跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 艾飛
Alfin Suprayuygo
論文名稱: 支撑框架结构的抗震性能耦合彎板阻尼器
Seismic Performance of Braced Frames with Coupled Bending Plate Dampers
指導教授: 許協隆
Hsieh-Lung Hsu
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 119
中文關鍵詞: 耦合彎板阻尼器耗能抗震性能支撐框架
外文關鍵詞: Coupled bending plate dampers, energy dissipation, seismic performance, braced frame
相關次數: 點閱:13下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 耦合彎板阻尼器是適用於支撐框架中藉遲滯韌性彎曲產生消散地震能量的新設計。耦合彎曲板的反應取決於其非彈性階段之剛度和屈服強度。該耦合板的塑性彎曲取代了拉伸屈服和彈性挫屈。此有效增加能量消散。
    在大地震運動下,耦合彎板阻尼器具完整和穩定的遲滯行為,在拉伸和壓縮,提供顯著耗能和延展性。相對於其他替代的地震能量消散系統,此耦合彎板阻尼器具有容易更換及拉壓載重下穩定行為之特性。在這項研究中,進行了一系列關於耦合彎板阻尼器之循環荷載試驗和支撐框架之反覆載重試驗。試驗結果證實,此設計有效提升結構之強度、剛度、變形能力和能量消散,因此為一有效之耐震設計。


    The coupled bending plate dampers is a new design of non-buckling braced system that applies on the braced frames to dissipate seismic energy through the hysteretic yielding within ductile bending plates. The hysteric response of a coupled bending plates depends on the inelastic behavior characterized by a post-yield increase in stiffness and strength at large displacements. The plastic bending of the coupled plates replaces the tensile yielding and inelastic buckling of traditional ductile braces. This gives a symmetrical hysteresis with increased energy dissipation.
    Under large seismic motions, the full and stable hysteretic behavior of the coupled bending plate dampers, which yields in both tension and compression, provides significant energy dissipation and ductility. Furthermore, when compared to other alternative seismic energy dissipation systems on the braced frames, the coupled bending plate dampers have advantages such as easy replacement following an earthquake and disallow damages in the main braced members. In this study, a series of cyclic loading tests on the coupled bending plate dampers and braced frames with the proposed dampers were conducted. The test specimens exhibited significant strength, stiffness, deformation capacity and energy dissipation which justified the effectiveness of the proposed design method.
    Keywords: Coupled bending plate dampers, energy dissipation, seismic performance, braced frame.

    ABSTRACT i TABLE OF CONTENTS iii LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Motivations 2 1.3. Objectives 2 1.4. Outlines 3 CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 4 2.1. Bending of Thick Steel Plates 4 2.2. Steel Frames with Semi-Rigid Connection 5 2.3. Concentrically Braced Frame 5 2.4. Concentrically Braced Frame with Eccentric Gusset 6 2.5. Top and Seat Angle 7 CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY 10 3.1. Theory 10 3.1.1. Strong Column Weak Beam Philosophy 10 3.1.2. Bolted Top and Seat Angle Connection 11 3.1.3. Double Web Angle with Slot Connection 12 3.1.4. Coupled Bending Plate Dampers 12 3.1.4.1. Braced Frame of Coupled Bending Plate Dampers 12 3.1.4.2. Bending Capacity of Beam 12 3.1.5. Hinge Gussets and High Strength Bolt 13 3.1.6. Strength of Coupled Bending Plate Dampers (Derivation of development equation) 14 3.2. Finite Element Analysis 16 3.2.1. Analytical Model for Plate Simulation 16 3.2.2. Analytical Model for Frame Response Simulation 18 3.3. Mechanism of Damper 19 CHAPTER IV EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM 21 4.1. General 21 4.2. Specimen Design 21 4.2.1. Set-Up for Component Tests 23 4.2.2. Set-up for Braced Frame Tests 23 4.3. Details of Specimens 23 4.3.1. Brace member 23 4.3.2. Component Test 24 4.3.3. Semi Rigid Moment Frame 24 4.3.4. Braced Frame 25 4.4. Materials 26 4.5. Specimen Construction 26 4.6. Instrumentation 26 4.6.1. Strain Gauges 26 4.6.2. Transducers 27 4.6.3. Data Acquisition System 27 4.7. Lateral Support 27 4.8. Loading Protocol 27 CHAPTER V RESULT AND OBSERVATION 28 5.1. General 28 5.2. Experimental Observations 28 5.2.1. Specimen CTS-6 28 5.2.2. Specimen CTS-9 29 5.2.3. Specimen CTS-12 30 5.2.4. Specimen CTS-15 31 5.2.5. Specimen CTM-6-6 31 5.2.6. Specimen CTM-9-6 32 5.2.7. Specimen MF-9 33 5.2.8. Specimen MF-12 34 5.2.9. Specimen MF-9-B-9 35 5.2.10. Specimen MF-9-B-12 36 5.2.11. Specimen MF-12-B-9 37 5.2.12. Specimen MF-12-B-12 38 CHAPTER VI COMPARISONS AND DISCUSSIONS 40 6.1. General 40 6.2. Comparisons of Strength Between Experimental and Analytical Results 40 6.2.1. Results from Derived Equation 40 6.2.2. Finite Element Simulation 41 6.3. Stiffness 42 6.4. Strength 42 6.5. Deformation Capacity 43 6.6. Energy Dissipation 44 6.7. Equivalent Viscous Damping Ratios of Component 44 6.8. Performance Evaluations 45 6.9. Design Recommendations 45 CHAPTER VII CONCLUSIONS 47 7.1. General 47 7.2. Suggestions 48 REFERENCES 49 TABLES 51 FIGURES 59

