| 研究生: |
陳立堯 Li-Yao Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
群眾募資專案之內部信號、外部信號、色彩搭配對消費者喜好程度、信任程度、購買意願之影響 |
| 指導教授: | 林建煌 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2022 |
| 畢業學年度: | 110 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 147 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 群眾募資專案 、顏色 、社會知覺風險 、消費者喜好程度 、信任程度 、購買意願 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:11 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
群眾募資平台的崛起,提供了許多富有想法的新創團隊更多元的籌資管道,但影響募資成敗的因素除了專案、產品本身的內容外,尚有其他外部以及內部因素,甚至是募資平台網站的色彩搭配,都可能對消費者的喜好程度、信任程度、購買意願產生影響。
本研究探討影響募資專案的外部信號,包含專案資金趨勢(上升/下降)、人均投資 金額(高/低)、專案時長(20天/40天/60天);和影響專案的內部信號,包含商品原創性 (原創/非原創)、 團隊成功經驗(有/無);以及商品 圖色調(彩色/黑白)、募資平台顏色(暖色/冷色),並加入社會風險(高/低)作為干擾 變數。探討以上實驗設計對消費者對於募資專案產品的喜好程度、信任程度、購買意願的 影響。研究結果如下:
1. 資金趨勢與人均投資金額會對消費者對於募資專案的喜好程度產生交互作用。
2. 資金趨勢與人均投資金額會對消費者對於募資專案的購買意願產生交互作用。
3. 人均投資金額與專案時長會對消費者對於募資專案的喜好程度產生交互作用。
4. 人均投資金額與專案時長會對消費者對於募資專案的信任程度產生交互作用。
5. 人均投資金額與專案時長會對消費者對於募資專案的購買意願產生交互作用。
6. 商品原創性與團隊成功經驗會對消費者對於募資專案的喜好程度產生交互作用。
7. 商品原創性與團隊成功經驗會對消費者對於募資專案的購買意願產生交互作用。
8. 商品圖色調與募資平台顏色會對消費者對於募資專案的喜好程度產生交互作用。
9. 商品圖色調與募資平台顏色會對消費者對於募資專案的購買意願產生交互作用。
10. 募資平台顏色與消費者社會知覺風險對於募資專案的購買意願產生交互作用。
The crowdfunding platforms provide different funding methods to entrepreneur. However, the factors that affect the success of the crowdfunding project, include external, internal or other reasons. Those f actors may have an impact on the consumer's preference, trust, and purchase intention.
Using the experimental method, three experiments are designed in this study:project funding trends (u p/ down), investment amount per capita(high/ low), project duration(20 days/ 40 days/ 60 days), produ ct originality(original/ non-original), successful experience(yes/ no), product image color (colorful/ no n-colorful), platform color (warm/ cool)as independent variables; social risk as moderating variable; pr oduct preferences, trust, purchase intension of consumers as dependent variables. The results of the stu dy are as follows:
1. There is an interaction effect between project funding trends and investment amount per capita on the consumers' preferences of product.
2. There is an interaction effect between investment amount per capita and investment amount per ca pita on the consumers' purchase intension.
3. There is an interaction effect between investment amount per capita and project duration on the co nsumers' preferences of product.
4. There is an interaction effect between investment amount per capita and project duration on the co nsumers' trust of product.
5. There is an interaction effect between investment amount per capita and project duration on the co nsumers' purchase intension.
6. There is an interaction effect between product originality and successful experience on the consum ers' preferences of product.
7. There is an interaction effect between product originality and successful experience on the consum ers' purchase intension.
8. There is an interaction effect between product image color and platform color on the consumers' p references of product.
