台灣校園的實驗室有各式各樣的研究成果，但校園師生將這些研究成果拿來創業成功者卻不多，到底是什麼的原因導致這樣的結果呢？我們希望透過觀察校園創業團隊在其創業初期歷程中的策略作為，來了解校園創業活動的面貌。進而希望能提出一些建議，讓這股創新的動力能夠在校園中茁壯，進一步為台灣社會經濟帶來一番新局。故藉由「意會活動」及「實質選擇權」兩大工具及前期紮根研究，本研究欲發展量化工具探討大學校園創業團隊如何進行意會活動，並分析探討該意會活動與實質選擇權之間的關係，如何影響其事業發展，及是否會帶動其事業價值。此外，我們會進而分析探討意會活動與實質選擇權之間的關係，並進行定量化的過程。研究結果部份，我們會嘗試以三個關鍵問題來引導實務界運用本研究的分析結果。第一個關鍵問題，創業團隊應該如何監控創業機會價值的變化？本研究建議可由實質選擇權價值來分析這個問題。第二個關鍵問題，應從
事哪些努力才能驅動有利的實質選擇權徵兆？我們也建議可由意會活動來分析此問題。第三個關鍵問題，對特定實質選擇權徵兆有明顯作用的意會活動項目為何？附帶的，能彼此相輔相成的意會活動組合為何？為回答此問題，我們在第七章將所有測量結構關係彙總，以利實務應用。

一、中文部分：
1. 蔡明宏、李文豪、徐銘宏、饒瑞霖、周惠卿撰，「技術創造力投資的策略哲學：
學童科學創作與產業創新情境之間的定性比較」，於國立政治大學，《創新與
創造力-技術創造力的涵意與開發研討會論文集》，民國89年
2. 徐宗國譯，《質性研究概論》，台北市：巨流出版，民國86年
3. 周昭正，「電子商務產業新創事業創業策略之研究–組織意會觀點之應用」，國
立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文，民國91年
4. 郭姿岑，「新創事業意會歷程之研究－以電子商務新創事業為例」，國立中央
大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文，民國91年
5. 陳正威，「生物技術產業新創事業創業策略之研究－組織意會活動與實質選擇
權觀點之應用」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文，民國92年
二、英文部分：
1. Berscheid, E. Gangestad, S. W., & Kulaskowski, D. (1983). Emotion in close
relationships: Implications for Relationship Counseling. Unpublished manuscript,University of Minnesota.
2. Blumer, H. (1969), Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Choo, C. W., 1998, The Knowing Organization, Oxford, Oxford University Press
4. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1992). Exploring Complex Organizations: A Cultural
Perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). ‘Toward a model of organizations as
interpretation systems,’ Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295.
7. Eccles, R. G., & Nohria, N. (1992). Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence
of Management, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Feldman, M. s. (1989), Order without Design, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9. Follett, M. P. (1924), Creative Experience, New York: Longmans, Green.
10. Gioia, D. A., & K. Chittipeddi (1991), ‘Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation,’ Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp. 433-448.
11. Hartshorne, C. (1962). ‘Mind as memory and creative love,’ In J. M. Scher (Ed.),Theories of the mind (pp. 440-463). New York: Free Press.
12. Huber, G. P., & R. L. Daft (1987), ‘The information environments of
organizations,’ In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Handbook of Organizational Communication (pp. 130-164). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
13. James, W. (1950). The Principles of Psychology (Vol. 1 & 2). New York: Dover.(Original work published 1890)
14. Kahlbaugh, P. A. (1993). ‘James Mark Baldwin: A bridge between social and
cognitive theories of development,’ Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,23, 79-103.
15. Leiter, K. (1980). A Primer on Ethnomethodology, New York: Oxford UniversityPress.
16. Louis, M. (1980). ‘Surprise and sensemaking: What newcomers experience in
entering unfamiliar organizational settings,’ Administrative Science Quarterly,25(3): 226-251.
17. Luehrmen, T. A. (1998). ‘Investment opportunities as real option: Getting started on the numbers,’ Harvard Business Review, July-August: 51-66.
18. Luehrman, T. A. (1998). ‘Strategy as a portfolio of real options,’ Harvard Business Review, September-October: 89-99.
19. Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress. New York:Norton.
20. March, J. G. (1984), ‘How we talk and how we act : Administrative theory and administrative life. ’ In T. J. Sergiovanni & J.E. Corbolly (Eds.), Leadership and Organizational Culture (pp. 18-35). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
21. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations.
Bergen, Norway:Universitetsforlaget.
22. Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985), ‘The cognitive perspective in social
psychology,’ In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of Social
Psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 137-230), New York: Random House.
23. McGrath R. G., & MacMillan I. C. (2000), ‘Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning,’ Research Technology Management, July-August: 35-50.
24. McGrath R. G., & MacMillan I. C. (2002), ‘Crafting R&D project portfolios,’Research Technology Management, September-October: 48-60.
25. Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as
cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of
Management Studies, (26):397-416.
26. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27. Ring, P. S., & Rands, G. P. (1989), ‘Sensemaking, understanding, and committing:Emergent interpersonal transaction processes in the evolution of 3M’s microgravity research program,’ In A, H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S.Poole(Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies
(pp. 337-366). New York: Ballinger.
28. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). ‘Formal and informal dimensions of transactions.’ In A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studie (pp.171-192). New York:Ballinger.
29. Sackman, S. A. (1991), Cultural Knowledge in Organizations: Exploring the
Collective Mind, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Muller, H. (2003), ‘Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures,’ Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 23-74.
31. Schutz, A. (1964). ‘The stranger: An essay in social psychology,’ In Collective papers (Vol. 2, pp. 91-105). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
32. Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, IL:
Northwestern University Press.
33. Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through Language.London: Sage.
34. Smircich, L., & Morgan, G. (1982). ‘Leadership: The management of meaning,’Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 257-273.
35. Starbuck, W. H., & Milliken, F. J. (1988), ‘Executives perceptual filters: What they notice and how the make sense,’ In D. c. Hambrick (Ed.), The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers (pp.35-65). Greenwich,CT: JAI.
36. Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Gioia, D. A. (1993), ‘Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes,’ Academy of Management Journal, 36, pp. 239-270.
37. Trigeorgis, L., and S. P. Mason. 1987. ‘Valuing managerial flexibility.’ Midland Corporate Finance Journal, 5(1): 14-21.
38. Trigeorgis, L.(1996), Real options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in
Resource Allocation, London, The MIT Press Cambridge.
39. Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). ‘Organizational memory,’ Academy of
Management Review, 16, 57-91.
40. Weick, K. E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, London, Sage Publications.
41. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A
New Foundation for Design, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.