由於人類活動量不斷增加，使全球暖化情形日漸嚴重，造成世界各地氣候異常，使得近年來節能減碳意識高漲，亦開始重視改善環境惡化之問題。營建工程所產生之碳排放量一直是臺灣總碳排放量的主要部分之一，故政府持續針對不同工程推動節能減碳計畫，環保署於2015年通過「溫室氣體減量及管理法」，成為台灣第一個與氣候變遷相關之法律，以期降低施工過程中之碳排放量。為了使碳排放量計算效率提升，本研究以堤岸工程為對象，運用知識本體建模技術清楚呈現堤岸工程內各工項之碳排放量，輔助設計人員進行碳排放量推估。經分析堤岸工程案例後，將作業項目及資源項目兩大項作為知識本體的類別，分析各項機具、材料的規格、用量及碳排放係數，並使用SWRL及SQWRL推理規則建立碳排放計算規則。建立完的知識本體模型包含堤岸工程碳排放表示架構及碳排放計算推理規則，讓使用者僅需輸入作業用量即可計算工程總碳排放量。透過案例測試以及與過往碳排放計算方法進行比較，結果顯示本研究之方法雖然對於初次使用者需花時間學習，但相較其他方法，後續使用將可提升設計人員之計算效率；此外，此模式將可快速套用至其他類似工程，以降低設計階段對於排放評估所需時間。

Due to the increasing amount of human activities, global warming is becoming more and more serious, further causing climate abnormalities around the world, heightening awareness of energy saving and carbon reduction, and making people pay attention to improve environmental degradation. The carbon emissions generated by construction projects have always been one of the main parts of Taiwan ’s total carbon emissions, so the government continues to promote energy conservation and carbon reduction plans for different projects. The Environmental Protection Agency passed the “Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Law”in 2015, the first law related to climate change in Taiwan, with a view to reduce carbon emissions during construction.
In order to improve the calculation efficiency of carbon emissions, this study takes an embankment project as the object, and applies ontological modeling technique to clearly present the carbon emissions of various work items in the embankment project for assisting designers in estimating the carbon emissions. After analyzing the embankment project case, classifications for activity and the resource items are developed in an ontology; the specifications, quantities and carbon emission coefficients of each machinery and material are then represented as class properties, and the carbon emission calculation rules are defined using SWRL and SQWRL inference rules. The built ontology model includes a carbon emission representation framework and carbon emission calculation inference rules for the embankment project, so that users only need to input the quantity of an operation to calculate the total carbon emission of a project. This model can be quickly applied to other similar projects and can be reduced the time required for the emission assessment at the design stage can be reduced.Testing and comparing with the time required for past carbon emissions calculations, proceeding to actually combine carbon emissions with the problems faced by ontology. The results show that although the method of this study takes time for first-time users to learn, compared with other methods, the use of it will improve the designer's computing efficiency.

[1]行政院環境保護署. (2018), 中華民國溫室氣體國家報告,
[2]行政院環境保護署. (2019). 節能減碳政策. from https://www.epa.gov.tw/Page/9AF4E3B600088167
[3]蘇玫心, 陳曼栖, 蕭怡珍, 蔣啟恆, 湯允中, 許肇安, . . . 曾大展（2016）。道路工程碳足跡管理與水足跡發展趨勢，頁 16。
[4]ISO. (2006a), ISO14064 產品標準含環境考量面之指引, ISO.
[5]ISO. (2006b), ISO14064-1 溫室氣體－第1 部：組織層級溫室氣體排放與移除之量化及報告附指引之規範, ISO.
[6]ISO. (2006c), ISO14064-2 溫室氣體─ 第2部： 計畫層級溫室氣體排放減量或移除增量之量化、監督及報告附指引之規範, ISO.
[7]ISO. (2006d), ISO14064-3溫室氣體－第3 部：溫室氣體主張之確證與查證附指引之規範, ISO.
[8]ISO. (2018), ISO14067溫室氣體-產品之碳足跡量化要求及指引, ISO.
[9]鄭仲凱. (2018), 新版ISO 14067:2018碳足跡國際標準解析, 鄭仲凱.
[10]BSI. (2011), PAS2050:2011,Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services, BSI.
[11]Institution, B. S. (2011). PAS 2050:2011: Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services: BSI.
[12]ISO. (2006e), ISO14025 環境標誌與宣告-第3 類環境宣告原則與程序, ISO.
[13]ISO. (2006f), ISO14040 環境管理-生命週期評估-原則與架構, ISO.
[14]ISO. (2006g), ISO14044 環境管理-生命週期評估-要求事項與指導綱要, ISO.
[15]行政院環境保護署. (2010), 產品與服務碳足跡計算指引, 行政院環境保護署.
[16]行政院環境保護署. (2016), 產品與服務碳足跡查證技術指引, 行政院環境保護署.
[17]Tung, H., Cédric, D., Ventura, A., Jullien, A., & Gilles, L. (2010). “A global tool for environmental assessment of roads–Application to transport for road building.”
[18]AsianDevelopmentBank. (2010). “Methodology for estimating carbon footprint of road projects–case study: India.” 33.
