跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李沅翰
Yuan-Han Li
論文名稱: Investigation of the mechanisms of anxiety-related functions in the general population using brain stimulation
指導教授: 馬杰仁
Neil G. Muggleton
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 生醫理工學院 - 認知與神經科學研究所
Graduate Institute of Cognitive and Neuroscience
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 153
中文關鍵詞: 焦慮認知控制跨顱直流電刺激連續性高脈衝式經顱磁刺激楔前葉
外文關鍵詞: anxiety, cognitive control, tDCS, cTBS, precuneus
相關次數: 點閱:19下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 焦慮對一般人或是焦慮性疾患而言都是常見的問題。近年來的研究已經證明,使用腦刺激可以改善焦慮性疾患的焦慮症狀,卻很少探討在一般人上的應用。因此,我們探討腦刺激可否調節一般人的焦慮程度,並瞭解正常的功能下焦慮的基本神經機制。注意力控制理論(attentional control theory)提出,焦慮會損害認知控制並增加外在刺激的影響(Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, 2007)。本文中,我們探討兩種認知控制功能,抑制(inhibition,第二章)及更新(updating,第三章),與焦慮之間的關聯。
    實驗一,我們使用一個偵測(detection)作業來確立一般人的焦慮程度與視覺搜尋效率之間的關聯。結果發現,實驗參與者對於負向評價的恐懼越高時,他們的反應時間會越長。並且,只有男性顯示這樣的關聯,而女性沒有。先前發表的研究中,招募較多的女性(約 81%實驗參與者),因此,我們推論在作業需求上有性別差異現象。在實驗二,我們將作業從偵測作業改為定位(localization)作業。再一次,只有男性顯示焦慮程度與視覺搜尋效率之間顯著的關聯,而女性沒有顯示此關聯。因此,我們探討工作記憶歷程中的另一種認知控制功能,更新。在實驗四,我們使用問卷、呈現 n-back作業、並使用驚嚇反應作為一個與焦慮相關的測量。背外側前額葉(dorsolateral prefrontal cortex)與楔前葉(precuneus)區域已被證明,在焦慮性疾患與一般人之間有所差異。因此,在實驗四中,我們使用跨顱直流電刺激(transcranial magnetic stimulation)來調節這兩個區域的活化。然而,我們在作業表現、驚嚇反應或量表分數上沒有發現任何跨顱直流電刺激造成的改善或損傷。當我們比較過去研究與實驗四的電刺激參數後,我們推論接受背外側前額葉電刺激的組別可能是因為電刺激的參數不夠準確。但是,目前還不確定電極片的排列是否會造成楔前葉電刺激在視覺知覺上的影響。因此,實驗五我們探討楔前葉電刺激在視覺知覺上的影響,沒有發現跨顱直流電刺激在作業上的影響。最後,在實驗六中,我們在楔前葉與頂點(vertex)使用連續性高脈衝式經顱磁刺激(continuous theta burst stimulation,cTBS)。結果顯示,只有楔前葉組顯示在工作記憶上的改變(促進),而頂點組沒有。雖然,楔前葉與頂點組在驚嚇反應上都有改善,但是只有楔前葉組在 0-back 作業(沒有記憶負荷)上有所改善。這說明了,即使在作業負荷低時,在楔前葉上使用連續性高脈衝式經顱磁刺激仍會改善驚嚇反應。並且,這些發現支持本研究在楔前葉上使用腦刺激會調節焦慮程度的想法。
    總結來說,第二章顯示了在焦慮程度與視覺搜尋效率之間的關聯中有性別差異。然而,目前仍不清楚,為何只有男性顯示出此兩者之間的關聯。在第三章,我們使用了跨顱直流電刺激與跨顱磁刺激,但是我們只在跨顱磁刺激實驗中發現顯著的差異。這樣的結果有著許多的可能性,包含了跨顱磁刺激可能比跨顱直流電刺激還要精確或是有效率。然而,本研究也支持楔前葉在焦慮中扮演著重要角色。未來,如果將作業表現與驚嚇反應作為與焦慮相關的指標,需要考慮如何減少不同作業難度在這兩個指標上造成的差異。


    Recently, studies have demonstrated that applying brain stimulation may improve the severity of anxiety symptoms. As anxiety is common in the general population as well as those with anxiety disorders, we investigated whether brain stimulation can modulate anxiety levels for the general population with the aim of understanding the underlying mechanisms of this process in a normal system. Attentional control theory (ACT) suggests that anxiety impairs cognitive control and increases the impact of external stimuli (Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, 2007). In this thesis, we investigated two cognitive control function, inhibition (in Chapter 2) and updating (in Chapter 3), in relation to anxiety.
