| 研究生: |
鄒春旺 Chun-wang Tsou |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
限用物質對漆包線產業影響探討 The exploration and impact of restricted substance to enameled wire industry. |
| 指導教授: |
于樹偉
Shuh-woei Yu |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 環境工程研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Environmental Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 119 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | IECQ HSPM QC080000 、限用物質 、綠色供應鏈 、綠色產品 、REACH 、RoHS 、平衡計分卡 、漆包線產業 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | REACH, IECQ HSPM QC080000, Green Supply Chain, Green Product, Balanced Scorecard, Enameled Wire, RoHS |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:10 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
國際間綠色產品發展趨勢與歐盟RoHS與REACH環境危害限用物質管制法規實施,造成企業營運相當的衝擊與影響。企業藉由綠色供應鏈管理與綠色產品管理系統推動,迎接綠色產品挑戰要求,已是當今企業面臨最重要的課題。
本研究以廣泛使用於電子電機產品零組件的漆包線為對象,探討限用物質管制要求對企業所造成的影響,目的在確認漆包線業界面臨限用物質管制要求時所產生的問題及所需要之協助,尋求較佳的管理模式面對這不可抵擋的綠色衝擊。研究結果顯示,漆包線產業面對RoHS指令與REACH法規要求的限用物質管制,都已被供應鏈客戶端要求進行限用物質管制,並且企業因應限用物質管制都有不同程度的瞭解與採取不同的因應措施,積極應對的廠商採取的方法為加入SONY公司Green Partner之綠色供應鏈體系或是導入IECQ HSPM QC080000無有害物質管理系統,未積極應對的廠商也採取於原有ISO 14001環境管理系統或是ISO 9001品質管理系統,再加以強化限用物質管制內容。由平衡計分卡展開的企業經營視角研究發現,平衡計分卡四大構面中漆包線產業以內部流程構面之資源投入最多,所得到的管理績效也最佳,展開之細部評量指標則以企業內部流程構面之創新流程、生產流程與顧客構面之夥伴關係與配合能力表現較佳,顯示漆包線產業在平衡計分卡內部流程改善與配合顧客要求議題上,因應情形表現良好。
本研究建議企業面對限用物質管制的挑戰,企業可以採取推行IECQ HSPM QC080000或SONY Green Partner等綠色產品管理系統、要求供應商建立內部限用管制物質管理規範,或是要求供應商加入公司綠色供應鏈夥伴組織之方式強化公司對限用物質管制之能力。
關鍵詞:RoHS、REACH、限用物質、綠色供應鏈、IECQ HSPM QC080000、綠色產品、平衡計分卡、漆包線產業
Abstract
With the ever-increasing demands on electrical and electronic products and short life cycles of these products, it is imperative that these products possess minimum risk to human health and the environment during their life cycle. The Restriction of the use of Hazardous Substances Directive of the European Union, RoSH, aims to limit the amount of six hazardous substances used in the manufacturing of many electrical and electronic products. Starting from July 1st 2006, electrical and electronic equipment producers are required to provide document proving that their products are compliant with RoSH.
Enameled wire is used in applications such as winding electric motor coils, transformers, electromagnets and inductors. Almost all electrical and electronic equipment contains components made of enameled wire. Most of the enameled wire use polymer resins as coating material, which makes it a possible candidate of RoSH requirements. This research attempts to analyze the compliance status and approach, taken or to be taken, of enameled wire manufacturers toward RoSH requirements.
A questionnaire survey was utilized to collect the information of the responding enameled wire manufacturers located in Taiwan, Mainland China and Southeast Asia. Questions based on the four perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard such as financial, customer, learning and growth, and internal business processes were designed to evaluate a company’s attitude and implementation strategy concerning RoSH or green supply chain. The survey results were checked for validity and reliability before being processed using SPSS software.
The results from this research show that the enameled wire manufacturers are subjected to the restriction of the use of hazardous substances arising from the green supply chain requirements. The survey results reveal that the enameled wire manufacturers have different levels of knowledge and understanding of RoSH. Proactive organizations have responded to the EU Directive by participating in the green supply chain of Sony’s Green Partner or by adopting IECQ HSPM QC080000, which applies a systems approach in managing restricted substances. A number of the enameled wire producing companies have expanded their existing ISO 14001 environmental management system or ISO 9001 quality management system to meet RoSH requirements. This research has found that the most proactive companies in the enameled wire business have invested resources in upgrading their internal processes. Results from the Balanced Scorecard illustrate that customers’ demands have the greatest impact on enameled wire manufacturers’ willingness to improve their internal processes.
This research recommends that when facing the challenges of restricted substances control, enameled wire manufacturers should adopt the systems approach such as IECQ HSPM QC080000 or should join the Sony Green Partner program. Manufacturers should also request their suppliers to set up their internal restricted substances control program or request the suppliers to become part of the green supply chain in order to strengthen their restricted substances control capability.
