跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 葉佐軒
Tso-Hsuan Yeh
論文名稱: 應用書目計量方法與文字採礦分析輔助科技的研究發展
Bibliometric analysis with text mining in assistive technology
指導教授: 沈建文
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系在職專班
Executive Master of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: 輔助科技書目資料分析文字探勘文字採礦
外文關鍵詞: Assistive technology, Bibliometric analysis, Text Mining, Network Analysis
相關次數: 點閱:6下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 輔助科技被定義為任一可用的裝置或系統,可以輔助並促進單一個人完成原本能力所無法完成的事項,並可提升使用時的安全性和降低完成任務的困難度。在本研究中,藉由資料圖形化和文字採礦(Text mining)的方式,分析大量與輔助科技相關文獻的書目資料文本,從綜觀的角度找出輔助科技的發展趨勢。研究中,使用Scopus作為主要資料來源的資料庫,並以2000年到2018年的文本資料作為主要分析區間。從分析結果中根據每年出版的相關文獻,顯示和輔助科技有關聯的議題討論從2006年開始便有顯著的提升,整體而言是呈現逐年增加的趨勢。在區域分佈上,作者來源和貢獻度以美國和英國最多。Accessibility出現在作者關鍵字中的高頻率,顯示輔助科技的發展和推廣還存在著很多限制和障礙,且大多都在於導入成本或是使用者對於社會觀感的在意程度。而在書目耦合(bibliography coupling)分析中,神經科學(neural science)是連結強度最高的議題。文字採礦(text mining)分析結果顯示,technology、rehabilitation、disability、education是2000年到2018年的區間中和輔助科技同時出現次數最高的單詞,另外,在2018年首次出現的單詞為innovation和collaboration。本研究從大量書目資料中抽取出現頻率最高的關鍵字、出版貢獻度最高的國家、以及作者和文獻之間的連結關係,以期能提供輔助科技在未來發展方向的一個參考。


    Assistive technology (AT) is an umbrella term for any device or system that allows individuals to perform tasks they would otherwise be unable to do or increase the ease and safety with which the tasks can be performed. The objective of this thesis is to conduct data visualization and text mining on bibliography information to provide a comprehensive overview of assistive technology development. Results from this study indicate that the AT-related publications have kept increasing, especially since 2006. From the perspective of research articles, the U.S. and the U.K. are the most productive countries. Term “accessibility” is the most frequent author keyword among the AT-related research, which shows that the cost of devices and the public perception towards AT still limit the use of AT devices. From the result of bibliographic coupling analysis, “neural science” is the most discussed term co-cited by authors because it has the strongest coupling strength. Meanwhile, the text mining results indicate that terms such as “innovation” and “collaboration” first appear in 2018. In short, this study extracts the strongest keywords, the most productive authors and countries, and the network relationships between authors and literatures among the research publications, which can provide development trend and research direction for the communities who are interested in AT research.

    中文摘要 i ABSTRACT ii Dedication iii Contents iv List of Figures v List of Table vi 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research objectives 3 2. Literature overview 4 2.1 Physical disabilities 4 2.2 Dementia and cognition disability 6 2.3 Learning disabilities 9 2.4 User experience/acceptance 12 3. Methodology 15 3.1 Data collection 15 3.2 Bibliometric analysis 15 3.3 Network analysis 16 3.3.1 Normalization 17 3.3.2 Mapping 18 3.3.3 Clustering 18 3.4 Text mining 19 4. Results 21 4.1 Distribution characteristics analysis 21 4.1.1 Distribution by year 21 4.1.2 Distribution by country 22 4.1.3 Author keywords 24 4.2 Network analysis 26 4.2.1 Co-authorship analysis 26 4.2.2 Co-Occurrence analysis 30 4.2.3 Citation analysis 33 4.2.4 Bibliographic coupling analysis 35 4.2.5 Co-citation analysis 37 4.3 Text mining 39 5. Conclusion 44 Reference 45

    Aarts, S., Cornelis, F., Zevenboom, Y., Brokken, P., van de Griend, N., Spoorenberg, M., . . . Wouters, E. (2017). The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study. Journal of medical radiation sciences, 64(1), 3-9.
