跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 宋正雄
Cheng-Hsiung Sung
論文名稱: 選擇權實證研究-以S&P500指數選擇權為例
Empirical Derivative Research:Evidence from S&P500 Index Options
指導教授: 張森林
San-Lin Chung
陳建中
Chien-chung Chen
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融學系
Department of Finance
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 56
中文關鍵詞: 隱含分配微笑波幅峰態係數波動性偏態係數
外文關鍵詞: implied distribution, VIX, skewness, volatility smile, kurtosis
相關次數: 點閱:9下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究利用Jarrow-Rudd模型獲得每天股價報酬分配隱含的波動性、偏態係數、 峰態係數。因為這些參數隱含著某些資訊在其中,因此我們將利用這些參數進行一連串的實證研究。從我們的實證結果,我們可以得知:(1) 我們延伸Bakshi、Kapadia和Madan的研究,加以探討隱含偏態係數、峰態係數對波動性微笑曲線的曲度的影響。我們發現隱含偏態係數及峰態係數的確在解釋波動性微笑曲線上有其解釋力。我們的實證結果也驗證了Zhang的數學推論:微笑曲線的斜率相關於隱含偏態係數,而曲度則相關於隱含峰態係數。(2) 從JR模型計算出來的隱含波動性是未來波動性的一個偏誤估計值,但是它仍然包含有預測未來波動性的資訊。(3) 隱含偏態係數包含市場情緒的特性在其中。投資者愈樂觀,則隱含偏態係數愈正。(4) 隱含偏態係數、隱含峰態係數及IIS指標對報酬皆有其解釋力。另外,當報酬率是正的情況時,VIX的正向變動愈大,則投資者愈感到樂觀。相反的,當報酬率是負的情況,VIX的正向變動愈大,則投資者是其為一個不好的現象,會愈悲觀。(5) 我們試圖利用隱含波動性、隱含偏態係數、隱含峰態係數來建立一個新的投資者恐懼衡量指標。新的指標的確有其衡量恐懼的效果存在,但是相對於VIX的效果而言,仍然是比較差的。


    This paper uses the Jarrow and Rudd model (1982) to obtain implied volatility, implied skewness, and implied kurtosis. Then we use these implied parameters to do a series of empirical test. From our empirical results, we can obtain some conclusions. First, we extend Bakshi, Kapadia, and Madan’s research (2003) .We find that implied skewness and implied kurtosis have explanatory power for the slope and the curvature of smile. Our empirical results also verify Zhang’s conclusions (2004): the slope is related with risk-neutral skewness, and the curvature is related with risk-neutral kurtosis. Second, the implied volatility from the Jarrow and Rudd model is a biased estimator of the future volatility, but the implied volatility still contains information in forecasting the future volatility. Third, implied skewness contains the effect of market sentiment. The more optimistic the investors are, the more positive the skewness is. Fourth, implied skewness, implied kurtosis, and IIS (Investors intelligence sentiment survey) have effects on explaining the return. When the return is positive, the result shows the larger the positive change of the VIX is, the more optimistic the investors are. On the contrary, when the return is negative, the result shows the larger the positive change of the VIX is, the more pessimistic the investors are. Finally, we utilize implied volatility, implied skewness, and implied kurtosis to construct a new fear gauge index. The new index indeed has certain effect on measuring the level of the investors’ fear.

    Abstract…………………………………………………………………..Ⅰ List of Tables……………………………………………………………..Ⅳ List of Figures…………………………………………………………….Ⅴ 一、 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….1 二、 Literature Review………..……………………………………………………….3 2.1 Alternative option pricing models………………………………....3 2.2 Volatility, Skewness, and Kurtosis………………………………...4 2.3 Behavior Finance ………………………………………………….6 三、 Data and Method…………………………………………………..…...8 3.1 Data …………………………………………………………………..8 3.2 Jarrow and Rudd Model…………………………………………...10 3.3 Parameters estimation……………………………………………..12 3.4 Construct 30-days ISD , ISK ,and ISK……………………………....13 四、 Performance…………………………………………………………….15 4.1 The characteristics of implied parameters……………………….…...15 4.2 Volatility smile, implied skewness, and implied kurtosis……..……22 4.3 The relationship between implied and realized volatility……..……28 4.4 Does skewness contain the effect of market sentiment? …………….30 4.5 The relationship between the return and various factors……….……33 4.6 Construct a new fear gauge index……………………………….……48 五、 Conclusion………………………………………………………………53 Reference…………………………………………………………………..54

