跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 林宜豫
Yi-Yu Lin
論文名稱： Performance Improvement of Semi-Rigid Moment Frames With Rim Dampers
指導教授： 許協隆
口試委員:
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年： 2018
畢業學年度： 106
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 136
中文關鍵詞： 半剛性構架 、鋼管消能器 、環形消能器 、耐震性能 、斜撐構架 、消能表現
外文關鍵詞： Semi-rigid frames, Steel pipe damper, Rim damper, Seismic performance, Braced frame, Energy dissipation
相關次數： 點閱：15  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 經由一系列的實驗與分析，本研究提出一種同時兼具美學、經濟性、良好消能能力並且能有效提升整體結構耐震表現的新型被動消能器，並將其命名為「環形消能器」。
    環形消能器由兩片圓管加工而成，並裝置於半剛性構架的斜撐中央，組合成一個斜撐構架。在外力加載時，環形消能器能提供相當佳的韌性進行消能，並在位移控制初期就能進入塑性區；此消能器安裝於半剛性構架後，構架中的主要梁柱桿件不易產生降伏、破壞。在經過多組反覆載重、應用不同加載歷時試驗後，試驗結果顯示環形消能器能有效地提升半剛性構架在力量、勁度、消能能力上的表現，試驗結果亦證實，加裝環形消能器的半剛性構架可有效提升其變形能力。

    A new type of passive damper, namely rim damper, consisting of aesthetics, economical and great energy dissipation capability was proposed to improve the performance of framed structures. Rim damper was made by two pieces of pipes and located in the middle of a brace which was connected to the semi-rigid frame, forming a braced frame. Rim damper has good ductility to dissipate the energy when an external load is applied to the structure. This damper exhibited yielding at an early stage of frame deformation.
    A series of cyclic loading tests on the rim damper and braced frames with the proposed dampers were conducted in this study. Two loading protocols were used in the frame tests to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in seismic design. Test results showed that the strength, stiffness and energy dissipation of the framed structures were effectively improved. It is also validated from the tests that braced frame exhibited significant performance in deformation capacity when the rim damper was applied.

    ABSTRACT i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Motivations 1 1.3 Objectives 2 1.4 Outlines 2 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 4 2.1 Evaluation of Structural Performance 4 2.2 Behavior of Semi-Rigid Moment Frame 5 2.3 Top and Seat Angle Connections 6 2.4 Eccentrically Braced Frame (EBF) 7 2.5 Braced Frame with Eccentric Gusset 7 2.6 Energy Dissipation Device 8 2.7 Pipe Damper 8 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 9 3.1 Theory 9 3.1.1 Strong Column Weak Beam Philosophy 9 3.1.2 Bolted Top and Seat Angle Connections 10 3.1.3 Double Web Angle with Slot Connection 11 3.1.4 Rim Dampers 11 3.1.5 Hinge gussets and High Strength Bolt 16 3.1.6 Mechanism of Rim Damper 16 3.2 Finite Element Analysis 17 3.2.1 Analytical Model for Brace Response Simulation 17 3.2.2 Analytical Model for Frame Response Simulation 19 CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM 22 4.1 General 22 4.2 Specimen Design 22 4.3 Details of specimens 24 4.3.1 Bracing system 24 4.3.2 Component Tests 25 4.3.3 Semi-Rigid Moment Frame Tests 25 4.3.4 Braced Frame Tests 26 4.4 Material Properties 27 4.5 Instrumentation 27 4.6 Test Procedures 29 4.7 Loading Protocol 29 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS 31 5.1 Introduction 31 5.2 Experimental Observations 31 5.2.1 Responses of P14 31 5.2.2 Responses of R14 32 5.2.3 Responses of P20 33 5.2.4 Responses of R20 33 5.2.5 Responses of FM (Semi-Rigid moment frame) 34 5.2.6 Responses of FR14 34 5.2.7 Responses of FR20 35 5.2.8 Responses of NFM (Semi-Rigid moment frame) 36 5.2.9 Responses of NFR14 37 5.2.10 Responses of NFR20 37 CHAPTER 6 COMPARISONS AND INTERPRETATIONS 39 6.1 General 39 6.2 Strength 39 6.3 Stiffness 40 6.4 Deformation Capacity 41 6.5 Energy Dissipation 42 6.6 Performance Evaluations 43 6.7 Design Recommendations 44 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS 45 7.1 Conclusions 45 7.2 Suggestions 46 REFERENCE 47 TABLES 50 FIGURES 55

    Andalib Z, Kafi MA, Kheyroddin A, Bazzaz M. Experimental investigation of the ductility and performance of steel rings constructed from plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2014;103;78-79.

    ANSI/AISC An American National Standard, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings 2016;341-16:41-42.

    ANSYS. Workbench user’s guide. ANSYS Inc 2017.

    Abolmaali A, Kukreti AR, Razavi H. Hysteresis behavior of semi-rigid double web angle steel connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2003;59:1057-1082.

    Berman JW, Bruneau M. Cyclic Testing of a Buckling Restrained Braced Frame with Unconstrained Gusset Connections. Journal of Structural Engineering 2009;135:1499-1510.

    Calado L, Matteis GD, Landolfo R. Experimental response of top and seat angle semi-rigid steel frame connections. Materials and Structures 2000;33:499-510.

    Cheraghi A ,Zahrai SM. Innovative multi-level control with concentric pipes along brace to reduce seismic response of steel frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2017;127:120-135.

    Degertekin SO, Hayalioglu MS. Design of non-linear semi-rigid steel frames with semi-rigid column bases. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering 2004;4:1-16.

    FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings 2000;356:38-42.

    Fahnestock LA, Ricles JM, Sause R. Experimental Evaluation of a Large-Scale Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame. Journal of Structural Engineering 2007;133:1205-1214.

    Gao N, Jeon JS, Hodgson DE, DesRoches R. An innovative seismic bracing system based on a superelastic shape memory alloy ring. Smart Materials and Structures 2016;25:1-16.

    Hunt AD, Broderick BM. Quasi-Static Testing and Correlative Dynamic Analysis of Concentrically Braced Frames with Hollow Steel Braces and Gusset Plate Connections. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2012;1-10.

    Hjelmstad KD and Popov EP. Characteristic of Eccentrically Braced Frames. Journal of Structural Engineering 1984;110:340-353.

    Heysami A. Types of Dampers and their Seismic Performance During an Earthquake. Current World Environment 2015;10:1002-1015.

    Krawinkler H. Loading history for cyclic tests in support of performance assessment of structure components. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2009;1-10.

    Kasai K and Popov EP. Cyclic Web Buckling Control For Shear Link Beams. Journal of Structural Engineering 1986;112:505-523.

    Musmar M. A. Effect of Link on Eccentrically Braced Frames. Journal of Engineering Sciences 2012;40:35-43.

    Maleki S, Bagheri S. Pipe damper, Part II: Application to bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2010;66:1096-1106.

    Pirmoz A, Khoei AS, Mohammadrezapour E, Daryan AS. Moment rotation behavior of bolted top seat angle connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2009;65:973-984.

    Serror MH, Diab RA, Mourad SA. Behavior of Steel Moment Resisting Frames with Supplemental Damping Devices. Journal of Advanced Research 2014;1-31.

    Wang XW. Experimental Research on Hysteretic Behavior of top-seat and web Angles Connections. 5th WSEAS international conference on Environment Ecosystems and Development 2007;75-79.

    Young WC, Budynas RG. Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain. McGraw-Hill 1990;7:314-316.

    QR CODE
    :::