近年來，企業積極推行多元（Diversity）、公平（Equity）、共融（Inclusion）（簡稱DEI）政策，以營造友善且具心理安全感的職場環境已成為全球趨勢。然而，根據台灣最新調查發現，實際落實DEI的企業比例仍偏低，勞工在求職與工作中亦面臨諸多不公平待遇與心理壓力。本研究旨在探討企業實施DEI政策與措施對員工公平感知與心理安全感的影響，並進一步分析員工性別、年齡與教育程度對此影響之調節效果。
本研究之研究對象為台灣地區不限產業的全職員工，以匿名網路問卷的方式取得分析資料，總計收回238份有效問卷。藉由階層迴歸分析，得知以下研究結果：(1) 企業推行部分DEI政策與措施對員工的公平感知具有正向影響；(2) 企業推行部分DEI政策與措施對員工的心理安全感具有正向影響；(3) 企業推行DEI政策與措施，相較於男性，對女性員工的公平感知不具較強的正向影響；(4) 企業推行DEI政策與措施，相較於男性，對女性員工的心理安全感不具較強的正向影響；(5) 企業推行部分DEI政策與措施，相較於年長者，對年輕員工的公平感知具有較弱的正向影響；(6) 企業推行部分DEI政策與措施，相較於年長者，對年輕員工的心理安全感具有較強的負向影響；(7) 企業推行DEI政策與措施，相較於高教育程度者，對低教育程度員工的公平感知不具有較強的正向影響；(8) 企業推行DEI政策與措施，相較於高教育程度者，對低教育程度員工的心理安全感不具有較強的正向影響。

In recent years, promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) has become a global trend as companies strive to build inclusive and psychologically safe workplaces. However, surveys in Taiwan reveal that DEI implementation remains limited, and workers still face various forms of discrimination and stress. This study investigates the impact of DEI policies and practices on employees' perceptions of fairness and psychological safety, with further analysis of gender, age, and education level as moderating variables.
Data were collected from 238 full-time employees across various industries in Taiwan through anonymous online surveys. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed: (1) Certain DEI policies positively influence employees’ fairness perceptions; (2) Certain DEI policies positively influence employees’ psychological safety; (3) DEI policies do not have a significantly stronger positive effect on fairness perception for women compared to men; (4) DEI policies do not have a significantly stronger positive effect on psychological safety for women compared to men; (5) Compared to older employees, younger employees perceive weaker fairness benefits from certain DEI policies; (6) Compared to older employees, younger employees experience stronger negative impacts on psychological safety from certain DEI policies; (7) Compared to highly educated employees, those with lower education levels do not perceive stronger fairness benefits from DEI policies; (8) Compared to highly educated employees, those with lower education levels do not perceive stronger psychological safety benefits from DEI policies.

一、中文文獻
1. 李俊彥(2024)。企業推動DEI措施對雇主品牌及工作滿意度之影響研究。中國文化大學社會科學院勞動暨人力資源學系碩士論文。
二、外文文獻
1. American Psychological Association. (2021). Equity, diversity, and inclusion framework.
2. Arries, E. J. (2009). Interactional justice in student—staff nurse encounters. Nursing Ethics, 16(2), 147-160.
3. Ball, G. A., Trevino, L. K., & Sims Jr, H. P. (1994). Just and unjust punishment: Influences on subordinate performance and citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 299-322.
4. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 107-124.
5. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior (pp. 289319). JAI Press.
6. Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological inquiry, 34(2), 193-206.
7. Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological inquiry, 34(2), 193-206.
8. Catalyst. (2018). Inclusive Environments: A Catalyst for Gender Diversity and Inclusion.
9. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Australasian Medical Journal, 49(3), 544–560.
10. Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2015). Measuring justice and fairness. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 187–202). Oxford University Press.
11. Colquitt, J. A., & Zipay, K. P. (2015). Justice, fairness, and employee reactions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 75–99.
12. Cropanzano, R. S., Ambrose, M. L., Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2015). Measuring justice and fairness. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace. Oxford University Press.
13. Cropanzano, R. S., Slaughter, J. E., & Bachiochi, P. D. (2005b). Interactional Justice Scale [Database record]. PsycTESTS.
14. Downey, S. N., van der Werff, L., Thomas, K. M., & Plaut, V. C. (2015). The role of diversity practices and inclusion in promoting trust and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–44.
15. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350.
16. Ferdman, B. M., & Deane, B. R. (Eds.). (2014). Diversity at Work: The Practice of Inclusion. Jossey-Bass.
17. Flynn, F. J., & Brockner, J. (2003). It's different to give than to receive: Predictors of givers' and receivers' reactions to favor exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1034-1045.
18. Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215–245). Laurence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
19. Guillaume, Y. R. F., Dawson, J. F., Otaye-Ebede, L., Woods, S. A., & West, M. A. (2015). Harnessing demographic differences in organizations: What moderates the effects of workplace diversity? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 276–303.
20. Hunt, V., Yee, L., Prince, S., & Dixon-Fyle, S. (2020). Diversity Wins: How Inclusion Matters. McKinsey & Company.
21. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59(4), S285-S300.
22. Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589-617.
23. Kaur, A., & Dhar, R. L. (2021). Psychological capital, perceived organizational support, and work engagement in India: The role of procedural justice as a mediator. Current Psychology, 1-12.
24. Kickul, J. R., Lester, S. W., & Finkl, J. (2002a). Promise breaking during radical organizational change: Do justice interventions make a difference? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 469–488.
25. Kickul, J. R., Neuman, G., Parker, C., & Finkl, J. (2002b). Settling the score: The role of organizational justice in the relationship between psychological contract breach and anticitizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13(2), 77–93.
26. Laura J.(2023).DEI support structures : Relationships between organizational diversity, equity, and inclusion policies and employee experience. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska at Omaha.
27. Lind, E. A., & van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 181–223.
28. Ludmila Nunes.(2021).New Directions for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Higher Education. Association for Phychological Science.
29. McKay, P. F., Avery, D. R., Tonidandel, S., Morris, M. A., Hernandez, M., & Hebl, M. R. (2007). Racial differences in employee retention: Are diversity climate perceptions the key? Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 35-62.
30. Morgan, J. (2017). The Employee Experience Advantage: How to Win the War for Talent by Giving Employees the Workspaces They Want, the Tools They Need, and a Culture They Can Celebrate. Wiley, pp. 33-48.
31. Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966.
32. Nwoga, A. (2023). Breaking the invisible wall: Barriers to DEI program implementation. Open Journal of Business and Management, 11(4), 1787-1815.
33. Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in organizational behavior, 12(1), 43-72.
34. Premeaux, S. F., & Bedeian, A. G. (2003). Breaking the silence: The moderating effects of self‐monitoring in predicting speaking up in the workplace. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1537-1562.
35. Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. E. (1985). Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: Replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 423-433.
36. Thomas, D. A. (2004). "Diversity as Strategy." Harvard Business Review, 82(9), 98-108.
37. Thomas, R. R. (1989). From Affirmative Action to Affirming Diversity. Harvard Business Review, 67(2), 107–117.
38. Thompson, M., & Heron, P. (2005). The difference a manager can make: Organizational justice and knowledge worker commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(3), 383–404.
39. Trine Fossland & Driss Habti (2022).University practices in an age of supercomplexity: Revisiting diversity, equality, and inclusion in higher education. Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 2.
40. Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (1999). A discrepancy model of psychological contract violations. Human Resource Management Review, 9(3), 367–386.
41. van den Bos, K., Ham, J., Lind, E. A., Simonis, M., van Essen, W. J., & Rijpkema, M. (2008). Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 201–219.
42. Windscheid, L., Bowes-Sperry, L., Kidder, D. L., Cheung, H. K., Morner, M., & Lievens, F. (2016). Actions speak louder than words: Outsiders’ perceptions of diversity mixed messages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(9), 1329–1341.
三、網路文獻
1. Alpha Plus(2024)。職場性別平等嗎？Alpha plus 婦女節調查：僅一成企業自評做得很完善。
2. ESG Times(2024)。從DEI到ESG的永續發展之路 長榮大學USR計畫將台灣經驗帶到非洲實踐。
3. 女人迷(2023)。DEI多元共融白皮書——企業人才公平發展與永續治理方針。
4. 天下雜誌(2024)。薪資比台灣平均翻倍！第二屆天下人才永續獎百強榜單出爐：玉山、台積電衛冕冠軍。
5. 經濟部(2024)。《2024年中小企業白皮書》。