近年來，內隱追隨力是管理學領域中常被探討的議題，無論在領導者與追隨者之間的關係，領導者對追隨者的影響力，皆有許多的研究。本研究著重於在主管視角的內隱追隨力對晉升力評分產生影響進行探討，並且加入主管喜愛部屬、主管部屬交換關係及績效評估作為中介因子，進一步分析兩者之間的關係是否受到中介因子的影響。
本研究以臺灣企業主管部屬配對的方式進行問卷發放，蒐集有效樣本共 212 份，利用結構方程式分析，了解主管視角的內隱追隨力如何影響部屬的晉升力評分外，也探討了主管喜愛部屬、主管部屬交換關係和績效評估在兩者間扮演的角色。從回收的問卷中發現，內隱追隨力會影響主管喜愛部屬的程度和主管部屬交換關係，主管喜愛部屬的程度與主管部屬交換關係也會影響主管對部屬的績效評估，進而影響到部屬在主管心目中的晉升力評分，因此領導者的內隱追隨力對部屬的晉升力評分會產生的影響外，主管喜愛的部屬、主管部屬交換關係和績效評估，在內隱追隨力和晉升力評分之間具有中介效果。
最後，本研究亦針對研究結果提出討論，並對於學術貢獻、管理意涵，於研究限制與建議中也對未來內隱追隨領域的發展提供不同的研究方向。

Implicit followership has been a frequently discussed topic in the field of management. There are many studies on the relationship between leaders and followers and the influence of leaders on followers. The purpose of the research is to explore the impact of implicit followership on employee promotability from supervisor’s perspective. The mediating effects of leaders' liking of subordinates, leader-member exchange (LMX) relationships and supervisor’s performance evaluation scores are examined as well.
Data were collected by questionnaires, which were distributed in the form of matching supervisors and subordinates in Taiwan. A total of 212 valid samples were obtained. The study applied the method of structural equation modeling to test hypotheses. The results support the research model: implicit followership positively effects on leaders' liking of subordinates and also on leader-member exchange (LMX) relationships. Also as predicted, mediating effects of leaders' liking of subordinates, leader-member exchange (LMX) relationships and supervisor’s performance evaluation on the relationship between implicit followership and employee promotability were showed significantly.
Finally, based on the results, the study suggests that there are other research directions toward implicit followership for the future studies.

一、 中文部分
〔1〕 王弘鈺、李雲劍（2018），中國本土情境下內隱追隨的維度與量表開發—基於形成 性指標的維度構建方法。廈門大學學報:哲學社會科學版(1)，78-85。
〔2〕 林明村（2001），「直屬主管之差序格局對領導行為與領導效能影響之研究」，中山大學，碩士論文，民國90年。
〔3〕 俞志緯（2012），「任務性, 脈絡性及適應性績效對晉升力之影響」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國101年。
〔4〕 徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、黃敏萍（2002），華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為，本土心理學研究，(18)，51-94。
〔5〕 徐瑋伶（2004）：海峽兩岸企業主管之差序式領導：一項歷程性的分析。台灣大學 心理學研究所。
〔6〕 祝振兵、羅文豪（2017），中國組織情境下的內隱追隨:內容、結構與測量，江西社會科學，37(3)，235-244。
〔7〕 郭衍宏、蘭玲（2017），中國情境下內隱追隨理論的建構與測量，中國人力資源開發(7)，25-37。
〔8〕 張火燦（1992），因應環境變動技職人力重規劃—高職人力資源發展的省思，技術及職業教育雙月刊，40-44。
〔9〕 劉珮琪（2015），華人社會追隨力之概念初探，中央大學碩士論文。
 
