跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李思瑩
Szu-Yin Lee
論文名稱: 高階經理人薪酬決定因素之實證研究
The determinants of CEO compensation - An Empirical Examination on Taiwanese Firms
指導教授: 劉念琪
Nien-Chi Liu
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Human Resource Management
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 71
中文關鍵詞: 高階經理人薪酬設計代理理論公司治理
外文關鍵詞: executive pay, corporate governance, CEO, agency theory
相關次數: 點閱:15下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 高階經理人的薪酬一直是備受矚目的焦點,以代理理論觀點來看,在代理關係的架構下,為了連結高階經理人與股東的利益,高階經理人薪酬的設計機制愈形重要。
    過去國內關於高階經理人薪酬之研究,由於缺乏客觀的薪酬資料,多數以問卷調查方式蒐集薪酬相關資料;而較近期有以次級財務資料進行驗證者,亦有探討變數或者是研究期間限制上的問題。本研究最大之相異處在於,涵蓋財務評估、公司治理結構及權變因素三種構面之變數,自證基會真象王資料庫與台灣經濟薪報資料庫,取得402家88年至90年上市公司財報資料;此外,基於薪酬設計的原則在於給員工過去努力成果的報酬,以及消除公司的固定影響效果,本研究同時採用遞延模型與一階差分兩種多元迴歸模型進行實證,期望從中發現更多高階經理人薪酬設計之重要機制。而本研究以總經理為高階經理人之代表。
    研究結果顯示,公司前期經營績效越好,總經理的薪酬水準會越高,而薪酬也會越高;當總資產與市場價值越高或是成長越多的時候,總經理的薪酬水準薪酬變動(增加)也越多。關於公司治理結構與權變因素,則得到較混淆的結果,這兩個構面,對於總經理的薪酬水準相較於薪酬的變動有更為顯著的影響,顯示公司治理結構對於總經理的薪酬水準訂定有較直接且決定性的監控效果;而研發支出代表高階經理人的決策能力,對其薪酬水準也有加分的作用。
    整體而言,不論是台灣總經理的薪酬水準或薪酬變動,都明顯地受到財務績效指標之影響。然而,其他因素雖然對高階經理人薪酬水準有顯著的影響效果,卻無法觀察出其對於薪酬變化量的影響效果,有可能受到某些制度環境之限制。未來如果能更擴大研究期間、豐富變數的內涵及種類,不管在學術上或是實業界,對於台灣高階經理人薪酬決定因素之探究必能帶來更大的貢獻。


    In order to align the objectives between managers and stockholders, agency theory argues that companies need to design the executive pay preciously so as to attract, retain, motivate, and reward these executive managers.
    Empirical studies have concluded that size and performance of firm are the major determinants of executive total compensation. This study examines the determinants of CEO compensation from three aspects which include financial indicators, corporate governance and contingent factors. By collecting pooled data on 402 publicly Taiwan companies gathered from 1999 to 2001, I analyze two models, lagged model and change model to explore the influential factors of determinants of CEO pay in Taiwan.
    Corporate size and performance are found to be the major explanatory variables to the level and change of executive pay. Nevertheless, the impacts of ownership structure and boards composition on CEO pay are more mixed. The ownership of large stockholders has negative effect and duality of CEO has positive effect on executive pay significantly. In addition, the expense of R&D which represents the executive decision-making ability has positive effect on the level of executive pay.
    Overall, firms’ financial performance is the most significant determinant of CEO pay in Taiwanese firms. Although some of the variables of corporate governance have significant effects on the level of CEO pay, all of them have little association with change in executive pay.

