| 研究生: |
翊翎‧撒利尤 Cerita |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
導入發音輔具英語自由閱讀活動對於學生閱讀興趣及投入之影響 The Impact of Free English Reading with Digital Pen Support and Guided Reading Video Activity on Students’ Situational Interest (SI) and Engagement |
| 指導教授: | 劉晨鐘 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
資訊電機學院 - 網路學習科技研究所 Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 108 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 閱讀興趣 、閱讀投入 、心流 、英語閱讀 、科技輔具 、點讀筆 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | English reading, situational interest (SI), reading engagement, flow, assistive device, digital pen technology |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:12 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
處於不停學的世代,「閱讀」絕對是這世代的每一位所學習的知識方法,閱讀能力不只是自己本身的競爭能力,更是代表著國家競爭能力。然而,開發新穎有效的學習環境,提高學生的閱讀效率並增加他們的興趣,是第二語言發展的一個重要問題。本文探討學生的英語閱讀情境興趣,設計與學生程度能力相符的閱讀活動,針對不同程度的學生觸發更有效的英語閱讀興趣,有效提升學生閱讀興趣,讓學生愛上閱讀。
本研究擬透過設計研究法進行,實驗對象為臺灣桃園市某國小三年級共計76位的學生;實驗的時間為期兩個學期,實際進行的英語閱讀活動共計16週。兩個學期分別進行英語自由閱讀與導入發音輔具的英語自由閱讀活動,觀察學生從依照自己的興趣自由選書閱讀,進而到有發音輔助工具英語閱讀的過程中,其閱讀投入、閱讀情境興趣的變化。
研究結果顯示,實驗組在導入發音輔具的英語自由閱讀活動中,在閱讀活動整體閱讀心流上升並漸入佳境,除維持英語閱讀愉快的感覺、閱讀方式的活潑更觸發學生的興趣。然而,研究進一步發現,針對拼讀較弱或不敢發音的情形,學生透過發音輔具簡易功能可自己操作,依照自己的速度調整閱讀步調,運用指讀及跟讀的方式,重複聽取讀本內容有助於字母拼讀的練習,更能維持學生的注意力。
值得注意的是,口語閱讀流暢度是整體閱讀能力的一個指標。建議教育研究者及老師,在數位的學習環境中實施英語自由閱讀活動,善用可融合聽、說、讀閱讀模式的發音輔具,其靈活性、便攜性和熟悉度,學生可獲得即時幫助,包括口語閱讀示範、獨立指讀閱讀及看字讀音。藉此,學生利用豐富的數位功能,同時保持傳統筆和閱讀文本的自然互動,進行重複口語閱讀練習及閱讀發音練習,觸發更有效的英語閱讀興趣。目前的研究建議將更多的閱讀計劃應用於學校以鼓勵閱讀。建議進行更多研究,以實現閱讀的真正潛力及其對學習者閱讀興趣的影響。
In this era of lifelong learning, reading is one of our ways to acquire knowledge, so that reading power is not only personal competitiveness, representing national competitiveness. However, developing new and effective learning environment, improving students' reading efficiency and enhance their interest are important issues for development of second language. This paper explores students' situational interest (SI) in English reading, it designs reading activities that correspond to students' ability, triggers more effective English reading interests for students of different degrees, and effectively enhances students' interest in reading, so that students love reading.
The study is conducted, basis for design-based research, using free reading in English was conducted at a public elementary schoo in Taoyuan County, Taiwan with 76 Grade 3rd students who are all comprised three classes students. The experiment was comducted for 16 weeks. “free English reading” and “free English reading with assistive device” were implemented in two semesters separately, to observe the students' engagement in reading and the degree of improvement for reading interest.
The research found that the experimental group in reading engagement, interest in English reading showed significantly better than the control group. In the case of weak or afraid to pronounce, most importment, through pronunciation aids can operate on their own, according to their own pace to adjust the reading speed, repeated listening to the story books or bridging-books also helps the Phonics exercises, more able to maintain children's attention, and effectively enhance children's interest in reading.