    In Experiment 1, we applied a detection task to establish the relationship between anxiety levels and visual search efficiency for the general population. We found that participants with higher fear of negative evaluation were slower in performing the task. Also, we found that only males showed such a relationship, but females did not. As a previously published study recruited more females (about 81% of participants) than males, we inferred that there may be gender differences on task demands. In Experiment 2, we changed the task from detection to localization. Again, only males showed significant correlation between anxiety levels and visual search efficiency, whereas females did not. Therefore, we turned to investigating working memory which comprises another function of attentional control, updating. In Experiment 4, we administered questionnaires, presented the n-back task, and used a startle reflex as an anxiety-related measurement. As dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and precuneus (PCu) have been demonstrated to show differences between those with anxiety disorders and normal people, we applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulated activities of these areas in Experiment 4. However, we did not find any significant improvement or impairment on task performance, startle reflex, nor questionnaire scores as a result of tDCS stimulation. As we compared parameters of tDCS between previous studies and ours, we inferred that one possibility was that the stimulation it might not have been precise enough for the DLPFC group. However, it was unclear whether or not the electrode arrangement led to any effect of PCu tDCS on visual perception. Therefore, we investigated the effects of PCu tDCS on a visual perception task in Experiment 5, but we did not find any significant effect on task performance. Finally, we applied continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over PCu and vertex in Experiment 6. We found that only the PCu group showed a change (improvement) in working memory, but the vertex group did not. Even though both PCu and vertex groups showed an improvement in the startle reflex, only the PCu group showed this improvement on the 0-back task (i.e. no memory load). This implied that applying cTBS over PCu improves the startle reflex even when task demand was low. Also, these findings supported the idea that applying brain stimulation over this area modulates anxiety levels.
    In summary, Chapter 2 showed a gender difference in the relationship between anxiety levels and visual search efficiency. However, it is still unclear why only males showed such relationship. In Chapter 3, we applied both tDCS and TMS, but observed significant differences only in the TMS experiment. There are number of possibilities for this, including, for example, that TMS may more precise or efficient than tDCS. However, the findings do support a role for precuneus in anxiety and how to both diminish the differences of task performance and in the startle reflex for different task difficulties may be important when using these as anxiety-related indices.

    Chapter 1 General introduction .............................................................................................. - 1 - 1.1 Anxiety ..................................................................................................................... - 1 - 1.2 Anxiety and cognitive control .................................................................................. - 2 - 1.2.1 Anxiety and attentional bias toward threat .................................................... - 2 - 1.2.2 Anxiety and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) .................................... - 3 - 1.2.3 Anxiety and load manipulation ...................................................................... - 5 - 1.3 Anxiety and precuneus (PCu) ................................................................................... - 7 - 1.4 Brain stimulation ...................................................................................................... - 7 - 1.4.1 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) ..................................................... - 8 - 1.4.2 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ............................................. - 9 - 1.4.3 Brain stimulation and anxiety disorders ........................................................ - 9 - 1.4.4 Brain stimulation and working memory ...................................................... - 10 - 1.5 Research aims ......................................................................................................... - 11 - 1.5.1 Anxiety and attentional bias for the general population .............................. - 11 - 1.5.2 Anxiety and working memory ..................................................................... - 11 - Chapter 2 Anxiety and Visual search .................................................................................... - 14 - 2.1 Experiment 1 The effects of facial expressions on target detection ....................... - 14 - 2.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. - 14 - 2.1.2 Methods ....................................................................................................... - 16 - 2.1.2.1 Participants ....................................................................................... - 16 - 2.1.2.2 Questionnaires .................................................................................. - 16 - 2.1.2.3 Task ................................................................................................... - 17 - 2.1.3 Results ......................................................................................................... - 19 - 2.1.4 Discussion .................................................................................................... - 28 - 2.2 Experiment 2 The effect of facial expressions on localization ............................... - 31 - 2.2.1 Methods ....................................................................................................... - 31 - 2.2.1.1 Participants ....................................................................................... - 31 - 2.2.1.2 Procedure .......................................................................................... - 31 - 2.2.2 Results ......................................................................................................... - 32 - 2.2.3 Discussion .................................................................................................... - 43 - 2.3 Experiment 3 The effects of fearful faces on localization task performance compared to the effects of truly neutral face presentation ............................................................ - 45 - 2.3.1 Methods ....................................................................................................... - 45 - 2.3.1.1 Participants ....................................................................................... - 45 - 2.3.2 Results ......................................................................................................... - 45 - 2.3.3 Discussion .................................................................................................... - 51 - 2.4 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. - 51 - Chapter 3 How does the activation of anxiety-related areas modulate cognitive functions? . - 55 - 3.1 Experiment 4 The effect of tDCS over anxiety-related areas on working memory performance .................................................................................................................. - 55 - 3.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. - 55 - 3.1.2 Methods ....................................................................................................... - 59 - 3.1.2.1 Participants ....................................................................................... - 59 - 3.1.2.2 Procedure .......................................................................................... - 59 - 3.1.2.3 Questionnaires .................................................................................. - 60 - 3.1.2.4 Task ................................................................................................... - 61 - 3.1.2.5 tDCS ................................................................................................. - 62 - 3.1.3 Results ......................................................................................................... - 63 - 3.1.3.1 Accuracy of judging whether or not the current letter matched the target letter .............................................................................................................. - 64 - 3.1.3.2 Reaction times when performing the working memory tasks .......... - 67 - 3.1.3.3 Reaction times corrected for accuracy and efficacy in performing the tasks .............................................................................................................. - 70 - 3.1.3.4 Performance of the 0-back task ........................................................ - 73 - 3.1.3.5 The startle reflex induced by the beep ..............................................- 77 - 3.1.3.6 State version of STAI (STAI-S) ........................................................ - 80 - 3.1.3.7 Trait version of STAI (STAI-T) ........................................................ - 82 - 3.1.3.8 Brief fear of negative evaluation (BFNE) scores ............................. - 84 - 3.1.3.9 BDI-II ............................................................................................... - 86 - 3.1.4 Discussion .................................................................................................... - 88 - 3.2 Experiment 5 The interaction of ocular dominance, precuneus tDCS, and electrode arrangement, on visual perception ............................................................................. - 92 - 3.2.1 Methods ....................................................................................................... - 92 - 3.2.1.1 Participants ....................................................................................... - 92 - 3.2.1.2 Procedure .......................................................................................... - 92 - 3.2.1.3 Task ................................................................................................... - 92 - 3.2.1.4 tDCS ................................................................................................. - 93 - 3.2.2 Results ......................................................................................................... - 93 - 3.2.3 Discussion .................................................................................................... - 98 - 3.3 Experiment 6 The effect of TMS over precuneus on working memory performance and anxiety .......................................................................................................................... - 99 - 3.3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. - 99 - 3.3.2 Methods .....................................................................................................- 100 - 3.3.2.1 Participants .....................................................................................- 100 - 3.3.2.2 Procedure ........................................................................................- 101 - 3.2.2.3 Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) ....................................- 101 - 3.3.3 Results ....................................................................................................... - 102 - 3.3.3.1 Accuracy for matching the current letter with the letter n-back from the current letter ................................................................................................ - 102 - 3.3.3.2 The reaction times in performing the working memory tasks ........- 105 - 3.3.3.3 Performances of the 0-back task ..................................................... - 107 - 3.3.3.4 The startle reflex .............................................................................- 109 - 3.3.3.5 The questionnaire scores ................................................................- 112 - 3.3.4 Discussion ..................................................................................................- 114 - Chapter 4 General discussion .............................................................................................- 116 - 4.1 Anxiety and visual search with facial expressions ...............................................- 116 - 4.2 The application of brain stimulation on modulating working memory performance, impact of external stimuli and self-reported anxiety levels ........................................- 121 - 4.3 Future directions ................................................................................................... - 127 - References ..........................................................................................................................- 129 -

    Adams, R. B., Jr., & Kleck, R. E. (2005). Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of
    facially communicated emotion. Emotion, 5(1), 3-11. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.3
    Amir, N., & Bomyea, J. (2011). Working memory capacity in generalized social phobia. J
    Abnorm Psychol, 120(2), 504-509. doi: 10.1037/a0022849
    Ansari, T. L., & Derakshan, N. (2011a). The neural correlates of cognitive effort in anxiety:
    effects on processing efficiency. Biol Psychol, 86(3), 337-348. doi:
    10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.12.013
    Ansari, T. L., & Derakshan, N. (2011b). The neural correlates of impaired inhibitory control in
    anxiety. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1146-1153. doi:
    10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.019
    Basten, U., Stelzel, C., & Fiebach, C. J. (2011). Trait anxiety modulates the neural efficiency of
    inhibitory control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3132-3145.
