跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李亞築
Ya-Chu Lee
論文名稱: 國際化及產品多角化策略對公司價值與財務績效影響之研究—以台灣上市公司為例
指導教授: 徐政義
Cheng-Yi Shiu
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融學系在職專班
Executive Master of Finance
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 39
中文關鍵詞: 國際化產品多角化財務績效公司價值
相關次數: 點閱:30下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以2010年至2019年兼具國際化及產品多角化策略之上市公司為研究樣本,探討一般產業公司採取國際化及產品多角化策略對公司財務績效與公司價值的影響,透過多元迴歸分析,並控制公司規模、成立年數、負債比率、股東報酬率等變數進行實證。結果發現,國際化與產品多角化交互作用對ROA與公司價值具顯著正向關係,這隱含企業進行產品多角化策略同時,可考慮透過國外直接投資有助於提升財務績效並增加公司價值。另外,得到公司規模越大,越容易取得資源改善經營績效、舉債程度過高則將對財務績效產生負面影響、公司成立年數與公司價值有負向關係與股東的投資報酬率越高,有助提升公司價值等結論。


    This study examines the impact of internationalization and product diversification strategies on the value and financial performance of companies in general industries by using a multiple regression analysis and controlling for variables such as company size, firm age, debt ratio, and return on shareholders. I find that the interaction between internationalization and product diversification has a significant positive relationship with ROA and company value, which implies that companies can consider foreign direct investment to improve financial performance and increase company value while engaging in product diversification strategy. In addition, I conclude that the larger–size company can obtain more resources to improve its financial performance; excessive debt has a negative impact on financial performance, and firm age has a negative relationship with company value. Finally, the higher the rate of return on shareholders, the higher the company value will be.

    目錄 摘要 i ABSTRACT ii 致謝 iii 目錄 iii 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vi 一、緒論 1 1-1研究動機 1 1-2研究目的 2 1-3研究架構與流程 3 二、文獻回顧 4 2-1國際化與多角化策略對績效之關係 4 2-2國際化程度之衡量 6 2-3產品多角化之衡量 7 三、研究方法 8 3-1樣本資料 8 3-2研究架構 10 3-3樣本選取標準 11 3-4迴歸模型 11 四、實證結果與分析 13 4-1樣本敘述統計 13 4-2相關係數結果 15 4-3多元迴歸分析 16 五、討論與建議 21 5-1研究結論 21 5-2研究限制及建議 22 參考文獻 23

    一、中文文獻
    1. 王俊和,「公司規模與超額價值之實證研究-以台灣上市櫃企業為例」,國立交通大學管理學院財務金融學程,碩士論文,2011。
    2. 江柏翰、林淑惠、張元,「董事會多樣性對產品多角化與國際多角化之影響」,當代商管論叢,3(1),1-28頁,2018。
    3. 林惠文,「國際化與多角化策略對財務績效之影響-本國銀行業之分析比較」,商管科技季刊,2(4),377-397頁,2001。
    4. 吳青松,「國際企業管理理論與實務」,初版,智勝文化事業有限公司,台北市,1996。
    5. 洪于婷,「國際化、集團效果、所有權結構與績效關係之研究-以台灣上市之多國籍企業為例」,南台科技大學財務金融系,碩士論文,2007。
    6. 陳瓊蓉、沈純慧,「臺灣上市製造業公司的國際化程度與績效關係之再探:傳產業與資電業之比較」,商管科技季刊,11(4),457-497頁,2010。
    7. 經濟部:進出口貿易量。2021 年3 月23 日,取自https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/6A206590076F7EF/8b5032af-1a67-4c02-bd16-8791aa459cd2。
    8. 趙永祥、王建民、陳旭播,「國際化程度與產品多角化策略度對公司價值與財務績效影響之研究-以台灣電子業上市公司為例」,育達學院學報,(14),17-42頁,2007。
    9. 趙維強,「產品多角化、風險分散與實質選擇權價值」,輔仁大學金融研究所,碩士論文,2010。
    10. 蔡人華,「企業多角化與績效之關係研究-以PCB產業為例」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文,2000。
    11. 劉韻僖、林玟廷,「台灣資訊產業上市公司國際化程度與公司治理關係之探討」,中山管理評論,16(1),51-82頁,2008。

    二、英文文獻
    1. Ansoff, H. I., “Strategies for Diversification”, Harvard Business Review, 35(5), pp. 113-124, Sep-Dec 1957.
    2. Berry, C. H., “Corporate Growth and Diversification”, Princeton University Press, 1975.
    3. Berger, P. G. and Ofek, Eli, “Diversification's effect on firm value”, Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), pp.39-65, 1995.
    4. Booz, G., Allen, J. L. and Hamilton, C., “Diversification: A Survey of European Chief Executives.”, Booz, Allen and Hamilton, Inc., New York, 1985.
    5. Buhner, R., “Assessing International Diversification of West German Corporations”, Strategic Management Journal, 8, pp. 25-37, 1987.
    6. Daniels, J. D., Bracker, J., “Profit performance: do foreign operations make a difference?”, Management international review, 29(1), pp. 46-56, 1989.
    7. Grant, R. M., “Multinationality and Performance Among British Manufacturing Companies”, Journal of International Business Studies, 18(3), pp. 79-89, 1987.
    8. Grant, R. M. and Jammine, A. P., “Performance Differences Between the Wrigley / Rumelt Strategic Categories”, Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 333-346, 1988.
    9. Wagner, H., “Internationalization speed and cost efficiency: evidence from Germany”, International Business Review, 13(4), pp. 447-463, 2004.
    10. Hitt, Michael A., Hoskisson, Robert E. and Kim, H., “International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms”, Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), pp.767-798, 1997.
    11. Lu, Jane W. and Beamish, Paul W., “International Diversification and Firm Performance: The S-Curve Hypothesis”, The Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), pp. 598-609, 2004.
    12. Michel, A. and Shake, I., “Multinational Corporations vs. Domestic Corporations: Financial Performance and Characteristics”, Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), pp. 89-100, 1986.
    13. Montgomery, C. A. and Singh, H., “Diversification Strategy and Systematic Risk”, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), pp. 181-191, 1984.
    14. Nathanson, D. A. and Cassano, J. S., “Organization, Diversity and Performance”, Wharton Management, 6(4), pp.19-26, 1982.
    15. Rumelt, R. P., “Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance”, Harvard University Press, Boston, 1974.
    16. Ruigrok, W. and Wagner, H., “Internationalization and Performance: An Organizational Learning Perspective”, Management International Review, 43(1), pp. 63–83, 2003.
    17. Tallman, S. and Li, J., “Effects of International Diversity and Product Diversity on the Performance of Multinational Firms”, The Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), pp.179-196, 1996.
    18. Thomas, D. E., “International diversification and firm performance in Mexican firms: A curvilinear relationship?”, Journal of Business Research, 59(4), pp.501-507, 2006.
    19. Thomas, D. E. and Eden, L., “What Is the Shape of Multinationality-Performance Relationship?”, Multinational Business Review, 12(1), pp.89-110, 2004.
    20. Williamson, O. E., “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications”, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1975.

    QR CODE
    :::