| 研究生: |
黃輝彬 Hui-Ping Huang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
台灣配電盤製造業流程再造之探討─以個案G公司為例 |
| 指導教授: |
李小梅
none |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階主管企管碩士班 Executive MBA Program |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 88 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 流程再造 、績效分析 、專業分工 、配電盤產業 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Business process reengineering, Analysis of performance, Specialization of work, Industry of distribution pannel board |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:4 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來,配電盤產業存在許多挑戰與發展的不確定因素,主要是因為國內投資市場的低迷,連帶影響用電需求,使得原先萎縮的內需市場,競爭更加的激烈。面臨這項挑戰,企業無不思考從中尋求任何機會,以提升自身的競爭優勢。配電盤產業中的高度客製化,在傳統中被視為產業競爭優勢的特點,如今卻視為發展競爭優勢與改善流程的一大阻礙。
本研究的主題為配電盤產業運用企業流程再造的方式,提升自身的經營績效,以達到永續經營的目標。本研究回顧了學者們對於企業流程再造的定義,從中找出其相同特點,藉由深入分析個案G公司的發展現況與其生產作業流程,運用Michael Hammer (1993)所提出的流程再造管理方法,遵循Grover (1995)的三項再造原則,將核心的生產製造流程,透過診斷流程、重新改造流程,完成生產線上的標準化、專業分工,將生產線上的操作技術需求門檻降低,使得產線對於市場需求反應更加快速,達成縮短了客戶訂單交期的企業目標,並且使得企業營收有大幅度的增加,在競爭激烈的市場中佔有一席之地。
本研究針對個案G公司流程再造後,提出相對應的建議,管理者必須更謹慎的評估新流程所帶來的績效,並且不斷追蹤改善。對於部門衝突建議設立企業內部控制部門,進行整體企業人員的訓練,以利新流程的導入。此外,本研究因採用個案研究方法,使得研究結果並不能夠完全適用於其他情況,未來希望能夠利用量化的方式,將研究結果產生出更高適用性的管理方法,以便其他產業能夠參考運用。
There are a variety of uncertainties about the challenge and development existing in the industry of distribution pannel board in recent years, mainly because of the sluggish domestic investment market, which reduces the demands for electricity, making the competition in the already shrinking domestic market even more intense. In the face of this challenge, enterprises invariably think about how to seek any opportunity to improve their own competitive advantages. Once regarded as the highlight in the traditional competition, the high degree of customization is now seen as a big obstacle to the development of competitive advantage and improvement of process.
The theme of this study is how the industry of distribution panel board adopts the business process reengineering to improve the business performance and achieve the goal of sustainable operation. This study reviewed the definition of business process reengineering made by scholars, and found out the characteristics in common. In this study, the development of G company and its production process are analyzed deeply, the method of business process reengineering proposed by Michael Hammer (1993) is adopted, and the three principles of reengineering proposed by Grover (1995) are abided by, in order to implement the standardization and specialization of work into the core production process through the diagnostic process and reengineering process, thus lowering the threshold of handling techniques requirement in the production line. By doing so, the production line can respond faster to the market demands, which helps the enterprise achieve the goal of shortening the delivery of customers’ order, dramatically lifting the enterprise’s revenue, and winning a place on the intensely-competed market.
The study, targeted at the business process reengineering carried out by G company, put forwards the corresponding suggestions. The management must evaluate the effects brought up by the new process more carefully, and continue to seek improvement. For the conflict within the department, the study suggests the set-up of internal control department responsible for training employees in the enterprise to facilitate the import of new process. Besides, the results of this study fail to completely apply to other situations, because the study adopts the method of case study. The use of quantitative method is expected to be employed in the future, in order to make the research results yield highly applicable methods of management, so as to provide reference for other industries.