    Basten, U., Stelzel, C., & Fiebach, C. J. (2012). Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of
    manipulation in working memory. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 12(3), 571-588. doi:
    10.3758/s13415-012-0100-3
    Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio.
    Berggren, N., Richards, A., Taylor, J., & Derakshan, N. (2013). Affective attention under
    cognitive load: reduced emotional biases but emergent anxiety-related costs to
    inhibitory control. Front Hum Neurosci, 7, 188. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00188
    Bishop, S. J. (2008). Trait anxiety and impoverished prefrontal control of attention. Nature
    Neuroscience, 12(1), 92-98. doi: 10.1038/nn.2242
    Bishop, S. J., Jenkins, R., & Lawrence, A. D. (2007). Neural processing of fearful faces: effects
    of anxiety are gated by perceptual capacity limitations. Cereb Cortex, 17(7),
    1595-1603. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl070

    Blumenthal, T. D., Cuthbert, B. N., Filion, D. L., Hackley, S., Lipp, O. V., & van Boxtel, A. (2005).
    Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies.
    Psychophysiology, 42(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00271.x
    Boggio, P. S., Rocha, M., Oliveira, M. O., Fecteau, S., Cohen, R. B., Campanha, C., . . . Fregni, F.
    (2010). Noninvasive brain stimulation with high-frequency and low-intensity
    repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for posttraumatic stress
    disorder. J Clin Psychiatry, 71(8), 992-999. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04638blu
    Boros, K., Poreisz, C., Munchau, A., Paulus, W., & Nitsche, M. A. (2008). Premotor transcranial
    direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans. Eur J
    Neurosci, 27(5), 1292-1300. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06090.x
    Brunoni, A. R., & Vanderhasselt, M. A. (2014). Working memory improvement with
    non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a systematic
    review and meta-analysis. Brain Cogn, 86, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.008
    Bystritsky, A., Kaplan, J. T., Feusner, J. D., Kerwin, L. E., Wadekar, M., Burock, M., . . . Lacoboni,
    M. (2008). A preliminary study of fMRI-guided rTMS in the treatment of generalized
    anxiety disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(7), 1092-1098.
    Cohen, H., Kaplan, Z., Kotler, M., Kouperman, I., Moisa, R., & Grisaru, B. N. (2004). Repetitive
    Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in
    Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Am J
    Psychiatry, 161(3), 515-524.
    Cowey, A. (2005). The Ferrier Lecture 2004 what can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us
    about how the brain works? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 360(1458), 1185-1205.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1658
    Derakshan, N., Ansari, T. L., Hansard, M., Shoker, L., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety,
    inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness. An investigation using antisaccade task. Exp
    Psychol, 56(1), 48-55. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.48

    Ewbank, M. P., Lawrence, A. D., Passamonti, L., Keane, J., Peers, P. V., & Calder, A. J. (2009).
    Anxiety predicts a differential neural response to attended and unattended facial
    signals of anger and fear. Neuroimage, 44(3), 1144-1151. doi:
    10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.056
    Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive
    performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-353. doi:
    10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
    Fales, C. L., Barch, D. M., Burgess, G. C., Schaefer, A., Mennin, D. S., Gray, J. R., & Braver, T. S.
    (2008). Anxiety and cognitive efficiency: Differential modulation of transient and
    sustained neural activity during a working memory task. Cognitive, Affective, &
    Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(3), 239-253. doi: 10.3758/cabn.8.3.239
    Ferreri, F., Lapp, L. K., & Peretti, C. S. (2011). Current research on cognitive aspects of anxiety
    disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 24(1), 49-54. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833f5585
    Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Leiberg, S., Langner, R., Kichic, R., Hajcak, G., & Salkovskis, P. M.
    (2002). The Obsessive-Complusive Inventory: Development and validation of a short
    version. Psychological Assessment, 14(4), 485-495. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.14.4.485
    Fox, E., Russo, R., & Georgiou, G. A. (2005). Anxiety modulates the degree of attentive
    resources required to process emotional faces. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral
    Neuroscience, 5(4), 396-404.
