| 研究生: |
蔡雅惠 Ya-Hui Tsai |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
基樁承受側向荷載後之表面摩擦特性 Friction Characteristics of Surface after The Lateral Load Applied on The Pile |
| 指導教授: |
張惠文
Huei-Wen Chang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 92 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 側向荷載 、定體積摩擦試驗 、過壓密比 、樁-土界面 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | lateral load, constant volume friction test, overconsolidation ratio, pile-soil interface |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:15 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
基樁廣見於各項工程中,藉由樁身之摩擦力與樁尖的支承力,將上部結構物之荷重傳遞到深層較堅硬之土層或岩盤上,而樁身摩擦力之多寡與其所承受之側向大小有關。本研究主要利用改良式直接剪力試驗儀,進行樁-土界面之定體積摩擦試驗,且在試驗中改變預壓密壓力與過壓密比等因素,以探討基樁承受側向荷載後之表面摩擦特性。
試驗結果顯示剪動過程中,樁-土界面之有效正應力、摩擦比、有效應力路徑均受過壓密比影響。當土壤之過壓密比愈大,樁-土界面之有效正應力隨著界面滑動位移之增加而增加的量愈多。在不相同預壓密壓力但相同過壓密比之情況下,所得之摩擦比曲線趨近於ㄧ條曲線。然而樁-土界面之極限摩擦比則隨過壓密比之增加而增加。經由反覆加壓與解壓應力變化之試驗結果,可知反覆加壓與解壓應力變化之次數對樁-土界面之摩擦性質影響不明顯。根據定體積摩擦試驗與分析結果,本研究以過壓密比為參數,建立破壞前之摩擦比與界面滑動位移之關係曲線。
Pile foundation is very popular seen in various constructions. It transmits load from the superstructure by means of friction force around pile and bearing capacity of the pile tip to stiffer soil or rock bed in deeper stratum. However, the magnitude of friction force around pile foundation is related to the lateral load which was exerted by pile foundation. This study carried out a series of constant volume friction tests of pile-soil interface by means of a modified direct shear apparatus. By changing preconsolidation pressures and overconsolidation ratios in this study, it was possible to investigate the frictional characteristics of surface after the lateral load applied on the pile.
The results exhibited that the overconsolidation ratio affected effective normal stress, friction ratio, and effective stress path when shearing. If the overconsolidation ratio of soil was higher, the increasing of effective normal stress due to the increasing of sliding displacement of interface got higher. The friction ratio curves of pile-soil interface under different preconsolidation pressures but the same overconsolidation ratio exerted on the soil approximate to a similar curve. The ultimate friction ratio of pile-soil interface increased with the overconsolidation ratio. From the results of cyclic loading and unloading tests, they showed that the frequency of cyclic loading and unloading did not affect the frictional characteristics of pile-soil interface obviously. According to the analysis results of constant volume friction tests, the relationship between the friction ratio curve before failure and overconsolidation ratio is established for the behavior of surface friction.
1.內政部營建署,「建築技術規則建築構造編基礎構造設計規範」(1989)。
2.王慶國,「鋼樁表面摩擦力之研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢(1991)。
3.林杏性,「黏性土壤與不同材質基樁間之摩擦特性」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工 程學系,中壢(1992)。
4.秦中天、鄭在仁與劉泉枝,「台北沉泥之不排水剪力強度與過壓密比之關係」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第ㄧ卷,第三期,第245-250頁(1989)。
5.秦中天與蕭仲光,「海域基樁在黏土中之摩擦力」,地工技術雜誌,第34期,第26-39頁(1991)。
6.陳國隆,「黏性土壤與樁材間之長期抗拔特性」,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢(1990)。
7.張惠文與廖新興,「時間效應對對正常壓密飽和黏土受剪膨脹特性之影響響」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第二卷,第一期,第89-93頁(1990)。
8.張惠文、廖新興與陳國隆,「黏性土壤與鋼材間之摩擦特性」,中華民國第十屆全國力學會議,中壢,第841-850頁(1990)。
9.黃崇仁,「黏性土層中基樁之抗拔特性」碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢(1989)。
10.楊孟霖,「台北砂土樁土介面摩擦行為之研究」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程技術研究所,台北(1998)。
11.廖新興,「黏性土壤中鑽掘樁之摩擦性質」,博士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢(1995)。
12.廖文彬,「由模型樁試驗探討砂土層中軸向基樁摩擦行為」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程技術研究所,台北(1999)。
13.盧玉璜,「黏性土層中基樁之摩擦行為」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢(1993)。
14.謝宏偉,「黏性土壤中模型鋼樁之摩擦特性」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,中壢(1990)。
15.簡弘雨,「NGI單剪試驗下重模黏土之剪力強度研究」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程技術研究所,台北(1995)。
16.Anderson, W. F., “Effective Stress on Shaft of Bored and Cast-in site Pile in Clays,” Proceeding of the First International Geotechnical Seminar on Deep Foundations on Bored and Auger Piles, Edited by W. F. Van Impe, pp.387-394(1988).
