| 研究生: |
蔡獻璋 Hsien-Chang Tsai |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: | Disability Inclusion Initiatives: Using Private Companies in Taiwan as Examples |
| 指導教授: |
王群孝
Chun-Hsiao Wang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Human Resource Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2023 |
| 畢業學年度: | 111 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 41 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 身心障礙職場包容 、ADKAR模型 、合理調整 、身心障礙人士 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Disability Inclusion, ADKAR model, reasonable accommodations, PwD |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:20 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以身心障礙職場包容為題,希望幫助台灣企業的人資建立一個友善職場的推廣藍圖,以達到效益的實踐。
為了達到上述研究目的,研究者訪問10位曾經聘雇過身心障礙員工的人力資源主管,透過訪談了解他們如何克服用人單位主管的抗拒,推動職場中對於身心障礙員工的包容。本研究使用變革管理模型 —ADKAR 作為訪談架構並進行內容分析,包含認知,渴望、知識、能力及鞏固等變革中的各個階段。
訪談結果顯示企業人資主管的推動策略受到台灣法令環境的影響,企業在法令要求的名額下,僅在特定職缺上聘雇較不影響工作內容的身心障礙者。整體而言,台灣的做法與聯合國推動的身心障礙人士基本人權概念不同,並非透過合理調整保障身心障礙者申請一般職缺。因此,筆者建立的藍圖中,除了從企業人資主管的案例分享中萃取經驗之外,同時加入其它研究中更多具有包容性與合理調整的元素,以建立更好的社會參與。在得到公平參與機會之後,透過觀察身心障礙的優勢與特質,得已更進一步的讓效益有更好的發揮。
The purpose of this study is to create a roadmap for enhancing the effectiveness of disability inclusion initiatives for private companies in Taiwan.
To answer the objective question, I interviewed 10 HR managers who had experience in hiring people with disabilities (PwD), understanding how they drive the change to overcome resistance from hiring managers. Using ADKAR model, a change management framework, as an interview structure for content analysis, this study includes the full change management stages, including aware, desire, knowledge, ability, and reinforcement.
The interview results showed HR’s strategies rely on differences in legal environment in Taiwan. Taiwan’s HR usually meet the minimum hiring number, by hiring people with a few types of disability on special positions. It shows a fundamental difference from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) on the legal right for PwD to apply for all other general positions. Therefore, the roadmap was created by consolidating the best practices in Taiwan, along with inclusive elements from other studies, to enhance a good social participation.
References
Accenture. (2018). Getting to Equal: The Disability Inclusion Advantage. 17.
Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. (2021, June). 國情統計通報. https://ws.dgbas.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNDYzL3JlbGZpbGUvMTEwMjAvMTAyMTkxLzI4NGY5ZThlLTk3Y2UtNDA5My05NWMyLTQ0ZmIzZDhhY2FjOC5wZGY%3d&n=MTYyMTcyMTExT00yNkxINTcucGRm&icon=.pdf
Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X
Ball, P., Monaco, G., Schmeling, J., Schartz, H., & Blanck, P. (2005). Disability as Diversity in Fortune 100 Companies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.629
Canada Employment and Social Development. (2013, April 18). Rethinking Disability in the Private Sector [Policies]. https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/disability/consultations/rethinking-disabilities.html
Centers for Disease Control. (2023, January 5). Disability Impacts All of Us Infographic | CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/infographic-disability-impacts-all.html
Disability:IN. (2022). The Case for Disability Inclusion in Environmental Social Governance Investing. Disability:IN, 17. https://disabilityin.org/resource/the-case-for-disability-inclusion-in-esg-investing/
Forrester. (2022, June 3). What Is ESG’s Significance To Business Leaders? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forrester/2022/06/03/what-is-esgs-significance-to-business-leaders/
Houtenville, A., & Kalargyrou, V. (2012). People with Disabilities: Employers’ Perspectives on Recruitment Practices, Strategies, and Challenges in Leisure and Hospitality. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly - CORNELL HOSP Q, 53, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965511424151
Huber, B. M., & Comstock, M. (2017, July 27). ESG Reports and Ratings: What They Are, Why They Matter. The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/07/27/esg-reports-and-ratings-what-they-are-why-they-matter/
IRC. (2017). Concluding Observations of the initial report of the Republic of China (Taiwan) on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) adopted by the.
Kaye, H. S., Janes, L. H., & Jones, E. C. (2011). Why Don’t Employers Hire and Retain Workers with Disabilities?
Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China (Taiwan). (2021). People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act. https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050046
McDonald, K. (2007). Exploring the Bottom Line: A Study of the Costs and Benefits of Workers with Disabilities. The Economic Impact Study.
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2021, July 23). 身心障礙統計專區 [文字]. 統計處; 統計處. https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5224-62359-113.html
Ministry of Labor. (2019). 108年身心障礙者勞動狀況調查. https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy08/0841menu.htm
Minot, D. (2022, September 29). Inside Dell Technologies’ Neurodiversity Hiring Program: An Autistic Cybersecurity Analyst’s Success Story. Autism Spectrum News. https://autismspectrumnews.org/inside-dell-technologies-neurodiversity-hiring-program-an-autistic-cybersecurity-analysts-success-story/
National Statistics, R.O.C. (2021). 身心障礙人數. https://nstatdb.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbasall/webMain.aspx?sys=100&funid=qryout&funid2=A150109010&outmode=8&ym=10000&ymt=11000&cycle=4&outkind=11&compmode=0&ratenm=%u7D71%u8A08%u503C&fldlst=11111111111111111111111&compmode=0&fil=A150109010&rr=q14227x&&rdm=R98316
Østerud, K. L., & Vedeler, J. S. (2022). Disability and Regulatory Approaches to Employer Engagement: Cross-National Challenges in Bridging the Gap between Motivation and Hiring Practice. Social Policy and Society, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000021
Pelled, L. H., Ledford, G. E., Jr, & Albers Mohrman, S. (1999). Demographic Dissimilarity and Workplace Inclusion. Journal of Management Studies, 36(7), 1013–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00168
Prosci Inc. (2020). Best Practices In Change Management (11th Edition).
Sun N. Y. (2016). 無障礙/可及性、合理調整與平等不歧視原則:從身心障礙者權利公約檢視我國憲法及身心障礙者權益保障法之平等原則內涵. 臺大法學論叢, 45(S), 1163–1228. https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2016.45.SP.02
The Workplace Initiative. (2016). Disability Employment and Inclusion: Your Guide to Success. Autism Speaks. https://www.autismspeaks.org/tool-kit/disability-employment-and-inclusion-your-guide-success
United Nations. (2007). United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) | Australian Human Rights Commission. https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/disability-rights/united-nations-convention-rights-persons-disabilities-uncrpd
United Nations. (2022). Guiding Principles of the Convention. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/guiding-principles-of-the-convention.html
U.S. Department of Justice. (2023, February 17). Introduction to the Americans with Disabilities Act. ADA.Gov. https://www.ada.gov/topics/intro-to-ada/
World Health Organization, & Bank, W. (2011). World report on disability 2011. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44575
Wu, S. C. (2005). From Theory to Practice: The Theories and Perspectives of Employment Services for the Disabled and the Discussions of Service Delivery. 112, 104–116.
Zhuang, K. (2016). Inclusion in Singapore: A social model analysis of disability policy. Disability & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1197821