在過去，家教式教學系統（Intelligent Tutoring System, ITS）往往只限於具備知識工程基礎的研究人員或專業人士才能開發。這項限制是起因於家教式教學系統開發方法的特性，結果造成大多數學教師在開發相關系統時的障礙。然而，就所具備的知識及動機而言，教師們卻是開發家教式教學系統的最佳人選。本研究的終極目的在於提出一個可供教師開發家教式教學系統的方法，以便加速家教式教學系統的普及化。本研究的現階段目的，則在解題領域為範圍內，提出一個可支援教師用以開發家教式互動元件的方法。
重覆使用互動紀錄（IDR）的概念，是在本研究中提出來作為設計此一方法的關鍵概念。一個關於重覆使用互動紀錄的故事，以及幾個關於重覆使用互動紀錄的應用、重覆使用互動紀錄應用時的主要部件及假設，均在本研究中提出以利闡釋此概念。為了將此概念應用到家教式教學系統的開發上，本研究中亦提出一個家教式教學互動的資料模型，以及一套從現有的教學互動資料中，以重覆使用資料的方式產生教學行動的程序。本研究中亦對此方法，以一個批改學生小考考卷的資料進行資料的重覆率研究，以瞭解其可行性。本研究的主要貢獻，在於奠定了以重覆使用互動紀錄概念開發家教式互動元件之方法的理論基礎。未來配合相關工具的開發，此方法可供一般教師使用。

Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) were used to be developed only by researchers or professionals with knowledge engineering background. This constraint is imposed by the characteristics of the adopted approach to ITS development. As a result, most of teachers, who are the best candidates of ITS developers of relevant subject domains in terms of their knowledge and motivation, are hindered from developing relevant systems. Therefore, the ultimate goal of this study is to propose an approach to ITS development for teacher use in order to help the dissemination of ITS applications. The current goal of this study is aimed at proposing an approach to helping teachers in developing a computer-supported tutoring interaction in problem-solving domain.
The concept of interaction data reuse (IDR) is proposed as the key concept for the design of the ITS development approach. An IDR story is narrated and some IDR applications as well as the major components and assumptions of an IDR application are described to explain the IDR concept. To apply the IDR concept to ITS development, a data model of tutoring interaction is proposed and a set of abstract procedures to generate tutoring actions by reusing existent tutoring data is introduced. A study of data repetition rate based on the data obtained from an experiment on quiz marking was performed to understand the feasibility of the IDR approach. This study lays down a theoretical foundation for the IDR approach to developing a computer-supported tutoring interaction component in problem-solving domain for teacher use. With the readiness of relevant tools, the goal can be achieved.

Ackerman, M.S. & Malone, T.W. (1990). Answer Garden: A Tool for Growing Organizational Memory. In the Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Office Information Systems, Cambride, MA, 31-39.
Aimeur, E., Dufort, H., Leibu, D. & Frasson, C. (1997). Some Justifications for the Learning by Disturbing Strategy. In du Boulay, B. and Mizoguchi, R. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education, IOS Press, 119-126.
Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. (2006). The Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT): Preliminary evaluation of efficiency gains. In M. Ikeda, K. D. Ashley, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006), 61-70, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R. & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
Anderson, J. R. & Pelletier, R. (1991). A Development System for Model-tracing Tutors. In L.Birnbaum (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Charlottesville, VA: AACE, 1-8.
Baeza-Yates, R. & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern Information Retrieval, Addison Wesley.
Blessing, S.B. (1997). A Programming by Demonstration Authoring Tool for Model–Tracing Tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 233-261.
Bloom, B.S. (1984). The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
Burke, R., Hammond K.J. & Cooper, E. (1996) Knowledge-based information retrieval from semi-structured text. AAAI Workshop on Internet-based Information Systems, 9-15.
Carbonell, J.R. (1970). AI in CAI: An Artificial-Intelligence Approach to Computer-Assisted Instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man-machine Systems, 11:4, 190-202.
Chan, T.W. & Baskin, A.B. (1988) Studying with the prince: The computer as a learning companion, Proceedings of International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, Canada, p. 194-200.