    目錄 第壹章 緒論………………………...…………………………………….….….1 第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………………..1 第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………………......3 第三節 研究流程…………………………………………………………......4 第貳章 文獻探討…………………………………..……………………….…..5 第一節 代理關係-所有權與經營權分離……………………………….......5 第二節 高階經理人的薪資設計、結構與特性………………………….......7 第三節 控制機制與高階經理人薪資設計……………………………...…...11 第四節 高階經理人的薪資設計決定因素………………………………......13 第叁章 研究方法……………………………………...……………………......32 第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………………..32 第二節 研究假說……………………………………………………………..33 第三節 樣本來源……………………………………………………………..35 第四節 分析模型…………………………………………………………..…36 第五節 統計分析方法………………………………………………………..40 第肆章 實證結果…………………………..…………………………………...42 第一節 樣本特性分析………………………………………………………..42 第二節 遞延模型之驗證結果………………………………………………..45 第三節 一階差分的驗證結果………………………………………………..54 第伍章 結論……………………………………………………………………..58 第一節 研究發現……………………………………………………………..58 第二節 研究限制……………………………………………………………..60 第三節 未來研究方向建議與管理意涵……………………………………..60 第陸章 參考文獻………………………………………………………...……..64 表目錄 表2-1國內外高階經理人薪酬決定因素之相關研究……………………………...28 表4-1變數定義與衡量……………………………………………………………...43 表4-2樣本公司高階經理人之平均薪資(按產業別)……………………………….44 表4-3遞延模型相關分析……………………………………………………………46 表4-4總經理薪酬水準之決定因素的影響效果.......................................................52 表4-5一階差分模型相關分析………………………………………………………54 表4-6總經理薪酬水準之決定因素的影響效果……………………………..……..56 表5-1假設驗證結果整理……………………………………………………………57 圖目錄 圖1-1研究流程………………………………………………………………………4 圖2-1CEO薪資結構的因果關係……………………………………………………8 圖2-2高階經理人薪資設計之基本架構……………………………………………14 圖3-1研究架構………………………………………………………………………32

    參考文獻
    一、中文部分
    柯林斯著,齊若蘭譯(2002)。從A到A+。台北,遠流出版社。
    曾玉潔(2000)。我國高階主管薪酬決定因素之實證研究。國立中正大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    彭懷貞(1989)。台灣企業業主的”關係”及其轉變-一個社會學的分析。東海大學社會學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    楊蕉霙(1990)。所有權結構與公司價值關係之研究。國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    葉銀華,李存修,柯承恩(2002)。公司治理與評等系統。台北,商智文化出版。
    辜秋屏(1997)。高階主管酬勞與公司經營績效之實證研究。國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    賴倩婷(2001)。高階經理人薪酬與其持股率、企業績效之關連性研究。國立成功大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    蕭黎明(1992)。臺灣上市公司最高主管之報償、持股比例與公司績效之關係研究。國立台灣大學財務金融學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
    二、英文部分
    Agarwal, A. & Walking, R.A.(1994). Executive Careers and Compensation Surrounding Takeover bids. The Journal of Finance, XLIX(3): p.985-1014.
    Agarwal, N. (1981). Determinants of Executive Compensation. Industrial Relations, 20(1): p. 36-46.
    Amburgey, T.L. & Miner, A.S.(1992). Strategic Momentum: The Effects of Repetitive Momentum on Merger Activity. Strategic Management Journal, 13: p.335-348.
    Attaway, M.C.(2000). A Study of the Relationship Between Company Performance and CEO Compensation. American Business Review, Jan.: p.77-85.
    Balkin, D.B.; Markman, G.D.& Gomez-Mejia, L.R.(2000). Is CEO Pay in High-Technology Firms Related to Innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 43(6): p.1118-1129.
    Barkema, H.G. & Gomez-Mejia, L.R.(1998). Managerial Compensation and Firm Performance: A General Research Framework. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2): p.135-145.
    Baysinger, B. & Hoskisson, R.E. (1990). The Composition of the Board of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects of Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15(1): p.72-87.
    Bilimoria, D. (1997). Perspectives on Corporate Control: Implications for CEO Compensation. Human Relations, 50(7): p.829-858.
    Bloom, M., & Milkovich, G.T. (1998). Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3): p.283-297.
    Boyd, B.K. (1994). Board Control and CEO Compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 15: p. 335-344.
    Bizjak, J.M.; Brickley, J.A. & Coles, J.L.(1993). Stock-Based Incentive Compensation and Investment Behavior. Journal of Accounting Economics, p.349-372.
    Brickley, J.& James, C.(1987). The Takeover Market Corporate Board Composition and Ownership Structure: The Case of Banking, Journal of Law and Economics, 30: p.161-180.
    Buchholtz, A.K.; Young, M.N. & Powell, G.N.(1998). Are Board Members Paws or Watchdogs? The link between CEO Pay and Firm Performance. Group and Organization Management, 23(1): p.6-26.
    Coughlan, A.T., & Schmidt, R.M. 1985. Executive Compensation, Management Turnover, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7: p. 43-66.
