跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 高宇成
Yu-Chen Kao
論文名稱: 隱私(權)議題中化約主義與功能主義之探究
指導教授: 甯應斌
Yin-Bin Ning
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 文學院 - 哲學研究所
Executive Master of Philosophy
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 211
中文關鍵詞: 自我意識自我反思人際關係人格個體性尊嚴人格的不可侵犯自身權社會文化的風俗習慣功能主義憲法侵權法化約主義隱私權隱私近用
外文關鍵詞: self-consciousness, self-reflexivity, human relationship, personhood, individuality, social culture convention, access, tort law, constitutional law, functionalism, reductionism, privacy, the right to privacy, diginity, the inviolate personality, the right over the person
相關次數: 點閱:20下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文的主旨在於深入探討現代社會中「隱私(權)」議題的哲學性論述,所謂「隱私(權)」議題,即是包含「隱私」和「隱私權」兩個概念的議題,上述兩種概念雖然不是完全相等的概念,但卻有著密不可分的關係。
    在「隱私(權)」的哲學性論述上,「化約主義」與「功能主義」是極為重要的
    兩種不同主張,這兩種論述幾乎針鋒相對的原因在於:目前對於「隱私」和「隱私
    權」概念的定義都是有缺漏的;此外這兩種主義深受美國「憲法」與「侵權法」的
    法律背景影響,而採取兩個不同的法律立場來論述。
    除了深入探討這兩種主義的論證之外,本文也經由這兩種主義的對話,進一步
    瞭解、比較兩者的關係;並且本文要透過現代社會中已經漸漸產生變化的「隱私(權)」內涵來進一步評估這兩者未來對「隱私(權)」詮釋的發展性與可能面臨的問題。
    本文在「隱私(權)」議題上所得到的結論,或許與一般人的直覺或大多數學者
    的功能主義觀點不同,但是卻更多考慮到現代社會中「隱私(權)」內涵的變化,期待能為「隱私(權)」議題,提供一個更新的哲學性論述思考方向。


    目錄…………………………………………………………...Ⅰ 第一章 序論…………………………………………………1 前言………………………………………………………..1 第一節 本文架構…………………………………………6 第二節 問題源起與問題意識…………………………..13 第三節 文獻探討………………………………………..19 第二章 隱私(權)的化約主義論述……………………..62 第一節 隱私沒有普遍性準則…………………………..67 第二節 隱私的負面影響………………………………..75 第三節 以新權利取代隱私權…………………………..85 第四節 透明社會的方向………………………………108 第三章 隱私(權)的功能主義論述……………………124 第一節 人格保障理論…………………………………127 第二節 人格促進理論…………………………………140 第三節 人際關係理論…………………………………153 第四節 隱私(權)的其它功能性……………………163 第四章 結論………………………………………………170 第一節 隱私(權)內涵的變化………………………174 第二節 以隱私(權)新內涵評估化約主義與功能主義之發展性…………………………………………186 第三節 總結……………………………………………200 參考書目……………………………………………………207