Chi, M., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001) Learning from Human Tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
Chou, C.Y., Chan, T.W. & Lin, C.J. (2003). Redefining the learning companion: the past, present and future of educational agents. Computers and Education, 40(3), 255-269.
Chou, C.Y., Chan, T.W. & Lin, C.J. (2002). An approach of implementing general learning companions for problem solving. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 14(6), 1376-1386.
Chou, C.Y., Lin, C.J. & Chan, T.W. (2002). An approach to develop computational supports for reciprocal tutoring. Knowledge-based Systems, 15, 407-412.
Chou, C.Y., Lin, C.J. & Chan, T.W. (1999) User modeling in simulating learning companion, Proceedings of AI-ED 99 World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Le Mans, France, 277-284.
Corbett, A.T. & Anderson, J.R. (1995). Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253-278.
du Boulay, B. (2000). Can We Learn from ITSs? In Gilles Gauthier, Claude Frasson and Kurt VanLehn (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 5th International Conference, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 9-17.
du Boulay, B. (2006). Commentary on Kurt VanLehn''s "The Behavior of Tutoring Systems". International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16, 267-270.
Fletcher, J. D. (2001) Evidence for Learning from Technology-Assisted Instruction. In H. F. O’Neil Jr. and R. Perez (Eds.) Technology Applications in Education: A Learning View. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Foshay, W.R., & Preese F. (2005). Do We Need Authoring Systems? A Commercial Perspective. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 2, 249-260.
Grandbastien, M. (1999). Teaching Expertise is at The Core of ITS Research. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 335-349.
Grasser, A.C. & Person, N.K. (1994). Question Asking During Tutoring, American Educational Research Journal, 31:1, 104-137.
Hammond, K., Burke, R., Martin, C. & Lytinen, S. (1995). FAQ Finder: A Case-Based Approach to Knowledge Navigation. In Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Information Gathering in Heterogeneous Environments, pages 69-73, AAAI. Modified version also appeared in Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, Los Angeles, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995.
Heinrich, E. & Maurer, H. (2000) Active Documents: Concept, Implementation and Applications. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 6(12) , 1197-1202.
Holt, P., Dubs, S., Jones, M. and Greer, J. (1994). The State of Student Modeling. In Greer, J., & McCalla, G. (Eds.) Student Modeling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction, Springer-Verlag, 3-35.
Hou, H.F. (2007). 侯慧芳，巧算技巧之解釋訓練教材。
Hwang, G.J., Hsiao, J.L. & Tseng, C.R. (2003). A Computer-Assisted Approach to Diagnosing Student Learning Problems in Science Courses. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 19(2), 229-248.
Johnson, W.L. (1990). Understanding and Debugging Novice Programs. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 51-97.
Kodaganallur, V., Weitz, R. R. and Rosenthal, D. (2005). A Comparison of Model-Tracing and Constraint-Based Intelligent Tutoring Paradigms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 117-144.
Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Heffernan, N. (2003) Toward a Rapid Development Environment for Cognitive Tutors. In U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo, & J. Kay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 455-457.
Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Heffernan. T., McLaren, B. & Hockenberry, M. (2004). Opening the Door to Non-Programmers: Authoring Intelligent Tutor Behavior by Demonstration. In the Proceedings of 7th Annual Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference. Maceio, Brazil.
Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H. and Mark, M.A. (1997). Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
Lester, J. (2006). Reflections on the KVL Tutoring Framework: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16, 271-276.
Lin, C.J., Chou, C.Y. & Chan, T.W. (2001). Computers as aids for accessing cognition of students. In Moore, J.D. and Redfield, C.L. & Johnson, W.L. (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education -- AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, IOS Press, 571-573.
Lin, C.J., Chou, C.Y. & Chan, T.W. (2000). BAPI: An approach for balancing productivity and intelligence. Proceedings of the 4th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education, Singapore, 137-143. (in Chinese)
Lin, C.J. & Chan, T.W. (1999). An initial study of applications of the teaching strategies of learning companion. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on CAI. TaiChung, Taiwan, 42-46. (in Chinese)
Lin, Y.J. (2007). 林怡如，巧算技巧之偵錯及改正訓練教材。
Lu, J.L., Lin, C.J. & Chan, T.W. (2001). Problem-solving exercises as gaming activity in a dyad learning system. In the Proceedings of the 5th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education / the 10th International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, ChungLi, Taiwan, 1001-1007. (in Chinese)
Matsuda, N., Cohen, W. W., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Applying Programming by Demonstration in an Intelligent Authoring Tool for Cognitive Tutors. In AAAI Workshop on Human Comprehensible Machine Learning, Menlo Park, CA: AAAI association.
