.
Smith, R. C. (2003). Pedagogy for autonomy as (becoming-) appropriate methodology. In Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 129-146). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Thompson, C. (2011). How Khan Academy is changing the rules of education. Wired Magazine, 126, 1-5.
Wall, S. (2003). Freedom as a political ideal. Social Philosophy and Policy, 20(2), 307-334.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learne: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.