Notably, sound out reading well is an indicator of overall reading capability. It is recommended that educational researchers and teachers carry out free English reading activities in a digital learning environment and make good use of pronunciation aids that can be integrated with listening, speaking and reading modes as well as the smart pen, therefore, provides practicability, flexibility, and portability. Meanwhile, children could exploit a smart pen to interact with paper-based reading story books getting assistance in time, such as sound out reading and independent fingerpoint-reading on word and sound out words with paper-based reading activities. Students take advantage of rich digital capabilities while maintaining the natural interaction of traditional pens and paper-based reading. The study recommends to apply more reading programmes into schools to impel reading. Undoubtedly, it also suggests carry on more research in order to become aware of the true potential of reading and its influence on learners’ situational interest.
中文文獻
王品卿. (2014). Web 2.0 英語學習活動之學生心流與學習動機歷程研究. 中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文, 1-121.
李秀萍. (2005). 加強背景知識教學提高外語閱讀能力. 延安教育學院學報, 19(4), 49-50.
李燕妮. (2007). 分享式閱讀教學對低年級學童閱讀理解能力及閱讀動機之影響。國立臺南大學,臺南市.
林青瑩. (2015). 指讀對學前幼兒識字量與閱讀流暢度之影響.
張文聰. (2017). 網路學習社群中社會網路、知識分享與投入之關聯. 中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文, 1-138.
教育部. (2017). 國教署臺灣參加PIRLS 2016成果發表106.12.05.
教育部. (2018). 2030雙語國家政策發展藍圖 行政院107年12月10日院授發綜字第
1070802190 號函頒
陳惠茹, &張鑑如. (2011). 指讀及文字討論之共讀方式對幼兒認字的影響. 教育心理學報, 43(2), 377-396.
楊偉琪. (2016). EFL 學習者口說策略使用及鷹架輔助: 個案研究. 2016. PhD Thesis.
羅貝珍. (2010). 應用點讀筆提升英語朗讀流暢度學習動機及學習滿意度研究. 政治大學圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-167.
劉加裕, & 林律君. (2016). 故事內含字母拼讀教學與直接字母拼讀教學對於台灣幼稚園學童音韻覺識發展與字彙學習的成效影響 (Doctoral dissertation).
鍾鎮城(主編). (2015). 第二語言習得與教學。台北:新學林。
英文文獻
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman. Inc. ED, 317, 950.
Afzali, K. (2013). The role of emotions in reading literary texts: Fact or fiction. The Iranian EFL Journal, 9(1), 412-426.
Akbari, H., Ghonsooly, B., Ghazanfari, M., & Shahriari, H. (2017). Attitude Toward Reading: L1 or L2 or Both. Sage Open, 7(3), 2158244017717303.
Al-Nafisah, K. (2011). Saudi EFL students’ reading interests. Journal of King Saud University-Languages and Translation, 23(1), 1-9.
Armstrong, T. (2003). Multiple intelligences of reading and writing: Making the words come alive. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Asgari, M., Ketabi, S., & Amirian, Z. (2019). Interest-Based Language Teaching: Enhancing Students' Interest and Achievement in L2 Reading. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(1), 61-75.
Bataineh, R. F., & Al-Barakat, A. A. (2005). The Reading Interests of Jordanian First-, Second and Third-Grade Pupils and the Obstacles Limiting these Interests. Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 6(03).
Blevins, W. (1997). Phonemic awareness activities for early reading success: Easy, playful activities that help prepare children for phonics instruction. Scholastic Inc..
Cavazos-Kottke, S. (2004). Very hungry readers: preliminary findings from an investigation into the reading preferences of gifted middle school boys.
Chen, C. M., Tan, C. C., & Lo, B. J. (2016). Facilitating English-language learners' oral reading fluency with digital pen technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 96-118.
Cho, K. S., & Krashen, S. D. (1994). Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids series: Adult ESL acquisition. Journal of reading, 37(8), 662-667.
Cho, K. S., & Krashen, S. (2001). Sustained silent reading experiences among Korean teachers of English as a foreign language: The effect of a single exposure to interesting, comprehensible reading. Reading Improvement, 38(4), 170-175.
Cho, K. S., & Krashen, S. (2019). Why don’t we take advantage of the power and pleasure of reading. Language and Language Teaching, 8(1), 15.
Coles, M., & Hall, C. (2002). Gendered readings: Learning from children’s reading choices. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(1), 96-108.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. J Nerv Ment Dis, 175, 526-536.