    Fregni, F., Boggio, P. S., Nitsche, M., Bermpohl, F., Antal, A., Feredoes, E., . . . Pascual-Leone, A.
    (2005). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances
    working memory. Exp Brain Res, 166(1), 23-30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6
    Gamble, A. L., & Rapee, R. M. (2010). The time-course of attention to emotional faces in
    social phobia. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 41(1), 39-44. doi:
    10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.08.008
    Gentili, C., Gobbini, M. I., Ricciardi, E., Vanello, N., Pietrini, P., Haxby, J. V., & Guazzelli, M.

    (2008). Differential modulation of neural activity throughout the distributed neural
    system for face perception in patients with Social Phobia and healthy subjects. Brain
    Res Bull, 77(5), 286-292. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.08.003
    Gentili, C., Ricciardi, E., Gobbini, M. I., Santarelli, M. F., Haxby, J. V., Pietrini, P., & Guazzelli, M.
    (2009). Beyond amygdala: Default Mode Network activity differs between patients
    with social phobia and healthy controls. Brain Res Bull, 79(6), 409-413. doi:
    10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.02.002
    Georgiou, G. A., Bleakley, C., Hayward, J., Russo, R., Dutton, K., Eltiti, S., & Fox, E. (2005).
    Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces. Vis cogn, 12(1),
    145-158. doi: 10.1080/13506280444000076
    Goldin, P. R., Jazaieri, H., Ziv, M., Kraemer, H., Heimberg, R., & Gross, J. J. (2013). Changes in
    Positive Self-Views Mediate the Effect of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Social
    Anxiety Disorder. Clin Psychol Sci, 1(3), 301-310. doi: 10.1177/2167702613476867
    Greenberg, P. E., Sisitsky, T., Kessler, R. C., Finkelstein, S. N., Berndt, E. R., Davidson, J. R., . . .
    Fyer, A. J. (1999). The economic burden of anxiety disorders in the 1990s. Journal of
    Clinical Psychiatry.
    Grossheinrich, N., Rau, A., Pogarell, O., Hennig-Fast, K., Reinl, M., Karch, S., . . . Padberg, F.
    (2009). Theta burst stimulation of the prefrontal cortex: safety and impact on
    cognition, mood, and resting electroencephalogram. Biol Psychiatry, 65(9), 778-784.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.029
    Hallett, M. (2000). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature,
    406(6792), 147-150.
    Herbert, J. D., Gaudiano, B. A., Rheingold, A. A., Moitra, E., Myers, V. H., Dalrymple, K. L., &
    Brandsma, L. L. (2009). Cognitive behavior therapy for generalized social anxiety
    disorder in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. J Anxiety Disord, 23(2),
    167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.06.004

    Horvath, J. C., Forte, J. D., & Carter, O. (2015). Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of
    Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct
    Current Stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul, 8(3), 535-550. doi:
    10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400
    Huang, Y. Z., Edwards, M. J., Rounis, E., Bhatia, K. P., & Rothwell, J. C. (2005). Theta burst
    stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron, 45(2), 201-206. doi:
    10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033
    Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W. J., & Meier, B. (2010). The concurrent validity of the
    N-back task as a working memory measure. Memory, 18(4), 394-412. doi:
    10.1080/09658211003702171
    Jones, R., & Bhattacharya, J. (2014). A role for the precuneus in thought-action fusion:
    evidence from participants with significant obsessive-compulsive symptoms.
    Neuroimage Clin, 4, 112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.11.008
    Judah, M. R., Grant, D. M., Mills, A. C., & Lechner, W. V. (2013). The neural correlates of
    impaired attentional control in social anxiety: an ERP study of inhibition and shifting.
    Emotion, 13(6), 1096-1106. doi: 10.1037/a0033531
    Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and
    comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey
    Replication. Archives of general psychiatry, 62(6), 617-627.
    Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Van Damme, S., & Wiersema, J. R. (2006).
    Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement,
    impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behav Res Ther, 44(12),
    1757-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.011
    Ladouceur, C. D., Silk, J. S., Dahl, R. E., Ostapenko, L., Kronhaus, D. M., & Phillips, M. L. (2009).
    Fearful faces influence attentional control processes in anxious youth and adults.
    Emotion, 9(6), 855-864. doi: 10.1037/a0017747

    Lally, N., Nord, C. L., Walsh, V., & Roiser, J. P. (2013). Does excitatory fronto-extracerebral
    tDCS lead to improved working memory performance? F1000Research, 2.
