隨著全球化和科技發展，企業面臨的不確定性和複雜挑戰日益增加。在這樣的環境背景下，悖論領導行為成為一種關鍵的領導者策略，領導者展現在管理過程中相互矛盾的感知與期望之間找到平衡，以推動組織創新和持續成長。悖論領導不僅需要領導者展現出高度的自我覺察和調節能力，還需要他們激勵員工積極參與創新過程。
本研究的目的在探討悖論領導行為如何影響部屬的創新工作行為，以及員工建言的中介效果和心理安全感的調節作用如何在此過程中發揮效果。在當今高度競爭和變化快速的環境中，對於實施悖論領導行為重要性，因為悖論領導將有助於促進組織的穩定性和靈活性，從而增強適應性與創新工作能力。
本研究收集台灣企業主管與部屬配對的有效問卷268份進行分析研究，研究結果證實了悖論領導與部屬工作創新行為之間存在顯著的正向影響。研究發現，員工建言在悖論領導與創新工作行為之間起了中介效果，然而，心理安全並未如預期般展現調節作用。這結果突顯了悖論領導在促進工作創新方面的重要性，並顯示了心理安全感在不同產業與工作環境下可能存在的局限性。

As globalization and technological development progress, businesses are increasingly facing uncertainties and complex challenges. In such an environment, paradoxical leadership emerges as a critical strategy for leaders tasked with balancing contradictory perceptions and expectations to drive organizational innovation and growth. Paradoxical leadership demands not only high self-awareness and adaptability from leaders but also that they inspire their employees to actively participate in the innovation process.
This study aims to examine the effects of paradoxical leadership on subordinates' innovative work behaviors, specifically through the mediating role of employee voice and the moderating role of psychological safety. In today's environment of intense competition and rapid change, the importance of applying paradoxical leadership is emphasized. This leadership style contributes to organizational stability and flexibility, thereby enhancing adaptability and the capacity for innovative work.
The research analyzed 268 valid paired surveys from supervisors and subordinates in various Taiwanese companies, establishing a significant positive correlation between paradoxical leadership and subordinates’ innovative behaviors. The results revealed that employee voice serves as a mediator between paradoxical leadership and innovation, although psychological safety did not display the expected moderating effect. These findings emphasize the significance of paradoxical leadership in fostering innovation at the workplace and illustrate the potential constraints of psychological safety across different industries and work environments.

林文政（2019年2月號）。成為最佳矛盾領導人。哈佛商業評論。 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/18561/become-the-best-contradictory-leader
陳婉如(2020)。矛盾領導行為對創新行為與工作績效之影響。國立中央大學。
黃芳銘(2015)。結構方程模式-理論與應用。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98 . https://doi.org/10.6504%2fJOM.2006.23.01.05
羅勝強（2022年1月27日）。矛盾式領導的好處。香港中文大學商學院https://www.bschool.cuhk.edu.hk/chi/the-virtue-of-paradoxical-leadership/
Anderson, N.; Potonik, K.; Zhou, J. (2014).Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi:10.1177/0149206314527128
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (2002). "Assessing the work environment for creativity." Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
Batool, U., Raziq, M. M., & Sarwar, N. (2023). The paradox of paradoxical leadership: A multi-level conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 33(4), 100983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100983
Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (8th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/01/what-vuca-really-means-for-youBrowne
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual (Vol. 6). Encino, CA: Multivariate software.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational research methods, 8(3), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105278021
Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.004
Bledow, R., Rosing, K., & Frese, M. (2013). A Dynamic Perspective on Affect and Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0894
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ,1986 3-28), 2.D
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian journal of social psychology, 2(1), 21-41.
Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2010). "Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety." Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.932
Chen, MJ. (2002). Transcending Paradox: The Chinese “Middle Way” Perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016235517735
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and innovation management, 19(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Voice Theories: Taken-for-Granted Rules of Self-Censorship at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Sage publications.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage publications.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books, Inc.
Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032
Hernandez Bark, A. S., Escartín, J., Schuh, S. C., & Van Dick, R. (2016). Who Leads More and Why? A Mediation Model from Gender to Leadership Role Occupancy. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2642-0
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition, Pearson, New York.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Hirak, R., Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.009
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
Kahn, William A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi:10.5465/256287
Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176
Morgan, D., & Zeffane, R. (2003). Employee involvement, organizational change and trust in management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 55–75. doi:10.1080/09585190210158510
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. https://doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.574506
Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183–191. https://doi:10.1037/a0020744
M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Martins, E.C. and Terblanche, F.(2003), "Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation",European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456337
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education.
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
Neeley, T. (2021). The future of flexibility at work. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from
https://hbr.org/2021/09/the-future-of-flexibility-at-work
Nasser, F., & Takahashi, T. (2003). The Effect of Using Item Parcels on Ad Hoc Goodness-of-Fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Example Using Sarason’s Reactions to Tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1601_4
Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of management review, 14(4), 562-578. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308389
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. The Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
Schein, E. H. (1993). "On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning." Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 40-51.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
Sharma, P. N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2015). Leveraging Leaders: A Literature Review and Future Lines of Inquiry for Empowering Leadership Research. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 193–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115574906
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring Nonlinearity In Employee Voice: The Effects of Personal Control and Organizational Identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1189–1203. https://doi:10.5465/amj.2008.35732719
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity.Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902
Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32(5), 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
Vogel, R., & Masal, D. (2015). Public Leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1165–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.895031
Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of Fit in Overidentified Models with Latent Variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 118–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001005
Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to Be a Paradox-Savvy Leader. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0070
Yang, Y., Li, Z., Liang, L., & Zhang, X. (2021). Why and when paradoxical leader behavior impact employee creativity: Thriving at work and psychological safety. Current Psychology, 40(4), 1911–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0095-1
Zhang, W., Liao, S., Liao, J., & Zheng, Q. (2021). Paradoxical Leadership and Employee Task Performance: A Sense-Making Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 753116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753116
Zhang, M. J., Zhang, Y., & Law, K. S. (2022). Paradoxical Leadership and Innovation in Work Teams: The Multilevel Mediating Role of Ambidexterity and Leader Vision as a Boundary Condition. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1652–1679. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1265
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Paradoxical Leadership and Employee Voice: A Role-perception Perspective. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2023, No. 1, p. 14341). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.14341abstract
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., & Li, X.-B. (2015). Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0995