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play (25th Anniversary ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikzentmihaly, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (Vol. 1990). New York: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35-54). Springer, Dordrecht.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life (Basic Books, New York).
Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Day, R. R., Bamford, J., Renandya, W. A., Jacobs, G. M., & Yu, V. W. S. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. RELC Journal, 29(2), 187-191.
Elley, W. B., & Mangubhai, F. (1983). The impact of reading on second language learning. Reading research quarterly, 53-67.
Gambrell, L. B., Palmer, B. M., Codling, R. M., & Mazzoni, S. A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The reading teacher, 49(7), 518-533.
Gambell, T., & Hunter, D. (2000). Surveying gender differences in Canadian school literacy. Journal of curriculum studies, 32(5), 689-719.
Goctu, R. (2016). The Impact of Reading for Pleasure on Georgian University EFL Students' Reading Comprehension (IBSU Case). Online Submission, 1(2), 73-81.
Greenspan, S. I., & Benderly, B. L. (1997). The growth of the mind and the endangered origins of intelligence. Perseus Publishing.
Khairuddin, Z. (2013). A Study of Students' Reading Interests in a Second Language. International Education Studies, 6(11), 160-170.
Kirchhoff, C. (2013). L2 extensive reading and flow: Clarifying the relationship. Reading in a foreign language, 25(2), 192-212.
Kirby, J. R., Ball, A., Geier, B. K., Parrila, R., & Wade‐Woolley, L. (2011). The development of reading interest and its relation to reading ability. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(3), 263-280.
Krashen, S. (2005). Free voluntary reading: New research, applications, and controversies. Anthology series-Seameo regional language centre, 46(1).
Krashen, S. (2006). Free reading. School Library Journal, 52(9), 42-45.
Krashen, S. D. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use.
Lai, H. Y. T. (2013). The Motivation of Learners of English as a Foreign Language Revisited. International Education Studies, 6(10), 90-101.
Lin, D. T. A., Choo, L. B., & Pandian, A. (2012). Learners’ perceptions of sustained silent reading practices in tertiary classrooms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 266-274.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and psychological measurement, 70(4), 647-671.
Liu, C.-C., Cheng, Y.-B., & Huang, C.-W. (2011). The Effect of simulation games on the learning of computational problem solving. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1907-1918. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.002
Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2011). Reading picture books and learning science: Engaging young children with informational text. Theory Into Practice, 50(4), 269-276.
Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (1997). Extensive reading in English as a foreign language. System, 25(1), 91-102.
McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a US survey. Reading research quarterly, 47(3), 283-306.
McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading research quarterly, 934-956.
Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (1999). Changes in elementary school children's achievement goals for reading and writing: Results of a longitudinal and an intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 207-229.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 239-263). Springer, Dordrecht.
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510-519.
Rebeiro, K. L., & Polgar, J. M. (1999). Enabling occupational performance: Optimal experiences in therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(1), 14-22.
Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. The role of interest in learning and development, 26(3-4), 361-395.
Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication research, 19(5), 539-573.
Sénéchal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific studies of reading, 10(1), 59-87.
Samuels, J., Eaton, W. W., Bienvenu, O. J., Brown, C. H., Costa, P. T., & Nestadt, G. (2002). Prevalence and correlates of personality disorders in a community sample. The British journal of psychiatry, 180(6), 536-542.
Smith, Anne (2017) "The Only Reason I Read" and Other Apologies: A Roadmap for Increased Pleasure Reading in the High School. The Graduate Review, 2, 29-37.
Sun, J. C. Y., Kuo, C. Y., Hou, H. T., & Lin, Y. Y. (2017). Exploring learners’ sequential behavioral patterns, flow experience, and learning performance in an anti-phishing educational game. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 45-60.
Watkins, M. W., & Coffey, D. Y. (2004). Reading Motivation: Multidimensional and Indeterminate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 110.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J., Freedman-Doan, C., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Change in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of educational psychology, 89(3), 451.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of educational psychology, 89(3), 420.
Whitehurst G. J., Lonigan C. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to readers. In S. B. Neuman, D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research New York, Guilford Press (pp. 11–29)
Yopp, H. K. (1992). Developing phonemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 45(9), 696-703.