    Leary, M. R. (1983). A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Personality and
    Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(3), 371-375.
    Liao, W., Chen, H., Feng, Y., Mantini, D., Gentili, C., Pan, Z., . . . Zhang, W. (2010). Selective
    aberrant functional connectivity of resting state networks in social anxiety disorder.
    Neuroimage, 52(4), 1549-1558. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.010
    Luber, B., Kinnunen, L. H., Rakitin, B. C., Ellsasser, R., Stern, Y., & Lisanby, S. H. (2007).
    Facilitation of performance in a working memory task with rTMS stimulation of the
    precuneus: frequency- and time-dependent effects. Brain Res, 1128(1), 120-129. doi:
    10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.011
    MacNamara, A., Ferri, J., & Hajcak, G. (2011). Working memory load reduces the late positive
    potential and this effect is attenuated with increasing anxiety. Cogn Affect Behav
    Neurosci, 11(3), 321-331. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0036-z
    Maeda, F., Keenan, J. P., Tormos, J. M., Topka, H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Modulation of
    corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clinical
    Neurophysiology, 111(5), 800-805. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00323-5
    Mantovani, A., Aly, M., Dagan, Y., Allart, A., & Lisanby, S. H. (2013). Randomized sham
    controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the dorsolateral
    prefrontal cortex for the treatment of panic disorder with comorbid major depression.
    J Affect Disord, 144(1-2), 153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.05.038
    Mantovani, A., Lisanby, S. H., Pieraccini, F., Ulivelli, M., Castrogiovanni, P., & Rossi, S. (2007).
    Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of panic
    disorder (PD) with comorbid major depression. J Affect Disord, 102(1-3), 277-280. doi:
    10.1016/j.jad.2006.11.027
    Mathews, A., Fox, E., Yiend, J., & Calder, A. (2003). The face of fear: Effects of eye gaze and emotion on visual attention. Vis cogn, 10(7), 823-835.
    Mogg, K., Garner, M., & Bradley, B. P. (2007). Anxiety and orienting of gaze to angry and
    fearful faces. Biol Psychol, 76(3), 163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.07.005
    Mogg, K., Philippot, P., & Bradley, B. P. (2004). Selective attention to angry faces in clinical
    social phobia. J Abnorm Psychol, 113(1), 160-165. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.1.160
    Moriya, J., & Sugiura, Y. (2012). High visual working memory capacity in trait social anxiety.
    PLoS One, 7(4), e34244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034244
    Moser, J. S., Becker, M. W., & Moran, T. P. (2012). Enhanced attentional capture in trait
    anxiety. Emotion, 12(2), 213-216. doi: 10.1037/a0026156
    Muellbacher, W., Ziemann, U., Boroojerdi, B., & Hallett, M. (2000). Effects of low-frequency
    transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior.
    Clinical Neurophysiology, 111(6), 1002-1007.
    Nitsche, M., & Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by
    weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of physiology, 527(3),
    633-639.
    Nitsche, M. A., Doemkes, S., Karakose, T., Antal, A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., . . . Paulus, W.
    (2007). Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human
    motor cortex. J Neurophysiol, 97(4), 3109-3117. doi: 10.1152/jn.01312.2006
    Oberman, L., Edwards, D., Eldaief, M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2011). Safety of theta burst
    transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin
    Neurophysiol, 28(1), 67-74. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318205135f
    Ohn, S. H., Park, C.-I., Yoo, W.-K., Ko, M.-H., Choi, K. P., Kim, G.-M., . . . Kim, Y.-H. (2008).
    Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement
    of working memory. Neuroreport, 19(1), 43-47.
    Olatunji, B. O., Ciesielski, B. G., Armstrong, T., & Zald, D. H. (2011). Emotional expressions and
    visual search efficiency: specificity and effects of anxiety symptoms. Emotion, 11(5), 1073-1079. doi: 10.1037/a0021785
    Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory
    paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain
    Mapp, 25(1), 46-59. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20131
    Paes, F., Machado, S., Arias-Carrión, O., Velasques, B., Teixeira, S., Budde, H., . . . P Huston, J.
    (2011). The value of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the
    treatment of anxiety disorders: an integrative review. CNS & Neurological
    Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-CNS & Neurological Disorders),
    10(5), 610-620.
