簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
江宥千 Yu-Chien Chiang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
加班文化壓力與職場不安全感對加班行為之影響:以產業別樣本比較檢視補償制 度與群體差異為探討核心 |
| 指導教授： |
王群孝
Chun-Hsiao Wang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別： |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱： |
管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Human Resource Management |
| 論文出版年： | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度： | 113 |
| 語文別： | 中文 |
| 論文頁數： | 55 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 加班文化壓力 、補償制度 、工作不安全感 、無償加班 、職位層級 、產業差異 |
| 外文關鍵詞： | Overtime culture pressure, Job insecurity, Paid and unpaid overtime, Compensation system, Job level, Industry comparison |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：32 下載：0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討加班文化壓力與工作不安全感對員工加班行為的影響，進一步檢視補償制度是否在其中發揮調節效果，並透過不同職位層級與產業樣本的比較，了解行為差異與心理感受的可能變化情形。研究關注的加班行為包含有償與無償兩種類型，希冀從制度與心理層面建構加班成因的綜合理解。
本研究採問卷調查法，針對台灣各產業受僱者蒐集資料，共回收 371 份有效樣本，涵蓋科技製造業、服務業與其他產業。主要變項包括加班文化壓力、有償與無償加班時數、補償制度類型（加班費與補休）、工作不安全感、職位層級與產業別。
研究結果顯示，加班文化壓力正向影響有償加班時數，但對工作不安全感呈負向關係，與原假設相反。補償制度具調節效果，加班費可減緩加班文化壓力對不安全感的影響，補休則可能強化此影響。工作不安全感正向預測無償加班行為，且在非主管群體中更為顯著。科技製造業樣本中，補休制度與不安全感之間呈現顯著正向關聯，顯示制度與產業文化間的適配性差異。
本研究提出四項實務建議：企業應破除加班等於敬業的文化迷思，重建明確的工時與責任界線；正視過度加班背後的心理風險；積極承擔員工職涯與生活支持責任；並強化補償制度的法治基礎，以建立永續且健康的勞動環境。
This study investigates the effects of overtime culture pressure and job insecurity on employees’ overtime behavior. It further examines whether compensation systems play a
moderating role and compares behavioral and psychological differences across job levels and industry sectors. Two types of overtime behavior are addressed: paid and unpaid overtime.
The aim is to develop an integrated understanding of the psychological and institutional mechanisms behind extended working hours.
A questionnaire survey was conducted among employees from various industries in Taiwan, resulting in 371 valid responses. The main variables include overtime culture pressure, frequency of paid and unpaid overtime, types of compensation systems (overtime pay vs. compensatory leave), job insecurity, job level (managerial vs. non-managerial), and industry classification.
The results show that overtime culture pressure has a significant positive effect on paid overtime frequency but is negatively associated with job insecurity, contrary to the original hypothesis. Compensation systems demonstrate a moderating effect: overtime pay reduces the impact of cultural pressure on insecurity, whereas compensatory leave tends to intensify it.
Job insecurity positively predicts unpaid overtime behavior, particularly among nonmanagerial employees. In the technology manufacturing sector, compensatory leave issignificantly associated with higher job insecurity, indicating a mismatch between institutional
design and industry-specific work culture.
Based on these findings, four practical recommendations are proposed: First, organizations should break the cultural myth equating long hours with dedication and clarify boundaries between working time and responsibilities. Second, the psychological risks behind excessive
overtime should be acknowledged and addressed. Third, employers are encouraged to take responsibility for supporting employees’ career development and work-life balance. Finally, the legal foundations of compensation systems should be strengthened to ensure that overtime
arrangements meaningfully reflect employees’ labor value and promote a sustainable and healthy work environment.
英文文獻
Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1989). Content, causes, and consequences of job
insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. Academy of Management
Journal. 32(4), 803–829.
Beckers, D. G. J., van der Linden, D., Smulders, P. G. W., Kompier, M. A. J., & Taris, T. W.
