跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃子瑜
Tzu-Yu Huang
論文名稱: 社會破壞對工作績效的影響:心理困擾的中介作用與組織支持的調節效果
The Impact of Social Undermining on Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Distress and the Moderating Effect of Organizational Support
指導教授: 陳明園
Ming-Yuan Chen
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Human Resource Management
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 59
中文關鍵詞: 社會破壞心理困擾組織支持工作績效
外文關鍵詞: Social Undermining, Psychological Distress, Organizational Support, Job Performance
相關次數: 點閱:73下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討職場中社會破壞行為對員工工作績效之影響機制,並進一步檢驗心
    理困擾的中介角色與組織支持的調節效果。社會破壞(social undermining)指蓄意損害
    他人職場表現、人際關係或聲譽的行為,雖不具明顯敵意,卻具有隱性與持續性特質,
    對員工心理與行為表現可能產生深遠影響。本研究以台灣地區具正職工作經驗之上班族
    為樣本,採用問卷調查法,共回收有效樣本 236 份,並運用結構方程模型與調節中介分
    析進行假說驗證。
    研究結果顯示,社會破壞雖然對工作績效無顯著直接影響,但卻會透過心理困擾產
    生間接負面效果;其中,同事社會破壞透過心理困擾影響工作績效的間接效果達顯著水
    準,主管社會破壞則未達顯著。進一步分析亦發現,組織支持對同事社會破壞、心理困
    擾與工作績效三者關係間的間接效果具有顯著調節作用,但其方向與原先假設相反,顯
    示在組織支持較高的情況下,社會破壞經由心理困擾對工作績效的負面影響反而更強,
    可能反映高支持情境下員工所感受到的心理壓力或期待反應。
    本研究補足既有文獻中對社會破壞後續影響機制的探討不足,強調心理歷程與組織
    情境資源之交互作用,亦提供企業實務管理上識別與緩解職場負面互動的參考依據。


    This study aims to explore the mechanism through which social undermining in the
    workplace affects employee job performance, focusing on the mediating role of psychological
    distress and the moderating effect of organizational support. Social undermining refers to
    intentional behaviors that impair others’ work performance, interpersonal relationships, or
    reputation. Though not overtly hostile, such behaviors are often subtle and persistent,
    potentially exerting profound effects on employees' psychological states and behaviors. Using
    a questionnaire survey method, data were collected from 236 full-time employees in Taiwan.
    Structural equation modeling and moderated mediation analysis were conducted to test the
    proposed hypotheses.
    The results showed that while social undermining did not have a significant direct effect
    on job performance, it exerted an indirect negative effect through psychological distress.
    Specifically, the indirect effect of coworker social undermining on job performance via
    psychological distress was significant, whereas the effect of supervisor social undermining was
    not. Further analysis revealed that organizational support significantly moderated the indirect
    relationship among coworker social undermining, psychological distress, and job performance.
    However, the direction of this moderation was contrary to expectations, indicating that under
    higher levels of organizational support, the negative impact of social undermining on job
    performance via psychological distress was actually intensified. This may suggest that in highly
    supportive environments, employees experience increased psychological pressure or
    expectations, thereby amplifying the adverse effects.
    This study contributes to the literature by addressing the underexplored post-impact
    mechanisms of social undermining, highlighting the interplay between psychological processes
    and contextual organizational resources. Practical implications are also offered for
    organizations aiming to identify and mitigate the impact of negative workplace interactions.