一、 中文部分
1. 吳萬益與吳志正,(1996)。臺美日企業在臺灣及大陸企業經營環境及競爭策略之研究。
2. 林琇雯,(2014)。企業流程再造與成熟度模型–以某ICT公司產品資料部為例。國立臺灣科技大學工業管理系碩士論文,台北市。
3. 邱孟秋,(2013)。公營機構物料管理流程再造之研究。東海大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文,台中市。
4. 范明中,(2003)。高科技產業核心資源,技術策略與經營績效之實證研究-以台灣通訊產業為例。淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,新北市。
5. 張峻源,(2013)。網路商店配送流程再造之研究-以台灣某大3C公司為例。輔仁大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,新北市。
6. 陳玄斐,(2014)。應用全面生產管理推動企業流程再造之研究 以某工具機製造廠為例~~以某工具機製造廠為例 ~。國立中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班碩士論文,台中市。
7. 黃仁澤,(2017)。模具業企業流程再造。逢甲大學經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,台中市。
8. 黃栗秋,(2012)。工程物料管理及流程再造之研究-以A個案公司為例。逢甲大學經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,台中市。
9. 葉蔭晟,(2017)。企業流程改造與大量客製化的效益探討─以G公司為例。國立中央大學高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文,桃園市。
10. 劉柏妤,(2011)。內部行銷,組織承諾,工作投入,及工作滿意對工作績效之影響-以台灣老人服務機構為例。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文,花蓮市.
11. 蔡妮芸,(2014)。中小企業流程再造之研究-以企業資源規劃系統建置為例。國立高雄應用科技大學工業工程與管理系碩士班碩士論文,高雄市。
12. 謝秀英,(2010)。企業流程改造過程與效益探討:以A公司為例。國立中央大學高階主管企管碩士班論文,桃園市。
13. 顏宸翔,(2012)。中小企業流程再造模式研究-以Y公司為例。逢甲大學國際經營管理碩士學位學程碩士論文,台中市。
14. 曠合芳,(2012)。由交易成本觀點探討自行車產業之供應鏈流程再造-以中部OEM自行車廠為例。東海大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,台中市。
15. 蘇呈顯,(2013)。流程再造運用於醫療與照護機構之研究-以中部地區某醫療照護機構為例。東海大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文,台中市。
二、 英文部分
1. Carroll, S. J., & Schneier, C. E. (1982). Performance appraisal and review systems: The identification, measurement and development of performance in organizations. Scott, Foresman.
2. Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign.
3. Davenport, T. H., & Stoddard, D. B. (1994). Reengineering: business change of mythic proportions?. MIS quarterly, 121-127.
4. Duquette, D. J., & Stowe, A. M. (1993). A performance measurement model for the office of inspector general. The Journal of Government Financial Management, 42(2), 27.
5. Earl, M., & Khan, B. (1994). How new is business process redesign?. European Management Journal, 12(1), 20-30.
6. Fenwick, I., & Amine, L. (1979). Export performance and export policy: evidence from the UK clothing industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30(8), 747-754.
7. Fried, L. (1991). A blueprint for change. Computerworld, 25(48), 91-5.
8. Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: don't automate, obliterate. Harvard business review, 68(4), 104-112.
9. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Business process reengineering. London: Nicholas Brealey, 444.
10. Johansson, H. J., McHugh, P., Pendlebury, A. J., & Wheeler, W. A. (1993). Business process reengineering: Breakpoint strategies for market dominance. Chichester: Wiley.
11. Kettinger, W. J., & Grover, V. (1995). Special section: toward a theory of business process change management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 9-30.
12. Klein, M. M. (1994). REENGINEERING METHODOLOGIES AND TOOLS A Prescription for Enhancing Success. Information system management, 11(2), 30-35.
13. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
14. Morrow, M., & Hazell, M. (1992). Activity mapping for business process redesign. Management Accounting, 70(2), 36-38.
15. Moskal, B. S. (1996). Reengineering without downsizing. Industry Week/IW, 245(4), 23-25.
16. Platt, H. D., & Platt, M. B. (1990). Development of a class of stable predictive variables: the case of bankruptcy prediction. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(1), 31-51.
17. Senn, J. (1991). Reshaping business processes through reengineering. SIM Network, 2, 4-7.
18. Stanton, S., Hammer, M., & Power, B. (1993). Reengineering: getting everyone on board. IT Magazine, 25(4), 22-27.
19. Steers, R. M. (1975). Problems in the measurement of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 546-558.
20. Szilagyi, A. D., & Wallace, M. J. (1983). Organizational behavior and performance. Good Year Books.
21. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of management review, 11(4), 801-814.