| 研究生: |
陳思穎 Szu-Ying Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
廠商綠色企業社會責任與利潤績效 |
| 指導教授: |
邱俊榮
Jiunn-Rong Chiou |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2024 |
| 畢業學年度: | 112 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 38 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 企業社會責任 、綠色市場 、寡占市場 、環境損害 、猜測變量 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | conjectural variation |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:8 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討廠商實踐ECSR時,會如何影響自身及對手廠商的產量、市場上價格及利潤,並且我們將對手廠商的反應考慮在內,驗證廠商在重視環境的同時,是否有可能同時使利潤提升。
本論文首先探討獨占廠商模型,當廠商重視ECSR時,產量減少,導致利潤減少。接著,我們分析在雙占市場模型中的廠商進行數量競爭,假設其他條件都不變之下,重視企業社會責任的廠商,產量、利潤一定會減少,但我們發現當兩廠商對環境的關心程度同時提高,減產的同時,利潤反而有可能增加,類似勾結的結果。除此之外,本論文在模型中加入猜測變量,當廠商減產時,猜測對手廠商也會減產,則廠商越重視環境損害時,利潤增加的可能性較低;反之,當廠商減產時,猜測對手廠商會增產,則廠商越重視環境損害時,利潤增加的可能性就越高。接著是,設定廠商從只關心自身生產時所造成的環境損害,轉變為關心整體社會的總環境損害時,當廠商減產時,同樣猜測對手廠商也會減產,則越重視環境損害時,利潤增加的可能性較低,還會低於當廠商只關心自身生產時;反之,當廠商減產時,猜測對手廠商會增產,則廠商越重視環境損害時,利潤增加的可能性越高,且會高於當廠商只關心自身生產時。
This research investigates the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices on firms' behavior and their competitors in terms of production output, market prices, and profits. The study employs models for both monopolistic and duopolistic market structures. For monopolistic firms emphasizing CSR, a reduction in production results in decreased profits. In duopoly markets, firms prioritizing CSR experience reductions in production and profits. However, when both firms intensify their environmental concern, a joint reduction in production may lead to increased profits, resembling collusion outcomes.
The study introduces speculative variables, suggesting that competitor reactions influence the likelihood of profit increase for environmentally conscious firms. Additionally, the research explores the transition from firms caring solely about their own environmental impact to considering the overall societal impact. The findings reveal that the likelihood of profit increase when prioritizing environmental concerns is influenced by competitor reactions.
In conclusion, this research offers insights into the nuanced effects of CSR on firms' strategies and considers the dynamic interactions in different market scenarios. Understanding how firms, while emphasizing social responsibility, navigate market competition and profit dynamics is crucial for informing sustainable business practices.
Baron, D. P. (2001), "Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy," Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7-45.
Baron, D. P. (2009), "A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7-43.
Bowen, H. R. (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York: Harper and Row.
Carroll, A. B. (1979), "A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance." Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
Cornell, B. and Shapiro, A. (1987), "Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance, " Financal Management, 16, 5-14.
Conrad, K. (2001), "Voluntary Environmental Agreements vs. Emission Taxes in Strategic Trade Models," Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, 361-381.
Davis, K. (1960), "Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities?" California Management Review, 2, 70-76.
Doni, N. and Ricchiuti, G. (2013), "Market Equilibrium in the Presence of Green Consumers and Responsible Firms: A Comparative Statics Analysis, " Resource and Energy Economics, 35(3), 380-395.
Friedman, M. (1970), "The Social Responsibility of Firms is to Increase its Profits," New York Times Magazine. September 13.
Hart, S. L. and Ahuja, G. (1996), "Does It Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37.
Hayek, R. (1960), "Social Responsibility of Business Manager." Academy of Management Journal, 7(1), 135-143.
Hwang, H. and Mai, C. C. (1988), "On the Equivalence of Tariffs and Quotas under Duopoly: A Conjectural Variation Approach, " Journal of International Economics, 24, 373-380.
Jinji, N. (2013), "Is Corporate Environmentalism Good for Domestic Welfare? " Review of International Economics, 21(5), 901-911.
Maxwell, J. W., Lyon, T. P., and Hackett, S. C. (2000), "Self-regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism," Journal of Law and Economics, 583-617.
Lyon, T. P. and Maxwell, J. W. (2008), "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Environment: A Theoretical Perspective, " Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 240-260.
Lutz, S., Lyon, T. P., and Maxwell, J. W. (2000), "Quality Leadership When Regulatory Standards are Forthcoming," Journal of Industrial Economics, 331-348.
Meyer, J. W., Rowan, B. (1977), "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony," American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
Moskowitz, M. (1972), "Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks," Business and Society, 1, 71-75.
Sheldon, O. (1924), The Social Responsibility of Management The Philosophy of Management, London, UK: Isaac Pitman and Sons.
Solomon, R. C. and Hanson, K. R. (1986), "It's good business ? " Perennial Library.
Tsai, T. H. and Chiou, J. R. (2022), "Strategic and Altruistic Corporate Environmental Responsibility in a Green Market " Academia Economic Papers, forthcoming.
Waddock, S. and Graves, S. (1997), "The Corporate Social Performance - Financial Performance Link," Strategic Management Journal, 18, 4, 303-319.