[19]Kawakami, A., Nitta, H., Kanou, T., & Kubo, K. (2009). “STUDY ON CO 2 EMISSIONS OF PAVEMENT RECYCLING METHODS.”
[20]交通部運輸研究所. (2012), 交通運輸工程碳排放量推估模式建立與效益分析之研究, (9789860326352). 交通部運輸研究所.
[21]Sightline Institute. (2007). “Increases in greenhouse-gas emissions from highway-widening projects.”.
[22]洪子賀（2015），「運用電腦模擬輔助施工碳盤查作業之研究-以混凝土坡面工為例」，國立中央大學營建管理研究所，桃園縣，碩士論文。
[23]范智豪（2016），「以工項組合進行工程碳推估之研究-以河川堤岸工程為例」，國立中央大學營建管理研究所，桃園縣，碩士論文。
[24]張又升（2002），「建築物生命週期二氧化碳減量評估」，國立成功大學建築學系碩博士班，台南市，博士論文。
[25]曾正雄（2006），「公寓住宅設備管線二氧化碳排放量評估」，國立成功大學建築學系專班，台南市，碩士論文。
[26]陳新欣（2007），「辦公大樓設備管線二氧化碳排放量評估」，國立成功大學建築學系專班，台南市，碩士論文。
[27]楊典樵（2010），「柔性路面工程之二氧化碳排放量評估」，逢甲大學土木工程所，台中市，碩士論文。
[28]Airaksinen, M., & Matilainen, P. (2011). “A Carbon Footprint of an Office Building.” Energies, 4.
[29]Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, D. (2017). “Estimation and uncertainty analysis on carbon dioxide emissions from construction phase of real highway projects in China.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 337-346.
[30]Zhang, Y., Yan, D., Hu, S., & Guo, S. (2019). “Modelling of energy consumption and carbon emission from the building construction sector in China, a process-based LCA approach.” Energy Policy, 134, 110949.
[31]Sowa, J. (2000). Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations.
[32]Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T., & Swartout, W. (1991). “Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing.” AI Magazine, 12, 36-56.
[33]Hendler, J. (2001). “Agents and the Semantic Web.” Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 16, 30-37.
[34]Gruber, T. R. (1993). “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.” Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.
[35]Noy, N., & McGuinness, D. (2001). “Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology.” Knowledge Systems Laboratory, 32.
[36]林群貿（2009），「以正規概念分析為基礎之本體論自動擴展機制」，國立成功大學工程科學系碩博士班，台南市，碩士論文。
[37]Chen, H., Finin, T., & Joshi, A. (2003). Using OWL in a Pervasive Computing Broker.
[38]McGuinness, D., L, D., Harmelen, F., & Frank. (2004). “OWL Web Ontology Language---Overview.”
[39]Group, W. C. O. W. (2012). “OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview.”
[40]Gennari, J. H., Musen, M. A., Fergerson, R. W., Grosso, W. E., Crubézy, M., Eriksson, H., . . . Tu, S. W. (2003). “The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(1), 89-123.
[41]趙敏慧（2017），「營造業職災特性關聯性分析與知識庫建立之研究」，國立中央大學營建管理研究所，桃園縣，碩士論文。
[42]羅明杰（2014），「應用知識本體技術協助建築專案單價分析作業之研究」，國立中央大學營建管理研究所，桃園縣，碩士論文。
[43]O'Connor, M. (2019). SWRLLanguageFAQ. from https://github.com/protegeproject/swrlapi/wiki/SWRLLanguageFAQ#wiki-pages-box
[44]O'Connor, M., & Das, A. (2009). SQWRL: a query language for OWL.
[45]Guarino, N. (1998). Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the First International Conference (FOIS'98), June 6-8, Trento, Italy: IOS Press.
[46]陳奕璋（2017），「應用Ontology/SWRL於住商大樓節電知識建立與推論」，國立中央大學土木工程學系，桃園縣，碩士論文。
[47]劉展元（2017），「結合建築資訊模型與本體論推論設施災害影響與應用」，國立中央大學土木工程學系，桃園縣，碩士論文。
[48]彭俞翔（2018），「結合建築資訊模型與知識本體建模技術 輔助消防安全設備審查之研究」，國立中央大學營建管理研究所，桃園縣，碩士論文。
[49]Zhou, Z., Goh Yang, M., & Shen, L. (2016). “Overview and Analysis of Ontology Studies Supporting Development of the Construction Industry.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(6), 04016026.
[50]Liu, K., & El-Gohary, N. (2016). “Ontology-based Sequence Labelling for Automated Information Extraction for Supporting Bridge Data Analytics.” Procedia Engineering, 145, 504-510.
[51]Ma, Z., Liu, Z., & Wei, Z. (2016). “Formalized Representation of Specifications for Construction Cost Estimation by Using Ontology.” 31, 4-17.
[52]Bilgin, G., Dikmen, I., & Birgonul, M. T. (2018). “An ontology-based approach for delay analysis in construction.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(2), 384-398.
[53]經濟部水利署. (2019), 水利工程工資工率分析手冊第四版,
[54]丁冠博（2013），「應用Ontology/Protégé/SWRL於建築資訊模型上進行推論」，國立中央大學土木工程學系，桃園縣，碩士論文。