    AISC, 2010. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. AISC 358-05 ed. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.
    Azizinamini, A. and Radziminski, J., 1988. Static and cyclic performance of semi-rigid steel beam to column connections. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, p. 2879–2997.
    Benschoten, P. V., Al Satari, M. and Hussain, S., 2013. Buckling Restrained Braced Frame (BRBF) Structures: Analysis, Design and Approvals Issues. Coffman Engineers, Inc. Los Angeles, CA, pp. 1-12.
    Berman, J. W. and Bruneau, M., 2009. Cyclic Testing of a Buckling Restrained Braced Frame with Unconstrained Gusset Connections. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, pp. 1499-1510.
    Broderick, B. M. and Hunt, A. D., 2012. Quasi-Static Testing and Correlative Dynamic Analysis of Concentrically Braced Frames with Hollow Steel Braces and Gusset Plate Connections. s.l., s.n.
    Calado, L., De Matteis, G. and Landolfo, R., 2000. Experimental response of top and seat angle semi-rigid steel frame connection. Materials and Structures, Volume 33, pp. 499-510.
    Citipitioglu, A. M., Haj-Ali, R. M. and White, D. W., 2002. Refined 3D finite element modeling of partially-restrained connections including slip. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, p. 995–1013.
    Danesh, F., Pirmoz, A. and Daryan, A. S., 2007. Effect of shear force on the initial stiffness of top and seat angle connections with double web angles. Journal Construction Steel, p. 1208–1218.
    Değertekin, Ö. S. and Hayalioglu, M. S., 2004. Design of Non-Linear Semi-Rigid Steel Frames With Semi-Rigid Column Bases. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, pp. 1-16.
    Fahnestock, L. A., Ricles, J. M. and Sause, R., 2007. Experimental Evaluation of a Large-Scale Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 133(9), pp. 1205-1214.
    Garlock, M. M., Ricles, J. M. and Richard, S., 2003. Cyclic Load Tests and Analysis of Bolted Top-and-Seat Angle Connections. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, pp. 1615-1625.
    Kurt, M. M. and Abolhassan, A.-A., 2003. Steel Semirigid Column–Tree Moment Resisting Frame Seismic Behavior. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, p. 1243.
    Promoz, A. and Mohammadrezapour, E., 2008. Behavior of Bolted Top-Seat Angle Connection Under Combined Axial Tension and Moment Loading. Beijing, World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Press.
    Siekrk, J. F. and Weinmann, K. J., 1985. A model of edge cracking in sheared and bent steel plate. Journal Applied Metalwoking, 3(4), pp. 391-392.
    Vargas, R. and Bruneau, M., 2009. Experimental Response of Buildings Designed with Metallic Structural Fuses. II. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, p. 394.
    Weng, F. C. and White, R. N., 1990. Residual Stresses in Cold Bent Thick Steel Plates. Journal of Structural Engineering, Volume 116, pp. 24-39.

    QR CODE
    :::