| 研究生: |
邱佩瑩 Pei-yin Chiu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
已婚婦女的子女性別偏好對其生育子女性別結構之影響 |
| 指導教授: |
蔡偉德
Wei-der Tsai |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 產業經濟研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Industrial Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2012 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 68 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 子女性別偏好 、生育男孩偏好 、子女性別組合 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | gender preference for children, preference for son, gender composition of the children |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:13 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著時代進步,出生人數及生育率逐年下滑,且男女出生性別比亦呈現下降趨勢,故本文以87年度及93年度20歲-49歲已婚且至少生育一個小孩的婦女為研究對象,透過觀察各項個人特質變數及家庭特質變數是否影響其子女性別偏好,並加以分析影響的程度,以及婦女的子女性別偏好是否影響其實際生育子女的性別結構。
本文係利用行政院衛生署國民健康局87年度及93年度「第8次、第9次臺灣地區家庭與生育力研究調查資料」,以順序概率模型(Ordered Probit Model)作為實證模型,分析婦女認為生育子女理由的子女價值觀念、家庭背景等個人與環境特質變數是否影響其生育男孩的子女性別偏好,另以概率模型(Probit Model)作為實證模型,分析婦女對於生育男孩的子女性別偏好是否影響其實際生育子女的性別結構。
本文的實證結果顯示:(1)婦女的教育程度及所得對其生育男孩偏好為顯著負向影響;(2)婦女本身傳宗接代的觀念對其生育男孩偏好為顯著正向影響;(3)先生若為獨子及婦女的婚姻由父母安排,對其生育男孩偏好為顯著正向影響;(4)對於那些生育3胎(含)以上且前2胎連生女孩的婦女,其生育男孩的偏好程度愈高,對其實際生育第3胎(含)以上至少有1個男孩的機率為顯著正向影響。根據實證結果,本文推論婦女生育男孩的偏好確實會影響其生育子女的性別組合。
With the time progressing, the number of births and fertility has been declining and makes the sex ratio at birth between boys and girls show a downward trend. By employing a data of married women who are aged 20-49 years old , and having at least one child in 1998 and 2004, this paper analyzes how the personal and environmental characteristic affects their gender preference for children (especially for son preference), and what is the effect of child gender preference affects the gender composition of their children.
This paper article uses “the 8th and 9th family and fertility survey and research data in Taiwan”, provided by the Bureau Health Promotion, Depart of Health, R.O.C. (Taiwan), to analyze how the personal and environmental characteristic affects the child gender preference of the women via the Ordered Probit Model, and how the child gender preference of the women affects the gender composition of their children via the Probit Model.
According to the analysis results, (1) there is a significant and negative effect to the child gender preference of the wife, if the wife were with the higher level of education and income. (2) If the wife cares more about having a son to carry on the family name, the child gender preference of the wife would be a significant and positive effect. (3) If the husband is the only son, or the marriage of women were arranged by their parents, the effect is also significant and positive to the child gender preference of the wife. (4) If the wife ,who already has more than three children with the first two are daughters, had a strong child gender preference, it would affect significantly and positive to the actual gender composition of the children. So we can speculate that the gender composition of the children is affected by the child gender preference of the wife.
參考文獻
一、中文部分
1、王君茹(2003),「家產繼承性別偏好的臺灣經驗:族群、世代、婚姻狀況與社會結構地位」,臺北大學社會學系碩士論文。
2、王彩婺(2003),「男嬰偏好對臺灣地區已婚有偶婦女生育動機與生育行為的影響」,臺北醫學大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文。
3、李大正,楊靜利(2004),「臺灣婦女勞動參與類型與歷程之變遷」,人口學刊,28,109-134。
4、林佩琪(2003),「已婚婦女之子女價值、理想子女數與性別偏好-世代觀點之比較分析」,臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系家政教學碩士班學位論文。
5、原新,涂肇慶(2004),「中國大陸出生性別比偏高之分析」,人口學刊,29,147-181。
6、梁文敏(2002),「臺灣地區第八次家庭與生育力研究調查」調查報告及相關議題之探討,國民健康局91年度科技研究發展計畫。
7、陳狄秋(2011),「夫妻家務分攤的角力-教育與所得差異扮演的角色」,中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
8、梁香撰(2001),「臺灣南部地區婦女生育動機及其相關因素之研究」,嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。
9、曾敏傑(2001),「臺灣地區兩性薪資差異與變遷:1982、1992及2000年的比較」,人口學刊,23,147-209。
10、鄭衛東(2007),「論小傳統生育文化-以日照市東村為例」,人口學刊,35,147-169。
11、賴思帆,余清祥(2006),「臺灣與各國生育率模型之實證與模擬比較」,人口學刊,33,33-59。
12、薛承泰(2000),「臺灣地區已婚婦女再就業時機的初步分析」,人口學刊,21,77-100。
13、簡文吟(2004),「臺灣已婚婦女勞動再參與行為的變遷」,人口學刊,28,1-47。
二、英文部分
1.Bumiller, E. (1990), “May You be the Mother of a Hundred Sons:A Journey among the Women of India,” Random House, New York.