    Äijö, J., 2003, Determinants of the volatility smile, the 2003 Multinational Finance Society Conference, Montreal
    Anagnou, I., M. Bedendo, S. Hodges, and R. Tompkins, 2002, The relation between implied and realized probability density functions, Working paper.
    Baker, M., and J. Wurgler, 2003, Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns, Working paper.
    Bakshi, G., C. Cao, and Z. Chen, 1997, Empirical performance of alternative option pricing model, Journal of Finance, 52, 2003-2049.
    Bakshi, G., N. Kapadia, and D. Madan, , 2003, Stock Return Characteristics, Skew Laws, and the Differential Pricing of Individual Equity Options, Review of Financial Studies, 16,101-143.
    Bakshi, G., and C. Cao, 2003, Risk-neutral kurtosis, jumps, and option pricing: evidence from 100 most actively traded firms on the CBOE, Working paper.
    Bliss, R. R. and N. Panigirtzoglou, 2003, Option-implied risk aversion estimates, Working paper.
    Bookstaber, R. M. and J. B. Macdonald, 1987, A general distribution for describing security price returns, Journal of Business, 60, 401-424.
    Brown, D. P., and J. C. Jackwerth, 2001, The pricing kernel puzzle: Reconciling index option data and economic theory, Working paper.
    Cao, C., H. Li, and F. Yu, 2001, Is investor misreaction economically significant? Evidence from S&P 500 LEAPS, Working paper.
    Chen, R. R., and O. Palmon, 2002, An empirical-distribution-based option pricing model: a solution to the volatility smile puzzle, Working paper.
    Chen, N. F., R. Roll, and S. A. Ross, 1986, Economic forces and the stock market, Journal of Business, 59, 383-403.
    Corrado, C. J., and T. Su, 1997, Implied volatility skews and stock index skewness and kurtosis implied by S&P 500 index option prices, Journal of Derivatives, 4, 8-19.
    Corrado, C. J., and T. Su, 1997, Implied volatility skews and stock return skewness and kurtosis implied by stock option prices, The European Journal of Finance, 3, 73-85.
    Dennis, P., and S. Mayhew, 2000, Implied volatility smiles: Evidence from options on individual equities, Working paper.
    Dennis, P., and S. Mayhew, 2002, Risk-Neutral Skewness: Evidence from Stock Options, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 471-493.
    Dumas, B., J. Fleming, and R. E. Whaley, 1998, Implied volatility functions: Empirical tests, Journal of Finance, 53, 2059-2106.
    Fleming, J., C. Kirby, and B. Ostdiek, 1998, Information and volatility linkages in the stock, bond, and money markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 111-137.
    Hull, J., and W. Suo, 2001, A methodology for assessing model risk and its application to the implied volatility function model, Working paper.
    Hull, J. C., 2003, Options, Futures, and Other Derivative Securities, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Jackwerth, J., 1999, Option-implied risk-neutral distributions and implied binomial trees: a literature review, Journal of Derivatives, 7, 66-82.
    Jackwerth, J., 1997, Generalized binomial trees, Journal of Derivatives, 5, 7-17.
    Jackwerth, J. C., and M. Rubinstein, 2001, Recovering stochastic processes from option prices, Working paper.
    Jarrow, R., and A. Rudd, 1982, Approximate option valuation for arbitrary stochastic processes, Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 347-369.
    Lee, C. M. C., and A. Shleifer, and R. H. Thaler, 1991, Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle, Journal of Finance, 46, 75-108.
    Lee, W. Y., C. X. Jiang, and D. C. Indro, 2002, Stock market volatility, excess returns, and the role of investor sentiment, Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 2277-2299.
    Lu, C. Y., 2003, The information content of TAIEX options implied volatility index, Working paper.
    Peña, I., G. Rubio, and G. Serna, 1999, Why do we smile? On the determinants of the implied volatility function, Journal of Banking & Finance, 23, 1151-1179.
    Penttinen, A., 2001, The sensitivity of implied volatility to expectations of jumps in volatility: an explanation for the illusory bias in implied volatility as a forecast, Working paper.
    Poteshman, A. M., 2001, Underreaction, overreaction, and increasing misreaction to information in the options market, Journal of Finance, 56, 851-876.
    Rosenberg, J. V., 2000, Implied volatility functions: a reprise, Journal of Derivatives, 8, 51-64.
    Rubinstein, M., 1994, Implied binomial trees, Journal of Finance, 69, 771-818.
    Serna, G., 2001, On The Information Content of Volatility, Skewness and Kurtosis Implied in Option Prices, Working paper.
    Shu, J., and J. E. Zhang, 2003, The Relationship Between Implied and Realized Volatility of S&P 500 Index, Wilmott magazine, January, 83-91.
    Whaley, R. E., 2000, The investor fear gauge, Institutional investor, Spring 2000.
    Zhang, J. E., 2004, Implied volatility smirk, Working paper.

    QR CODE
    :::