二、 英文部分
〔1〕 Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
〔2〕 Blau, P. M. J. R. S. (1964). Social exchange theory. 3(2007), 62.
〔3〕 Bjugstad, K., Thach, E. C., Thompson, K. J., & Morris, A. (2006). A fresh look at followership: A model for matching followership and leadership styles. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7(3), 304.
〔4〕 Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & McGregor, R. J. T. l. q. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. 21(3), 543-562.
〔5〕 Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. J. J. o. E. S. P. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. 33(5), 541-560.
〔6〕 Cox Jr, T., & Nkomo, S. M. (1992). Candidate age as a factor in promotability ratings. Public Personnel Management, 21(2), 197-210.
〔7〕 Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., Haga, W. J. J. O. b., & performance, h. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. 13(1), 46-78.
〔8〕 De Pater, I. E., Van Vianen, A. E., Bechtoldt, M. N., & KLEHE, U. C. (2009). Employees' challenging job experiences and supervisors' evaluations of pormotability. Personnel psychology, 62(2), 297-325.
〔9〕 Dixon, G., & Westbrook, J. J. E. M. J. (2003). Followers revealed. 15(1), 19-26.
〔10〕 Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. J. J. o. a. p. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. 75(1), 51.
〔11〕 Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. J. A. o. m. J. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. 40(4), 988-1010.
〔12〕 Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. J. J. o. a. p. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. 89(2), 293.
〔13〕 Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. J. T. L. Q. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. 24(6), 858-881.
〔14〕 Feldman, A. G. J. J. o. m. b. (1986). Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (λ model) for motor control. 18(1), 17-54.
〔15〕 Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
〔16〕 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
〔17〕 Gao, P., & Wu, W. (2019). Effect of leaders’ implicit followership theory on subordinates’ career success. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 47(5), 1-14.
〔18〕 Gilbert, G. R., & Hyde, A. C. J. P. A. R. (1988). Followership and the federal worker. 962-968.
〔19〕 Gioia, D. A., Nag, R., & Corley, K. G. J. J. o. M. I. (2012). Visionary ambiguity and strategic change: The virtue of vagueness in launching major organizational change. 21(4), 364-375.
〔20〕 Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. Leadership frontiers, 143, 165.
〔21〕 Graen, G. B., Liden, R. C., & Hoel, W. J. J. o. a. p. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. 67(6), 868.
〔22〕 Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. J. R. i. o. b. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing.
〔23〕 Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. J. A. o. m. J. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. 33(1), 64-86.
〔24〕 Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (1993). Job performance attributions and career advancement prospects: An examination of gender and race effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(2), 273-297.
〔25〕 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed) Upper Saddle River.
〔26〕 Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. J. A. p. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. 51(5), 469.
〔27〕 Hollander, E. P. (1992). The essential interdependence of leadership and followership. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(2), 71-75.
〔28〕 James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 233-244.
〔29〕 Jussim, L. J. P. r. (1986). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. 93(4), 429.
〔30〕 Kay, D., Jones, F., Wyer, M., Fleisher, J., Salmon, R., Godfree, A., . . . Shore, R. J. T. l. (1994). Predicting likelihood of gastroenteritis from sea bathing: results from randomised exposure. 344(8927), 905-909.
〔31〕 Kleinsmith, S. L., & Everts-Rogers, S. J. S. A. (2000). The Art of Followership. 57(8), 35-38.
〔32〕 Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1990). The credibility factor: What followers expect from their leaders. Management Review, 79(1), 29-34.
〔33〕 Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of applied psychology, 78(4), 662.
〔34〕 Longenecker, C. O., & Fink, L. S. J. C. D. I. (2008). Key criteria in twenty‐first century management promotional decisions.
〔35〕 Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & Phillips, J. S. J. L. B. e. v. (1982). A theory of leadership categorization. 104, 121.
〔36〕 Lord, R. G., Maher, K. J. J. H. o. i., & psychology, o. (1991). Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology. 2, 1-62.
〔37〕 Lord, R. G. J. R. i. o. b. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations.
〔38〕 Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475.
〔39〕 Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
〔40〕 Notgrass, D. 2014. The relationship between followers’ perceived quality of relationship and preferred leadership style. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(7): 605-621.
〔41〕 Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric Theory, ed. New York McGraw.
〔42〕 Poole, P. P., Gioia, D. A., & Gray, B. J. T. J. o. A. B. S. (1989). Influence modes, schema change, and organizational transformation. 25(3), 271-289.
〔43〕 Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1994). Investigating the “glass ceiling” phenomenon: An empirical study of actual promotions to top management. Academy of management j
〔44〕 Reddin, W. J. (1970). Managerial effectiveness.
〔45〕 Robbins, T. L., & DeNisi, A. S. J. J. o. A. P. (1994). A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in performance evaluations. 79(3), 341.
〔46〕 Rosenbach, W. E., Pittman, T. S., & Potter III, E. H. J. C. i. i. l. (2012). What makes a follower. 77-87.
〔47〕 Rosenthal, R. (1993). Interpersonal expectations: Some antecedents and some consequences. Interpersonal expectations: Theory, research, and applications, 3-24.
〔48〕 Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. J. T. u. r. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. 3(1), 16-20.
〔49〕 Snead, K. B. (2013). Contextual Constraints: An Examination of Implicit Followership Theories.
〔50〕 Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543-554.
〔51〕 Sy, T. (2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 73-84.
〔52〕 Thacker, R. A. (1999). Perceptions of trust, upward influence tactics, and performance ratings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(3_suppl), 1059-1070.
〔53〕 Turner, R. H. (1960). Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system. American Sociological Review, 855-867.
〔54〕 Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of applied psychology, 85(4), 526.
〔55〕 Wang, H., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. J. T. I. J. o. H. R. M. (2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: An empirical study in the Chinese context. 19(10), 1809-1824.
〔56〕 Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of applied psychology, 75(5), 487.
〔57〕 Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Graf, I. K., & Ferris, G. R. (1997). The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 979-1006.
〔58〕 Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3): Sage.
〔59〕 Whiteley, P., Sy, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders' conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The leadership quarterly, 23(5), 822-834.