| 研究生: |
林美霞 Mei-Hsia Lin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
影響網路拍賣參與訂價因素之探討 The Determinates of Participative Pricing in Online Auction |
| 指導教授: |
林建煌
Chien-Huang Lin |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系在職專班 Executive Master of Business Administration |
| 畢業學年度: | 95 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 65 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 延遲出價 、網路拍賣 、參與訂價 、贏家詛咒 、資訊不對稱 、線上拍賣 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | late bidding, winner''s curse, online auction, internet auction, participative pricing, asymmestric information |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:7 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討線上參與訂價的價格決定因素。自2006年11月4日至12月26日止,從台灣Yahoo拍賣網站蒐集1013筆飯店住宿卷拍賣成交資料,以迴歸分析探討拍賣中影響結標價的決定因子(determinates)。由於住宿卷產品同質性高,同一飯店同一產品具有價格共通性(Common Value),結標價不同可能是因為競標策略或其他變數的影響,對這些變數的研究可以讓我們了解隱含在拍賣參與訂價的過程中的消費者行為。
資料分兩群,分有直購價與無直購價,分別觀察在有直購價下與無直購價下個別自變數對結標價的影響。實證結論如下:
(1) 商品數量與結標價為負向關係。
(2) 起標價對結標價沒有顯著影響。
(3) 出價次數是拍賣氛圍的表徵,對結標價具正向關係。
(4) 直購價對結標價有正向影響。
(5) 最小出價增額對結標價的影響權重最重,且為正向關聯。
(6) 運費在無直購價情境中有正向影響,在有直購價的情境下,淡化到不具影響力。
(7) 買家評價對結標價影響未達顯著水準。
(8) 賣家評價於無直購價中的參考作用比在有直購價情境中高,無直購價中賣家評為正向顯著影響、賣家正評為負向顯著影響、賣價負評為負向顯著影響。在有直購價的拍賣中,唯有賣家正評為負向顯著影響。
(9) 刊登天數對拍賣結標價影響未達顯著水準。
(10) 第一位投標者出價對結標價有正向影響。
(11) 結標時間為晚間時段在有直購價情境下高度正向影響,在無直購價下影響未達顯著水準。
(12)延遲出價(late bidding)在有直購價情境下對結標價有負面高度影響,在無直購價下影響未達顯著水準。
(13)1元起要對結標價有高度負向影響。
This paper presents an exploratory analysis of the determinants of participative pricing in online auction for collectable Taiwan hotel coupon at Yahoo Web site. Starting from November 4 through December 26, we have obtained 1013 closing auction data, and perform multiple regression analysis on a restricted sample of the 1013 data.
We choose auction transaction data on hotel coupon as our research data due to its homogeneous and obvious common value. It leaves us room to measure the variables influence on the auction final price.
We separated the data into two groups, one is listing buyout price and another is without listing buyout price, observed the price determinants effect and magnitude on the auction final price. We have thirteen major finding.
(1). Item quantity has a negative effect on the final auction price.
(2). Minimum bids have no significant effect on the final auction price.
(3). Number of bids have positive effects on the final auction price.
(4). Buyout price has positive effect on the final auction price.
(5). Minimum bid increment has positive effects on the final auction price.
(6). Freight has a much greater effect on the final auction price when there is no listing buyout price than under listing buyout price.
(7). Buy’s feedback ratings have no effect on the final auction price.
(8). Seller’s feedback ratings have a much greater effect on the final price when there is no listing buyout price than under listing buyout price. Seller’s positive feedback ratings have a negative impact on the final auction price. Seller’s negative feedback ratings have a significant negative impact on the final auction price when there is no listing buyout price; have no effect under listing buyout price.
(9) Auction listing day has no effect on the final auction price.
(10). First bidder price has positive effect on the final auction price.
(11). Listing auction at night time has significant positive effects on the final price under listing buyout price, have no effect when there is no listing buyout price.
(12). Late bidding has significant negative impact on the auction final price under listing buyout price, has no effect when there is no listing buyout price.
(13). One dollar minimum bid has significant negative impact on the auction final price.
一. 英文部份
Akerlof, G.A. (1970), “The Market for “lemons”:Quality Uncertainty and The Market Mechanism”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500
Ariely, Dan and Itamar Simonson (2003), “Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions”, Journal of consumer Psychology, 13(1&2), 113-123.
Bazerman, H. Max and William F. Samuelson (1983), “I Won The Auction But Don’t Want The Prize”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 27, No.4.
Buchan, Nancy R., Rachel T. A. Croson and Eric J. Johnson (2004), “When Do Fair Beliefs Influence Bargaining Behavior? Experimental Bargaining in Japan and the United States”, Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 181-189.
Cabral, Luis and Ali Hortacsu (2004), “Dynamics of Seller Reputation: Theory and Evidence from eBay”, Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Chandran, Sucharita and Vicki G. Morwitz (2005), “Effects of Participative Pricing on Consumers’ Cognitions and Actions: A Goal Theoretic Perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 249-485
Cooper, Russell and Thomas Ross (1984), “Price, Product Qualities, and Asymmetric Information: The Competitive Case”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 51, No. 2, 197-207.
