Drucker（1995）曾說：「創業的確需要加以系統化，也需要加以管理，但最重要的是，它必須是基於有目的的創新。」換言之，經營模式不斷創新過程其實是應該加以系統化管理的。然而，過去只有少數學者探討。因此，本研究企圖回答每一次經營模式創新之間的關係為何？本研究以紮根理論、認知圖與特徵結構分析研究Google的經營模式結構。研究發現，Google經營模式演進過程可分成四個路徑相依的階段。各階段的經營模式結構中皆包含開採與探勘的雙基因，以及平衡雙基因的槓桿因子。並且各階段的槓桿因子逐漸集合形成經營模式核心—強大的電腦運算科技、方便客戶使用、與提高用戶操縱資訊的能力。

Drucker (1995) said: “Entrepreneurship does need, however, to be systematic. It needs to be managed. Above all, it needs to be based on purposeful innovation.” That is, the processes of adjacent business model innovations should be systematically managed. However, few scholars focused on. Accordingly, this study attempts to explore what the relationship between business model innovations is. Grounded theory qualitative research method, casual map, and structure characteristics were imported to collect and analyze various data for the business model structures of Google. We found that the evolution of Google''s business model can be divided into four phases which are path dependency. The business model structure in every phase includes bi-gene (exploration and exploitation) with their leverage factor. 　The leverage factor of each phase gradually reinforces the core of business model: powerful computing technology, easy to use for customers, and raising the user’s ability to manipulate information.

英文部分
[1] Ackoff, R. L. 1999. Re-creating the corporation: A design of prganizations for the 21st century. Oxford Univ Pr.
[2] Afuah, A. 2004. Business odels: A strategic management approach. McGraw-Hill College.
[3] Barr, P. S., & Huff, A. S. 1997. Seeing isn’t believing: understanding diversity in the timing of strategic response. Journal of Management Studies, 34(3): 337-370.
[4] Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. 1992. Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 15-36.
[5] Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L., 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisted. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 238-256.
[6] Bossidy, L., Charan, R., & Burck, C. Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done. Random House.
[7] Bougon, M., Weick, K., & Binkhorst, D. 1977. Cognition in organizations: an analysis of the utrecht jazz orchestra. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4): 606-639.
[8] Bonacich, P. 1987. Power and centrality: a family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5): 1170.
[9] Brown, S. M. 1992. Cognitive mapping and repertory grids for qualitative survey research: some comparative observations. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3): 287-307.
[10] Cossette, P. 2002. Analysing the thinking of FW Taylor using cognitive mapping. Management Decision, 40(2): 168-182.
[11] Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A. 2002. The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3): 51-58.
[12] Druker, P. F. 1995. Innovation and entrepreneurship. Blackstone Audiobooks.
[13] Dubosson-Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. 2001. eBusiness model design, classification and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(1): 5-23.
[14] Eden, C. 1992. On the nature of cognitive maps. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3): 261-265.
[15] Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. 2007. Catalyst code: The strategies behind the world’s most dynamic companies. Client Distribution Services.
[16] Fiol, C. M., & Huff, A. S. 1992. Maps for managers: where are we? Where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies, 29(3): 267-285.
[17] Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3): 215-239.
[18] Hamel, G. 2000. Leading the revolution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
[19] Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. 2006. Strategic management theory: An integrated approach. Houghton Mifflin.
[20] Hodgkinson, G. P., Maule, A. J., & Bown, N. J. 2004. Causal cognitive mapping in the organizational strategy field: A comparison of alternative elicitation procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 7(1): 3.
[21] Kwahk, K. Y., & Kim, Y. G. 1999. Supporting business process redesign using cognitive maps. Decision Support Systems, 25(2): 155-178.
[22] Langfield-Smith, K. 1992. Exploring the need for a shared cognitive map. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3): 349-368.
[23] Magretta, J. 2002. What management is: How it works and why it’s everyone’s business. Commonwealth.
[24] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Pubns.