    引用資料:
    Alfino, Mark, and Mayes, G. Randolph. “Reconstructing the Right to Privacy.” Social Theory and Practice. 29.1 (2003): 1-18
    Allen, Anita L. Uneasy Access. New Jersey:Rowman&Littlefield, Publishers, 1988.
    Benn, Stanley I. “Privacy, Freedom, and Respect for Person.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 223-244
    Bloustein, Edward J. “Privacy as An Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 156-202
    Boling, Patricia. Privacy And the Politics of Intimate Life. Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press, 1996.
    Brin, David. The Transparent Society:Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom?. Addison-Wesiey:Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., 1998.
    Bronski, Michael. The Pleasure Principle. New York:St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
    Castiglione, Robert I. “Paul, Weiss-Privacy the Rediscovery of Human Being” Philosophy Today 28(1984): 20-35
    Coleman, Craig Stuart. Privacy And Property: A Reexamination of The Right to Private Property. Madison: Thesis(Ph.D), The University of Wisconsin, 2000.
    Cooke, Maeve. ”A Space of One''s Own: Autonomy, Privacy, Liberty.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 25.1 (1999): 23-53
    Engstrom, Timothy H. “Corporate Appropriation of Privacy: The Transformation of the Personal and Public Spheres.” Ethics and Behavior 7.3 (1997): 239-252
    Etzioni, Amitai. “Medical Records: Enhancing Privacy, Preserving the Common Good” Hastings-Center-Report 29.2 Mr-Ap (1999): 14-23
    Fried, Charles. “Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 203-222
    Gavison, Ruth. “Privacy and The Limits of Law.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 346-402
    Gerber, Scott D. “Privacy and Constitutional Theory.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2000): 165-185
    Gerstein, Robert S. “Intimacy and Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 265-271
    Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge:Polity Press, 1991.
    Hasian, Marouf Jr. ”Vernacular legal discourse: Revisiting the public acceptance of the "right to privacy" in the 1960s.” Political Communication 18.1 (2001): 89-105
    Inness, Julie C. Privacy Intimacy And Isolation. New York:Oxford University Press, 1992.
    Johnson, Jeffery L. ”A Theory of the Nature and Value of Privacy.” Public Affairs Quarterly 6.3 (1992): 271-288
    Johnson, Jeffery L. “Constitutional Privacy.” Law and Philosophy 13.2 (1994): 161-193
    Posner, Richard A. “An Economic Theory of Privacy.” Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 333-345
    Prosser, William L. ” Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology.
    Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
    104-155
    Rachels, James. “Why Privacy Is Important.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy:
    An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University
    Press, 1984. 290-299
    Reiman, Jeffrey H. “Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood.” Philosophical Dimensions
    of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press, 1984. 300-316
    Schoeman, Fredinand David. Ed. Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1984.
    ‧‧‧. Privacy And Social Freedom. Cambridge; New York, NY, USA:Cambridge University Press, 1992 .
    Soifer, Eldon and Szabados, Bela. “Hypocrisy and Privacy.” Journal of Philosophical Research 27 (2002): 601-618
    Thomson, Judith Jarvis. ”The Right to Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 272-289
    Warren, Samuel D., and Louis D. Brandeis. ” The Right to Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 75-103
    Wasserstrom, Richard A. ” Privacy:Some Arguments and Assumptions.”
    Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand
    D.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 317-332
    Westin, Alan F. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum press. 1967
    甯應斌 “性工作與現代性:現代自我的社會條件” 臺灣社會研究 53(2004):85-143
    劉靜怡 “網路社會的資訊隱私權保護” 二十一世紀 63(2001.02):17-27
    參考資料:
    Allen, Anita L. “Privacy in American Law.” Privacies: Philosophical Evaluations. Ed. by Rossler, Beate. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 2004. 19-39
    ‧‧‧. ”Why Privacy Isn''t Everything: Feminist Reflections on Personal.” Philosophy in Review 24.1 (2004): 1-3
    Beauchamp, Tom L. “The Right to Privacy and The Right to Die.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2002): 276-292
    Chambers, Jean E. ”Privacy, Sex, and Norms: An Indirect Control Definition.”
    Journal of Information Ethics 9.1 (2000): 10-25
    Corlett, J. Angelo. “The Nature and Value of the Moral Right to Privacy.” Public Affairs Quarterly 16.4 (2002): 329-350
    Davison, Scott A. “Privacy and Control.” Faith and Philosophy 14.2 (1997): 137-151
    Epstein, Richard A. “Deconstructing Privacy: And Putting It Back Together Again.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2000): 1-24
    Frey, R. G. ”Privacy, Control, and Talk of Rights.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2002): 45-67
    Halper, Thomas ”Privacy and Autonomy: From Warren and Brandeis to Roe and Cruzan.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21.2 (1996): 121-135
    Hixon, Richard F. Privacy In A Public Society:Human Rights In Conflict. New York:Oxford University Press, 1987.
    LoPucki, L. M. “Did privacy cause identity theft?” Hastings Law Journal 54.4 (2003): 1277-1297
    Marshall, Sandra E. “Public Bodies, Private Selves.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 5 (1988): 147-158
    Moore, Banmgton. Privacy: Studies In Social And Cultural History. New York:Distributed by Pantheon Books, 1984.
    Robison, Wade L. ”Privacy and Personal Identity.” Ethics and Behavior 7.3 (1997):
    195-205
    Rosenberg, Alexander. “Privacy as a Matter of Taste and Rights.” Social Philosophy
    And Policy; 17.2 (2000): 68-90
    Staples, William G. The Culture of Surveillance : Discipline and Social Control in
    the United States. New York, NY: St. Martin''s Press, 1997.
    Taylor, James Stacey. “Privacy and Autonomy: A Reappraisal.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 40.4 (2002): 587-604
    Weinreb, Lloyd L. “The Right to Privacy” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2000): 25-44
    中文部分:
    李松婷撰 國小兒童隱私概念之研究A Study on Children’s Concept of Privacy。 台北市:碩士論文,台北市市立師範學院國民教育研究所,2002。
    林建中撰 隱私權概念之再思考:關於概念範圍,定義,及權利形成方式。 台北市:碩士論文,台灣大學法律研究所,1999。
    詹文凱撰 隱私權之研究。 台北:博士論文,台灣大學法律研究所,1998。
    藍培青撰 隱私權在美國演進歷程之研究。 台北縣:博士論文,私立淡江大學美國研究所,1997。

    QR CODE
    :::