現今電子書的設計上，大多延續了紙本書上的設計與安排，因此在閱讀的模式上仍與紙本書相同，讀者無法從中看到文章的思考展現。在學習時，學生不容易由使用情境與思考架構來理解與記憶文章中的思考架構進而學到或碰到的字詞佳句事例。電子書在設計時如kindle只是將字典作為查詢單字之用，並沒有考量學生在往後的如何經由閱讀使用這些語彙與知識與相關知識的擴展。
本論文裡，我們設計了一個方法（1）建置於電子書內容上（2）根據架構於思考地圖的學習者語彙與知識的建構網。在電子書內容上建構一個寫作者在思考內容時的可用的思考圖（thinking map),而根據內容知識需要的觀念語彙，字詞,佳句事例於思考圖架構下呈現。學習者可在閱讀時看到寫作者依據思考圖時所蒐集整理的觀念語彙，字詞,佳句事例的解釋，並且看到在思考圖與其架構下相關的內容。我們認為這樣的安排學習者較容易記得與再使用這些內容並且在觀看其他書上內容時可以擴增相關的語彙內容。
經由61位大學生與校外人士參與實驗，本研究的成果顯示：電子化的閱讀能夠同步展示文章與呈現文章的思考架構，讓閱讀者能夠看到原寫作者的思考，經由程序型的知識閱讀，有效的習得寫作者在文章中使用語彙。

Nowadays, most of the eBooks still continued the same design and arrangement of the paper, as the result, the reading model still like reading on the book. The reader cannot see the thinking of the context. Therefore, students are unable to understand and remember those metaknowledge through the context and the thinking modules while learning. For example, the dictionary in the e-book like Kindle are just designed to lookup the word and did not consider the situation how students use these words, knowledge and the expansion of related knowledge after reading.
As a result, in this paper, we propose a method (1) building on the e-book content (2) constructing the map of users ’words and knowledge base on the thinking map. Build a thinking map in the e-book for writers to think the content while writing, and the word and the idiom needed in the content knowledge are display in thinking map. Therefore, user will see the meaning of the word and the idiom collected from the writers’ thinking map while reading. Our point is that, with this arrangement, user can remember and reuse the content easily and they can grab and extend the relative words while reading other books.
Sixty-one college students and other participators participated in the experiment, out evaluation indicate that the content and the thinking structure can be synchronized display on the e-book and the reader can see the authors’ think more clearly. In consequence, through procedural reading with thinking map, user can learn the words effectively in the article.

〔1〕 Chesser, W.D., The e-textbook revolution. Library technology reports, 2011. 47(8): p. 28-40.
〔2〕 Lundblom, E.E.G. and J.J. Woods, Working in the Classroom: Improving Idiom Comprehension Through Classwide Peer Tutoring. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 2012. 33(4): p. 202-219.
〔3〕 Levorato, M.C., M. Roch, and B. Nesi, A longitudinal study of idiom and text comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 2007. 34(03): p. 473.
〔4〕 Ritchhart, R., M. Church, and K. Morrison, Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. 2011: John Wiley & Sons.
〔5〕 Hyerle, D.N. and L. Alper, Student successes with thinking maps®: school-based research, results, and models for achievement using visual tools. 2011: Corwin Press.
〔6〕 Perkins, D., Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. 2008: Simon and Schuster.
〔7〕 Graves, D., Forward: Mosaic of thought. 1997: Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
〔8〕 Li, L.-Y., G.-D. Chen, and S.-J. Yang, Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers & Education, 2013. 60(1): p. 32-39.
〔9〕 Lee, Y.-H., G.-D. Chen, L.-Y. Li, C.-Y. Fan, and K.-H. Chiang. The effect of utilizing the learning skill of highlighting and constructing a map in a networked hyperlink condition on learning performance. in Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on. 2012. IEEE.
〔10〕 Li, L.-Y., C.-Y. Fan, D.-W. Huang, and G.-D. Chen, The effects of the e-book system with the reading guidance and the annotation map on the reading performance of college students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2014. 17(1): p. 320-331.
〔11〕 陳永哲, [論點─ 理由─ 證據] 模式之議論文閱讀素養學習系統; A Tutoring System with “Claim-Reason-Evidence” Teaching Model to Foster Argumentation Reading Competence. 2013.
〔12〕 Stull, A.T. and R.E. Mayer, Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of educational psychology, 2007. 99(4): p. 808.
〔13〕 Ponce, H.R. and R.E. Mayer, Qualitatively different cognitive processing during online reading primed by different study activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014. 30: p. 121-130.
