個股選擇權隱含波動率之研究｜國立中央大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	廖子翔 Tzu-Hsiang Liao
論文名稱：	個股選擇權隱含波動率之研究 Essays on Implied Volatility of Individual Stock Options
指導教授：	周賓凰 Pin-Huang Chou 張傳章 Chuang-Chang Chang
口試委員:
學位類別：	博士 Doctor
系所名稱：	管理學院 - 財務金融學系 Department of Finance
畢業學年度：	96
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	76
中文關鍵詞：	組合檢定、隱含波動微笑、非涵蓋模型、套利風險、反常態法、反卡方法
外文關鍵詞：	inverse normal method, arbitrage risk, implied volatility smile, combination test, non-nested model, inverse chi-square method
相關次數：	點閱：16 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

本研究是由二篇有關於個股選擇權隱含波動率之文章所構成。
第一篇文章所研究的是關於套利風險對於個股選擇權之隱含波動率曲線斜率的影響。如果套利風險會影響隱含波動率曲線的斜率，則個股選擇權與套利風險之間是有關連的。實證結果顯示套利風險的確會影響到個股選擇權的隱含波動率曲線。當套利風險愈大時，隱含波動微笑的情形會愈明顯。藉由分開探討價外的賣權及買權，發現有些套利風險的影響是非對稱的。此外，投資人所抱持的信念差異也與套利風險有關。
第二篇文章的研究重點在於選擇權隱含波動率曲線不同模型之間的比較。在過去一、二十年間，有許多關於選擇權市場中隱含波動率模型估計的爭論。然而，在文獻上卻很少發現隱含波動率模型的比較，原因就在於缺乏一個理論基論。在此文章中，採用了組合虛無假設檢定的方法來比較不同的隱含波動模型。據目前所知，這是首次利用組合檢定的方法來探討此爭論的研究。實證結果顯示線性分段模型是最適合隱含波動微笑的模型。

This study contains two essays in implied volatility of individual stock options. The first essay examines the effect of arbitrage risk on the slope of implied volatility curve for individual stock options. If arbitrage risk affects the slope of implied volatility curve, then there is a connection between stock options and arbitrage risk. The empirical results reveal that arbitrage risk does affect the slope of the implied volatility curve for stock options. The implied volatility smile is more pronounced for stocks with higher arbitrage risk. In addition, the longer the maturity of the option, the smaller the effect. By investigating the slopes for OTM puts and OTM calls, some effects of the arbitrage risk on the implied volatility curve are asymmetric.
The second essay focuses on the comparison among models of implied volatility curve of the stock options. Over the past few decades, there are many issues associated with the implied volatility smile in the options market. However, no much works have been found in the literature regarding the comparison of implied volatility models because lacking a theoretical foundation on which the comparative investigation could be conducted. In this essay, the methods for combining hypothesis tests are used to compare different implied volatility models. The empirical result shows that the linear piecewise model is the most appropriate model for implied volatility curves.

Contents....................................................................................................................	i
List of Tables............................................................................................................	iii
List of Figures..........................................................................................................	v
Essay 1: Arbitrage Risk and Volatility Smile in Individual Stock Options.......	1
Introduction...........................................................................................................	2
Arbitrage Risk Proxies....................................................................................................	4
1  Fundamental Risk..................................................................................................	4
2  Noise Trader Risk..................................................................................................	5
3  Implementation Risk..............................................................................................	5
4  Firm-Specific Variables.........................................................................................	6
Data and Methodology....................................................................................................	7
Empirical Results............................................................................................................	10
Robustness Check...........................................................................................................	18
Conclusion......................................................................................................................	28
References.............................................................................................................................	28
Essay 2: Fitting and Testing for Implied Volatility Curve with
Parametric Models..........................................................................	32
Introduction...........................................................................................................	33
Implied Volatility Models and Non-nested Hypotheses.................................................	36
1  Implied Volatility Models......................................................................................	36
2  Non-nested Hypotheses..........................................................................................	38
3  Non-nested Testing Procedure...............................................................................	39
Combination Test............................................................................................................	42
1  Inverse Chi-square Method....................................................................................	42
2  Inverse Normal Method.........................................................................................	45
Data.................................................................................................................................	46
Empirical Results............................................................................................................	47
1  Preliminary Results................................................................................................	48
2  Combination Tests.................................................................................................	50
3  Robustness Checks................................................................................................	57
Conclusion......................................................................................................................	61
References.............................................................................................................................	64