    Anderson‐Inman, L., & Horney, M. A. (2007). Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 153-160.
    Arntzen, C., Holthe, T., & Jentoft, R. (2016). Tracing the successful incorporation of assistive technology into everyday life for younger people with dementia and family carers. Dementia, 15(4), 646-662.
    Baker, P. M., & Moon, N. W. (2008). Wireless technologies and accessibility for people with disabilities: Findings from a policy research instrument. Assistive Technology, 20(3), 149-156.
    Bateni, H., & Maki, B. E. (2005). Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 86(1), 134-145.
    Bell, S. M., Cihak, D. F., & Judge, S. (2010). A preliminary study: Do alternative certification route programs develop the necessary skills and knowledge in assistive technology? International Journal of Special Education, 25(3).
    Betke, M., Gips, J., & Fleming, P. (2002). The camera mouse: visual tracking of body features to provide computer access for people with severe disabilities. IEEE Transactions on neural systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 10(1), 1-10.
    Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs: Paul H. Brookes Pub.
    Bharucha, A. J., Anand, V., Forlizzi, J., Dew, M. A., Reynolds III, C. F., Stevens, S., & Wactlar, H. J. T. A. j. o. g. p. (2009). Intelligent assistive technology applications to dementia care: current capabilities, limitations, and future challenges. 17(2), 88-104.
    Birbaumer, N., & Cohen, L. G. (2007). Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. The Journal of physiology, 579(3), 621-636.
    Borg, J., Larsson, S., & Östergren, P. O. (2011). The right to assistive technology: For whom, for what, and by whom? Disability & Society, 26(2), 151-167.
    Brodwin, M. G., Star, T., & Cardoso, E. (2004). Computer assistive technology for people who have disabilities: Computer adaptations and modifications. Journal of rehabilitation, 70(3), 28.
    Buchholz, M., Ferm, U., & Holmgren, K. (2018). “That is how I speak nowadays”–experiences of remote communication among persons with communicative and cognitive disabilities. Disability and rehabilitation, 40(12), 1468-1479.
    Carswell, W., McCullagh, P., Augusto, J. C., Martin, S., Mulvenna, M., Zheng, H., . . . Taylor, B. (2009). A review of the role of assistive technology for people with dementia in the hours of darkness. Technology and Health Care, 17(4), 281-304.
    Cooper, R. A., Cooper, R., & Boninger, M. L. (2008). Trends and issues in wheelchair technologies. Assistive Technology, 20(2), 61-72.
    Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4), 229-243.
    Cowan, D., & Turner-smith, A. (1999). The role of assistive technology in alternative models of care for older people, in [26. Paper presented at the Research, HMSO.
    Cowan, R. E., Fregly, B. J., Boninger, M. L., Chan, L., Rodgers, M. M., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2012). Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 9(1), 20.
    Dakopoulos, D., & Bourbakis, N. G. (2009). Wearable obstacle avoidance electronic travel aids for blind: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 40(1), 25-35.
    Donoghue, J. P. (2008). Bridging the brain to the world: a perspective on neural interface systems. Neuron, 60(3), 511-521.
    Edyburn, D. L. J. M. r. (2000). Assistive technology and mild disabilities. 612, 10-16.
    Evans, J., Brown, M., Coughlan, T., Lawson, G., & Craven, M. P. (2015). A systematic review of dementia focused assistive technology. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
    Forgrave, K. E. (2002). Assistive technology: Empowering students with learning disabilities. The Clearing House, 75(3), 122-126.
    Frank Lopresti, E., Mihailidis, A., & Kirsch, N. (2004). Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: State of the art. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14(1-2), 5-39.
