汽車以租代購在中國發展迅速，緊跟著汽車融資以及租賃產業突飛猛進的發展，投入此產業者也越來越多，隨著政府補貼政策、網路發達的宣傳，產生了許多不同的市場機會。
本研究針對中國電動汽車的創新經營模式做深度分析與評估，首先探討汽車產業概況與新能源汽車的發展概況，再根據Osterwalder and Pigneur(2010)所提出的商業模式來進一步分析中國大陸新能源汽車以租代購的經營模式與未來發展。
本研究採質性研究，主要探討中國電動汽車的發展概況及其創新經營模式，針對以租代購的方式進行分析與評估，研究的性質屬於解釋性問題，故適合採質性研究法當中的案例分析法，本研究主要採次級資料蒐集與業界專家訪談法。
本研究的結論包括: 1.未來新能源汽車將成為中國汽車市場的主流 2.以租代購的經營模式清晰明確，具體可行 3.業者宜自律以降低以租代購的風險與弊端。本研究針對電動汽車產業以租代購經營模式的建議包括: 1.提升融資租賃服務的專業知識 2.提升銀行汽車貸款和廠商金融貸款的專業知識 3.掌握市場最新資訊與動態 4.做好競爭者分析與因應對策。
本研究提出對未來研究方向的建議，包括: 1.進行量化研究，結果將更具意義 2.持續追蹤未來電動汽車產業的發展 3.未來可以針對電動汽車產業其他的經營模式做深入分析。

Leasing rather than buying a car is developing rapidly in China. Along with the skyrocketing development of the car loan and leasing business industry, more and more people are stepping in this industry. Moreover, with the government’s subsidy policy and the wide-spread propaganda in the network, many different market opportunities have popped up.

This study will perform an in-depth analysis and evaluation of the innovative business model of Chinese electric cars. First, we will investigate the current situation of the car industry and the developmental situation of new energy cars. Then, based on the business model raised by Osterwalder and Pigneur (2010), we will further analyze the leasing rather than buying business model for new energy cars and its future development in China. This study will be performed on a qualitative basis. The research subject will be the innovative business model of Chinese electric cars and a profound analysis and evaluation will be made on leasing rather than buying. This study is intended to investigate the developmental situation and its innovative business model of Chinese electric cars and the investigation will be focused on the approach of leasing rather than buying. Since the nature of this study is to interpret issues, it is therefore suitable for using the case-study method in the qualitative study. This study will secondarily use data collection and the interview-with-industry-experts method.
The conclusion of this study includes: 1. New energy cars will become the mainstream on the future Chinese car market. 2. The leasing rather than buying business model is crystal clear and feasible. 3. Business providers should well discipline themselves to minimize the leasing rather than busying risk and drawback. For the leasing rather than buying business model for the electric car industry, this study would recommend: 1. Boost the professional knowledge of car loan and leasing services. 2. Boost the professional knowledge of bank car loads and company financing. 3. Keep track of the latest market information and trend. 4. Be well prepared with the competitor analysis and the countermeasure.

This study proposes recommendations for the future research direction, which includes: 1. Perform a quantification study, the result will be more meaningful. 2. Continuously trace the future development of the electric car industry. 3. Perform an in-depth analysis for other business models of the electric car industry in the future.

一、 英文文獻
1. Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. New York.
2. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
3. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbaum, R. S. (2000). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation (working paper). Boston: Harvard Business School, 98.
4. Collett, S. (1999). SWOT analysis. Computer world, 33(29), 58-58.
5. Dubosson‐Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). E‐business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(1), 5-23.
6. Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resources-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33 (3), 114–135.
7. Grant, R. M. (2002). Contemporary strategic analysis, 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Limited.
8. Grant, R. M. (2016). Contemporary strategy analysis: Text and cases edition. John Wiley & Sons.
9. Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the Revolution Harvard Business School Press. Boston, MA, USA, 343-354.
10. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press).
11. Hill, C. W., ＆ Jones, G. R. (1995) Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Hill, C. W., & Jones, G. R. (1998). Strategic Management Theory. N.Y.: Houghton Miffflin Company.
13. Hill, C. W., & Jones, G. R. (2001). Strategic Management Theory. Houghton Mifflin Company, Fifth Edition.
14. Hill, C. W., & Jones, G. R. (2007). Strategic Management Theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15. Hill, C. W., & Kim, W. C. (1988). Searching for a dynamic theory of the multinational enterprise: A transaction cost model. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 93-104.
16. Hill, C. W., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic management journal, 11(2), 117-128.
17. Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2015). Strategic Management: Theory and Cases: An Integrated Approach, 11 editions, Cengage Learning Publications.
18. IH, A. (1965). Corporate Strategy, An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
19. Loewe, P., & Chen, G. (2007). Changing your company's approach to innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 35(6), 18-26.
20. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harward Business Review, 80(5), 86-92.
21. Mahadevan, B. (2000). Business models for Internet-based e-commerce: An anatomy. California management review, 42(4), 55-69.
22. Michel, A., & Shaked, I. (1986). Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: Financial performance and characteristics. Journal of international business studies, 17(3), 89-100.
23. Mitchell, D., & Coles, C. (2003). The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 15-21.
24. Narayanan, V. K., & Fahey, L. (2005). The relevance of the institutional underpinnings of Porter's five forces framework to emerging economies: An epistemological analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 207-223.
25. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1.
26. Pearce, A. J. & Richard B. R. (2000). Formulation, Implementation, and Control of Competitive Strategy, 7th edition. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill Press.
27. Pearce, J. A., Robinson, R. B., & Subramanian, R. (2000). Strategic management: Formulation, implementation, and control. Columbus, OH: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
28. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competition. New York, 300, 28.
29. Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., & Linder, J. C. (2005). The power of business models. Business horizons, 48(3), 199-207.
30. Stähler, P. (2002). Business Models as an Unit of Analysis for Strategizing.
31. Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic markets, 8(2), 3-8.
32. Valentin, E. K. (2001). SWOT analysis from a resource-based view. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 9(2), 54-69.
33. Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long range planning, 15(2), 54-66.
34. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 2nd edition, Newbury Park, Sage publications.
二、 中文文獻
1. 大前研一，「策略家的智慧」，黃宏義譯，長河出版社，1984。
2. 司徒達賢，策略管理新論，台北：智勝，2001。
3. 司徒達賢，策略管理新論：觀念架構與分析方法，台北：智勝文化，2001。
4. 伍忠賢，策略管理，三民書局，台北，2002。
5. 余朝權，產業分析構面之探討，台北市銀行月刊，22(7)，9-19，1991。
6. 余朝權，產業競爭分析專論，台北：五南圖書出版公司，1994。
7. 利弘毅，路線貨運業經營策略轉型之分析–以H公司為例，國立中央大學管理學院高接主管企管碩士論文，2016。
8. 林建煌，策略管理，新陸書局，2009年。
9. 許士軍，定性研究在管理學上的重要，中原學報，24(2)，1-3，1996。
10. 許士軍，現代行銷管理，台北：環球經濟社，1980。
11. 陳向明，社會科學質的研究，台北：五南，2002。