「鷹架」可以幫助學生從既有的知識中，發展內化新資訊的能力。但是，「鷹架」假設所有的學生為初學者且侷限學生的思考。故本研究採用「尋求幫助」的後設認知概念並將其運用在「鷹架」上，設計一個「尋求鷹架」的學習機制。研究者希望可以藉由此系統促進學生個人的學習，學生可以主動的尋求電腦鷹架的幫助。不同學習成就的學生可以選擇自己解題或選擇適當的鷹架輔助。本研究並分為預試、個案研究與實驗等三階段的研究流程，在預試的初步系統設計的課堂觀察與個案研究後，研究者根據其觀察及分析的結果，更改「尋求鷹架」系統的設計，最後在實驗中使用的「尋求鷹架」系統則增加鷹架的說明、金幣制度和信心度的詢問機制。
在研究中發現，學生在「尋求幫助」系統中進行數學文字解題活動，電腦適時的鷹架輔助會增加學生解題的信心程度，並幫助學生順利解題。當學生不需要電腦鷹架輔助時，也可以在以作答正確為前提下，加快作答的速度。另外，在「尋求幫助」的系統下，學生可以利用試算紙的功能，幫助自己發展獨立的解題思維；而在解題遇到困難時，學生可以主動的透過尋求鷹架的輔助，逐漸建立解題的技巧與方法。

Scaffolding can develop a student’s ability to internalize new information on the basis of prior knowledge. However, it assumes that all students are novices and likely limits students’ way of thinking. Therefore, this study incorporates the concept of help seeking in the usage of scaffolds, so that students can think as a whole before using scaffolds. The author preliminarily designed an activity flow of seeking scaffolds for promoting student’s active learning and seeking appropriate scaffolds. This study adopted three research steps: trial study, case study, and experiments. According to the class observation and the data obtained from the trial study and case study, the author amended the system by adding some of functions such as the instructions of using scaffolds, coins system, and the confidence questionnaire.
The results showed that, after using the “scaffolding-seeking” system, students had higher confidence to solve mathematical word problems. When answering correctly, students could solve the word problem faster if they can solve it on their own. On the other hand, student could use a digital sheet to externalized their thinking and solve the problem. When students faced difficulty in solving a word problem, students could choose an appropriate scaffold to not only solve the problem but also learn the skill and the way of solving word problems gradually.

Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS quarterly, 18(2), 159–174.
Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2004). Toward Tutoring Help Seeking (Applying Cognitive Modeling to Meta-cognitive Skills). Lecture notes in computer science, 227–239.
Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277.
Baker, E. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Computer-based assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3-4), 269–282.
Barab, S. (2006). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the learning scientist. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 153–170.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation andother more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.),Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the learning sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, 229–270.
Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.)Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. New directions in educational technology, 96, 15–22.
Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities, 289–298.
De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1991). Some factors influencing the solution of addition and subtraction word problems. Language in mathematical education: Research and practice, 117–130.
Collective, T. D. R. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Dick, W., & Reiser, R. A. (1989). Planning effective instruction. Prentice Hall.
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Commentary: design research: what we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105–121.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The nature of intelligence, 12, 231–235.
Karabenick, S. A. (1998). Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lester Jr, F. K. (1983). Trends and issues in mathematical problem-solving research. Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes, 229–26.
Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1981). Help-seeking: An understudied problem-solving skill in children. Developmental Review 1, pp. 224–246.
Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications, 283–301.
Newman, R. S. (1998). State-space modeling of animal movement and mortality with application to salmon, Biometrics 54 (1998), pp. 1290–1314.
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. (2nd ed.). New York: Doubleday.
Renkl, A. (2002). Learning from worked-out examples: Instructional explanations supplement self-explanations. Learning & Instruction, 12(5), 529–556.
Raymond, E. (2000). Cognitive characteristics. Learners with Mild Disabilities, 169–201.
Roll, I., Baker, R.S., Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., & Koedinger, K.R. (2005) Modeling Students’ Metacognitive Errors in Two Intelligent Tutoring Systems. in proceedings of User Modeling 2005, 379-88.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoiding Seeking Help in the Classroom: Who and Why? Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 93–114.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Pr.
Van Der Stuyf,R.R. (2002) Scaffolding as a Teaching Strategy.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., Ko, H. W., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 371–382.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Wood, H.; Wood, D. (1999). Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers & Education , 33(2-3):153-169.
吳沂木(1999)。淺談資訊教育融入學科教學。班級經營，4(1)，47-52。
李佩樺(2008)。鷹架學生的數學學習---以資優生解連比的自發性解題策略為資產。國立嘉義大學數學教育研究所碩士論文。
林勝隆(2009)。高一數學成就不同學生一元二次不等式解題歷程的分析。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。　
翁瑜璘(2008)。以註解算式引導小學數學文字題擬題之鷹架設計。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士論文。
張錦文(2003)。後設認知理論在數學領域教學的應用。高雄市博愛國小，未出版。
孫賢霖(2008)。從數位學習發展談社會認知發展論對技職資訊教育之啟示。網路社會學通訊(71)。
黃茂在、陳文典(2005)。問題解決的能力。科學教育月刊，273，21-41。
陳月珍(2004)。資 優同儕鷹架支持與電腦輔助教學對提昇身障學生數學學 習成效與互動品質之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系在職進修碩士 論文，未出版，台北。
陳彥廷、柳賢（2005）。運用鷹架理論初探國小學生數學學習—以一位五年級學童為例。南大學報，39（1），27-44。
單文經(1998)。班級經營策略研究。台北：師大書苑。
劉中琪(2009)。國小文字題解題流程之電腦鷹架設計。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士論文。
劉炳輝、劉世雄(2004)。全球資訊網融入教學與其教學設計之應用--以鷹架理論發展教學設計 EXPERT模式為例。現代教育論壇，11期，35-44。
羅豪章（2001）。鷹架作用在電腦輔助教學上之應用。視聽教育雙月刊，42(4)，頁20-30。