| 研究生: |
游琇螢 SIOU-YING YU |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
ESG分數對公司績效表現與風險的影響 —以台灣市場為例 Impact of ESG score on financial performance and firm risk —Evidence in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: | 黃瑞卿 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系 Department of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 47 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | ESG 、財務績效 、公司風險 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:14 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究之目的希望探討ESG分數對於公司績效及風險的影響,並以2008至2017年之台灣市場做為主要研究對象。樣本所使用之ESG分數來自Thomson Reuters ESG資料庫,研究方向主要檢測ESG總分(ESG Combined Score)及其三大面向環境(ENV)、社會(SOC)、公司治理(GOV)之分數對公司績效與風險的影響。本文所使用之公司績效變數以代表公司價值之Tobin’s Q及主要財務績效指標—資產報酬率(ROA)、股東權益報酬率(ROE)作為代理變數;公司風險變數則使用公司之股票報酬標準差代表總風險、貝它(Beta)代表系統風險及根據Carhart四因子模型之殘差計算出的標準差代表非系統性風險進行風險衡量。實證結果發現,ESG總分僅對資產報酬率有顯著之正影響,環境因子與Tobin’s Q呈現正相關、並與資產報酬率及股東權益報酬率呈現負相關,此結果顯示投入環境相關議題無法改善財務績效,但對公司價值具有效性。至於風險方面,結果顯示ESG總分之提升可以減少公司之系統風險,對總風險及非系統風險則無顯著效果,並且環境因子對於所有風險變數皆有負向影響,而公司治理因子及社會因子則可能造成公司之風險提升。
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of ESG scores on financial performance and firm risk in Taiwan. The sample data covers the period from 2008 to 2017. We collect the ESG scores data from the Thomson Reuters ESG database, which provides information on ESG factors since 2002. This study takes both ESGC scores (ESG Combined Score) and three ESG pillar scores into consideration to examine the effect on financial performance and firm risk. We have estimated firm’s performance by using three different performance measures: Tobin’s Q, ROA and ROE. For the risk measures, we used total risk (TOTR), systematic risk (BETA) and idiosyncratic risk (IDIO) to estimate firm risk. Our findings suggest that higher ESGC scores tend to have greater ROA performance, whereas ENV factor is positively associated with Tobin’s Q, and negatively associated with ROA, ROE. This result indicates that participating in ENV activities cannot improve the financial performance in short run. The evidence also shows that higher ESGC scores may have significantly negative effect on firm’s systematic risk. However, we cannot detect a significant effect on both total and idiosyncratic risk. As for the three pillar scores, ENV scores have a significantly negative effect on all three risk measures. In contrast, GOV and SOC scores may increase firm risk.
林俊傑、劉梧柏、黃華瑋 (2018)。「公司治理評鑑與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討:以台灣上市櫃企業公司治理評鑑為例」,商略學報,第十卷第一期,23-46。
洪榮耀、陳正佑(2012)。「上市上櫃公司治理實務守則與公司績效關連性之探究」,商業現代化學刊,第六卷第四期,43-61。
Agrawal, A., and Knoeber, C. R., (1996), “Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377-397.
Balatbat, M. C. A., Siew, R. Y. J., and Carmichael, D. G. (2012), “ESG scores and its influence on firm performance: Australian evidence”, Australian School of Business School of Accounting, School of Accounting Seminar Series Semester 2.
Brammer, S., Brooks, C., Pavelin, S. (2006), “Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures”, Financial Management, 35(3).
Brammer, S., and Millington, A. (2006), “Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis”, Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6-18.
Carhart, M. M., (1997), “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance”, The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
Charles, A., Darne, O., and Fouilloux, J. (2015), “ESG Indices Financial Risk: Performance measures based on Value-at-Risk approach”.
Chung, K. H., Wright, P., and Charoenwong, C. (1998), “Investment opportunities and market reaction to capital expenditure decisions”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 41-60.
Chung, K. H., and Pruitt, S. W. (1994), “A Simple Approximation of Tobin's q”, Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74.
Czerwinska, T., and Kazmierkiewicz, P., (2015), “ESG Rating in Investment Risk Analysis of Companies Listed on the Public Market in Poland”, Economic Notes, 44(2), 211–247.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., and Yang, Y. G. (2011), “Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social
Responsibility Reporting”, The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
Gao, L., Zhang, J. H., (2015), “Firms’ earnings smoothing, corporate social responsibility, and valuation”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 108-127.
Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., and Mishra, D. R. (2011), “Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2388–2406.
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., and Hansen, J. M. (2009), “The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis”, Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.
Huang, M., Li, P., Meschke, F., and Guthrie, J. P. (2015), “Family firms, employee satisfaction, and corporate performance”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 108–127.
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976), “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jensen, M. C., and Ruback, R. S. (1983), “The Market For Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 5-50.
Jo, H., Na, H. (2012), “Does CSR Reduce Firm Risk? Evidence from Controversial Industry Sectors”, Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 441–456.
Kim, Y., Li, H., Li, S. (2014), “Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1-13.
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., and Tamayo, A. (2017), “Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis”, The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
Loof, H., and Stephan, A. (2019), “The Impact of ESG on Stocks’ Downside Risk and Risk Adjusted Return”, CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series, (477).
Luo, X., and Bhattacharya, C. (2009), “The Debate Over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk”, Journal of
Marketing, 73(6), 198-213.
Ng, A. C., Rezaee, Z. (2015), “Business Sustainability Performance and Cost of Equity Capital”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128-149.
Orlitzky, M., and Benjamin, J. D., (2001), “Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review”, Business & Society, 40(4), 369–396.
Richardson, A. J., Welker, M., and Hutchinson, I. R. (1999), “Managing Capital Market Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility”, International Journal of Management
Review, 1, 17-43.
Salama, A., Anderson, K., and Toms, J. S. (2011), “Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006”, Business Ethics: A European Review, 20, No. 2.
Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., and Hardeck, I. (2016), “Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe”, Journal of Business Economics, 86(8), 867–904.
Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B., (1997), “The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., and Byun, R. (2018), “Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea”, Sustainability, 10(10).