跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 游曼欣
Man-Hsin Yu
論文名稱: 跨領域合作設計活動之互動分析:群組軟體的支援與設計
An analysis of interdisciplinary collaborative design activities:How groupware design mediated interdisciplinary collaboration
指導教授: 劉晨鐘
Chen-Chung Liu
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊電機學院 - 網路學習科技研究所
Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 104
中文關鍵詞: 溝通模式Design-Based Research群組軟體跨領域
外文關鍵詞: groupware, interdisciplinary, communication pattern, Design-Based Research
相關次數: 點閱:10下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 現今許多科學界的複雜議題都涉及於不同領域,這些艱深的議題需要不同領域的研究者藉由跨領域合作的方式整合彼此專業的知識,利用各個專業領域獨特的思考方法、執行方式以達成共同的研究目標。因此跨領域研究合作的重要性已越來越受到學術界的重視,由目前大學許多新增的跨領域課程即可得以證明。但由於領域背景的差異性在知識表達、分享、交換及整合時往往造成跨領域合作的障礙。
    因此,本研究以CELL(Contributing, Exchanging and Linking for Learning)群組軟體支援跨領域合作設計活動,基於Design-Based Research設計、執行、分析、再設計的連續性循環方式共進行兩次活動,首先進行一次無群組軟體支援的活動,活動後進行對話分析及溝通模式分析,觀察跨領域合作中存在不同領域間在知識表達、交換及整合時所產生的協調性、視覺聚焦、社會關係、平等參與及資源管理的問題。而後設計CELL群組軟體的導入以解決這些問題並且提出建議作為群組軟體支援跨領域合作之參考。


    Nowadays complex scientific issues are involved in different fields. In order to reach the common research objectives, researchers in different fields need to integrate each other''s professional knowledge for these difficult issues by interdisciplinary collaboration which included using each expertise’s unique thinking and implementation. The importance of interdisciplinary collaborative research has been more and more attention by academia, since the more new interdisciplinary courses are available in university. However, due to differences in background field, there are still some barriers when knowledge expressing, sharing and exchanging in interdisciplinary collaboration.
    Therefore, this study use CELL(Contributing, Exchanging and Linking for Learning) groupware to support interdisciplinary collaborative design activities, based on Design-Based Research method to proceed two activities: first, after activity without the groupware, conduct analysis of dialogue and communication pattern. To observe coordination, visual focus, social relationship, equal participation and resource management problems arising from knowledge expressing, exchanging and integrating between different fields in interdisciplinary collaborative. Then, CELL groupware designed into this study to address these issues and finally make recommendations as groupware to support interdisciplinary collaboration reference.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 viii 第1章 緒論 1 1-1 研究背景與動機 1 1-2 研究目的與問題 2 第2章 文獻探討 3 2-1 跨領域合作 3 2-2 群組軟體支援的跨領域合作學習 6 2-3 設計本位研究法 9 2-4 研究流程 10 第3章 跨領域合作評估 11 3-1 研究對象 11 3-2 活動時程 12 3-3 實驗活動設計 12 3-3-1 活動內容 12 3-3-2 教室環境設計 13 3-3-3 活動劇本 14 3-4 研究工具與資料收集 15 3-4-1 錄影軟體 15 3-4-2 對話內容類型分析 15 3-4-3 對話溝通模式分類 16 3-4-4 問卷調查 16 3-4-5 統計分析 17 3-5 資料分析 18 3-5-1 問卷分析 18 3-5-2 對話內容類型分析 20 3-5-3 對話溝通模式 23 3-6 研究結果與討論 25 3-6-1 對話內容類型分析結果 25 3-6-2 對話溝通模式分析結果 30 3-6-3 問卷結果 35 3-7-1 發現問題與困難 42 第4章 解決跨領域合作學習困難-使用CELL系統 44 4-1 CELL系統設計理念 44 4-2 系統畫面操作說明及軟體功能介紹 44 4-2-1 系統畫面 44 4-2-2 軟體功能使用 46 4-3 研究對象 51 4-4 活動時程 52 4-5 實驗活動設計 52 4-5-1 活動內容 52 4-5-2 教室環境設計 52 4-6 研究工具與資料收集 53 4-6-1 系統硬體需求 53 4-6-2 軟體環境 53 4-7 資料分析 54 4-7-1 問卷分析 54 4-7-2 對話分析 54 4-7-3 共享螢幕(Shared Display)操作行為 55 4-7-4 CELL系統操作記錄 56 4-8 研究結果與討論 57 4-8-1 對話內容類型分析結果 57 4-8-2 對話溝通模式分析結果 68 4-8-3 問卷結果 73 第5章 結論 79 5-1 結論 79 參考文獻 82 附錄A 自我評估問卷 85 附錄B RIPLS態度問卷及合作環境問卷 86 附錄C各類統計次數表 88