    Cook, (1981). The compensation director and the board’s compensation committee Compensation Review, 13(2): p. 37-41
    Conyon, M.J.& Leech, D.(1994). Top Pay, Company Performance and Corporate Governance. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56(3): p.229-247.
    Conyon, M.J.& Peck, S.I.(1998). Board Control, Remuneration Committees, and Top Management Compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2): p.146-157.
    Cordeiro, J.J. & Veliyath, R.(2003). American Business Review, Jan.: p.56-66.
    David, P.; Kochhar, R. & Levitas, E.(1998). The Effect of Institutional Investors on the Level and Mix of CEO Compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2): p.200-208.
    Deckop, J.R.(1987). Top Executive Compensation and the Pay-for-Performance. New Perspectives on Compensation: p. 285-293. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Eisenhardt, K.M.(1985). Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches. Management Science, 31(2): p.134-149.
    Eisenhardt, K.M.(1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14: p.57-74.
    Elitzur, R.R. & Yaari, V. (1995). Executive incentive compensation and earnings manipulation in a multi-period setting. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 26: p. 201-219.
    Fama, E.F.(1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2): p.288-307.
    Fama, E.F. & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control Journal of Law and Economics, 26: p.301-325.
    Firth, M.; Tam, M.& Tang, M.(1999). The Determinants of Top Management Pay. The International Journal of Management Science, 27: p.617-635.
    Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D. C., (1988). Chief Executive Compensation: A Synthesis and Reconciliation. Strategic Management Journal, 9: p.543-558.
    Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D. C., (1989). Chief Executive Compensation: A Study of the Intersection of Markets and Political Process. Strategic Management Journal, 10: p.121-134.
    Finkelstein, S. & Boyd, B. K., (1998). How Much Does the CEO Matter? The Role of Managerial Discretion in the Setting of CEO Compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2): p.179-199.
    Freedman, S.R.; Keller, R.T. & Montanari, J.R.(1982). The Compensation Program: Balancing Organizational and Employee Needs. Compensation Review, 14(2): p.47-53.
    Garen, J.E.(1994). Executive Compensation and Principal-Agent Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 102: p.1175-1199.
    Gaver, J.J. & Gaver, K.M.(1995). Compensation Policy and the Investment Opportunity Set. Financial Management, 24(1): p.19-32.
    Gomez-Mejia, L.R.; Tosi, H. & Hinkin, T.(1987). Managerial control, performance, and executive compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 30: p51-70.
    Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. & Balkin, D.B.(1992). Compensation Organizational Strategy and Firm Performance. Cincinnati: Southwestern.
    Goldberg, L.G. & Idson, T.L. (1995). Executive compensation and agency effects. The Financial Review, 30(2): p. 313-335
    Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. & Wiseman Robert M., (1998). A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk Taking. Academy of Management Review, 23: p.133-153.
    Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. & Wiseman Robert M., (1997). Reframing Executive Compensation: An Assessment and Outlook. Journal of Management, 23(3): p.291-374.
    Gerhart, B.& Milkovich, G.T. (1990). Organizational Differences in Managerial Compensation and Financial Performance Academy of Management Journal, 33: p. 663-691.
    Herman, E.S.(1981). Corporate Control, Corporate Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Hill, C.W.; Hansen, G..S.(1989). Institutional Holdings and Corporate R&D Intensity in Research Intensive Industries. Academy of Management Proceedings, p. 17-21.
    Hill, C.W. & Phan, P.(1991). CEO Tenure As a Determinant of CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): p.712-717.
    Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., & Hill, C.W.L. (1992). Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms. Organization Science, 3(4): p. 1-17.
    Hallock, K.F.& Oyer, P.(1999). The Timeliness of Performance Informantion in Determing Executive Compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5: p.303-321.
    Hunt, H.G.(1986). The Separation of Corporate Ownership and Control: Theory, Evidence, and Implications. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5: p.85-124.
    Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: p.305-360.
    Jensen, M.C. & Murphy, K.J. (1990). Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2): p.225-264.
    Jensen, M.C.(1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3): p.831-879.
    Kroll, M., Simmons, S.A., & Wright, P. (1990). Determinants of CEO Compensaiton following major acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 20: p.349-366.
    Kerr, J. & Kren, L. (1992). Effect of relative decision monitoring on chief executive compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2): p.370-397.
