| 研究生: |
陳怡甄 Yi-Chen Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
最適政府支出組成-不完全競爭總體模型 The optimal composition of government expenditures:The role of imperfact competition |
| 指導教授: |
賴景昌
Ching-Chong Lai 姚睿 Ruey Yau |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 60 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 政府支出 、內生成長 、福利 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | endogenous growth, government expenditures, welfare |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:10 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文建構一個中間財商品市場具有不完全競爭特質的內生成長模型,檢視政府當局變動不同的政策工具下,對於經濟體系的均衡成長率及福利水準的衝擊反應。本文的研究得到的以下的結論:首先,就成長的政策效果而言,政府消費性支出比重的擴張將會抑制體系經濟成長率的表現;但所得稅率的提高則對體系的經濟成長表現造成不確定的衝擊。值得一提的是,中間財廠商獨占力的提高,將會弱化上述兩者的衝擊效果。接著,在次佳境界下,體系存在一個最適的消費性政府支出比重,且該比重是大於最佳成長表現下對應的消費性政府支出比重;同時,福利最佳下的所得稅率將大於成長最佳下的水準,迥異於著名的Barro命題。最後,在次佳境界下,不完全競爭的環境將獲得較完全競爭環境更大的消費性政府支出比重。這個結論點出「不完全競爭獨占力的存在與否」與「公共消費性支出比重高低」確實具有重要的依存關係。
In this study, we consider an endogenous growth model with imperfect competition in the intermediate-good market. With this framework, we examine how the steady-state growth rate and social welfare react following the variation under different government policy tools respectively. The research of this study gets the following conclusions. First, the expansion of the fraction of comsumption expenditures in public spending will suppress steady-state growth rate. However, the expansion of income tax rate brings the uncertain influence to the steady-state growth rate. It deserves to be mentioned that the expansion of monopoly power will weaken the impact effect of both policy tools. Second, we find out that the social-welfare maximizing fraction of comsumption expensitures is higer than the growth-maximizing one. Besides, we get a result, departs from the famous Barro hypothesis, which shows that the growth-maximizing income tax rate is not equivalent to the social-welfare maximizong one. Furthermore, under the imperfect competition environment, the optimal fraction of comsumption expenditures are higer than under the perfect competition environment. This proposition points out that the important relationship between the monopoly power and the optimal public spending composition.
一、中文部分
賴景昌 (2004),<總體經濟學>。台北:雙葉。
二、英文部分
Aschauer, D. A. (1989), “Is Public Expenditure Productive?” Journal of Monetary Economy 23: 177-200.
Baixer, S. and Glomm, G. (2001), “Long-run Growth and Welfare Effects of Public Policies with Distortionary Taxation,” Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control 25: 2007-42.
Barro, R. J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Political Economy 98: S103-125.
Barro, R. J. (1991), “Government Growth in a Cross Section of Countries,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 407-444.
Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004), Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Singapore.
Benhabib, J. and Farmer, R. E. (1994), “Indeterminacy and Increasing Returns,” Journal of Economic Theory 63: 19-41.
Buiter, W. H. (1984), “Saddlepoint Problems in Continuous Time Rational Expectations Models: A General Method and Some Macroeconomic Examples,” Econometrica 52: 665-680.
Burmeister, E. (1980), “On Some Conceptual Issues in Rational Expectations Modeling,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 12: 800-816.
Chang, J. J., Hung, H. W., Shieh, J. Y. and Lai, C. C. (2007), “Optimal Fiscal Policies, Congestion and Over-entry” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109: 137-151.
Chang, W. Y., Tsai, H. F. and Lai, C. C. (2004), “Taxation, Growth, and the Spirit of Capitalism,” European Journal of Political Economy 20: 1011-1025.
Chen, B. L. (2006), “Economics Growth with an Optimal Public Spending Composition,” Oxford Economic Papers 58: 123-136.
Chen, B. L. (2007), “Factor Taxation and Labor Supply in a Dynamic One-Sector Growth Model,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31: 3941-3964.
Devereux, M. B., Head, A. C. and B. J. Lapham (1996), “Monopolistic Competition, Increasing Returns, and the Effects of Government Spending,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28: 233-254.
Devereux, M. B., Head, A. C. and B. J. Lapham (2000), “Government Spending and Welfare with Returns to Specialization,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102: 547-561.
Devereux, M. B. and Love, D. R. F. (1995), “The Dynamic Effects of Government Spending Policies in a Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Model,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 27: 232-256.
Dixit, A. K. and J. E. Stiglitz (1997), “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity,” American Economic Review 67: 297-308.
Dixon, H. (1987), “A Simple Model of Imperfect Competition with Walrasian Features,” Oxford Economic Papers 39: 134-160.
Faig, M. (1995), “A Simple Economy with Human Capital: Transitional Dynamics, Technology Shocks, and Fiscal Policies,” Journal of Macroeconomics 17: 421-446.
Futagami, K., Morita, Y. and Shibata, A. (1993), “Dynamic Analysis of an Endogenous Growth Model with Public Capital,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95: 607-625.
Grier, K. and Tullock, G. (1989), “An Empirical Analysis of Cross-National Economic Growth, 1951-1980,” Journal of Monetary Economics 24: 259-276.
Guo, J. T. (2005), “Tax Policy Under Keeping Up with the Joneses and Imperfect Competition,” Annals of Economics and Finance 6: 25-36.
Guo, J. T. and K. J. Lansing (1999), “Optimal Taxation of Capital Income with Imperfectly Competition Product Markets,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23: 967-995.
Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V. and Zou, H. (1996), “The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics 37: 313-344.
IMF (1979-2006), Government Finance Statistics Yearbook, International Monetary Funds, Washington, DC.
Kneller, R., Bleaner, M. F. and Gemmell, N. (1999), “Fiscal Policy and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries,” Journal of Public Economics 74: 171-190.
Landau, D. (1983), “Government Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study,” Southern Economic Journal 49: 783-792.
Lau, S. H. P. (1995), “Welfare-Maximizing vs. Growth-Maximizing Shares of Government Investment and Consumption,” Economics Letters 47, 351-59.
Lee, J. (1992), “Optimal Size and Composition of Government Spending,” Journal of The Japanese and International Economics 6: 423-39.
Molana, H. and Moutos, T. 1992, “A Note on Taxation, Imperfect Competition and the Balanced Budget Multiplier,” Oxford Economic Papers 43: 68-74.
Ott, I. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2006), “Excludable and Non-Excludable Public Inputs: Consequences for Economic Growth,” Economica 73: 725-748.
Shieh, J. Y., Lai, C. C. and Chang, W. Y. (2002), “The Impact of Military Burden on Long run Growth and Welfare,” Journal of Development Economics 68: 443-354.
Startz, R. (1989), “Monopolistic Competition as a Foundation for Keynesian Macroeconomic Models,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 737-52.
Turnovsky, S. J. (1995), Methods of Macroeconomics Dynamics, The MIT Press, MA, Cambridge.
Turnovsky, S. J. (1996), “Fiscal Policy, Adjustment Costs, and Endogenous Growth,” Oxford Economic Papers 47: 361-381.
Turnovsky, S. J. (1997), “Public and Private Capital in an Endogenously Growing Economy,” Macroeconomic Dynamics 1: 615-639.
Turnovsky, S. J. (2000), “Fiscal Policy, Elastic Labor Supply, and Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics 45: 185-210.
Turnovsky, S. J. and Fisher, W. H. (1995), “The Composition of Government Expenditure and its Consequences for Macroeconomic Performance,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19: 747-786.