    中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 第一章 緒論 1 1-1 研究背景與動機 1 1-2 研究目的 2 1-3 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 2-1 社會破壞 4 2-2 工作績效 5 2-3 組織支持 7 2-4 心理困擾 9 2-5 各變項之間的關係與假說 10 2-5-1 社會破壞對心理困擾與工作績效的影響:心理困擾的中介作用 10 2-5-2 組織支持的調節效果:緩解社會破壞對心理困擾與工作績效的影響 12 第三章 研究方法 14 3-1 研究架構 14 3-2 研究假設 14 3-3 研究工具 15 3-3-1 自變項:社會破壞 15 3-3-2 調節變項:組織支持 18 3-3-3 中介變項:心理困擾 19 3-3-4 依變項:工作績效 21 3-3-5 控制變項:個人基本資料量表 23 3-4 分析方式 24 第四章 研究結果 26 4-1 樣本敘述統計 26 4-2 信度與效度分析 28 4-2-1 信度分析 29 4-2-2 組合信度、收斂效度與區辨效度 30 4-2-3 模型配適度分析 33 4-3 各變項之敘述統計與相關分析 34 4-4 結構方程模型假說驗證 35 第五章 結論與建議 40 5-1 研究結果與討論 41 5-1-1 社會破壞對工作績效之影響 41 5-1-2 社會破壞對心理困擾之影響 41 5-1-3 心理困擾對工作績效之影響 42 5-1-4 心理困擾在社會破壞與工作績效間之中介作用 43 5-1-5 組織支持在心理困擾與工作績效間調節作用 43 5-1-6 組織支持在社會破壞對工作績效間接影響之調節中介作用 44 5-2 管理意涵 45 5-3 研究限制與建議 46

    中文文獻
    1111 人力銀行。(2023年9月4日)。職場霸凌大揭密調查。1111人力銀行。
    https://www.1111.com.tw/news/jobns/152943
    哈佛商業評論。(2023)。3個做法,檢視公司是否有悄悄報復的文化 | 哈佛商業評論
    ・與世界一流管理接軌。哈佛商業評論・與世界一流管理接軌。
    https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/22496/does-your-company-have-a-culture-of
    quiet-retaliation
    嘉義市政府人事行政研究小組。(2007)。公務人員人格特質與工作績效關係之研
    究。嘉義市:嘉義市政府。
    英文文獻
    APA Dictionary of Psychology.https://dictionary.apa.org/anxiety
    Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include
    elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel
    selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). Jossey-Bass.
    Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark
    side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and
    impact in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670.
    Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and
    organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of
    industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687–731). Consulting
    Psychologists Press.
    Cheng, T.-A., Williams, P., & Institute of Psychiatry, London. (1986). The design and
    development of a screening questionnaire (CHQ) for use in community studies of
    mental disorders in Taiwan. Psychological Medicine, 16, 415–422.
    Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.
    Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.
    Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations.
    Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75.
    Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace.
    Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 331–352.
    Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., Shaw, J. D., Johnson, J. L., & Pagon, M. (2006). The social
    context of undermining behavior at work. Organizational Behavior and Human
    Decision Processes, 101(1), 105–126.
    Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shaw, J. D., Tepper, B. J., & Aquino, K. (2012). A social context
    model of envy and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 643
    666.
    Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational
    support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.
    Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation
    of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51.
    Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Bowler, W. M. (2007). Emotional exhaustion and job performance:
    The mediating role of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 93–106.
    He, Y., Walker, J. M., Payne, S. C., & Miner, K. N. (2021). Explaining the negative impact of
    workplace incivility on work and non-work outcomes: The roles of negative
    rumination and organizational support. Stress and Health, 37(2), 297–309.
    Hershcovis, M. S. (2010). “Incivility, social undermining, bullying… oh my!”: A call to
    reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational
    Behavior, 32(3), 499–519.
    House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley.
    Johnson, J. V., & Hall, E. M. (1988). Job strain, workplace social support, and cardiovascular
    disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working
    population. American Journal of Public Health, 78(10), 1336–1342.
    Kahn, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and
    ambiguity. Wiley.
    Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. (2016). Burnout. In G. Fink (Ed.), Stress: Concepts, cognition,
    emotion, and behavior (pp. 351–357). Academic Press.
    Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the
    literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
    Ridner, S. H. (2004). Psychological distress: Concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing,
    45(5), 536–545.
    Ross, C. E. (2003). Social causes of psychological distress. Routledge.
    Zhu, Y., Jha, S. C., Shutta, K. H., Huang, T., Balasubramanian, R., Clish, C. B., Hankinson,
    S. E., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2022). Psychological distress and metabolomic markers:
    A systematic review of posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and subclinical distress.
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 143, 104954.

    QR CODE
    :::