    Lambert, R.A. (1993). The use of accounting and security price measures of performance in managerial compensation contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16: p.101-123.
    Larcker, D.F.(1983). The Association Between Performance Plan Adoption and Corporate Capital Investment. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5: p.3-30.
    Lazear, E.D. & Rosen, S.(1981). Rank Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89: p.841-864.
    Lippert, R.L. & Moore, W.T.(1994). Compensation Contracts of Chief Executive Officers: Determinants of Pay-for Performance Sensitivity. The Journal of Financial Research, 17(3): p.321-332.
    March, James G..(1984). Notes on Ambiguity and Executive Compensation. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, August: p.53-64.
    March, James G..(1988). Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 9: p.5-24.
    Meindl, J.R.; Ehrlich, S.B.; & Dukerich, J.M.(1985). The Romance of Leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: p.78-102.
    Mehran, H.(1995). Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38: p.163-184.
    Mintzberg, H.(1975). The Manager’s Job: Folklore and Fact. Harvard Business Review, 54(4): p.49-61.
    Mehran, H.(1995) Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38: p.163-184.
    Miller, D.J.(1995). CEO Salary Increases May Be Rational After All: Referents and Contracts in CEO Pay. Academy of Management Journal, 38: p.1361-1385.
    Milkovich, G.T. & Newman, J.M.(2002). Compensation. McGraw-Hill.
    Napier, N.K. & Smith, M. (1987). Product Diversification Performance Criteria and Compensation at the Corporate Manager Level. Strategic Management Journal, 8: p. 195-201.
    O’Rielly, C.A.; Main, B.C. & Crystal, G.S.(1988). CEO Compensation as Tournament and Social Comparison: A Tale of Two Theories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2): p.257-274.
    Perri, T.J.(1994). Influence Activity and Executive Compensation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 24: p.169-181.
    Rappaport, A.(1986). Creating Shareholder Value. New York: Free Press.
    Riahi-Belkaoui, A.& Pavlik, E. (1993). Effect of Ownership Structure Firm Size and Diversification Strategy on CEO Compensation a Path Analysis. Managerial Finance, 19(2): p.33-54.
    Reingold, J. (1997). Executive Pay. Business Week(April 21), p.58-66.
    Sanders, W.G. & Carpenter, M.A. (1998). Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41: p. 158-178.
    Schmidt, D.R.& Fowler, K.L.(1990) Post-Acquisition Financial Performance and Executive Compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7): p.559-570.
    Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W.(1997). Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager Specific Investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25: p.123-139.
    Singh, H. & Harianto, F. (1989). Top Management Tenure, Corporate Ownership Structure and the Magnitude of Golden Parachutes Strategic Management Journal, 10: p. 143-156.
    Smith, C.W. & Watts, R.L.(1992). The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend and Compensation Policies. Journal of Financial Economics, Dec.: p.263-292.
    Stigler, George J.; Friedland, Claire & North, Douglass C.. The Literature of Economics: The Case of Berle and Means/Comment. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2): p.237-271.
    Tosi, H.L., Werner, S., Katz, J.P., & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2000). How Much Does Performance Matter? A Meta-Analysis of CEO Pay Studies. Journal of Management, 26(2): p. 301-339.
    Tosi, H.L. & Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. (1989). The Decoupling of CEO Pay and Performance: An Agency Theory Perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: p.16-9-190.
    Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D.(1991). Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference Dependent Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4): p.1039-1061.
    Ungson, G.R. & Steers, R. M. (1984). Motivation and Politics in Executive Compensation. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): p.313-323.
    Westphal, J.D. & Zajac, E.J. (1994).Substance and Symbolism in CEOs’ Long-Term Incentive Plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: p.367-390.
    Westphal, J.D. & Zajac, E.J. (1995). Accounting for the Explanations of CEO Compensation: Substance and Symbolism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: p.283-308.
    Williams, M.J.(1985). Why Chief Executives’ Pay Keeps Rising. Fortune, April 1: p.66-76.
    Wright, P., Ferris, S.P., Sarin, A., & Awasthi, V. (1996). Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2): p. 441-463.
    Zajac, E.J.(1990). CEO Selection, Succession, Compensation, and Firm Performance: A Theoretical Integration and Empirical Analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 11: p.217-231.

    QR CODE
    :::