本實驗採用熱蒸鍍法製備數組Cu 奈米微粒，經過氧化後形成
Cu/Cu2O 奈米微粒，最後採用三組樣品粒徑分別為3.4 nm、2.3 nm 與3.9 nm。並使用物理特性量測系統(Physical property measurement system)量測其磁性，利用朗之萬函數(Langevin function)加上一線性項擬合實驗，此線性項為順磁與反磁一起貢獻的結果，進而分析其磁性。
在塊材的銅與氧化亞銅皆為反磁性，但此實驗發現在低磁場部分
由鐵磁性表現，高磁場則為銅與氧化亞銅共同表現的現象，當溫度升高時反磁現象越明顯，不過當Cu2O 變多時反而是使反磁性降低。由此也可推測出核內的銅在奈米尺度下能為反磁性，但氧化亞銅則與塊材實的磁性有所不同。在磁矩與溫度的關係上，則發現磁矩排列隨溫度上升而變大的特性，μP ~ kBT。而造成這些與塊材磁性相異的原因，推測乃因表面電子自旋極化與Cu/Cu2O 部分氧缺陷所造成。

Copper nanoparticles were fabricated by the thermal evaporation method. A series of copper nanoparticles were oxided to form core-shell structure. The diameters of 3.4 nm, 2.3 nm and 3.9 nm Cu/Cu2O nanoparticles were determined by atomic force microscope images.
We observe the spin polarization in Cu/Cu2O fine particles. The applied magnetic field dependency of magnetization (M-H curve) can be described by using Langevin function. And we also find two magnetic
components in Cu/Cu2O nanoparticles at low temperatures. We can find that the fitting parameters μp increase with increasing temperature. According to ferromagnetic component in M-H curves and remanence, the ferromagnetic spin polarization of Cu/Cu2O nanoparticles is observed.

[1] J Ramirez-Ortiz, T Ogura, J Medina-Valtierra et al. Applied Surface Science, 2001, 174: 177184.
[2] P E De Jongh, D Vanmaekelbergh, J J Kelly. J. Elect. Soc., 2000, 147 (2): 486~489.
[3] 羅吉宗、戴明鳳、林鴻明、鄭振宗、蘇程裕、吳育民著，奈米科技導論，全華科技圖書股份有限公司.
[4]牟中原，陳家俊，”奈米材料研究發展，”科學發展月刊，第28卷，第4期，第281-288 頁，2000。
[5]Y. Yamamoto, T. Miura, M. Suzki, N. Kawamura, H Miyagawa, T. Nakamura, K.Kobayashi, T. Teranishi, and H. Hori, Phys. Rev. Latt. 93, 116801 (2004)
[6]S. Y. Wu, W. -H. Li
[7]V. R. Palkar, P. Ayyub, S. Chattopadhay, and M. Multani, Phys. Rev. B
53, 2167 (1996).
[8] R. Espiau de Lamaestre and H. Bernas, “Significance of lognormal nanocrystal size distributions,” Phys. Rev. B 73, 125317 (2006)
[9] E. Limpert, W. A. Stahel, and M. Abbt, “Log-normal Distributions across the Sciences: Keys and Clues,” BioScience 51, 341 (2001)
[10]王進威,擬合X光繞射峰型判定奈米微粒分末的粒徑分佈,中央大
學碩士論文 (2006)
[11] 近角聰信撰，張煦、李學養合譯，聯經出版社(1982)
[12] S. H. Kilcoyne, R. Cywinski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140, 1446 (1995)
[13] P. Allia, M. Coission, P. Tiberto, F. Vinai, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 226, 1904 (2001)
[14] I.S. Elfimov, S. Yunoki, and G.A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 216403
[15] Manoj K. Harbola and Viraht Sahni, Phys. Rev. B 37, 745 (1987)
[16] V. Shni, K. –P. Bohnen, Phys. Rev. B 31, 7651 (1984)
[17] Steen Morup, Cathrine Frandsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 217201 (2004)
[18] A. Punnoose, H. Magnone, M. S. Seehra, Phys. Rev. B 64, 174420 (2001)
[19] 林裕祥,奈米氧化亞銅微粒的氧化缺陷與自旋極化,中央大學碩士論文 (2007)