[25] Mitchell, D., & Coles, C. 2003. Gaining and Extending Industry Leadership Through Continuing Business Model Innovation. The CEO refresher.
[26] Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. 2005. The entrepreneur''s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6): 726-735.
[27] Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. 2005. Exploratory social network analysis with pajek. Cambridge University Press.
[28] O’ Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L., 2004. The ambidextrous organization, Harvard Business Review, 82(4): 74-81.
[29] Sawhney, M., Wolcott, R. C., & Arroniz, I. 2006. The 12 different ways for companies to innovate. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3): 75-81.
[30] Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., & Linder, J. C. 2005. The power of business models. Business horizons, 48(3): 199-207.
[31] Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. 1998. Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press.
[32] Siggelkow, N. 2002. Evolution toward fit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1): 125-159.
[33] Tapscott, D. 2001. Rethinking strategy in a networked world (or why Michael Porter is wrong about the internet). Strategy+Business, 4.
[34] Tikkanen, H., Lamberg, J., Parvinen, P., & Kallunki, J. 2005. Managerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm. Management Decision, 43(6): 789-809.
[35] Vise, D. A., Malseed, M. 2006. The Google story. Bantam Dell Pub Group.
[36] Weick, K. E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. Random House USA Inc.
[37] Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. 2001. Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6): 730-743.
[38] Zhang, W. R., Chen, S. S., & Bezdek, J. C. 1989. Pool2: A generic system for cognitive map development and decision analysis. IEEE Transactions on SMC, 19(1): 31-39.
中文部分
[39] 李田樹譯，2003，《管理是什麼》，天下文化。
[40] 李田樹譯，2005，《創新與創業精神》，臉譜。
[41] 李定宇，2005，「突破式創新與經營模式互動關係之文獻研究—兼論商業智能之前導作用」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[42] 李芳齡譯，2007，《企業觸媒策略》，天下。
[43] 李興益，「經營模式元件角色之分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所，2007。
[44] 吳芝儀，廖梅花譯，2001，《質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法》，濤石。
[45] 胡幼慧，1996，《質性研究—理論、方法及本土女生研究實例》，巨流。
[46] 范揚君，2007，「經營模式階次區塊之分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[47] 陳銑鈞，2006，「經營模式元件及其間關係之紮根研究」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[48] 陳浩民，2005，「突破式創新與經營模式對創新導入之影響的文獻研究—兼論商業智能之前導作用」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[49] 張芬芬譯，2005，《質性研究資料分析》，雙葉書廊。
[50] 張美惠譯，1999，《資訊經營法則》，時報出版。
[51] 張順教、陳建良譯，《數位資本：建構商業網的力量》，商周出版，2002。
[52] 張景翔，2005，「商業智能與經營模式設計之文獻研究-兼論與突破式創新演化之關係」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[53] 黃佳瑜譯，2001，《交響樂組織：互動管理：循環式組織、內部市場經濟、多層面組織》，大塊文化。
[54] 黃詩婷，2005，「經營模式創新之探索性研究—以台積電為例」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
[55] 楊峰豪，2007，「經營模式元件僑街關係之分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[56] 劉乙興，2005，「突破式創新與經營模式對主宰設計之影響的文獻研究—兼論商業智能之前導作用」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[57] 劉雅妍，2005，「商業智能與經營模式設計之文獻研究--兼論與突破式創新進入策略之關係」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[58] 顏君安，2005，「經營模式、進入策略、主宰設計關係之文獻研究－兼論商業智能之前導作用」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[59] 蕭美惠、林秀津譯，2006，《翻動世界的Google》，時報出版。
[60] 蕭瑞麟，2007，《不用數字的研究：鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究》，培生集團。
網站資料
[61] comScore. 2008. http://www.comscore.com/
[62] Google. 2008. http://googlepress.blogspot.com/
[63] Nielsen Online. 2008. http://www.nielsen-online.com/
[64] ZDNet科技新聞網，2008。http://www.zdnet.com.tw/
[65] 資策會，2007。http://www.iii.org.tw