9. There is an interaction effect between product image color and platform color on the consumers' p urchase intension.
10. There is an interaction effect between platform color and social risk on the consumers' purchase in tension.
一、中文部分
1. 李昌明,2015,群眾募資之關鍵成功要素,輔仁大學國際經營管理碩士論文。
2. 野村順一,1985,商品色彩論,千倉書房。
3. 陳勇霖,2008,3C產品色彩研究-以筆記型電腦為例,大葉大學碩士論文。
4. 廖淑伶,2007,消費者行為,前程文化。
5. 鄭國裕,1987,色彩計畫,藝風堂出版社。
二、英文部分
1. Agrawal (2011).“Assessing the impact of changes to diagnostic criteria on the estimated prevalence of alcohol use disorders in general population surveys,”Society for the Study of Addiction, 106(11), 1944-1945.
2. Agrawal, Catalini, and Goldfarb (2010). “The Geography of Crowdfunding,”NET Institute Working Paper, 10(8), 57
3. Bagchi & Cheema (2013). “The Effect of Red Background Color on Willingness-to-Pay: The Moderating Role of Selling Mechanism,”Journal of Consumer Research , 39(5), 947-960
4. Baird, I. S., & Thomas, H. (1985).“Toward a Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking,” Academy of Management Review, 10, 230-243.
5. Bauer, R.A. (1960). "Consumer Behavior as Risk-Taking, Dynamic Marketing for Changing World. American Marketing Association, Chicago,”Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(3), 389.
6. Bellizzi, J.A., Crowley, A.E. and Hasty, R.W. (1983). “The Effects of Color in Store Design,”Journal of Retailing, 59, 21-45.
7. Cox, W.E. (1967).“Product Life Cycles as Marketing Models,”Journal of Business, 40, 375-384.
8. Cubukcu (2008).“Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies,”Issues In Educational Research, 18(1).
9. Cunningham, S.M. (1967).“The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk. Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(1), 82-108.
10. Tingting Fan, Leilei Gao, Yael Steinhart (2020).“The Small Predicts Large Effect in Crowdfunding,”Journal of Consumer Research, 47(4), 544-565.
11. Featherman & Pavlou (2003).“Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective,”International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451-474.
12. Fishbein & Ajzen (1975).“Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research”, Addison-Wesley.
13. Forsythe & Shi (2003).“Consumer Patronage and Risk Perceptions in Internet Shopping,”Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 867-875.
14. Gefen, D. (2000).“E-Commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust,”Omega, 28(6), 725-737.
15. Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998).“The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions,”Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46–59.
16. Hemer, Joachim (2011).“A snapshot on crowdfunding,”Working Papers Firms and Region.
17. Herzenstein, Dholakia, and Andrews (2011).“Strategic Herding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Loan Auctions,”Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(1).
18. Jacoby, J. & L. Kaplan (1972),“The Components of Perceived Risk,”Association for Consumer Research, 382-393.
19. Koch & Siering (2015). “The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns: An analysis of crowdfunding success factors and their interrelations,”Electronic Markets ,29(4).
20. Lee & Turban (2001).“A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping,”International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91.
21. Marom and Sade (2013).“Are the Life and Death of a Young Start-Up Indeed in the Power of the Tongue? Lessons from Online Crowdfunding Pitches,” SSRN Electronic Journal.
22. Mitchell (1999).“Consumer Perceived Risk: Conceptualisations and Models,” European Journal of Marketing, 33(1), 163-195.
23. Mollick (2013).“The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study,”Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
24. Norton, F. (1987).“The Coase Theorem and Suoptimization in Marketing Channels,”Marketing Science, 6(3), 268-285.
25. Schiffman, L .G. & L. L. Kanuk, (2000).“Consumer Behavior”, Upper Saddle River.
26. Smith, Bailey & Brynjolfsson (2000).“Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers,”Management Science, 46(4), 563-585.
27. Tan, Y. and Thoen, W. (2001).“Toward a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce,”Internation Jornal of Electronic Commerce, 5(2), 61-74.
28. Urban, G. L., Sultan, F. and Qualls, W. (2000).“Making Trust the Center of Your Internet Strategy,”Sloan Management Review, Fall(1), 39-48.