    Giacino, J. T., & Kalmar, K. (2005). Diagnostic and prognostic guidelines for the vegwive and minimally conscious states. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 15(3-4), 166-174.
    Gibson, G., Dickinson, C., Brittain, K., & Robinson, L. (2015). The everyday use of assistive technology by people with dementia and their family carers: a qualitative study. BMC geriatrics, 15(1), 89.
    Gilja, V., Chestek, C. A., Diester, I., Henderson, J. M., Deisseroth, K., & Shenoy, K. V. (2011). Challenges and opportunities for next-generation intracortically based neural prostheses. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58(7), 1891-1899.
    Gillespie, A., Best, C., & O'Neill, B. (2012). Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: A systematic review. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(1), 1-19.
    Gillespie, L. D., Robertson, M. C., Gillespie, W. J., Sherrington, C., Gates, S., Clemson, L. M., & Lamb, S. E. (2012). Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane database of systematic reviews(9).
    Gottlieb, A. S., & Caro, F. G. (2001). Extending the effectiveness of home care for elders through low-cost assistive equipment. Policy brief (Center for Home Care Policy and Research (US))(6), 1-6.
    Hawkins, C. (2001). Single Subject Research: Applications in Educational and Clinical Settings. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 14(2), 155-157.
    Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. International journal of social robotics, 2(4), 361-375.
    Hochberg, L. R., Bacher, D., Jarosiewicz, B., Masse, N. Y., Simeral, J. D., Vogel, J., . . . Van Der Smagt, P. (2012). Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature, 485(7398), 372.
    Holburn, S., Nguyen, D., & Vietze, P. M. (2004). Computer‐assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 19(1), 25-37.
    Jamwal, R., Callaway, L., Ackerl, J., Farnworth, L., & Winkler, D. (2017). Electronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: Implications for occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 80(2), 89-98.
    Jonge, D. d., Rodger, S., & Fitzgibbon, H. (2001). Putting technology to work: Users' perspective on integrating assistive technology into the workplace. Work, 16(2), 77-89.
    Kim, S.-P., Simeral, J. D., Hochberg, L. R., Donoghue, J. P., & Black, M. J. (2008). Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia. Journal of neural engineering, 5(4), 455.
    Kintsch, A., & DePaula, R. (2002). A framework for the adoption of assistive technology. SWAAAC 2002: Supporting learning through assistive technology, 1-10.
    L. Fozard, J. R., Herman Bouma, JAM Graafmans, James. (2000). Gerontechnology: Creating enabling environments for the challenges and opportunities of aging. Educational Gerontology, 26(4), 331-344.
    Lenker, J. A., Harris, F., Taugher, M., & Smith, R. O. (2013). Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(5), 373-380.
    Maki, B. E., Cheng, K. C.-C., Mansfield, A., Scovil, C. Y., Perry, S. D., Peters, A. L., . . . kinesiology. (2008). Preventing falls in older adults: new interventions to promote more effective change-in-support balance reactions. 18(2), 243-254.
    Martins, M. M., Santos, C. P., Frizera-Neto, A., & Ceres, R. (2012). Assistive mobility devices focusing on smart walkers: Classification and review. 60(4), 548-562.
    McCreadie, C., & Tinker, A. (2005). The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. 25(1), 91-110.
    Mcnaughton, D., & Bryen, D. N. (2007). AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 217-229.
    Millán, J. d. R., Rupp, R., Müller-Putz, G., Murray-Smith, R., Giugliemma, C., Tangermann, M., . . . Leeb, R. (2010). Combining brain–computer interfaces and assistive technologies: state-of-the-art and challenges. Frontiers in neuroscience, 4, 161.
    Mostaghel, R. (2016). Innovation and technology for the elderly: Systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4896-4900.