〔14〕 Baker, J.R., Is multiple-column online text better? it depends. Usability News, 2005. 7: p. 2.
〔15〕 Chan, A. and P. Lee, Effect of display factors on Chinese reading times, comprehension scores and preferences. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2005. 24(2): p. 81-91.
〔16〕 Braganza, C., K. Marriott, P. Moulder, M. Wybrow, and T. Dwyer. Scrolling behaviour with single-and multi-column layout. in Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. 2009. ACM.
〔17〕 Mayer, R.E., Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 2005: p. 183-200.
〔18〕 Mayer, R.E., Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). 2009.
〔19〕 Liu, Z., Paper to digital: Documents in the information age. 2008: ABC-CLIO.
〔20〕 Salmon, A.K., Young English language learners making thinking and language visible. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 2008(10): p. 126-141.
〔21〕 Salmon, A.K. and T. Lucas, Exploring young children's conceptions about thinking. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 2011. 25(4): p. 364-375.
〔22〕 Strangman, N., T. Hall, and A. Meyer, Graphic organizers and implications for universal design for learning: curriculum enhancement report. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum, 2014.
〔23〕 陳聖謨, 讓思考看得見：簡介「思考圖」在教學上的應用. 國教之友, 1998. 49（4，56-62。）.
〔24〕 Hyerle, D. and K. Williams, Bifocal assessment in the cognitive age: Thinking maps for assessing content learning and cognitive processes. The New Hampshire Journal of Education, XII, 2010: p. 32-28.
〔25〕 Hyerle, D., Thinking maps: Visual tools for activating habits of mind. Activating and engaging habits of mind, 2000: p. 46-58.
〔26〕 Hyerle, D., Thinking Maps®: A Visual Language for Learning, in Knowledge Cartography. 2008, Springer. p. 73-88.
〔27〕 Hyerle, D., Visual Tools for Constructing Knowledge. 1996: ERIC.
〔28〕 程嬇玲, 思考地圖運用於生活故事寫作之研究. 2009. 國立新竹教育大學.
〔29〕 Thinking Maps. [cited 2015 4 Jun]; Available from: http://thinkingmaps.com/.
〔30〕 Armbruster, B.B., F. Lehr, J. Osborn, R. O’Rourke, I. Beck, D. Carnine, and D. Simmons, Put reading first. Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA), 2003.
〔31〕 Gallagher, M.L., Using thinking maps to facilitate research writing in upper level undergraduates classes. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 2011. 29(2): p. 53-56.
〔32〕 Al-naqa, S.A. and M.F. Abu-Owda, The effect of using thinking maps strategy to improve science processes in science course on female students of the ninth grade. Science, 2014. 2(2): p. 44-49.
〔33〕 COOKS, J. and A. SUNSERI, Leveling the Playing Field: The Efficacy of Thinking Maps on English Language Learner Students’ Writing. CATESOL Journal, 2014. 25(2013): p. 2013.
〔34〕 楊璧華, 心智繪圖應用於文章構思的研究── 以國小六年級學童為例(未出版之碩士論文). 國立新竹教育大學中國語文學系語文教師碩士在職專班碩士論文, 2014: p. 1-130.
〔35〕 何秀芬, 運用思考地圖提升學童繪本(未出版之碩士論文). 國立新竹教育大學課程與教學碩士學位在職進修專班碩士論文, 2014: p. 1-213.
〔36〕 潘儀軒, 思考地圖融入閱讀教學對國小學習障礙學生閱讀理解成效之探究. 國立新竹教育大學中國語文學系語文教學碩士班碩士論文, 2014: p. 1-161.
〔37〕 謝雅筑, 思考地圖融入國語科教學對國小四年級學生閱讀理解成效的影響. 國立新竹教育大學語文教學碩士班碩士論文, 2014.
〔38〕 何鈺淇, 思考地圖融入課文為本之敘事寫作教學研究-國小三年級為例. 國立新竹教育大學語文教學碩士班碩士論文, 2014: p. 1-130.
〔39〕 Davies, M., Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? Higher education, 2011. 62(3): p. 279-301.
〔40〕 Merchie, E. and H. Van Keer, Spontaneous Mind Map Use and Learning from Texts: The Role of Instruction and Student Characteristics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. 69: p. 1387-1394.
〔41〕 Chang, K.-E., Y.-T. Sung, and I.-D. Chen, The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 2002. 71(1): p. 5-23.
〔42〕 唐鳳. 萌典. [cited 2015 7 JUN]; Available from: https://www.moedict.tw/.