簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
江鎵翔 Chia-Hsiang Chiang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
微型金融機構雙基線目標之研究 A Study of Microfinance Institutions'' Double Bottom Line |
| 指導教授： |
邱慈觀
Tzu-Kuan Chiu |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別： |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱： |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系 Department of Finance |
| 畢業學年度： | 98 |
| 語文別： | 中文 |
| 論文頁數： | 52 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 微型金融機構 、葛拉敏銀行 、另類銀行 、微型貸款 |
| 外文關鍵詞： | Microfinance Institution, Grameen Bank, Alternative Bank, Microcredit |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：9 下載：0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文以南亞地區六國的94家微型金融機構為樣本，探討微型金融機構在雙基線目標下，經營者如何在財務性目標及社會性目標兩者間作取捨。財務性目標衡量微型金融機構永續性經營的能力，第一個指標為30天逾期貸款比例 (PAR30) 衡量還款情形，第二個指標為營運自足率 (OSS) 衡量收入支應成本的程度，第三個指標為平均每位借款者負擔成本 (OCB) 衡量成本結構。社會性目標衡量微型金融機構服務貧窮客戶的程度，以貸款利率 (Yield) 及平均每人貸款額度 (ALB) 為代表。本研究結果顯示微型金融機構可以藉由調整利率政策以及貸款規模政策來對兩個目標做出權衡。此外，本文並探討微型金融機構的其他相關議題，包括評價方法、多角化議題及除貧成效。
Using regression analysis we study the determinants of self-sustainability of a sample of microfinance institution in South Asia. There are 94 MFIs in South Asia. We investigate particularly three aspects of sustainability: repayment of loans, cost coverage by revenue and cost control. We also investigate two aspects of social objective: yield and average loan per borrower. Our results suggest MFIs could change yield and average loan per borrower to balanced double bottom line objective. Our contribution is assessing the ability of a set of MFIs to reach sustainability without harming outreach to the poor. Finally, we will introduce MFIs’ valuation model, diversified effect and poverty alleviation.
1. 穆罕默德．尤努斯，打造富足新世界，曾育慧譯，初版，台北市，民國九十七年。
2. Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, “Financial Access 2009”, 2009
3. Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, “Minimum Indicators That Donors and Investors Should Track”, 2009
4. Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, “Measuring Result of Microfinance Institutions”, 2009
5. J.P. Morgan and Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, “Shedding Light on Microfinance Equity Valuation: Past and Present”, 2009
6. Alain de Crombrugghe, Michel Tenikue and Julie Sureda , “Performance Analysis for A Sample of Microfinance Institutions in India”, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 79:2, pp. 269–299, 2008
7. Ledgerwood j., Microfinance Handbook: an Institutional and Financial Perspective, The World Bank, Washington DC, 1998
8. Robinson M., The Microfinance Revolution, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2001
9. Ahlin C. and Townsend R., “Using repayment data to test across models of joint liability lending”, Economic Journal , vol. 117, pp. 11–51, 2007
10. Conning Jonathan, “Outreach, sustainability and leverage in monitored and peer-monitored lending”, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 60, pp. 51–77, 1999
11. Schreiner M., “A cost-effectiveness analysis of the Grameen Bank of Bangladesh”, Development Policy Review, 21, pp. 357–382, 2003
12. Robert Cull, Asli Demirgu Kunt and Jonathan Morduch, “Financial Performance and Outreach: A Global Analysis of leading Microbanks”, The Economic Journal, 117, pp. 107–133, 2007
13. Caskey et al., “The Urban Unbanked in Mexico and the United States”, Policy Research Working Paper 3835, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2006
14. Dupas, Pascaline, and Jonathan Robinson, “Savings Constraints and Microenterprise Development: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya.” NBER Working Paper 14693, Cambridge, 2009
15. Abhijit Banerjee et al., “The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation”, MIT Department of Economics and NBER, 2009
16. Nicolas Krauss, Ingo Walter, “Can Microfinance Reduce Portfolio Volatility? ”, New York University Working Paper, 2008