                                

Essay 1
Ali, A., L.-S. Hwang and M. A. Trombley, 2003, Arbitrage Risk and the Book-to-
Market Anomaly, Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 355-373.
Ang, A., R. J. Hodrick, Y. Xing and X. Zhang, 2006, High Idiosyncratic Volatility
and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence, Working Paper.
Bakshi, G., N. Kapadia and D. Madan, 2003, Stock Return Characteristics, Skew
Laws, and the Di?erential Pricing of Individual Equity Options. Review of
Financial Studies, 16, 101-143.
Bakshi, G. and D. Madan, 2000, Spanning and Derivative Security Valuation, Journal
of Financial Economics, 55, 205-238.
Bali, T. G., N. Cakici, X. Yan and Z. Zhang, 2005, Does Idiosyncratic Risk Really
Matter? Journal of Finance, 60, 905-929.
Barberis, N. and R. Thaler, 2003, A Survey of Behavior Finance, in G. Constanti-
nides, M. Harris and R. Stulz, eds.: Handbook of the Economics of Finance,
North-Holland.
Bates, D., 1996, Jumps and Stochastic Volatility: Exchange Rate Processes Implicit
in Deutsche Mark Options, Review of Financial Studies, 9, 69-107.
Black, F., 1976, Studies in Stock Price Volatility Changes, Proceedings of the Business
and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 177-181.
Black, F. and M. Scholes, 1973, The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,
Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-659.
Brennan, M., Jagadeesh, N. and Swaminathan, B., 1993, Investment Analysis and
the Adjustment of Stock Prices to Common Information, Review of Financial
Studies, 6, 799-824.
Bollen, N. and R. Whaley, 2004, Does Net Buying Pressure A?ect the Shape of
Implied Volatility Functions? Journal of Finance, 59, 711-753.
Buraschi, A. and Jiltsov, A., 2006, Model Uncertainty and Option Markets with
Heterogeneous Beliefs, Journal of Finance, 61, 2841-2897.
Dechow, P., Hutton, A., Meulbroek, L. and Sloan, R., 2001, Short-Sellers, Funda-
mental Analysis and Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 77-106.
De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., L. H. Summers and R. J. Waldmann, 1990, Noise Trader
Risk in Financial Markets, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 703-738.
Dennis, P. and S. Mayhew, 2002, Risk-Neutral Skewness: Evidence from Stock Op-
tions, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 471-493.
Diether, K. B., Malloy, C. J. and Scherbina, A., 2002, Di?erences of Opinion and the
Cross Section of Stock Returns, Journal of Finance, 62, 2113-2141.
Duan, J.-C. and J. Wei, 2007, Systematic Risk and the Price Structure of Individual
Equity Options, Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming.
Dumas, B., Fleming, J., and Whaley, R. E., 1998, Implied Volatility Functions:
Empirical Tests, Journal of Finance, 53, 2059-2106.
Fama, E. F. and J. MacBeth, 1973, Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests,
Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607-636.
Fama, E. F. and K. R. French,1992, The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns,
Journal of Finance, 47, 427-465.
Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, 1993, Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stock
and Bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3-56.
Figlewski, S., 1989, Options Arbitrage in Imperfect Markets, Journal of Finance, 44,
1289-1311.
Goyal, A. and P. Santa-Clara, 2003, Idiosyncratic Risk Matters! Journal of Finance,
58, 975-1007.
Han, B., 2007, Investor Sentiment and Option Prices, Review of Financial Studies,
forthcoming.
Hong, H., Lim, T. and Stein, J., 2000, Bad News Travels Slowly: Size, Analyst
Coverage, and the Protability of Momentum Strategies, Journal of Finance,
55, 265-295.
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny, 1994, Contrarian Investment, Extrap-
olation and Risk, Journal of Finance, 49, 1541-1578.
Lesmond, D., Ogden, J. and Trzcinka, C., 1999, A New Estimate of Transaction
Costs, Review of Financial Studies, 12, 1113-1141.
Longsta?, F. A., 1995, Option Pricing and the Martingale Restriction, Review of
Financial Studies, 8, 1091-1124.
Malkiel, B. G. and Y. Xu, 1997, Risk and Return Revisited, Journal of Portfolio
