在討論平台中透過同儕討論及反思使同儕之間可以學習的更好，透過彼此不同的觀點來學習相同的知識，可以獲得較廣的面向。本研究旨建立一個社群互動機制的討論平台，來探究社群互動機制在討論平台中對學生的參與度及利他性的影響。
本研究之研究對象為桃園市某大學60位學生，其中包含大學生及研究生，分為實驗組與對照組。實驗組學生使用有社群互動機制的討論平台，對照組則使用無社群互動機制的討論平台，兩組皆在完成數位學習劇場的展演後至討論平台進行討論並填寫問卷。本研究使用獨立樣本T檢定對留言內容進行研究結果與分析。
透過討論平台所收集的數據以及問卷得知，實驗組的留言數量高於對照組，在留言品質中，實驗組沒有出現負面留言，對照組則是出現少數的負面留言，而社交性留言的比例則是實驗組低於對照組，最後正向鼓勵和建設性留言則是實驗組高於對照組，故在有社群互動機之下的討論平台提升了學生的參與度、利他性以及互利互助的學習風氣，從中也減少了負面及社交性的留言。

In the discussion platform, peer assessment and reflection make students learn easily and efficiently, through different perspectives to learn knowledge, students are able to embrace different angle of thinking. In this research, we create a discussion platform with the mechanism of social interaction, to explore whether impact student engagement and beneficial leaning on the mechanism of social interaction in the discussion platform.

The 60 students from one of the universities in Taoyuan city are used as the main research participant in divided experiment and control groups, include the college student and master. The student of experiment groups to discuss by the discussion platform with the mechanism of social interaction, the student of control groups to discuss without the mechanism of social interaction, after performing the digital learning platform, both groups went to discuss it in discussion platform and fill in the questionnaire. The comments data will be analyzed by independent sample T-test.

We get to know from collected data and result of the questionnaire by discussion platform, the number of comments of experiment groups is higher than control groups. In the quality of comment, the experiment groups do not appear any negative comments, Control groups appear the few negative comments, The proportion of social comments in experiment groups lower than control groups, last, The proportion of encouragement and constructive comments in experiment groups higher than control groups. Therefore, In the discussion platform with the mechanism of social interaction does enhance student engagement, comments quality and built a mutually beneficial learning culture, at the same time also descending the comments of negative and sociability.

Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionis, A., & Mishne, G. (2008, February). Finding high-quality content in social media. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 183-194). ACM.
Accordino, D. B., & Accordino, M. P. (2011). An exploratory study of face-to-face and cyberbullying in sixth grade students. American Secondary Education, 14- 30.
Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education?: It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 217-232.
Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 573-590.
Brandtzæg, P. B., & Heim, J. (2008, January). User loyalty and online communities: why members of online communities are not faithful. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on INtelligent TEchnologies for interactive enterTAINment (p. 11). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social- Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering).
Bazelli, B., Hindle, A., & Stroulia, E. (2013, September). On the personality traits of stackoverflow users. In Software Maintenance (ICSM), 2013 29th IEEE
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory: Prentice Hall.
Cole, M. (2009). Using Wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers & education, 52(1), 141-146.
International Conference on (pp. 460-463). IEEE.
Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.
Dror, G., Koren, Y., Maarek, Y., & Szpektor, I. (2011, August). I want to answer; who has a question?: Yahoo! answers recommender system. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1109-1117). ACM.
Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Programmed Learning, 32(2), 175-187.
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 153-172.
Hainey, T., Connolly, T., Stansfield, M., & Boyle, E. (2011). The differences in motivations of online game players and offline game players: A combined analysis of three studies at higher education level. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2197-2211.
Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in higher education, 15(6), 703-714.
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.
Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS quarterly, 265- 291.
Liu, Y. (2010). Social media tools as a learning resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 3(1), 8.
Lipponen, L. (2002, January). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 72-81). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Mamykina, L., Manoim, B., Mittal, M., Hripcsak, G., & Hartmann, B. (2011, May). Design lessons from the fastest q&a site in the west. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2857-2866). ACM.
Miltenberger, R. G. (2011). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Cengage Learning.
Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook?. Personality and individual differences, 52(3), 243-249.
Romm, C., Pliskin, N., & Clarke, R. (1997). Virtual communities and society: Toward an integrative three phase model. International journal of information management, 17(4), 261-270.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Windschitl, M. (1998). The WWW and classroom research: What path should we take? Educational Researcher, 27(1), 28–33.
吳仲理. (2016). 以行為改變技術架構高參與度的數位利他學習平台. 中央大學 資訊工程學系學位論文.
劉育芳. (2017). 以教室內數位互動式劇場促進學生學習成效與動機. 台灣數位 學習發展研討會.
徐嵩昱. (2017). 戲劇式學習之教師管理及學生利他討論系統. 中央大學資訊工 程學系學位論文.
夏希璿, "以 Wiki 為基礎建構供線上小組合作與線上教材使用的知識共建平台," 碩士論 文, 國立中央大學, 2005.
張世慧. (2015). 行為改變技術: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
陳碩珮, & 黃馨玉. (2008). 網路知識分享行爲之研究-以 “Yahoo! 奇摩知識+” 爲例. 國立虎尾科 技大學學報, 27(4), 75-87.
沈慶珩, & 黃信義. (2006). 網路同儕互評在 Moodle 系統上的應用. 教育資料與 圖書館學, 43(3), 267-284.
均一教育平台. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.junyiacademy.org/
陳雪芝. (2016). 均一教育平台運用於國小四年級數位輔助教學之成效:以概數單 元教學為例. (碩士論文), 義守大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibary database.
萬榮水, & 梁瑞文. (2007). 虛擬社群形成之意義及其衡量指標之探討: 以網路書 店為例. 資訊社會研究, 13, 295-317.
黃俊宇. (2007). 維基百科知識分享現象之研究. 中央大學資訊管理學系學位論 文, 1-84.
吳姮憓, & 羅偉峰. (2014). [按讚, 留言或分享]-探究影響臉書訊息反應行為意圖 之前置因素. 行銷評論, 11(2), 107-131.
吳尚庭, & 陳五洲. (2011). 社群媒體網站對體育輔助教學之應用—以 Facebook 粉絲專頁為例. 臺灣體育論壇, (2), 1-10.