(2008). Voluntary or involuntary? Control over overtime and rewards for overtime in
relation to fatigue and work satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22(1), 33–50.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
behavior. Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Smartphone use, work－home interference, and burnout:
A diary study on the role of recovery. Applied Psychology, 63(3), 411–440.
https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12012
Elsbach, K. D., Cable, D. M., & Sherman, J. W. (2010). How passive "face time" affects
perceptions of employees: Evidence of spontaneous trait inference. Human Relations,
63(6), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709353139
Government of Alberta. (n.d.). Employment Standards Code (RSA 2000, c E-9). Alberta
Queen’s Printer. Retrieved June 25, 2025, from https://www.qp.alberta.ca/1266.cfm
Hellgren, J., Sverke, M., & Isaksson, K. (1999). A two-dimensional approach to job
insecurity: Consequences for employee attitudes and well-being. European Journal of
Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 513-524.
https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398302
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.
American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.51342
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition.
Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Average annual hours
actually worked per worker. https://stats.oecd.org
Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2008). It takes two to tango: Workaholism is
working excessively and working compulsively. In R. J. Burke (Ed.), Research
companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 203-213). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Snir, R., & Harpaz, I. (2006). The workaholism phenomenon: A cross-national analysis.
Career Development International, 11(5), 374-393.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430610683070
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
Yang, S. Y., Chen, S.-C., Lee, L., & Liu, Y.-S. (2021). Employee stress, job satisfaction and
job performance: A comparison between high technology and traditional industry in
Taiwan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 605-618.
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0605
中文文獻
丁肇九。(2025 年 4 月 17 日)。台灣人有多過勞？問題不只七天假被砍，而是全體「有
薪休假日」都太少！。關鍵評論網。 取自
https://www.thenewslens.com/article/251586
王超弘、賴文正。（2016 年 5 月）。工作不安全感對於工作績效之影響：以銀行正職員
工與派遣人員為例（報告於第 19 屆科際整合管理研討會）。東吳大學，台北市，
臺灣。
李金泉、何易修、陳俊瑜。（2011）。光電產業員工工作壓力、工作不安全感對職場疲
勞影響之評估（碩士論文，南台科技大學人力資源管理研究所）。南台科技大學43
李俊彥。（2016）。延長工時之權責探討。收錄於《勞動與就業關係學術研討會論文
集》（頁 249–256）。中華勞動與就業關係學會
李心茹。(2024)。延長工時對於工作壓力之影響以內、外工作動機為調節變項（碩士論
文，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所）。國立中央大學
林秀娟、李元墩、戴謙。（2012 年 10 月）。高科技企業員工工作品質改善之研究－工作
負荷觀點。品質學報，19(5)，445–463。https://doi.org/10.6220/joq.2012.19(5).03
社會主義行動。(2025 年 5 月 1 日)。壓垮台灣勞工的高工時與血汗過勞。 取自
https://chinaworker.info/zh-hant/2025/05/01/47114/
邱炳文。（2020）。又在加班嗎？加班、加班動機與工作生活平衡之相關研究（碩士論
文，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所）。國立中山大學。
許書瑋 (Ryan Shuwei Hsu)、周庭佑 (Ting-Yu Chou). (2018)。華人員工的加班心理感
受：質性研究的初探結果. 第 20 屆科際整合管理研討會. 東吳大學。
勞動部。（2023）。112 年度勞工生活及就業狀況調查統計結果。取自勞動部統計查詢
網：https://www.mol.gov.tw/1607/1632/1633/66059/post
勞動部。（2024）。113 年度勞工生活及就業狀況調查統計結果。取自勞動部統計查詢
網：https://www.mol.gov.tw/1607/1632/1633/77925/
勞動部。（2025）。113 年度年總工時。取自勞動統計查詢網：
https://statfy.mol.gov.tw/index17.aspx
勞動部。（n.d.）。工作生活平衡補助計畫。取自工作生活平衡網：
https://wlb.mol.gov.tw/Page/Content.aspx?id=38
黃庭邦、周燕玉、呂伯嶔。（2021 年 8 月）。探討工作不安全感、組織承諾、工作投
入與正面情緒之關係模式。管理資訊計算，10(2)，140–154。
https://doi.org/10.6285/MIC.202108/SP_02_10.0013
葉冠妤。（2024 年 12 月 8 日）。台勞工去年總工時 2020 個小時 亞洲第 2 高 僅次新加
坡。世界新聞網。取自 https://www.worldjournal.com/wj/story/121221/841170544
閻美吟(2016)。高科技產業員工的習慣性延長工時與離職意圖影響之研究：以員工福
利作為調節變項. 國立高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所。