2.Chahnazarian, A. (1991), “Determinants of the Sex Ratio at Birth:Review of the Recent Literature,” Social Biology, 35, 214-235.
3.Chung, W. and Gupta, M.D. (2007), “The decline of son preference in South Korea:The roles of development and public policy,” Population and Development Reviea, 33(4), 757-783.
4.Clare, J.E. and Kiser, C.V. (1951), “Preference for Children of Given Sex in Relation to Fertility,” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 29(4), 440-92.
5.Edlund, L. and Lee, C. (2009), “Son Preference, Sex Selection and Economic Development:Theory and Evidence from South Korea,” Columbia University Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series.
6.Freedman, D.S., Freedman, R. and Whelpton, P.K. (1960), “Size of Family and Preference for Children of Each Sex,” American Journal of Sociology, 66(2), 141-146.
7.Freedman, R. (1959), “Social Value about Family Size in the Uinted States,” International Population Conference, 173-83.
8.Gu, B.and Roy, R. (1995), “Sex ratio at Birth in China, with Reference to other Areas in East Asia:What we know,” Asia Pacific Population Journal, 10(3), 17-42.
9.Hull, T.H. (1990), “Recent trends in sex ratios at birth in China,” Population and Development Review, 16, 63-83.
10.Jackman, S. (2000), “Models for Ordered Outcomes,” Political Science 200C.
11.Johansson, S. and Nygren, O. (1991), “The missing girls of China:A new demographic account,” Population and Development Review, 17, 35-51.
12.Kureishi, W. and Wakabayashi, M. (2011), “Son preference in Japan,” Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 873-893.
13.Poston, D.L. JR(2002), “Son Preference and Fertility in China,” Journal of Biosocial Science, 34, 333-347.
14.Poston, D.L. JR and Gu, B. (1987), “Socioeconomic development, family planning and fertility in China:a subregional analysis,” Demography, 24, 531-551.
15.Poston, D.L. JR, Wu, J.J., Yuan, M.M. and Glover, K.S. (2000), “Patterns and variation in the sex ratio at birth in China and Taiwan,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chinese Sociologists Association, Washington, DC, august 11.
16.Puri, S., Adams, V., Ivey, S., and Nachtigall, R.D. (2011), “There is such a thing as too many daughters, but not too many sons:A qualitative study of son preference and fetal sex selection among Indian immigrants in the United States,” Social Science and Medicine, 72, 1169-1176.
17.Shek, D.T.L. (1996), “Hong Kong Parents’ Attitudes About Marital Quality and Children,” The Journal of Psychology, 157(2), 125-135.
18.Williamson, N.E. (1976), “Son or Daughtersn: A Cross-Cultural Survey of Parental Preference,” Beverly Hills : Sage Publication.
19.Zeng, Y., Yu, P., Gu, B., Xu, Y., Li, B., and Li, Y. (1991), “Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China,” Population, 19, 283-302.
三、網路資料
1、女性就業與婚育概況社會指標(2005),行政院主計處。
2、中華民國內政部統計資訊網(http://www.stat.gov.tw)。
3、生育概況社會指標(2007),行政院主計處。
4、亞洲嬰兒性別失衡之探討社會指標(2009),行政院主計處。
5、國際比較-統計資料比較,行政院主計處。