Keywords: RoHS, REACH, Green Supply Chain, IECQ HSPM QC080000, Green Product, Balanced Scorecard, Enameled Wire
參考文獻
[1] Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), Official Journal of the European Union, 2003.
[2] Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS), Official Journal of the European Union, 2003.
[3] REGULATION (EC) No 1907/2006 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 18 December 2006。Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals, (REACH)。
[4] 林俊豪,“新環保規範=新貿易壁壘”,財經文摘,2005年5月。
[5] 台灣區電線電纜工業同業公會網站 http://www.taiwancable.org.tw/
[6] “2009-2012年漆包線行業發展前景分析及投資風險預測報告”,慧典市場研究報告網 http://www.hdcmr.com/
[7] DIRECTIVE 2009/125/EC establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (ErP指令)
[8] European Parliament 2005/618/EC Directive COMMISSION DECISION of 18 August, 2005.
[9] Dr. John H. Lau,“因應歐盟RoHS指令之無鉛組裝技術最新發展研討會”
[10] 「電子信息產品污染控制管理辦法」(中華人民共和國信息產業部令第39號2006年2月28日)
[11] 「電子信息產品污染控制標示要求」(SJ-T11364-2006) (中華人民共和國信息產業部,2006年)
[12] 張家淵,“台商面對大陸綠色產品規範浪潮之因應策略”,永續產業發展雙月刊,2006。
[13] 「資源有效利用促進法」(Law for the Promotion of Effective Utilization of Resources),日本通產省, Revised : 27 April, 2006.
[14] 「電気・電子機器の特定の化学物質の含有表示方法(The marking for presence of the specific chemical substances for electrical and electronic equipment),日本工業標準 JIS C 0950」
[15] SB20(Sher):Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003 ; SB50(Sher): Emergency Amendment to SB 20 ; SB 20 & 50:DTSC guidance,SB 20 (Sher, Chapter 526, Statutes of 2003) and SB 50 (Sher, Chapter 863, Statutes of 2004), California.
[16] The Act for Resource Recycling of Electrical/Electronic Products and Automobiles, 2006 2, Ministry of Environment Republic of Korea.
[17] 「促進節約及資源回收法案」(Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources) , Ministry of Environment Republic of Korea.
[18] 「歐盟法規1907/2006/EC化學物質之註冊、評估、許可和限制(REACH)附錄17(ANNEX XVII)修訂(276/2010/EC)」
[19] SONY公司SS-00259「零部件和材料中的环境管理物质管理规定」,索尼技術標準事務局,2010年4月1日
[20] Oliver, R. K. and Webber, M. D.(1982),"Supply-chain management: logistics catches up with strategy," Outlook, cit. Martin Christopher, Logistics, The Strategy Issues, London: Chapman and Hall, 1992.
[21] 莊仁閔,“電腦產業供應鏈管理價值之研究”,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文,2002。
[22] Thomas, D .J. and P .M . Griffin, "Coordinated Supply Chain Management", European Journal of operational Research 94, pp1-15, 1996.
[23] Green Business Network, "Going Green Upstream: The promise of supplier environmental management", Green Business Network, The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation, 2001.
[24] 丁執宇,“知識經濟時代清潔生產新趨勢─綠色供應鏈管理”,永續產業發展,期7,頁21-32,2003。
[25] 陳穆臻,“勢在必行的綠色供應鏈”,管理雜誌,期373,頁72-76,2005。
[26] 楊致行,“產業綠色供應鏈運作機制與案例彙編─管理篇”,臺北市:經濟部工業局,2005。
[27] 汪波、白彥壯、李敏,“企業可持續發展的綠色供應鏈管理研究”,天津大學管理學院。http://www.paper.edu.cn/,2005。
[28] 許享承,“綠色供應鏈管理機制建構之研究-以A公司為例”,國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文,2006。
[29] 黃英傑,“綠色供應鏈管理的策略分析-以智邦科技為例”,清華大學,2006。
[30] 經濟部工業局,“產業綠色採購指引-邁向產業永續發展之路”,臺北市:經濟部工業局;臺灣環境管理協會,2003。
[31] 經濟部工業局,“綠色採購與綠色設計-邁向產業永續發展之路”,臺北市:經濟部工業局;臺灣環境管理協會,2002。
[32] “International Electrotechnical Commission—IEC Quality Assessment System for Electronic Components (IECQ)”, IEC, Part 5: Hazardous Substance Process Management Requirements, 2005.
[33] 漢康科技,“運用平衡計分卡推動企業績效管理”,2003年5月19日,取自http://bi.fast.com.tw/Product/Vi23.htm.
[34] Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic Management system. In Harvard Business School (Ed.), Harvard Business Review on measuring corporate performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1996.