    Naudé, K., & Hughes, M. (2005). Considerations for the use of assistive technology in patients with impaired states of consciousness. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 15(3-4), 514-521.
    Parette, H. P., & Peterson-Karlan, G. R. (2007). Facilitating student achievement with assistive technology. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 387-397.
    Parette, P., & Scherer, M. (2004). Assistive technology use and stigma. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 217-226.
    Petry, K., Maes, B., & Vlaskamp, C. (2005). Domains of quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities: The perspective of parents and direct support staff. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(1), 35-46.
    Pollack, M. E. (2005). Intelligent technology for an aging population: The use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. AI magazine, 26(2), 9-9.
    Portnova, A. A., Mukherjee, G., Peters, K. M., Yamane, A., & Steele, K. M. (2018). Design of a 3D-printed, open-source wrist-driven orthosis for individuals with spinal cord injury. PloS one, 13(2), e0193106.
    Rosenberg, L., & Nygård, L. (2012). Persons with dementia become users of assistive technology: a study of the process. Dementia, 11(2), 135-154.
    Sánchez, D., Adamovich, S., Ingram, M., Harris, F. P., de Zapien, J., Sánchez, A., . . . Marrone, N. (2017). The potential in preparing community health workers to address hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 28(6), 562-574.
    Sellers, E. W., Vaughan, T. M., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2010). A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 11(5), 449-455.
    Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 7): McGraw-hill New York.
    Simeral, J., Kim, S.-P., Black, M., Donoghue, J., & Hochberg, L. (2011). Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array. Journal of neural engineering, 8(2), 025027.
    Souza, A., Kelleher, A., Cooper, R., Cooper, R. A., Iezzoni, L. I., & Collins, D. M. (2010). Multiple sclerosis and mobility-related assistive technology: systematic review of literature. J Rehabil Res Dev, 47(3), 213-223.
    Van der Roest, H. G., Wenborn, J., Pastink, C., Dröes, R. M., & Orrell, M. (2017). Assistive technology for memory support in dementia. Cochrane database of systematic reviews(6).
    Van Peppen, R. P., Kwakkel, G., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hendriks, H. J., Van der Wees, P. J., & Dekker, J. (2004). The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clinical rehabilitation, 18(8), 833-862.
    Velázquez, R. (2010). Wearable assistive devices for the blind. In Wearable and autonomous biomedical devices and systems for smart environment (pp. 331-349): Springer.
    Vichitvanichphong, S., Talaei-Khoei, A., Kerr, D., & Ghapanchi, A. H. (2014). Adoption of assistive technologies for aged care: A realist review of recent studies. Paper presented at the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
    Wang, W., Collinger, J. L., Degenhart, A. D., Tyler-Kabara, E. C., Schwartz, A. B., Moran, D. W., . . . Ashmore, R. C. (2013). An electrocorticographic brain interface in an individual with tetraplegia. PloS one, 8(2), e55344.
    Wang, W., Collinger, J. L., Perez, M. A., Tyler-Kabara, E. C., Cohen, L. G., Birbaumer, N., . . . Weber, D. J. (2010). Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics, 21(1), 157-178.
    Wessels, R., Dijcks, B., Soede, M., Gelderblom, G., & De Witte, L. (2003). Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technology and disability, 15(4), 231-238.
    WHO. (2010). Global data on visual impairment 2010. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/blindness/publications/globaldata/en/
    WHO. (2018a). Ageing and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health
    WHO. (2018b). Assistive technology. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
    Wolpaw, J., Schalk, G., McFarland, D., Hinterberger, T., Perelmouter, J., Godde, B., . . . Pfurtscheller, G. BCI2000: a general purpose brain–computer interface system. Paper presented at the Soc Neurosci Abstr 2000c.
    Zwijsen, S. A., Niemeijer, A. R., & Hertogh, C. M. (2011). Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: An overview of the literature. Aging & mental health, 15(4), 419-427.

    QR CODE
    :::