    Akay, A. (2008). A renaissance in engineering PhD education. European Journal of Engineering Education,33(4), 403–413.
    Arias, E., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A. & Scharff, E. Transcending the Individual Human Mind – Creating Shared Understanding through Collaborative Design. ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 1 (2000), 84-113
    Brainard, J. (2002) US agencies look to interdisciplinary science, The Chronicle of Higher Education,48(40), 20_25.
    Bromme, R. (2000). Beyond one’s own perspective: The psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In P.Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity (pp. 115–133). Toronto: University ofToronto Press.
    Chen, G., C. Wang and K. Ou. Using group communication to monitor Web-based group learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19(4): 401–415, 2003.
    Dede, C., Nelson, B., Ketelhut, D., Clarke, J., & Bowman, C. (2004). Design-based research strategies for studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on the learning sciences, pp. 158-165. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
    Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Designbased research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
    Gibbons, M. (1998) Higher education relevance in the twenty-first century (Washington, DC,Education Human Development Network World Bank).
    Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences:An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
    Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005) "Beyond Binary Choices: Integrating Individual and Social Creativity," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS) Special Issue on Computer Support for Creativity (E.A. Edmonds & L. Candy, Eds.), 63(4-5), pp. 482-512
    Hursh, B., Haas, P., & Moore, M. (1983). An interdisciplinary model to implement general education. Journal of Higher Education, 54 (1), 42–49.
    Ivanitskaya, L., Clark, D., Montgomery, G. and Primeau, R. (2002) ‘Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes’, Innovative Higher Education, 27(2), 95–111.
    Jeffery, Paul (2003) ’Smoothing the Waters: Observations on the Process of Cross- Disciplinary Research Collaboration’, Social Studies of Science 33(4): 539-562
    Levine, L. E., Fallahi, C. R., Nicoll-Senft, J. M., Tessier, J. T., Watson, C. L., & Wood, R. M. (in press). Creating significant learning experiences across disciplines in higher education. College Teaching.
    Liu, C. C. & C. C. Tsai. An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers and Education 50: 627–638, 2008
    Mutero, C. M., Kabutha, C., Kimani, V., Gitau, G., Ssennyonga, J., Githure, J., et al. (2004). A transdisciplinary perspective on the links between malaria and agroecosystems in Kenya. Acta Tropica, 89,171–186.
    Newell, W. H. (1990). Interdisciplinary curriculum development. Issues in Integrative Studies, 8, 69–86.
    Newell, W. H., & Green, W. J. (1982). Defining and teaching interdisciplinary studies.Improving College and University Teaching, 30(1), 23–30.
    Parkes, M. W., Bienen, L., Breilh, J., Hsu, L.-N., McDonald, M., Pratz, J. A., et al. (2005). All hands on deck: Transdisciplinary approaches to emerging infectious disease. EcoHealth, 2, 258–272.
    Parsell G, Bligh J. The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ 1999;33:95±100.
    Sperber, D. (2006) ‘Why rethink interdisciplinarity? Interdisciplines’, [online] URL: http://www.interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/1
    Star, S., L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) ‘Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley''s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology’, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
    Sugimoto, M., Hosoi, K. & Hashizume, H., Caretta: A System for Supporting Face-to-Face Collaboration by Integrating Personal and Shared Space. Proc. CHI, (2004), ACM Press, 41-48
    Warr, A. and O’Neill, E., “Tool Support for Creativity Using Externalizations”, Proceedings Creativity and Cognition (C&C ’07), June 13-15, ACM Press, pp127-136, 2007.
    Zurita, G and Nussbaum, M (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected hand-held computers. Computers & Education, 42(3): 289-314

    QR CODE
    :::