Dholakia, Utpal M., Itamar Simonson (2005), “The Effect of Explicit Reference Points on consumer Choice and Online Bidding Behavior”, Marketing Science, 206-217.
Einolf, Karl W. (2003), “Bidding Stratergies and The eBay Auction: does Bidding Late Eliminate Paying Great?”, http://faculty.msmary.edu/einolf, 1-16.
Gross, Ben and Alessandro Acqusti (2003), “Balances of Power on eBay: Peers or Unequals?”, bgross@sims.berkeley.edu, 1-5.
Gupta, Shobhit and Jeremie Gallien (2006), “Temporary and Permanent Buyout Prices in Online Auction”, MIT Sloan Working Paper 4608-06,1-34.
Jin, Ginger Zhe and Andrew Kato (2005), “Price, Quality and Reputation:Evidence from An Online Field Experiment”, The RAND Journal of Economics, 1-34.
Jin, Ginger Zhe and A. Kato (2002), “Blind Trust Online: Experimental Evidence from Baseball Cards”, Working Paper, University of Maryland.
Kamins, Michael A., Xavier Dreze and Valerie S. Folkes (2004), “Effects of Seller-Supplied Prices on Buyers’ Product Evaluations: Reference Prices in an Internet Auction Context”, Journal of Consumer Research, 3, PP. 622-627
Kirkegaard, Rene and per Baltzer Overgaard (2003), “Buy-Out Prices in Online Auctions: Multi-Unit Demand”, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Klein, Tobias J., Christian Lambertz, Giancarlo Spagnolo and Konrad O. Stahl (2005~2006), “Last Minute Feedback”, Governance and The Efficiency of Economic Systems.
Klemerer, P. (1999), “Acution Theory: A Guide to the Literature”, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 13, No. 3, 227-286.
List, John A. and David Lucking-Reiley (2002), “Bidding Behavior and Decision Costs in Field Experiments”, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 40, No.4, October, 611-619.
List, John A. and David Lucking-Reiley (2000), “Demand Reduction in Multiunit Auctions: Evidence from a Sportscard Field Experiment”, The American Economic Review, Sep., 961-972.
Lucking-Reiley, David, Doug Bryan, Naghi Prasad and Daniel Reeves (1999~2006), “Pennies from eBay: the Determinants of Price in Online Auctions, reiley@eller.arizona.edu, 1~14
Lucking-Reiley, David (2000), “Vickrey Auctions in Practice: From Nineteenthe-Century Philately to Twenty-First-Century E-Commerce”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 14, Number 3-Summer, 183-192.
Lucking-Reiley, David (2000), “Auctions on The Internet: What’s Being Auctioned, and How?”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Volume XLVIII, No.3, 227-252.
Mathews, Timonthy (2002), “Buyout Optons in Internet Auction Markets”, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Suny, Stony Brook.
Mathews, Timothy (2003), “The Impact of Discounting on an Auction with a Buyout Option: a Theoretical Analysis Motivated by eBay’s Buy-It-Now Feature”, Journal of Economics, Vol. 81 (2004), No.1, 25-52.
Melnik, M. I. and J. Alm (2002), “Does A Seller’s eCommerce Reputation Matter” Evidence from eBay Auctions.” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 50, No.3, 337-50
Mogan, John and Jennifer Brown (2006), “Reputation in Online Auctions: The Market for Trust", California Management Review, www.haas.berkeley.edu/news
Resnick, P., R. Zeckhauser, J. Swanson, and K. Lockwood (2003), “The Value of Reputation on eBay: A Controlled Experiment”, Working paper, Harvard Kennedy Scholl.
Reynolds, S. and J. Wooders (2002), “Ascending Bid Auction with a Buy-Now Price”, draft, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Rothe Alvin E. and Axel Ockenfels (2002), “Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet”, The American Economic Review,92(4), 1093-1103.
Stern, Barbara B. and Marla Royne Stafford (2006), “Individual and Social Determinants of Winning Bids in Online Auctions”, Journal of Consumer Behavior, 5, 43-55.
Suter, Tracy A. and David M. Hardestry (2005), “Maximizing Earnings and Price Fairness perceptions in Online Consumer-to-Consumer Auctions”, Journal of Retailing, 81(4) 307-317
Vikrey, Williams (1961), “Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitvie Sealed Tenders”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 16, No.1, 8-37.
Wintr, Ladislav (2005), Some Evidence on Late Bidding in eBay Auctions, http://students.clarku.edu/~1wintr/, 1~23.
二. 中文部份
陳佳志, 2004, “線上拍賣競標行為之研究: 以雅虎奇摩拍賣消費性電子產品市集為例”, 國立東華大學企業管理研究所, 碩士論文。
許志文, 2005, “附有直購買價拍賣機制分析”, 世新大學經濟學研究所, 碩士論文。
苗惠茹, 2004, “影響網路拍賣消費者投標意願之因素”, 東吳大學商學院資訊科學系所, 碩士論文。