17.Azzouz, A. S., Baligh, M. M. and Whittle, A. J., “Shaft Resistance of Pile in Clay,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , Vol.116, No.2, pp.205-221(1990).
18.Briaud, J. L. and Garland, E., “Loading Rate Method for Pile Response in Clay,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , Vol.111, No.3, pp.319-335(1985).
19.Brumund, W. F., and Leonards, G. A., “Discussion on Influential Factors of Friction between Steel and Dry Sands,” Soils and Foundations, Vol.27, No.2, pp.66-67(1987).
20.Chandler, R. J., and Martins, J.P., “An Experimental Study of Skin Friction around Pile in Clay,” Geotechnique, Vol.32, No.2, pp.119-132(1987).
21.Clark, J. I., and Meyerhof, G. G., “The Behavior of Piles Driven in Clay, I, An Investigation of Soil Stress and Pore Water Pressure as Related to Soil Properties,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.9, pp.351-373(1972).
22.Dyvik, R., Berre, T., Lacasse, S., and Raddim, B., “Comparsion of Truly Undrained and Constant Volume Direct Simple Shear Tests,” Geotechnique, Vol.37, No.1, pp.3-10(1987).
23.Heerema, E. P., “Relationship Between Wall Friction,Displacement
Velocity, and Horizontal Stress in Clay and in Sand, for Pile Driveability Analysis ,” Ground Engineering, Vol.12, No.1, pp.55-61(1979).
24.Kishida, H., and Uesugi, M., “Tests of the interface between sand and
soil in the simple shear apparatus,” Geotechnique, Vol.37, No.1, pp.45-52(1987).
25.Konder, R. L., “Hyperbolic Stress-Strain Response : Cohesive Soils,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, Vol.89, No.SM1, pp.115-143(1963).
26.Kraft, L. M., Focht, J. A. and Amerasinghe, S. F., “Friction Capacity of Piles Driven into Clay,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , Vol.107, No.11, pp.1521-1541(1981).
27.Kulhawy, F. H., “Drained Uplift Capacity of Drilled Shafts,” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp.1549-1552(1985).
28.Mitchell, J. K., Foundament of Soil Bahavior, John Wiley and Sons, INC., PP.305-320(1976).
29.Mochatar, I. B., and Edil, T. B., “Shaft Resistance of Model Pile in Clay,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.114, No.11, pp.1227-1244(1988).
30.Parry, R. H. G. and Swain, C. W., “Effective Stress Method of Calculating Skin Friction on Driven Piles in Soft Clay,” Ground Engineering, Vol.10, No.3, pp.24-26(1977a).
31.Parry, R. H. G. and Swain, C. W., “A Study of Skin Friction on Pile in Stiff Clay,” Ground Engineering, Vol.10, No.8, pp.33-37(1977b).
32.Potyondy J. G., “Skin Friction between Various Soil and Construction Materials,” Geotechnique, Vol.11, No.4, pp.339-353(1961).
33.Reddy, E. S., Chapman, D. N., and Sastry, V. V. R. N. “Direct Shear Interface Test for Shaft Capacity of Pile in Sand,”Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol.23, No.2, pp.199-205(2000).
34.Tomlinson, M. J., “Some Effects of Pile Driving on Skin Friction,”
Behavior of Piles, London, Institute of Civil Engineering, pp.107-114
(1971).
35.Tsubakihara, Y., et al., “Effects of Steel Roughness and Rate of Loading
OnFrictional Resistance Between Clay and Steel,” Proceedings,
National Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering(1989).
36.Uesugi, M., Kishida, H., and Uchikawa, Y., “Friction between Dry Sand and Concrete under Monotonic and Repeated Loading,” Soils and Foundations, Vol.30, No.1, pp.115-128(1990).
37.Vijayvergiya, V. N., and Focht, J. A., “A New Way to Predict Capacity of Pile in Clay,” Proceedings of 4th Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Tex., Vol.2, pp.865-87(1972).
38.Yoshimi, Y., and Kishida, T., “Friction between Sand and Metal Surface,” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp.831-834(1981).