Management, 23, 9-14.
Malkiel, B. G. and Y. Xu, 2006, Idiosyncratic Risk and Security Returns, Working
Paper.
Newey, W. and K. West, 1987, A Simple, Positive Semi-denite, Heteroscedasticity
and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix, Econometrica, 55, 703-708.
Ofek, E., M. Richardson and R. Whitelaw, 2004, Limited Arbitrage and Short Sales
Restrictions: Evidence from the Options Markets, Journal of Financial Eco-
nomics, 74, 305-342.
Pantzalis, C. and Z. Xu, 2007, Idiosyncratic Volatility, Uncertainty and Cross-Sectional
Returns, Working Paper.
Pan, J. and Poteshman, A. M., 2006, The Information in Option Volume for Future
Stock Prices, Review of Financial Studies, 19, 872-908.
Ponti?, J., 1996, Costly Arbitrage: Evidence from Closed End Funds, Quarterly
Journal of Economics 111, 1135-1152.
Rubinstein, M., 1994, Implied Binomial Trees, Journal of Finance, 49, 771-818.
Rubinstein, M., 2001, Derivatives Performance Attribution, Journal of Financial and
Quantitative Analysis, 36, 75-92.
Shefrin, H., 1999, Irrational Exuberance and Option Smiles, Financial Analysts Jour-
nal, 55, 91-103.
Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny, 1997, The Limits of Arbitrage, Journal of Finance,
52, 35-55.
Stein, J., 1989, Overreactions in the Options Market, Journal of Finance, 44, 1011-
1024.
Swidler, S. and Diltz, J. D., 1992, Implied Volatilities and Transaction Costs, Journal
of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 437-447.
Toft, K. and B. Prucyk, 1997, Options on Leverage Equity: Theory and Empirical
Tests, Journal of Finance, 52, 1151-1180.
Wurgler, J., and E. Zhuravskaya, 2002, Does Arbitrage Flatten Demand Curves for
Stocks? Journal of Business, 75, 583-607.
Essay 2
Bakshi, G., N. Kapadia and D. Madan, 2003, Stock Return Characteristics, Skew
Laws, and the Di?erential Pricing of Individual Equity Options. Review of
Financial Studies, 16, 101-143.
Black, F. and M. Scholes, 1973, The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,
Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-659.
Brown, M. B., 1975, A Method for Combining Non-independent, One-sided Tests of
Signicance, Biometrics, 31, 987-992.
Cox, D. R., 1961, Test of Separate Families of Hypotheses, Proceedings of the Fourth
Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1, Berke-
ley: University of California Press.
Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J. G., 1981, Several Tests for Model Specication in
the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses, Econometrica, 49, 781-793.
Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J. G., 1982, Some non-nested Hypothesis Tests and
the Relations Among Them, Review of Economic Studies, 49, 551-565.
Derman, E. and Kani, I., 1994, Riding on the Smile, Risk, 7, 32-39.
Dumas, B., Fleming, J., and Whaley, R. E., 1998, Implied Volatility Functions:
Empirical Tests, Journal of Finance, 53, 2059-2106.
Dupire, B., 1994, Pricing with a Smile, Risk, 7, 18-20.
Fisher, R. A., 1932, Statistical Methods for Research Workers (4th ed.), London:
Oliver & Boyd.
Glass, G. V., 1976, Primary, secondary, and Meta-analysis of Research. Educational
Researcher, 5, 3-18.
Hartung, J., 1999, A Note on Combining Dependent Tests of Signicance, Biometrical
Journal, 41, 849-855.
Hou, C. -D., 2005, A Simple Approximation for the Distribution of the Weighted
Combination of Non-independent or Independent Probabilities, Statistics and
Probability Letters, 73, 179-187.
Lipt?k, T., 1958, On the Combination of Independent Tests, Magyar Tudomanyos
Akademia Matematikai Kutato Intezetenek Kozlemenyei, 3, 171-197.
Pe?a, I., Rubio, G. and Serna, G., 1999, Why Do We Smile? On the Determinants of
the Implied Volatility Function, Journal of Banking and Finance, 23, 1151-1179.
Pesaran, M. H., 1974, On the General Problem of Model Selection, Review of Eco-
nomic Studies, 41, 153-171.
Rubinstein, M., 1994, Implied Binomial Trees, Journal of Finance, 49, 771-818.
Satterthwaite, F. E., 1946, An approximate Distribution of Estimates of Variance
Components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110-114.

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文