國內工程進度出現延誤之情形層出不窮，規劃正確及合理的時程網圖對於工程能否順利進行有著很大的影響。當工程發生爭議時，已通過審查的時程網圖往往是爭議處理的重要判斷依據。一個專案是否能順利進行，與時程網圖的品質與控管有著密不可分的關係。然而國內對於時程網圖的審查標準四散各處，且各機關相關作業手冊往往僅有原則性的審查建議，審查人員在審查時常常無所適從，只能憑自身經驗進行判斷，導致國內的時程網圖審查常常流於形式、成效不佳。本研究以文獻回顧的方式，綜整國外對於時程網圖健康度之概念與建議，結合國內時程網圖相關文獻建立的網圖審查流程及準則，進而建立合適的時程網圖評估指標。本研究最終彙整出九大網圖健康度評估指標與60個檢核細項，以初步評判網圖之完整性、正確性及合理性。本研究另以實際工程案例之時程網圖進行分析，檢視其指標之可行性，並透過訪談評估是否適用於工程實務中。期望本研究之成果可以彌補國內審查標準不足之現況，並能提升國內時程網圖之水準。

Delays in the construction processes of domestic projects emerge endlessly, and a correct and reasonable construction schedule has a great impact on the smooth progress of the project. When a dispute occurs in a project, the construction schedule that has passed the review is often the important basis for reaching the dispute settlement. Whether a project can proceed smoothly is inseparable from the quality and control of the construction schedule. However, the domestic review standards for construction schedule are unclear, and the relevant execution manuals for schedule review by various government agencies commonly have general and limited review recommendations. The reviewers are often at a loss when reviewing, and can only make judgments based on their own experience. As a result, domestic construction schedule reviews often become mere formalities and review outcomes are poorly effective for improving the performance of construction schedule. This study used a literature review method to extract the concepts and suggestions on the health of construction schedule from other countries, combined them with the schedule network review process and criteria established by domestic research outcomes and government execution manuals, and established appropriate schedule network evaluation indicators. In the end, nine major construction schedule health evaluation indicators consisting of 60 evaluation items were developed to evaluate the completeness, correctness and rationality of construction schedule based on the purpose of preliminary schedule review. This study has confirmed the feasibility of proposed evaluation indicators by actual construction schedule network, and their appropriateness by domain expert interviews. Excluding to make up for the current lack of domestic review standards, it is hoped that the performance level of domestic construction schedule can be improved based on the outcomes of this study.

〔1〕陳玉書等：〈施工網圖更新及修正之應用(下)〉，現代營建，第264期，第45-50頁，2001。
〔2〕陳朝和：〈時程規範〉，碩士論文，國立成功大學，2000。
〔3〕林君頤：〈營建工程時程網圖審查準則之研究〉，碩士論文，國立中央大學，2015。
〔4〕魯李威：〈網圖審查心得(上)〉，現代營建，第164期，第37-44頁，1993。
〔5〕陳玉書等：〈施工網圖更新及修正之應用(上)〉，現代營建，第263期，第47-56頁，2001。
〔6〕黃价成：〈時程管理體系整合做法〉，碩士論文，國立成功大學，2000。
〔7〕劉文良：《專案管理：結合實務與專案管理師認證》，台灣：碁峰，2012。
〔8〕劉智遠：〈公共工程進度計算方式之認定研究〉，碩士論文，國立中央大學，2005。
〔9〕台灣營建研究院：《工程爭議處理》，2003。
〔10〕PMI, “A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge-Sixth Edition”, 2017.
〔11〕鄧勝軒等：〈公共工程工程進度展延爭議的探討〉，仲裁季刊，第92期，第97-117頁，2010。
〔12〕張清榮：〈不同類型營建專案排程實務之適用性探討(上)〉，現代營建，第380期，第55-64頁，2011。
〔13〕賴瓊華：〈完工時間限制下模糊計畫評核術之研究〉，碩士論文，國立成功大學，2001。
〔14〕魏彣芯：〈國內公共工程專案時程管理規範之研究〉，碩士論文，國立中央大學，2020。
〔15〕周詠傑：〈營建工程時程網圖審查作業流程與準則建立之研究〉，碩士論文，國立中央大學，2016。
〔16〕California Department of Transportation, “Project Scheduling with Primavera P6”, 2011.
〔17〕The U.S. Defense Contract Management Agency, “Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Program Analysis Pamphlet (PAP)”, 2012.
〔18〕Marco Alvise Bragadin and Kalle Kähkönen, “Schedule health assessment of construction projects”, Construction Management and Economics, 34, 875-897, 2016.
〔19〕Brandon Bogle, “DCMA 14-Point Assessment for Project Schedule Health”, 2016, https://edwps.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/DCMA-14-point.pdf.
〔20〕行政院公共工程委員會：《公共工程訂定工期參考原則》，2019。
〔21〕黃正翰：〈總分類碼（OMNI Class）應用於建築資訊模型之分享〉，土木水利，第44期，第45-53頁，2017。
〔22〕姚乃嘉：《營建規劃與時程管理》課程講義，2020。