    Pascual-Leone, A., Valls-Solé, J., Wassermann, E. M., & Hallett, M. (1994). Responses to
    rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain, 117(4),
    847-858.
    Peng, Z. W., Yang, W. H., Miao, G. D., Jing, J., & Chan, R. C. (2011). The Chinese version of the
    Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised scale: replication and extension to
    non-clinical and clinical individuals with OCD symptoms. BMC Psychiatry, 11, 129. doi:
    10.1186/1471-244X-11-129
    Poreisz, C., Boros, K., Antal, A., & Paulus, W. (2007). Safety aspects of transcranial direct
    current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull, 72(4-6),
    208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004
    Rossignol, M., Philippot, P., Douilliez, C., Crommelinck, M., & Campanella, S. (2005). The
    perception of fearful and happy facial expression is modulated by anxiety: an
    event-related potential study. Neurosci Lett, 377(2), 115-120. doi:
    10.1016/j.neulet.2004.11.091
    Sachdev, P. S., Loo, C. K., Mitchell, P. B., McFarquhar, T. F., & Malhi, G. S. (2007). Repetitive
    transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder:
    a double-blind controlled investigation. Psychol Med, 37(11), 1645-1649. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707001092
    Sadeh, N., & Bredemeier, K. (2011). Individual differences at high perceptual load: the
    relation between trait anxiety and selective attention. Cogn Emot, 25(4), 747-755. doi:
    10.1080/02699931.2010.500566
    Sarkhel, S., Sinha, V. K., & Praharaj, S. K. (2010). Adjunctive high-frequency right prefrontal
    repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was not effective in
    obsessive-compulsive disorder but improved secondary depression. J Anxiety Disord,
    24(5), 535-539. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.011
    Somerville, L. H., Kim, H., Johnstone, T., Alexander, A. L., & Whalen, P. J. (2004). Human
    amygdala responses during presentation of happy and neutral faces: correlations with
    state anxiety. Biol Psychiatry, 55(9), 897-903. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.01.007
    Spielberger, C. D., & Gorsuch, R. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults: Manual and
    Sample: Manual, Instrument and Scoring Guide: Consulting Psychologists Press.
    Sylvester, C. M., Corbetta, M., Raichle, M. E., Rodebaugh, T. L., Schlaggar, B. L., Sheline, Y.
    I., . . . Lenze, E. J. (2012). Functional network dysfunction in anxiety and anxiety
    disorders. Trends Neurosci, 35(9), 527-535. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.04.012
    Telzer, E. H., Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Mai, X., Ernst, M., Pine, D. S., & Monk, C. S. (2008).
    Relationship between trait anxiety, prefrontal cortex, and attention bias to angry
    faces in children and adolescents. Biol Psychol, 79(2), 216-222. doi:
    10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.05.004
    Vytal, K., Cornwell, B., Arkin, N., & Grillon, C. (2012). Describing the interplay between
    anxiety and cognition: from impaired performance under low cognitive load to
    reduced anxiety under high load. Psychophysiology, 49(6), 842-852. doi:
    10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01358.x
    Walsh, V., & Rushworth, M. (1999). A primer of magnetic stimulation as a tool for
    neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia, 37, 125-136. Watts, B. V., Landon, B., Groft, A., & Young-Xu, Y. (2012). A sham controlled study of
    repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for posttraumatic stress disorder. Brain
    Stimul, 5(1), 38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.02.002
    Wieser, M. J., Pauli, P., & Muhlberger, A. (2009). Probing the attentional control theory in
    social anxiety: an emotional saccade task. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 9(3), 314-322.
    doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.3.314
    Yoon, K. L., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2008). Interpreting neutral faces as threatening is a default mode
    for socially anxious individuals. J Abnorm Psychol, 117(3), 680-685. doi:
    10.1037/0021-843X.117.3.680
    Zafar, N., Paulus, W., & Sommer, M. (2008). Comparative assessment of best conventional
    with best theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols on human
    motor cortex excitability. Clin Neurophysiol, 119(6), 1393-1399. doi:
    10.1016/j.clinph.2008.02.006
    Zhao, X. H., Wang, P. J., Li, C. B., Hu, Z. H., Xi, Q., Wu, W. Y., & Tang, X. W. (2007). Altered
    default mode network activity in patient with anxiety disorders: an fMRI study. Eur J
    Radiol, 63(3), 373-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.006

    QR CODE
    :::