Maurer, H. (2000). What we should expect from WBT and how WBT is just part of knowledge management. In the Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Computers in Education, 1560-1560. Taipei, Taiwan.
Mayes, J.T. and Neilson I. (1995). Learning from other people’s dialogues: questions about computer-based answers. In B. Collis and G. Davies (eds), Innovative Adult Learning with Innovative Technologies (A-61), 31-47, North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
McLaren, B. M., Koedinger, K. R., Schneider, M., Harrer, A., & Bollen, L. (2004). Bootstrapping Novice Data: Semi-Automated Tutor Authoring Using Student Log Files. In the Proceedings of the Workshop on Analyzing Student-Tutor Interaction Logs to Improve Educational Outcomes. Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS-2004), August 2004.
Merril, D.C., Reiser, B.J., Ranney, M., Trafton, J.G. (1992). Effective Tutoring Techniques: A Comparison of Human Tutors and Intelligent Tutoring Systems. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(3), 27-305.
Mitrovic, A., Mayo, M., Suraweera, P. & Martin, B. (2001) Constraint-based Tutors: A Success Story. In the Proceedings of 14th Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, Budapest, Hungary.
Mitrovic, A. & Ohlsson, S. (1999). Evaluation of a Constraint-based Tutor for a Database Language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 238-256.
Mitrovic, A., Suraweera, P., Martin, B., Zakharov, K., Milik, N. & Holland J. (2006). Authoring Constraint-Based Tutors in ASPIRE. In the Proceedings of 8th International Conference, ITS 2006, LNCS 4053, 41-50.
Mizoguchi, R. & Bourdeau, J. (2000). Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome Common AI-ED Problems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, p.107-121.
Murray, T. (1999). Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Analysis of the State of the Art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 98-129.
Murray, T. (2003). An Overview of Intelligent Tutoring System Authoring Tools: Updated Analysis of the State of the Art. In Murray, T., Blessing, S., & Ainsworth, S. (Eds.) (2003). Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments: Towards cost-effective adaptive, interactive and intelligent educational software. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Newell, A. & Simon, H.A. (1963). GPS, A Program That Simulates Human Thought. In FeigenBaum, E.A. & Feldman, J. (Eds), Computers and Thoughts, McGraw-Hill, New York, 279-293.
Ohlsson, S. (1992). Constraint-based Student Modeling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3(4), 429-447.
Person, N. K., Bautista, L., Graesser, A. C., Mathews, E. & The Tutoring Research Group (2001). Evaluating student learning gains in two versions of AutoTutor. In Moore, J.D. and Redfield, C.L. & Johnson, W.L. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI–ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, IOS Press, 286–293.
Rosé, C. P., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K. & Weinstein, A. (2001). Interactive conceptual tutoring in Atlas–Andes. In Moore, J.D. and Redfield, C.L. & Johnson, W.L. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI–ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, IOS Press, 256–266.
Self, J. (1974). Student models in computer-aided instruction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 6, 261-276.
Self, J. (1993). An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence in Education. In the Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education, Taiwan.
Self, J. (1988). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modeling. In the Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems 88, Montreal, Canada, 18-24.
Self, J. (1999). The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: ITSs care, precisely. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 350-364.
Shute, V. J., Torreano, L.A., & Willis, R.E. (1998). DNA – Uncorking the Bottleneck in Knowledge Elicitation and Organization. Intelligent Tutoring Systems: ITS ’98, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 146-155.
Shute, V.J. (1993). A Macroadaptive Approach to Tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4(1), 61-93.
VanLehn, K. (2006). The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16, 227-265.
Weng, Y.L. (2007). 翁瑜璘，算術應用題擬題訓練教材。